A presentation by Steven A. Melnyk, Professor of Operations and Supply Chain Management, Michigan State University, USA.
Delivered during the 38th annual SAPICS event for supply chain professionals in Sun City, South Africa.
Performance measurement plays a critical role in every organization. It is also undergoing a dramatic transformation. This presentation explores the changes taking place and the implication of these changes for the supply chain manager. It identifies and investigates the critical changes – from control to communication; from being backwards oriented to feedforwarding.
2. Steven A. Melnyk
• Professor of Operations & Supply Chain
Management
Department of Supply Chain Management
Eli Broad Graduate School of Business
Michigan State University
East Lansing, MI 48824-1122
USA
• +15174326410
• melnyk@msu.edu
7. Q1: Which is more important?
• Strategy? • Performance
measurement?
8. Answer
• Strategy, while setting
the overall direction of
the firm, is often vague
and meaningless to
most people.
• Measurements convert
strategy and the
business model into
actions that they have
to take; measurements
makes strategy
concrete!
10. The Flow
• Who is our key customer(s)?
• What is our value proposition?
• What does the customer value?
– Order qualifiers
– Order winners
– Order losers
• What is the Desired Outcome?
• These determine how frequency of measurement!
11. The Importance of Measurement
• One of the most powerful management disciplines, the
one that more than any other keeps people focused and
pulling in the same direction, is to make an
organization’s purposes tangible. Managers do this by
translating the organization’s mission – what it,
particularly, exists to do – into a set of goals and
performance measures that make success concrete for
everyone. This is the real bottom line for every
organization – whether it’s a business or a school or a
hospital. Its executives must answer the question,
“Given our mission, how is our performance going to be
defined?”
– Magretta & Stone, Management. 2002, p. 129
12. Q2: The Primary goal of Performance
Measurement
• Monitor and control • Communicate
13. Performance Measurement - Goal
• Communicate
– Goals
– Expectations
– Consequences
• Sell
– Get commitments
• Educate
– What is important
– What is not important
• Direct
– To gaps
• Measure/Correct
14. Q3: We should use the same measures
throughout the firm?
• True? • False?
16. How do we communicate?
• Top management
– Output measures (after the fact)
• Sales
• Market share
• Quality problems reported
– Why?
• Get their support
• Resources
• Time
17. How do we communicate?
• To our subordinates/suppliers
• Output measures are useless except as score
keeping.
• Need predictive or process measures
– Measures associated with the process
– Identifies process attributes that we should
manage to achieve the desired outcome(s)!
18. Process Measures Example
Lead times
• Our goal is to reduce lead
times, what aspects of the
process are suitable for being
process measures?
• Answer
– Number of steps in the process
– Distance covered
– Number of people who touch
the order
– Setup times
21. Measures versus Metrics
• A measure is a verifiable indictor stated in quantitative
(e.g., 95% inventory accuracy) terms and intended to
close the gap between value, strategy, and specific
activities.
• Objectives
– Measure
– Teach
22. Metrics are different
Metrics bring 3 elements
together
Metrics
Measure
ConsequenceStandard
Some thoughts
• A metric without a standard
is meaningless!
• A metric with the wrong
standard is dangerous!
23. Q5: When it comes to measures, the
more the better?
• True? • False?
24. The Goldilock’s Principle
• Measures are best if:
– There are not too few
• Over-focus
– There are not too many
• Confusion
• Gamesmanship
• Focus on what you can do well
25. Then what is just right?
• For decision-makers:
– 5 +/- 2 has been found to be about right!
26. Implications
• If you want to introduce a new measure or metric
and you are at 7 something has to go!
• Measure what you need, not what you can.
• Avoid conflicts in measurement systems.
– The lesson of a cereal company
• Measures have life cycles.
• Beware bad data!
27. Q6: Measures are accurate indicators of
performance?
• True? • False?
28. Truth of Measures
• Measures are often imperfect proxies for
performance and desired outcomes.
• Just because the numbers look right, don’t
assume that the desired changes are taking place.
– A pharma story
– A company tries to change its strategy from lean to
innovation.
• Measures are subject to the telephone game
effect.
31. Word of Mouth Communications Requirements Past Experience
Expectations
Perceived
Performance
Actual
Performance
Performance
Standards
Management
Perceptions of
Expectations
External
Communications
Gap 2
Gap 3
Gap 5 Gap 4
Gap 6
CustomerSeller
Gap 1
Opportunities for Errors
32. The Advent of Forwardcasting!
• If you focus on the past, then the measures
ultimately become punitive!
– The past is done, move on!
• New approach
– Measures describe future goals
– Periodically, we compare actual progress with desired
progress
• If on track, keep going
• If off track, why? What can be done to reorient activities to
achieve future goals.
33. Q9: Within the supply chain, measures
should be aligned?
• True? • False?
34. Through Whose Eyes Do We See
the World
Through our own! Through our customers’
39. Comments
• Measures and metrics are:
– Critical
– Confusing
– Changing
• Increasingly important
• New insights require new approaches
• Developing measures is a key skill of the strategic
supply chain manager.
40. The Three Laws of Metrics
• Management has a desired to
measure quantitatively everything.
• Every metric will generate under
desired or unexpected
behavior/results.
• There should be balance
– Long term vs. short term
– Making money now vs. investing in the
future
– Outcomes vs. processes.