[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
Open@Fao presentation at the EADI Open For Development Project, 2012
1. Open For Development
EADI IMWG Conference 2012
Open @ FAO
Stephen.Katz@ fao.org (Twitter: @SteveK1958)
Chief, Knowledge Management and Library Services
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
2. Agenda
Open @ FAO
1 Context and History of Open @ FAO
Ongoing Practical Initiatives
2 • FAO Open Archive
• Open Data (data.fao.org)
• Data Governance and Standards
3
Issues, Challenges and Lessons Learned
4 Group Discussion
3. Open @ FAO : Food For Thought?
Food for Thought
4. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
(FAO)
• FAO is a specialized
agency of the United
Nations with its own
independent governance
• 190+ Member Countries
• HQs in Rome, Offices in
over 80 countries with
over 5000 staff.
5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
(FAO)
• Collects, analyses, interprets and
disseminates information on
nutrition, food and agriculture
• Policy Advice
• Furnishes Technical Assistance
• A Neutral Forum for International
Cooperation
6. FAO has been in the
“knowledge” business
since 1946!
Our mandate....
Ensure that the world’s
knowledge of food and
agriculture is available to
those who need it when
they need it and in a form
which they can access
and use.
7. Open @ FAO : A Bit of History
1995 – Central Publishing Unit Abolished
1996 – SGML Repository Proposal; FAOSTAT on-line
1997 – Document Repository (XML Compatible)
2003 – Document Repository (PDF)
2007 – Open Archive Proposal (Fedora Commons)
2010 – Open Data Repository Proposal (data.fao.org)
2012 – OpenArchive.Fao.Org; Data.Fao.Org
8. FAO Open Archive
Goals/Objectives
To make FAO’s Global Public Goods openly
accessible from a single access point
To be able to exchange data in an open and
standardized way
To have a smooth/efficient workflow to
manage FAO’s Institutional memory
To integrate e-publishing and library workflows
9. FAO Open Archive
Architecture
Based on Open Source tools (Fedora
Commons and Java)
Based on modern standards for data
management (MODS and FRBR)
Allowing for easier management and sharing
of multilingual content
And this is what it looks like:
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16. Open Archive Resources
Available at Start-up Time
Resource Type Number of Records
Full Text Documents 40,100
Photos and Videos 17,100
Audio Files 1,200
17. Open Data (data.fao.org)
Goals/Objectives
To address fragmentation and duplication of
information systems and data presently distributed
across many organizational units
http://data.fao.org: one-stop shop that aggregates,
integrates, and catalogues data from multiple sources
across FAO. Topics are related to nutrition, food and
agriculture and include statistics, maps, pictures,
documents and more.
18. Open Data (data.fao.org)
Guiding Principles
Uniting FAO data with one brand : http://data.fao.org
Engaging a Community : #FAOdata
Mobile First
Serve the data in the most convenient format
Integrate, don't reimplement
19. data.fao.org - The Big Picture
Specialised
Website Services and Widgets application(s)
consume/provide
Orchestration and Integration
Search Catalogue Statistics Maps Content Infrastructure
Statistical Data
Full text Identity Warehouse Geospatial Documents Logging
Structured Metadata Raster Pictures Caching
Linked Data Time Series Vector Video Security
... Indicators Point Multimedia Audit
Observations Pages ...
20. Data Flow Architecture
Data
Data Source
Source
Ingest
Harmonise
Data
Integrate
Source
Enrich
Publish
Data
Source Data
Source
26. CIARD – a global movement
• All organizations that create and
To make
possess public agricultural
agricultural research information disseminate
research and share it more widely
information • CIARD partners create coherence
and by a) coordinating their efforts, b)
knowledge promoting common formats, c)
truly acessible adopting open systems and
to all standards
• Create a global network of public
collections of data and information
28. Distributed Data Sets
• stats
• gene banks
• gis data
• blogs,
• journals
• open archives
• raw data
• technologies
• learning objects
• ………..
How to make value added services?
How to infer new knowledge?
How to organize collaboration?
Maybe we really need this?...
29. …to
• stats
• gene banks
• gis data
• blogs,
• journals
• open archives
• raw data
• technologies
• learning objects
• ………..
31. OpenAgris
Aggregates different data sources to expand
knowledge about a topic
Is a “linked-data” environment mashing-up
interlinked datasets to create an integrated
knowledge base
OpenAgris uses the Agrovoc thesaurus as
backbone to interlink to other existing
datasets (DBPedia, WorldBank, Geopolitical
Ontology…)
32.
33. Open Archive : Issues, Challenges, Lessons
Unclear Policy Framework
Unclear collection selection policy
Variable quality standards (content, legal, editorial,
accountability)
Licensing policy/conditions for re-use
Working with partners and scientific journals
Freely available but need attribution
Supply vs demand (personal interest vs impact)
Tension with Sales and Marketing needs
May Lead To Negative Consequences such as:
Low credibility/trust, reputational risk, legal exposure?
34. Open Data : Issues, Challenges, Lessons
Well the same stuff as before really
Unclear Policy Framework
Unclear collection selection policy
Variable quality standards
Licensing policy/conditions for re-use
Working with partners
Freely available but need attribution
Supply vs demand (personal interest vs impact)
Tension with Sales and Marketing needs
May Lead To Negative Consequences such as:
Low credibility/trust, reputational risk, legal exposure?
35. Open Data : Issues, Challenges, Lessons
But also:
Every data-type has it’s own standards (e.g. OGC for GIS,
SDMX for stats, MODS for documents, IPTC for Photos)
Aggregate data quality set by lowest common denominator
Poor data governance leads to:
Conflicting/contradictory data values from different sources
Lack of agreement of definitions and concepts, and
Insufficient metadata
Comparing apples, pears and oranges (different units, different
assumptions, different contexts)
May Lead To Negative Consequences such as:
Low credibility/trust, reputational risk, legal exposure?