Sain Associates is an engineering firm founded in 1972 with 70 employees specializing in site engineering, traffic engineering, and surveying. They have experience working with education clients as well as other sectors. The document discusses Sain's capabilities for schools and presents a case study of their work with four schools located within one mile dealing with traffic congestion. It provides recommendations including improving intersections and separating vehicle and bus traffic.
2. Sain Associates
• Founded in 1972 by Charles “Hack” Sain
• Staff of approximately 70 professionals
• Engineering capabilities:
• Site/Civil Engineering
• Traffic & Transportation Engineering & Planning
• Surveying
• Headquarters in Birmingham, Alabama
• We have experience in a variety of market sectors including:
– Education
– Retail/Commercial
– Industrial
– Health Care
– Residential
– Government
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
3. Site Engineering
• CAPABILITIES WE CAN PROVIDE TO SCHOOLS INCLUDE:
– Site investigation and conceptual planning
– Master planning
– Site layout with horizontal control
– Preliminary budgets and feasibility
– Sanitary sewer/wastewater design
– Hydrological and hydraulic design
– Site grading and storm drainage design
– Sanitary sewer rehabilitation
– Flood studies
– Water supply and distribution design
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
4. Traffic/Transportation
Engineering & Planning
• CAPABILITIES WE CAN PROVIDE TO SCHOOLS INCLUDE:
– Conceptual planning
– Traffic Impact Studies
– On-site circulation & parking design
– Traffic signal, roadway and intersection design
– Signing and striping plans
– Pedestrian and bicycle planning
– Carpool operation assessment
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
5. Surveying
• CAPABILITIES WE CAN PROVIDE TO SCHOOLS INCLUDE:
– Boundary Surveys
– Topographic Surveys
– ALTA/ACSM Land Title Surveys
– Construction Staking
– Real-Time GPS
– Subdivision Platting
– Roadway/Highway Surveys
– Utility Surveys
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
6. Sain has provided professional
services to the following school systems:
Birmingham City Schools
Hoover City Schools
Mountain Brook City Schools
Pell City Schools
Tarrant City Schools
Troy City Schools
Trussville City Schools
Blount County Schools
Jefferson County Schools
Morgan County Schools
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
7. Let’s Talk Traffic
What things contribute to traffic
congestion at schools?
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
8. Good traffic flow starts
at the front door!
• A controlled carpool operation is essential
• Right-side loading/unloading
• Enough shelter to accommodate 6-8 cars
• Avoid double lines if possible
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
9. On-site and Off-site Operations
are Intertwined
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
10. Case Study: Hayden Schools
3 schools
located within
½ mile
Hayden Junior High School
Hayden High School
Hayden Middle School
All 4 schools
located within
il e
m
Hayden Elementary School
½
1 mile
≈
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
11. With all four of these schools
located within a one-mile area of
SR-160 . . .
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
12. TRAFFIC CONGESTION!
AM School Peak PM School Peak
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
13. Data Collection
• Roadway network inventory
• Meet with officials
– School traffic flow plans
(parents, buses)
– Bell schedules
– Manual traffic control
– Existing/projected
enrollment
– Coordinate with ALDOT
• Traffic counts
• Historical traffic data
• Historical crash data
• Campus observations
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
14. Campus Observations
– Parent drop-off/pick-up
– Bus drop-off/pick-up
– Driveway intersections
– Manual traffic control
– Problem areas
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
15. Circulation Pattern
Existing Traffic Flow
Hayden Elementary School
Hayden Middle School
Hayden High School BUS FLOW SEPARATE NORTH
Buses FROM VEHICLE FLOW
iv e
e Dr
re High School
n tT
Be
Elem. School Middle School
d
Roa
o od
Atw
SRO ad SRO
Ro
ry
er
sF
an
De
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
16. Hayden Elementary School
SRO stops both
directions of SR-160
to let buses out
Back of school looking EB Exit drive onto SR-160 looking NB
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
17. Hayden Middle School
School staff stops parent pick-up/
drop-off for buses to cross to
Hayden Elementary School
West side of school looking SB West side of school looking NB
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
18. Hayden High School
SRO stops both directions
of SR-160 to let Hayden
High School traffic out
Intersection of SR-160 and Atwood Road looking NB Intersection of SR-160 and Atwood Road looking WB
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
19. Hayden Junior High School
2007-2008 Traffic Flow
Hayden Junior High School
Buses
4th Street
SRO
ad
et
ro
re
ail
St
XR
in
Ma
CS
ive
Dr
d
oa
il r
Ra
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
20. Goals for School Traffic
– Make it Safe
– Make it Efficient
– Separate school traffic from through
traffic as quickly as possible
– Separate parent pick-up/drop-off
and bus pick-up/drop-off
– Plan for safe pedestrian and bicycle
access (if applicable)
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
21. Short-Term Recommendations
• ALDOT to create a state-funded project to add turn lanes and
increase radius at intersection of SR-160 @ Bent Tree Drive
• School to relocate traffic flow into Elementary School and Middle
School to intersection of SR-160 @ Bent Tree Drive
• School to widen drive between Elementary School and Middle
School in sharp curve
• ALDOT and School to monitor Hayden Junior High School traffic
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
22. Short-Term Recommendations
Proposed Traffic Flow
Hayden Elementary School
Hayden Middle School
Hayden High School NORTH
START TWO-LANE
Buses
ONE-WAY
(W/ GUIDE SIGNAGE)
iv e
e Dr WIDEN ROAD
re IN CURVE
n tT
Be
d
Roa
o od
Atw
SRO ad SRO
Ro
ry
er
TURN LANES, sF
INCREASE RADIUS an
De
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
23. Long-Term Recommendations
• ALDOT to retain turn lanes and large radius at intersection of
SR-160 @ Bent Tree Drive and other existing turn lanes in design of
SR-160 widening project
• ALDOT to require five-lane cross section in vicinity of schools
• School to retain traffic flow recommended in short-term
improvements (via intersection of SR-160 @ Bent Tree Drive)
• ALDOT and/or School to make any necessary adjustments to
SR-160 widening design or Hayden Junior High School traffic
operations based on findings of monitoring
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
24. Did the recommendations work?
Traffic flow is better!
Now speeding is an issue.
Need to monitor speeds
and possibly increase
speed zone signage and
enforcement.
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
25. Golden Keys to Safe & Efficient
Transportation
Engineering
Make sure you have a good plan.
Education
Everyone needs to understand the plan.
Enforcement
Be willing to enforce the plan.
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
26. Try to get it right the first time.
If you miss the mark, fix it!
sain associates, inc.
Consulting Engineers /Surveyors
What things contribute to traffic congestion at schools? Too many parents driving kids to school / or too many teenagers driving themselves Everybody arrives right before the bell rings Parents come before school dismisses and line up in the road Some schools don’t have enough on-site storage for carpool lines Mixing car and bus traffic Inadequate facilities for walking to school Unsafe conditions for bicycling to school Large school districts Schools located away from neighborhoods Schools clustered together Inadequate roadway network around the school Congestion on adjacent roadway
Efficient operation of carpool loading and unloading is determined by the attention given to it by a school’s faculty. Even within the same school system, we see wide variations at individual schools. The most efficient carpool operations can safely load a child in an average of 30 seconds from the time a platoon or cars begins to move into pickup position to the time it pulls away from the curb. We’ve seen inefficient operations take twice that long and the result is a very long queue of vehicles that takes longer to dissipate.
A thorough school traffic study will look at both on-site and off-site traffic operations. Usually there are needed improvements in both areas. On-site issues could include: Inefficient or unsafe carpool operations Conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians or bicyclists Mixing of bus and automobile traffic Inadequate parking facilities Circulation through the parking lot Inadequate access Off-site issues could include: School traffic causing congestion on adjacent roadways Poor intersection or street geometry Lack of sidewalks or bike paths Inadequate school zone signage Speeding in the school zone
Let’s look at a sample project that included many of these issues. Hayden schools – located on Alabama State Route 160 in Blount County Project was part of an larger project by Alabama DOT to widen SR 160 from two lanes to five lanes. School traffic was causing some immediate improvement needs on AL 160 that did not need to wait for the five-lane widening. Cluster of three schools within a ½ mile radius and a proposed fourth school located within 1 mile.
This is a list of items collected at the start of the project. These are typical of what we would normally collect on a school traffic project.
The most important element of the data collection phase is campus observations. Sain has a staff of nine traffic engineering specialists. We make sure we post enough people to observe all aspects of the morning and afternoon peaks. We watch. We ask questions. And we listen. On another project, I once road through carpool with a mother who had strong concerns and needed to know she was heard.
This illustrates the circulation pattern that was in place at the Hayden schools when we did our study in 2006. Notice the multiple access points.
The next three slides show conditions at the elementary, middle, and high schools.
In addition to looking at the three existing schools, we developed an access plan for the proposed junior high school which is now operating in the old high school building. This school is now in operation and is called Hayden Middle School. The school modified our suggested plan, reversing the west to east flow to work in an east to west direction.
There are some general goals we try always to keep in mind when developing recommendations for traffic handling at schools. First and foremost, we must make conditions safe for all users. We want to make things run as efficiently as possible, without compromising safety. Separating school and adjacent street traffic helps, as does separating automobile and bus traffic. We also want to make sure we accommodate alternate modes of travel like walking or biking to school.
Our recommendations for the Hayden schools were separated into short term and long term since the highway widening project would take several years to construct. Most of the things needed by the schools were accommodated in the short-term. The long-term recommendations were geared more toward the highway widening and its impacts.
The key recommendations was an alteration to the circulation pattern at the elementary and middle schools. The new flow plan concentrated all entering traffic to the middle and elementary schools at one intersection where turn lanes were added. The new circulation plan increased vehicle storage for the elementary school carpool line.
As I mentioned, the long-term recommendation focused mainly on the State Route 160 widening project. Also recommended was some continued monitoring of traffic flow to determine if adjustments to the ALDOT project would be needed for the junior high school.
The schools report that traffic flow on SR 160 and at the school entrances is a lot better. However, the SROs report that, with less congestion, speeds have increased on the highway. The school zone signage is adequate and there are speed limit flashers. More enforcement is probably needed.
Success in any traffic engineering project depends on three key areas: engineering, education, and enforcement. You need a good plan. Ideally transportation planning is a key ingredient of any new school design. Tackling it from the outset will save a lot of headaches later. But if that didn’t happen, it’s usually possible to retrofit an improvement. Education means helping users understand the plan. That’s done through road signage and striping, and through carpool instructions that are communicated to parents and bus drivers. If the first two keys are done well, the need for enforcement is minimized but never eliminated.
Sometimes it takes a willingness to admit that an improvement is needed.