This presentation describes the Vetting Process used by the Jackson Park Renaming Committee to identify the top 10 names for Alameda's first park.
This presentation was created by Rasheed El Shabazz, MCP, UC Berkeley 2021, as part of LDARCH 242: Citizen Involvement in the Planning Process.
2. Objectives
Purpose
● Discuss the Park Naming Committee
Timeline and Process
● Decide on top names and next steps
Outcomes
● Committee members will understand
name vetting process
● Identify top 8-12 names
● All committee members will have a
task for next meeting(s)
Process
● Discuss Vetting Process
● Reduce names list
3. Overview
Renaming Process
● Park Renaming Goals & Process
● Park Naming Committee Timeline
Vetting Sub-Committee
● Renaming Scorecard
● Naming Criteria
● First Iteration Name Vetting
● Refined Criteria
● Second Iteration Name Vetting
● Top 20 Names’ List
Full Committee
● Process Discussion
● Names for Public Feedback
6. We are seeking a park name
that reflects inclusion,
diversity, and equity of the
entire community of
Alameda, and which
represents social justice,
human rights, and/or anti-
racism.
If a person’s name is
submitted, they must be
deceased. Submitted park
names should be related to
Alameda and/or the
greater SF Bay Area.
7. Cultural • Person • Historical • Nature • Values • Generic
CATEGORIES
8. Criteria:
● Diversity
● Equity
● Inclusion
● Social Justice
● Human
Rights
● Anti-Racism
● Alameda or
Bay Area
connection
● Deceased
9.
10. ● Cultural
● Person
● Historical
● Nature
● Values
● Generic
People:
● Persons
● Cultural references
Principles:
● Values
● Idease
Place:
● Nature
● Historical references related to
geography
Categories
11.
12.
13. People
1. Fred Korematsu
1. Ohlone
3. Yoshiko Uchida
4. Chochenyo
4. Mabel Tatum
6. Mary Rudge
6. Nielsen Tam
8. Ishi
9. Bohol Circle
9. Ohlone Freedom
Places
1. Alameda
2. Park Ave
3. Magnolia
4. Poplar
5. Dumb Friends
Principles
1. Justice
2. Peace
2. Unity
4. Diversity
5. Liberty
Top 20 Names
14. Progress - Name Collection
Accomplishment 1
● City collected names twice
(March 2019 & October
2020)
● Rename Jackson Park and
Park Ave residents
Accomplishment 2
● Over 150 names submitted
● Total participants?
16. Nov. 2-9
1. Define criteria
2. Collect and compile names
3. Count submission frequency
4. Consolidate names’ lists
5. Apply first round criteria
Nov. 9-
6. Tally names
using scorecard
Nov. 16-
7. Research names
(including forum)
Nov. 23-
8. Review Top names
9. Make
recommendation to
Commission
Dec. 10
10. Presentation to
ARPD Commission
17.
18. Discussion questions
Subcommittee
● Initial reactions
● Process feedback
● Scoring approaches
● Questions for scorers
● Concerns
Full committee
● Reactions
● Names to remove
● Next steps
19. Next steps
Community Forum & Public Feedback
How many names to the Community Forum and how can public
provide feedback on the names submitted?
Name research and rationale
Who is providing a background and rationale for each name?
Additional research & final steps
Any additional name research required?
Hinweis der Redaktion
Renaming Process
Park Naming Committee Timeline
Vetting Sub-Committee
Renaming Scorecard
Naming Criteria
First Iteration Name Vetting
Refined Criteria
Second Iteration Name Vetting
Top 20 Names’ List
Full Committee
Process Discussion
Names for Public Feedback
Renaming Process
Park Naming Committee Timeline
Vetting Sub-Committee
Renaming Scorecard
Naming Criteria
First Iteration Name Vetting
Refined Criteria
Second Iteration Name Vetting
Top 20 Names’ List
Full Committee
Process Discussion
Names for Public Feedback
Week 2: 11/9
6. Tally names using scorecard
Week 3-4: 11/16
7. Research names (including forum)
Weeks 4-5 11/23
8. Review Top names
9. Make recommendation to Commission
Week 6 12/7
10.
What feedback do we want to share on the scoring process this time around? (i.e. wanted to give 0.5/half a point, not enough info, etc.)
What was your approach to using the criteria?
What is your reaction to the ranking process and the ranking/results?
Do you have any questions for other scorers? (i.e. How did you get x points for y name candidate?)
Are there any concerns with any of the top names?
What are our next steps?