The role of Finance continues to rapidly evolve and is becoming increasingly strategic. Senior finance professionals are being asked to increase value-added services across the entire organization, and are taking on a greater role in facilitating growth-related initiatives across the enterprise. Attend this session to understand the shift in how finance leaders are spending their time and the implications of that change. Learn how they align strategy, scorecards and systems to be more effective in driving growth initiatives within and beyond the finance function. Hear how finance executives in leading-edge organizations are approaching this transformational shift in their roles and functions, and successfully elevating the view of the Finance function, while empowering growth across the enterprise.
Speakers: Mike Forman, VP Finance & Corporate Controller, NetSuite
Carl Cox, CFO and EVP of Operations, LightSpeed Technologies
Presentation delivered at ProformaTECH 2014 - http://www.proformatech.com
Track: Managing Change | Session: 1
41. Thank You For Attending
Managing the
Evolving Role of
Finance to
Empower
Enterprise
Growth
Hinweis der Redaktion
Before we jump into the heart of the discussion today, I’d like to share some background information with you regarding NetSuite. NetSuite was founded in 1998 and went public in 2007. We generated more than $400M in revenue in 2013 and currently employ more than 2,200 employees worldwide. NetSuite provides a cloud-based financials/ERP software suite. In addition to financials/ERP, the Company offers a broad suite of applications, including accounting, CRM, Professional Services Automation and Ecommerce that enable companies to manage most of their core business operations in a single integrated suite. The Company delivers its suite over the Internet as a subscription service using the software-as-a-service model. In addition to 16,000+ organizations using the NetSuite service, NetSuite, itself utilizes the service to run its own business.
In my nearly 10 years at NetSuite and my prior Controller and external auditor experiences, the topic of preparing for the next million or hundred million dollars of revenue has been a recurring theme. What will the company look like? What must it do between now and that next milestone to achieve the goal and be prepared to meet the next set of milestones? This includes looking at personnel, processes and systems. We can’t afford to wait for the next process or system to break. We need to hire the right people that can grow with the company and that can be instrumental in constantly looking at processes and systems to ensure we’re on track. When I first started with NetSuite, from a systems perspective, we knew that we had to have a system that would handle our growing revenue base and international expansion. And what that, we spoke to our development team to create our OneWorld and Revenue Recognition modules as Excel was not going to cut it. We’re now consolidating 15 subsidiaries and creating revenue recognition journal entries from more than 120k revenue recognition schedules.
In a recent survey conducted by the Institute of Management Accountants, the members were asked to identify how their time has changed over the last three years. The top 3 answers included (1) more higher value-added activities; (2) support of more strategic outlook; and (3) driving productivity improvements. I think many of these areas resonate of with most of us who are trying to keep up with the increasing demands of our CFO’s who themselves are taking on more strategic roles. All three of these areas demand that we and our staffs get more out of our systems from both an analysis and process perspective. There’s also pressure to drive down costs and pursue more timely analytics to drive decision making throughout our organizations.
While Controllers are now having to step up to more value-added areas of challenge, we are still expected to tackle the basics like controls and compliance and financial reporting. The continued focus on Sarbanes-Oxley, convergence of IFRS and FASB and the introduction of XBRL raises those expectations around the basics. And if you haven’t heard your auditors mention the PCAOB’s focus on management review controls, you’ll need to start allocating additional resources around meeting these documentation requirements. Another challenge has to do with pulling together the necessary information from a variety of systems to produce timely and accurate financial and management reports and associated disclosures. Many systems don’t talk to each other in the same language and require complicated integrations which have a tendency to break when one system is further customized. A significant percentage of companies are using ERP and other key systems that are outdated and are not capable of keeping up with today’s reporting and operational requirements.
In the same IMA survey referenced earlier, the members were asked to identify the change in support requested over the last three years. The top 4 answers included increased access to (1) financial or budget data; (2) operational data; and (3) data through KPI’s and dashboards; and (4) new business performance and customer data. Unfortunately, the expansion of this access highlights typical limits with many of today’s on-premise systems in the areas of reporting capabilities, real-time data and information system capacity. I experienced these same challenges in my prior company where I couldn’t provide real-time data until the month was fully closed; and when I had to depend on my accounting manager, who had a degree in MIS, to construct various financial reports from a system that was external from our ERP system. Today’s cloud environment removes many of these obstacles in that you can construct your own real-time reporting with straight-forward UI’s that don’t require an MIS degree. In addition, since the data is real-time, you have the ability to stay on top of key metrics through easy-to-construct KPI’s and dashboards. And finally, you can set up recurring reporting for non-finance departments which allows those internal customers to provide for themselves cutting down on their day-to-day reliance on the IT and Finance departments.
I think this quote reminds us all about how we can underestimate the time and resources required to adapt to new and changing regulations or the challenges in growing our systems to keep up with evolving business requirements. And most of us don’t have the luxury of simply adding resources to meet these ongoing demands due to pressures to keep costs down. The use of an integrated cloud-based ERP system has certainly facilitated my approach to these challenges. For instance, when we first adopted EITF 08-01, we took advantage of a sandbox environment to report our revenue results under our prior revenue recognition policy while utilizing our production environment for the current policy. We plan to do the same as we prepare for the latest set of revenue rules to be adopted in 2017.
Relying on many of today’s aging disparate systems with the requirement to grow the business can often mean that (1) you’ll face significant challenges in customizing systems and processes; (2) you’ll need to adopt error-prone, inefficient, time-consuming manual processes; (3) the level of confidence in financial and management data will decline; (4) significant IT resources are required to simply maintain the separate systems resulting in a poor use of capital; (5) “siloed” data, in the sense that you have key data kept in separate systems that can’t be consolidated to provide the necessary views. And with companies that have global operations, which isn’t just a big company issue anymore, a lack of well-integrated systems that aren’t in the cloud present other challenges such as (1) an extended close cycle for rolling up subsidiary financials; (2) lack of visibility into subsidiary operations; (3) scaling processes across geographies; and (4) lack of IT resources in distributed locations. I, myself, experienced this same set of challenges at my first Controller job out of public accounting. My company, while only employing about 40, already had a UK subsidiary where a critical R&D function was located. Due to the fact that we were using an on-premise ERP solution in the US, we had no visibility to the UK operations until our month was closed. So we were basically in the dark throughout the month without the ability to access the day-to-day results and operations of our foreign R&D efforts.
A statement that may sound familiar to you, and a problem I have encountered in many organizations that I’ve worked with during my public accounting days as well as in my prior controller job. Not only from a management perspective, but the lack of well-integrated systems causes compliance headaches when you’re trying to satisfy your auditors’ requirements to support transaction flows and related controls. As an external auditor, I recall having to spend significant time trying to get comfortable with standard processes such as order to cash and procure to pay due to the number of disparate systems involved. This time spent simply getting comfortable with the workflows resulted in taking up significant client resources and incremental billings which none of us appreciate (except the audit firms).
Here is the typical journey that most of our businesses go through. We start with a basic ERP system, incorporate some Excel files for analytics, add a separate application to deal with sales activities, construct a homegrown website to sell our services and products and then add more licenses for the above as the business grows. This typical evolution requires more and more complex integrations and incremental costs to maintain them.
The result is an applications “hairball” over time. Because most businesses are running multiple point systems for financials, sales, inventory, support, website, they’re burdened with manual tasks and productivity bottlenecks.Businesses have:Substantial resources spent on supporting manual processes, rather than strategic tasks.Lack of employee and executive visibility necessary to maximize performance.Error ridden customer information, outdated business information, and spreadsheet nightmares.
Here’s a visual comparison of what a lot of companies suffer from today versus what technologically progressive businesses are adopting today. On the one hand, you have various applications with single-purpose processes, often connected with other applications in a disorganized fashion, creating manual processes and reconciliation nightmares. And then on the other hand, you have a single data source providing the same information to a number of different processes contained in one suite giving visibility throughout the organization. This integrated, dynamic platform gives you one accurate answer, easily allows collaboration and real-time decision making.
Here’s another success story of leveraging a cloud-based integrated ERP solution. Prior to their adoption of NetSuite, they were using spreadsheets to manage and record subscription revenue for more than 600 customers. They could not longer scale without a revenue recognition solution as the use of Excel was resulting in a rising number of errors. Ultimately, Glassdoor adopted the revenue recognition functionality which provided them confidence in their month end revenue numbers, provided them customer revenue reporting and became accessible to more than just the owner of the Excel file. The incremental system cost was far less than the cost of an additional revenue accountant and provided much more reliability around the numbers.
Before I dive into some of the specifics of the financial processes at my company, I wanted to share some background information regarding our company to give you some context. While we’re not the most complicated business, we are a publically-traded company running more than 15 subsidiaries with various functional currencies on top of managing 35 currencies for various transactions. From a revenue perspective, we amortize our subscription services, recognize our professional services on a % of completion basis and allocate our multiple-element agreements in accordance with EITF 08-01. Our Finance Team is primarily located in the US and Philippines with both G/L and FP&A team members located in both locations.
The first advantage of working in the cloud/suite environment is in the area of our standard financial close. We perform the same hard close every month. We’re able to finalize our monthly consolidated results in about 5 days as we’re able to avoid time required to reconcile the interactions of numerous systems given that we perform all of our core processes in one system. And since everybody is looking at the same data on a real-time basis, we can spread our close/FP&A resources between our headquarters and our shared service center w/out having to wait for one group to roll up their separate financials. With the ability to quickly finalize our actuals, our FP&A team can update their forecasts with their business partners in a timely fashion which forms the basis for new strategic decisions. A couple of key processes, order to revenue and procure to pay, also leverage the cloud/suite platform. Sales and Finance operate in numerous geographies/time zones with the ability to convert a lead to an estimate to a SO and then invoice that SO, book the revenue and apply the cash to the invoice with all of those records and transactions linked leaving an easy to follow audit trail. The procure to pay process works very much the same in the sense that even with a de-centralized purchasing function, our AP group can follow the purchase request to PO to bill and bill payment through the same system as they are all linked and processed in one system leaving nothing to reconcile. We can spend more of our time analyzing results rather than trying to reconcile various systems. Our auditors also leverage the cloud concept by being able to view transactions and supporting documentation from anywhere with a custom role that we develop for them. The system notes that document movements through the suite also provide them with a solid audit trail as they perform internal control and SOX testing to form the basis of their review and audit conclusions. And by processing nearly all of our transactions in one system, the auditors can reduce their testing of integrations and key IT controls of numerous systems.
Here’s an example of the kind of dashboard that I, and my finance team, use to monitor and manage my company’s performance. And you may be surprised to hear that we achieved it without having to spend any time tying together multiple systems and spreadsheets.On my dashboard and as a finance organization as a whole, we have real time visibility across the key drivers for the business, across sales, expenses, billings, renewals and more.I also have developed reminders, using simple saved searches, to identify various transactions and workflows, that are awaiting my review and approval. This monitoring of outstanding requests helps to ensure that I’m staying on top of critical decisions that impact the operations of both Finance and other departments in the company.
Here is an example of what a detailed income statement looks like with the subsidiary structure noted in the header section along with the elimination entity and the consolidated results. We maintain our GAAP income statement and balance sheet inside the system with very few modifications needed as we add subsidiaries and accounts. The cloud/suite approach also facilitates the integration of entities that we acquire as you can simply use your existing account structure, import/create the necessary entity records (i.e. customers, vendors, employees) and leverage the existing workflows with your new employees wherever they may be located. We have been successful in getting our acquired entities up and running within 60-90 days.
So to summarize, here’s why a cloud/suite environment supports the Controller Function: (1) Being able to manage the business through a single system and database from anywhere that you have an internet connection; (2) Where all employees log into the same system and see the same data, only limited by the roles and permissions that you establish; (3) Consolidated data can be viewed and analyzed on a real-time basis with the ability to customize various geographical views; (4) Control can be localized and customized while at the same time allowing for a global roll-up within the same system; and (5) It facilitates a global finance organization regardless of how centralized or de-centralized you wish it to be given the access point of the internet.OK, so at this time I want to turn your attention to our other speaker, Carl Cox, EVP of Operations and CFO at Lightspeed. Carl will share with you some of his experiences and advice about working in the cloud with an integrated system.