Where Are We NowâŠ. Chapter 6
The purpose of Chapter 6 is to explain how to use various tools to select the best candidate for the job. The main topics weâll cover include the selection process, basic testing techniques, background and reference checks, ethical and legal questions in testing, types of tests, and work samples and simulations
Learning Objectives:
After studying this chapter, you will be able to:
6-1. Answer the question: Why is it important to test and select employees?
6-2. Explain what is meant by reliability and validity.
6-3. List and briefly describe the basic categories of selection tests, with
examples.
After studying this chapter, you will be able to:
6-4. Explain how to use two work simulations for selection.
6-5. Describe four ways to improve an employerâs background checking
process.
The Basics of Testing and Selecting Employees
In this chapter, weâll discuss several popular selection tools, starting with tests. A test is basically a sample of a personâs behavior. Any test or screening tool has two important characteristics, reliability and validity. Weâll start with the former
Reliability- is a selection toolâs first requirement.
It is defined as the consistency of scores obtained by the same person when retested with the identical tests or with a
alternate forms of the same test
So therefore, âA reliable test is one that yields consistent scores when a person takes two alternate forms of the test or when he or she takes the same test on two or more different occasions.â
What can cause a test to be Unreliable-
These include the following:
physical conditions -(quiet one day, noisy the next),
differences in the test taker (healthy one day, sick the next), and
differences in test administration (courteous one day, curt the next).
Or the questions may do a poor job of sampling the material; for example, test one focuses more on Chapters 1 and 3, while test two focuses more on Chapters 2 and 4.
Because measuring reliability generally involves comparing two measures that assess the same thing, it is typical to judge a testâs reliability in terms of a reliability coefficient. This basically shows the degree to which the two measures (say, test score one day and test score the next day) are correlated. Figure 6-1 illustrates correlation.
Because measuring reliability generally involves comparing two measures that assess the same thing, it is typical to judge a testâs reliability in terms of a reliability coefficient. This basically shows the degree to which the two measures (say, test score one day and test score the next day) are correlated. Figure 6-1 illustrates correlation.
In both the left and the right scatter plots, the psychologist compared each applicantâs time 1 test score (on the x-axis) with his or her subsequent (time 2) test score (on the y-axis). On the left, the scatter plot points (each point showing one applicantâs test score and subsequent test performance) are dispersed. There seems to be no correlation between test scores obtained at time 1 and at time 2. On the right, the psychologist tried a new test. Here the resulting points fall in a predictable pattern. This suggests that the applicantsâ test scores correlate closely with their previous scores.
Validity
Test Reliability, while indispensable, tells you only that the test is measuring something consistently.
Test Validity tells you whether the test is measuring what you think itâs supposed to be measuring.
Test validity answers the question âDoes this test measure what itâs supposed to measure?â Put another way, it refers to the correctness of the inferences that we can make based on the test
How to demonstrate Validity:
There are several ways to demonstrate a testâs validity.
Criterion validity âinvolves demonstrating statistically a relationship between scores on a selection procedure
and job performance of a sample of workers. For example, it means demonstrating that those who do well on the test also do well on the job, and that those who do poorly on the test do poorly on the job.
Content validity is a demonstration that the content of a selection procedure is representative of important aspects of performance on the job. For example, employers may demonstrate the content validity of a test by showing that the test constitutes a fair sample of the jobâs content. The basic procedure here is to identify job tasks that are critical to performance, and then randomly select a sample of those tasks to test.
Construct validity means demonstrating that (1) a selection procedure measures a construct (an abstract idea such as morale or honesty) and (2) that the construct is important for successful job performance.
How do Employers Use Test at Work?
About 41% of companies in one survey tested applicants for basic skills (defined as the ability to read instructions, write reports, and do arithmetic).
About 67% of the respondents required employees to take job skills tests, and 29% required some form of psychological measurement.
Tests are not just for lower-level workers. In general, as work demands increase(in terms of skill requirements, training, and pay), employers tend to rely more on selection testing.
And, employers donât use tests just to find good employees, but also to screen out bad ones.
Types of Tests
We can conveniently classify tests according to whether they measure cognitive (mental) abilities, motor and physical abilities, personality and interests, or achievement.
Weâll Take a look at each
Cognitive tests include testing general reasoning ability or intelligence. In addition, they include tests of specific mental abilities such as memory or inductive reasoning.
Intelligence tests are known as (IQ) tests of general intellectual abilities. They measure not a single trait but rather a range of abilities, including memory, vocabulary, verbal fluency, and numerical ability. An adultâs IQ score is a âderivedâ scored; it reflects the extent to which the person is above or below the âaverageâ adultâs intelligence score.
Specific Cognitive Abilities -There are also measures of specific mental abilities, such as deductive reasoning, verbal comprehension, memory, and numerical ability. Psychologists often call such tests aptitude tests, since they purport to measure aptitude for the job in question.
Test of Motor and Physical Abilities - You also might need to measure motor abilities, such as finger dexterity, manual dexterity, and (if hiring pilots) reaction time. Tests of physical abilities may also be required. These include static strength (such as lifting weights), dynamic strength (pull-ups), body coordination (jumping rope), and stamina
Measuring Personality and Interests -Personality tests measure basic aspects of an applicantâs personality, such as introversion, stability, and motivation. Industrial psychologists often focus on the âbig fiveâ personality dimensions: extraversion, emotional stability/neuroticism, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness to experience.
Types of Tests
Interest Inventories - A personal development and selection device that compares the personâs current interests with those of others now in various occupations so as to determine the preferred occupation for the individual.
Achievement Tests - Achievement tests measure what someone has learned. Most of the tests you take in school are achievement tests. They measure your âjob knowledge.â
Improving Performance: The Strategic Context
Crowdsourcing at Google
Google knows that to maintain its fast-growth strategy, it must keep innovating new services. To support that strategy, Google needs its employees engaged and collaborating with each other. Having employees thinking of themselves in isolated âsilosâ would inhibit the cross-pollination that Googleâs strategy depends on. In formulating its employee selection practices, Google therefore found a way to foster the employee engagement and collaboration its success depends on. Google uses âcrowdsourcingâ when it comes to making hiring decisions.
Hereâs how it works. When a prospective employee applies for a job, his or her information (such as school and previous employers) goes into Googleâs applicant tracking system (ATS). The ATS then matches the applicantâs information with that of current Google employees. When it finds a match, it asks those Google employees to comment on the applicantâs suitability for the position. This helps give Google recruiters a valuable insight into how the Google employees actually doing the work think the applicant will do at Google. And it supports Googleâs strategy, by fostering a sense of community and collaboration among Google employees, who see themselves working together to select new âGooglers.â â
Talk About it (Discussion) : Do you think it would really go counter to the sort of culture Google is trying to nurture to have a central HR department simply test candidates and assign them to work teams with just an interview with the team supervisor? Why?
Work Samples and Simulations
With work samples, you present examinees with situations representative of the job for which theyâre applying, and evaluate their responses. Experts consider these (and simulations, like the assessment centers we also discuss in this section) to be tests. But they differ from most tests because they directly measure job performance.
Using Work Sampling for Employee Selection
The basic procedure with work sampling is to select a sample of several tasks crucial to performing the job, and then test applicants on them.
Situational judgment tests are personnel tests ââŠdesigned to assess an applicantâs judgment regarding a situation encountered in the workplace.â Situational judgment tests are effective and widely used.
A management assessment center is a 2- to 3-day simulation in which 10 to 12 candidates perform realistic management tasks (like making presentations.) Under the observation of experts who appraise each candidateâs leadership potential. Most experts view assessment centers as effective for selecting management candidates. However, they are quite costly in terms of money and time.
Situational tests require examinees to respond to situations found on the job. Work sampling and some assessment center tasks fall into this category. Some of the testing may be video-based.
The video-based simulation presents the candidate with several online or computer video situations, each followed by one or more multiple-choice questions.
Using Work Sampling for Employee Selection:
The Miniature Job Training and Evaluation Approach - involves training candidates to perform several of the jobâs tasks, and then evaluating their performance prior to hire. The approach assumes that a person who demonstrates that he or she can learn and perform the sample of tasks will be able to learn and perform the job itself. Like work sampling, miniature job training and evaluation tests applicants with actual samples of the job, so it is inherently content relevant and valid.
Realistic Job Previews - Sometimes, a dose of realism makes the best screening tool. In general, applicants who receive realistic job previews are more likely to turn down job offers, but their employers are more likely to have less turnover.
Choosing a Selection Method - The employer needs to consider several things before choosing to use a particular
Selection tool (or tools). These include the toolâs reliability and validity, its return on investment (in terms of utility analysis), applicant reactions, usability, adverse impact, and the toolâs selection ratio (does it screen out, as it should, a high percentage of applicants or admit virtually all?)
IMPROVING PERFORMANCE: HR Tools for Line Managers and Small Businesses
Employee Testing and Selection
One of the ironies of being a line manager in even the largest of companies is that, when it comes to screening employees, youâre often on your own. Some large firmsâ HR departments may work with the hiring manager to design and administer the sorts of screening tools we discussed in this chapter. But the fact is that in many of these firms, the HR departments do little more than some preliminary prescreening (for instance, arithmetic tests for clerical applicants), and then follow up with background checks and drug and physical exams.
What should you do if you are, say, a marketing manager, and want to screen some of your job applicants more formally? It is possible to devise your own test battery, but caution is required. Purchasing and then using packaged intelligence tests or psychological tests or even tests of marketing ability could be problematical. Doing so may violate company policy, raise questions of validity, and even expose your employer to EEO liability if problems arise.
A preferred approach is to devise and use screening tools, the face validity of which is obvious. The work sampling test we discussed is one example. Itâs not unreasonable, for instance, for the marketing manager to ask an advertising applicant to spend half an hour designing an ad, or to ask a marketing research applicant to quickly outline a marketing research program for a hypothetical product. Similarly, a production manager might reasonably ask an inventory control applicant to spend a few minutes using a standard inventory control model to solve an inventory problem.
For small business owners, some testsâ ease of use makes them particularly good for small firms. One is the Wonderlic Personnel Test; it measures general mental ability in about 15 minutes. The tester reads the instructions, and then keeps time as the candidate works through the 50 short problems on two pages. The tester scores the test by totaling the number of correct answers. Comparing the personâs score with the minimum scores recommended for various occupations shows whether the person achieved the minimally acceptable score for the type of job in question. The Predictive Index measures work-related personality traits on a two-sided sheet. For example, there is the âsocial interestâ pattern for a person who is generally unselfish, congenial, and unassuming. This person would be a good personnel interviewer, for instance. A template makes scoring simple. As many managers know, for some jobs past performance is a more useful predictor of performance than are formal selection tests. For example, one study of prospective NFL players concluded that collegiate performance was a significantly better predictor of NFL performance than were physical ability tests.â
Talk About it (Discussion) : You own a small ladiesâ dress shop in a mall and want to hire a salesperson. Create a test for doing so?
Background Investigations and Other Selection Methods
Testing is only part of an employerâs selection process. Other tools may include background investigations and reference checks, pre-employment information services, honesty testing, and substance abuse screening.
One of the easiest ways to avoid hiring mistakes is to check the candidateâs background thoroughly. Doing so is inexpensive and (if done right) useful. There are two main reasons to check backgroundsâto verify the applicantâs information and to uncover damaging information.
How to Check a Candidateâs Background
There are several things managers and employers can do to get better information. Most employers at least try to verify an applicantâs current (or former) position and salary with his or her current (or former) employer by phone (assuming you cleared doing so with the candidate). Others call the applicantâs current and previous supervisors to try to discover more about the personâs motivation, technical competence, and ability to work with others (although, again, many employers have policies against providing such information).
Many employers get background reports from commercial credit rating companies for information about credit standing, indebtedness, reputation, character, and lifestyle. (Others check social network sites, as we will see in a moment.) Automated online reference checking can improve the results.
Using Pre-employment Information Services
It is easy to have employment screening services check out applicants. Major background checking providers include Automatic Data Processing Inc., First Advantage, HireRight, and Sterling Backcheck. They use databases to access information about matters such as workersâ compensation, credit histories, and conviction and driving records. For example, retail employers use First Advantage Corporationâs Esteem Database to see if their job candidates have previously been involved in suspected retail thefts.
There are three reasons to use caution with such services.
First, EEO laws apply.
2. Second, various federal and state laws govern how employers acquire and use applicantsâ and employeesâ background information.
3. Third, the criminal background information may be flawed.
The Polygraph and Honesty Testing
The polygraph is a device that measures physiological changes like increased perspiration. The assumption is that such changes reflect changes in emotional state that accompany lying.
To administer a polygraph test for an ongoing investigation, an employer must meet four standards:
1. It must show that it suffered an economic loss or injury.
2. It must show that the employee in question had access to the property.
3. It must have a reasonable suspicion before asking the employee to take the polygraph.
4. The person to be tested must receive the details of the investigation before the
test, as well as the polygraph questions to be asked.
Written Honesty Tests The Polygraph Protection Act triggered a burgeoning market for paper-and-pencil (or computerized or online) honesty tests. These are psychological tests designed to predict job applicantsâ proneness to dishonesty and other forms of counter productivity.
Testing for Honesty: Practical Guidelines - With or without testing, thereâs a lot a manager can do to screen out dishonest applicants or employees. Specifically:
â Ask blunt questions
â Listen, rather than talk.
â Watch for telltale body signals.
â Do a credit check.
â Check all employment and personal references.
â Use written honesty tests and psychological tests.
â Test for drugs.
â Establish a search-and-seizure policy and conduct searches.
Graphology
Graphology - is the use of handwriting analysis to determine the writerâs basic personality traits.
It thus has some resemblance to projective personality tests, although graphologyâs validity is highly suspect. The handwriting analyst studies an applicantâs handwriting and signature to discover the personâs needs, desires, and psychological makeup.
âHuman Lie Detectorsâ
Some employers are using so-called âhuman lie detectors,â experts who may (or may not) be able to identify lying just by watching candidates.
In review of Chapter 6 you should now be able to:
6-1. Answer the question: Why is it important to test and select employees?
6-2. Explain what is meant by reliability and validity.
6-3. List and briefly describe the basic categories of selection tests, with examples.
6-4. Explain how to use two work simulations for selection.
6-5. Describe four ways to improve an employerâs background checking process.