Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Die SlideShare-Präsentation wird heruntergeladen. ×

IntegrtdAppro-GlblSuppChnTrans-Final-v2a

Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Wird geladen in …3
×

Hier ansehen

1 von 26 Anzeige

Weitere Verwandte Inhalte

Diashows für Sie (20)

Ähnlich wie IntegrtdAppro-GlblSuppChnTrans-Final-v2a (20)

Anzeige

IntegrtdAppro-GlblSuppChnTrans-Final-v2a

  1. 1. APICS is not responsible for statements or opinions expressed by individuals in its publications or at its meetings. The views expressed are solely those of the individual and are not necessarily endorsed by APICS. An Integrated Approach to Global Supply Chain Transformation Gary Kilponen, Senior Manager – Deloitte Mark Hardison, CPIM, CHBC, Global Director of Supply Chain Management – Banner Pharmacaps Inc.
  2. 2. Global Manufacturing Industry Benchmarking Study Background Geographic Coverage • Nearly 750 companies and business units from Europe, North America, and Asia/Pacific participating as of July, 2004 Focus • Global Manufacturing Strategies • Operations • Business Performance • Metrics Regional Profile North America 36% Western Europe 46% Asia / Pacific / Africa 7% Central Europe 11% Automotive 11% Consumer Products 30% Diverse Manufacturing 25% High Technology 8% Life Sciences 7% Process / Chemicals 18% Aerospace & Defense 1% Industry Profile Size Profile <$50 million 13% $50 - 200 million 29% $200 - 600 million 27% $600 - 1 billion 11% $1 - 5 billion 16% >$5 billion 4%
  3. 3. Profiting From Complexity? (37%) (7%) (7%) $$= 73%= 73% MOREMORE PROFITABLEPROFITABLE €€ $$= 19%= 19% MOREMORE PROFITABLEPROFITABLE €€ $$ == BASEBASE €€ (49% of Respondents) LowGlobalValueChainComplexitylobalValueChainComplexityHigh Low Value Chain CapabilitiesValue Chain Capabilities High $$= 17%= 17% MOREMORE PROFITABLEPROFITABLE €€ Two dimensions: Degree of Globalization Based on the geographic diffusion of: • Sourcing • Manufacturing • Engineering • Marketing and Sales Level of Value Chain capabilities • Based on the following areas: • Product innovation and Time to market • Sourcing effectiveness • Product quality • Manufacturing flexibility, productivity and lead time • Cost effectiveness • Logistics effectiveness • Customer service • Supply chain cost structure Only 7% of the companies combine globalization with outstanding value chain capabilities – and they are 73% more profitable than the baseline companies.
  4. 4. The Challenge: From Complexity to Profitable Growth CUSTOMER PRODUCT SUPPLY CHAIN What is the path to profitable growth? LowGlobalValueChainComplexitylobalValueChainComplexityHigh Low Value Chain CapabilitiesValue Chain Capabilities High Cost Efficiency / Quality Gains Time-to-Market Improvement Service Level Improvement Manufacturing Productivity Newmarkets Newproducts Newgeographies The Goal: Profitable Growth
  5. 5. Initial Findings: The Paradoxes of Complexity 1. The Optimization Paradox • Most Companies still are optimizing locally, not globally 2. The Customer Collaboration Paradox • Despite customer service being the #2 supply chain priority, only a small % of manufacturers report a strong commitment to customer collaboration 3. The Innovation Paradox • Product innovation is the #1 factor for revenue growth, yet is the lowest of the supply chain priorities 4. The Flexibility Paradox • Despite being a critical capability, cost reduction focus is driving behaviors that inversely impact flexibility 5. The Risk Paradox • Keeping quality high is a #1 priority, yet more and more companies are making radical supply chain changes that can increase the risk profile These paradoxes indicated the discrepancies between what companies say is important and what they are actually doing
  6. 6. Why Globalize? Multi nationals are sub-optimizing Today Tomorrow Disparate affiliate business processes and systems There will be two types of processes: global and standardized local. Global processes will be performed by members of a global organization. Standardized local processes will be performed by employees at the plant level, but in accordance with defined standards that facilitate global management of results. Ineffective leveraging of global employees and organizations Optimally sized and structured global organizations will be put in place to drive global processes and manage local activities. Metrics focused on maximizing local profits and efficiencies resulting in conflicting metrics between global and plant organizations All employees, functions and processes will be measured by key performance metrics that clearly link to strategic objectives and financial performance. Lack of clear accountability for global performance Emphasis will be placed on making fact-based decisions, globally and locally, and using consistent data to evaluate operational and financial performance. Performance of all plants, functions and employees will be reviewed regularly and acted upon promptly. No global standard for data, names and terminology Standard nomenclature for data, tools, processes and terminology and the necessary processes in place to ensure ongoing compliance. IT architecture that inhibits the ability to collect and analyze global data Information systems characterized by a single software instance and centralized technical architecture hosted in a high availability data center environment. These systems will enable both real-time availability of global data and centralization of regulatory validation.
  7. 7. Global Supply Chain Transformation – A Conceptual Model Note: Incremental benefits as the business moves up the spectrum. Returnon Investment Resources (People, Time, Cost) Technology Implementation Business Transformation Competitive Advantage  New Technology  Visibility of Business  Processes & Information  Reduced IT Support Expenditure  Customer Satisfaction  Profits  Global Integration  Operating Expenses  Inventory Costs  Direct/Indirect Material Costs  Market Share  Supplier of Choice  Strategic Alignment Software driven approach with process improvement only related to technology- enabled processes Process driven approach with technology as an enabling platform. Concentrates on Supply Chain & infrastructural process improvement. Strategy driven approach which aligns entire effort with strategy. Assess business direction, competitor positioning, etc.
  8. 8. Supply Chain Process Model Material Releases Material Releases Enterprise Material Planning Enterprise Material Planning Plant Level Material Requirements Planning Plant Level Material Requirements Planning Source Execution Level Scheduling Execution Level Scheduling Enterprise Production Planning Enterprise Production Planning Plant Level Master Production Scheduling Plant Level Master Production Scheduling Make Inventory Deployment Inventory Deployment Enterprise Distribution Planning Enterprise Distribution Planning Distribution Requirements Planning Distribution Requirements Planning Deliver Strategic Operational Tactical ERP SYSTEM Enterprise Demand Planning Enterprise Demand Planning ForecastsForecasts Plan OrdersOrders Concept/ Markets Concept/ Markets Prototype/ Testing Prototype/ Testing Design Pilot/ Launch Pilot/ Launch
  9. 9. Supply Chain Technology Material Releases Enterprise Material Planning Plant Level Material Requirements Planning Source Execution Level Scheduling Enterprise Production Planning Plant Level Master Production Scheduling Make Inventory Deployment Enterprise Distribution Planning Distribution Requirements Planning Deliver Strategic Operational Tactical ERP SYSTEM Enterprise Demand Planning Forecasts Plan Orders Concept/ Markets Prototype/ Testing Design Pilot/ Launch Supply Chain Network Optimization Demand Planning Production and Distribution Planning Production Scheduling Warehouse Management ERP Backbone e-Procurement Business Intelligence Product Lifecycle Management Supply Chain Event Management
  10. 10. Global Supply Chain Transformation Benefits Benefit Area Demand Mgmt S&OP Source Lean Mfg Demand Pull Move from facility to GLOBAL view X X X Consistency of data X X Collaboration with suppliers/customers X X X X More accurate demand for our suppliers X X X Improved customer response time X X X X X Knowledge of optimal product mix X Improved product quality X X Focus on constraints X X X Increased capacity X X X Reduced lead times X X X Reduced costs X X X X X Improved yields X Reduced inventory X X X X Improved flexibility X X X X Ability to prioritize capital expenditures X X Tax efficient supply chain X X X X X
  11. 11. Banner Transformation Program Background • Business Transformation Program (BTP) – New business strategy and objectives • Global Transformation Scope  Complete Business Process Redesign  Standardization of Process and Data nomenclature  Organizational Change Management  ERP & APS Implementation  Approx. 420 Users • Global Geographic Scope  Multi National “Profit Center” Business Model • Limited internal resource availability
  12. 12. Business Strategy Key strategic initiatives: • Shift from a multi-national to a global business model • Develop and market new drug delivery technologies • Leverage these by registration of a Banner portfolio of products and by offering superior value to branded and private label manufacturers • Maintain a substantial presence as a contract manufacturer by improving quality, price competitiveness, timeliness and reliability of the supply chain • Align R&D, Commercial and Supply Chain functions • Build direct-to-market capabilities where applicable • Improve communication, training and development of the workforce to ensure commitment, alignment and execution of the strategies The Business Transformation Plan was developed to support the strategic direction as defined above.
  13. 13. Business Transformation Plan Approach The integrated approach for developing the BTP is detailed below:
  14. 14. BTP Vision The framework for the BTP since inception has been based on a holistic approach to create and sustain improved operating performance Global Business Re-engineering Nomenclature Standardization & Rationalization ERP Implementation • Standard, global business processes • Leading industry and Banner practices are considered • A chance to fix the process prior to automation • Enterprise view of customers, suppliers, products, raw materials • Duplicate data eliminated • Foundational requirement for ERP implementation • Foundational requirement to support and sustain business process changes • Single repository of global data • Reduction in the number of systems requiring support
  15. 15. Business Transformation Framework The approach will be integrated with the strategic plan and the “Under One Banner” reorganization Information Systems: Banner Transformation Program Business Process: Underway, BTP Org: Global Functions Strategy: Business Plan Strategy/Policy - Key overall business drivers Organization - Aligned with Strategic Drivers Business Process - Processes which enable the new strategy Information - Supporting Information Systems to enable the Processes FieldFeedback Dependencies
  16. 16. What is a process reference model? Process reference models integrate the well-known concepts of business process reengineering, benchmarking, and process measurement into a cross-functional framework Quantify the operational performance of similar companies and establish internal targets based on “best-in- class” results Quantify the operational performance of similar companies and establish internal targets based on “best-in- class” results Benchmarking Characterize the management practices and software solutions that result in “best-in-class” performance Characterize the management practices and software solutions that result in “best-in-class” performance Best Practices Analysis Process Reference Model Capture the “as-is” state of a process and derive the desired “to-be” future state Capture the “as-is” state of a process and derive the desired “to-be” future state Business Process Reengineering Capture the “as-is” state of a process and derive the desired “to-be” future state Quantify the operational performance of similar companies and establish internal targets based on “best-in-class” results Characterize the management practices and software solutions that result in “best-in- class” performance
  17. 17. Supply Chain Implementation Framework SupplyChainOperationsReferenceModel 1 2 3 4 (Decompose Processes) Implementation (Decompose Process Elements) Balance Production Resources with Production Requirements Establish Detailed Production Plans Identify, Prioritize, and Aggregate Production Requirements Identify, Assess, and Aggregate Production Resources P3.1 P3.3 P3.4 P3.2 Level Description Schematic Comments Tool Plan MakeSource Deliver • Process element definitions • Process element information inputs, and outputs • Process performance metrics • Best practices, where applicable • System capabilities required to support best practices • Systems/tools by vendor SCOR & SPEED SCOR, SPEED & SolutionPrint SolutionsPrint & Applications SupplyChainOperationsReferenceModelSolutionPrint 11 22 SupplyChainOperationsReferenceModel 11 22 33 44 As Is Assessment Approach Planning (Decompose Processes) Implementation (Decompose Process Elements) Balance Production Resources with Production Requirements Establish Detailed Production Plans Identify, Prioritize, and Aggregate Production Requirements Identify, Assess, and Aggregate Production Resources P3.1 P3.3 P3.4 P3.2 Phase Description Schematic Comments Tool Plan MakeSource Deliver Plan MakeSource Deliver The Approach Planning phase refines the “To Be” state to the next level of detail. This level consists of: • Process element definitions • Process element information inputs, and outputs • Process performance metrics • Best practices, where applicable • System capabilities required to support best practices • Systems/tools by vendor Processes enabled by technology are implemented at this phase. Implementation defines the tools, processes, and practices to Enable the organization to improve its supply chain. Phase 1 assesses the current supply chain and reviews the supply chain processes “As Is” SCOR & SPEED SCOR, SPEED & SolutionPrint SupplyChainOperationsReferenceModel To Be SCOR & SPEED SCOR & SPEED Phase 2 determines the “To Be” future state of the supply chain. This phase aligns the supply chain with the corporate strategic goals.
  18. 18. Building a World Class Supply Chain Differentiator Synchronized Value Chain Qualifier Customer Product Supply Chain Technology Customer strategic planning Collaboration – new products Collaboration - cost reduction Customer / channel profitability Inventory replenishment Collaboration - demand planning Customer segmentation Customer service levels - fulfillment Customer collaboration- quality Product Lifecycle Management Design for Manufacturing Product Data Management Common Parts / Common Platform Product profitability Design for Quality Cross-functional design teams SKU rationalization Supplier collaboration new materials / new processes Product quality Supply Chain Network Optimization / Tax Structure SCM organization Program Management Flexible capacity Production Schedule Optimization Transportation Optimization Integrated Sales & Operations Planning Quick Changeover Six Sigma / SPC Demand planning Lean Manufacturing ISO Quality Certification Scenario Planning Business Intelligence Customer / Supplier Portal Product Lifecycle Mgmt Advanced Planning Systems Customer Relationship Management Transportation Mgmt Product Data Mgmt Warehouse Mgmt Demand planning EDI Quality Mgmt ERP Capability Focus of Banner Transformation Program
  19. 19. BTP Implementation Timeline Scoping & Planning Visioning & Targeting Design Construction Implementation Scoping & Planning Scoping & Planning Visioning & Targeting Visioning & Targeting DesignDesign ConstructionConstruction ImplementationImplementation Change Leadership FDA Validation I nfrastructure Development Program Management FormalProgramLaunch-10/03 Site # 3 Site # 6 Site # 5 PLM I mplementation Completion Phase 3 Global S&OP (Plan) and APS I mplementation Nomenclature Phase 1 Nomenclature Phase 2 Completion Phase 1 Deliver, Make & H/ R Global Model Build Finance & Source Global Model Build & I mplementation at all sites Site # 1 Project Review Q1 Y1 Q2 Y1 Q3 Y1 Q4 Y1 Q1 Y2 Q2 Y2 Q3 Y2 Q4 Y2 Q1 Y3 Q2 Y3 Q3 Y3 Q4 Y3 Q1 Y4 Global Business Transformation Plan Site # 4 Completion Phase 2 Site # 2
  20. 20. Challenges/Critical Success Factors Without these critical success factors a BTP will not be successful Organization • Complete transition to global management structure Metrics • Define success metrics for global business and transformation program Accountability • Tie personnel compensation metrics Tools • Enable and sustain global process changes using technology  Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)  Advanced Planning and Scheduling (APS)  Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) Resources • Provide necessary resources for program execution Ownership • The GMT must own and be held accountable for the success of the BTP Business Leadership • Allow the business to drive the program utilizing IT as a support, not an initiative Change Management • Implement a Change Management plan including necessary resources Program Management • Utilize a Program and Project Management Office to manage activities through each phase of the implementation Transformation • Transform the business focusing on translating the strategic plan into financial results
  21. 21. BTP Value Drivers Improve Cash Flow & ROCE Revenue Growth Asset EfficiencyOperating Margin Time to Market SG&AProduct Availability COGS Property, Plant & Equipment Inventory Receivables Payables FinanceGlobal Strategic Sourcing ValueDriversBTPRecommendations S&OP Manufacturing Process Improvement Nomenclature  Improve production operations  Move from inventory push to demand pull  Improve shop floor execution  Reduce manufacturing costs  Reduce inventory  Increase order visibility  Improve demand management capability  Improve forecasting  Reduce global inventory  Increase leverage through competition  Reduce # of suppliers  Adopt global governance  Increase consignments & VMI  Improve spend compliance  Reduce total spend  Maintain pricing standards  Improve accounting process  Improve cash flow management  Standardized products and processes  Build the foundation of transactional system  Reduce total spend Order Management Increase Shareholder Value
  22. 22. Supply Chain Implementation Framework Plan Improved Supply ChainImproved Supply Chain ProcessesProcesses Enabling Technology: Infrastructure, Enterprise Data Model, PeopleSoft Supplier Internal or External Customer Customer’s Customer Make DeliverSource Make DeliverMakeSourceDeliver SourceDeliver Internal or External SCOR Model Source PharmaPrint Process Models Mapped to PeopleSoft/JDE SPEED Supply Chain Diagnostic Tool SCOR Supply Chain Strategy Reference Model
  23. 23. Banner’s Goal is to become a Complexity Master – Two dimensions: 1.Globalization Complexity Based on the geographic diffusion of • Sourcing • Manufacturing • Engineering • Marketing and Sales 2. Capabilities Based on the following areas: • Product innovation and time to market • Sourcing effectiveness • Product quality • Manufacturing flexibility, productivity and lead time • Cost effectiveness • Logistics effectiveness • Customer service • Supply chain cost structure Low CapabilitiesCapabilities High LowGlobalComplexitylobalComplexityHigh 100 = base (49 % of respondents) 17% more profitable(37%) Complexity Masters (7%) 73% more profitable (7%) 19% more profitable
  24. 24. Closing Slide Gary Kilponen, Senior Manager, Deloitte gkilponen@deloitte.com www.deloitte.com/us/manufacturing Mark Hardison, CPIM, CHBC, Global Director of Supply Chain Management, Banner Pharmacaps Inc. MCHardison@Banpharm.com www.banpharm.com Please return your completed session survey to the room monitor or the collection boxes near the exit. APICS programs are noncommercial forums. Speakers have agreed to refrain from the use of brand names and specific product endorsement whenever possible. Speakers understand that the association’s podium cannot be used as a place for direct promotion of the presenter’s product, services, or for monetary self interest. Please visit: www.supply-chain.org
  25. 25. Questions?
  26. 26. Must Attend Session at APICS Overcoming the Challenge of Innovation: Synchronizing your Supply Chain and Improving Product Lifecycle Management Tuesday, October 12, 2004 11:00 a.m. – 12:15 p.m. Session: H-10 Room 7 A&B Speaker: Doug Engel, U.S. Manufacturing Practice Leader, Deloitte

Hinweis der Redaktion

  • This template works on PowerPoint 97 SR-2 and on 2002 SP-1. It should work on most all versions in use today.
    The slides printed correctly in B&amp;W. The handouts and notes pages also print correctly.
    Contact Harvey McChesney if you have questions: 610-799-0774 or at H.McChesney@att.net
  • &amp;lt;number&amp;gt;
    Ok, we talked about the pressures, so let’s take a moment to talk about reality
    These paradoxes were the result of our initial review of the data from the survey – what we found without looking at the complexity masters
    These essentially are trade-off decisions …. Often that don’t fit nicely into a cost model or an ROI calculation
    EXAMPLES HERE
    UCAR example (from Stewart Witt) fits into #1
    Kennametal example -- new products will account for 40% of revenue – but without changes to supply chain this was running at 10% fits into #3
    For #4 and #5 – The Long beach Dock Workers strike hits home for most companies
  • &amp;lt;number&amp;gt;
    Ok, we talked about the pressures, so let’s take a moment to talk about reality
    These paradoxes were the result of our initial review of the data from the survey – what we found without looking at the complexity masters
    These essentially are trade-off decisions …. Often that don’t fit nicely into a cost model or an ROI calculation
    EXAMPLES HERE
    UCAR example (from Stewart Witt) fits into #1
    Kennametal example -- new products will account for 40% of revenue – but without changes to supply chain this was running at 10% fits into #3
    For #4 and #5 – The Long beach Dock Workers strike hits home for most companies

×