SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 8
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
LM-3A Series Launch Vehicle User’s Manual
Issue 201110-1
CHAPTER 10 SATELLITE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
10.1 Introduction
This Chapter introduces the satellite design requirements from the launch vehicle
compatibility perspective, which include load conditions, coupled load analysis, safety
requirements, satellite mass and CoG, specifications of satellite qualification and
acceptance tests.
10.2 Load Conditions for Satellite Design
10.2.1 Frequency Requirement
To avoid the SC dynamic coupling with the launch vehicle, the primary frequency of SC
structure should meet the following requirement (under the condition that SC/LV separation
plane is considered as a rigid body):
The first order lateral frequency of the main mode: > 10 Hz
The first order longitudinal frequency of the main mode: > 30 Hz
10.2.2 Loads Applied for SC Structure Design
The maximum lateral load occurs when the launch vehicle flies with a transonic speed or
under Maximum Dynamic Pressure (MDP).
The maximum longitudinal static load occurs at the first stage engines shutdown for LM-3A.
The maximum longitudinal static load occurs at the boosters’ engines shutdown for LM-3B,
LM-3BE and LM-3C.
The maximum longitudinal dynamic load occurs immediately following the first and second
stage separation.
Therefore, the following limit loads corresponding to different flight conditions are
recommended for SC design consideration. See Table 10-1 and Table 10-2.
LM-3A Series Launch Vehicle User’s Manual
Issue 2011 10-2
Table 10-1 LM-3A Limit Loads
Flight Condition
Transonic Phase
& MDP
Stage-1 Engines
Shutdown
1st
/2nd
Stage
Separation
Static + 2.0 + 5.0 + 1.4
Dynamic
+ 0.8
- 0.8
+ 0.8
- 5.5
+ 3.0
- 3.8
Longitudinal
Load Factor
(g)
Combined + 2.8
+ 5.8
- 0.5
+ 4.4
- 2.4
Lateral Load
Factor (g)
/ 2.0 1.0 1.0
Table 10-2 LM-3B/3BE/3C Limit Loads
Flight Condition
Transonic Phase
& MDP
Stage-1 Engines
Shutdown
1st
/2nd
Stage
Separation
Static + 2.2 + 5.3 + 1.0
Dynamic
+ 0.8
- 0.8
+ 0.8
- 3.6
+ 2.7
- 3.6
Longitudinal
Load Factor
(g)
Combined + 3.0 + 6.1
+ 3.7
- 2.6
Lateral Load
Factor (g)
/ 1.5* 1.0 1.0
Notes for Table 10-1 and Table 10-2:
a) * means that 1.5g is effective only under the following conditions:
i) The SC frequency meets the requirement in Paragraph 10.2.1;
ii) Mass of SC: ≤ 5,100 kg for LM-3B; ≤ 5,500 kg for LM-3BE; ≤ 3,800 kg for LM-3C.
iii) The distance between SC CoG to the SC/LV separation plane: ≤1.6 m.
For specific SC, the “1.5 g” may be larger. The users should consult with CALT to
determine the actual load conditions according to the specific SC conditions.
b) Usage of the above loads in the Tables:
Loads for SC design = Limit loads x Safety Factor**
** The safety factor is determined by the SC designer. A safety factor ≥1.25 is recommended
by CALT.
c) The lateral load means the load acting in any direction perpendicular to the longitudinal
axis.
d) For a given flight condition, both lateral and longitudinal loads should be considered
simultaneously.
e) The plus sign "+" in longitudinal load factor means compression.
10.3 Coupled Load Analysis
LM-3A Series Launch Vehicle User’s Manual
Issue 201110-3
The SC manufacturer should provide its SC mathematical model to CALT for the Coupled
Loads Analysis (CLA). CALT will predict the SC maximum dynamic response by coupled
load analysis. The SC manufacturer should confirm that the SC can survive the predicted
environment and has an adequate safety margin. The safety factor recommended by CALT
is ≥ 1.25.
10.4 Safety Requirements
XSLC has implemented a safety program to protect the launch site personnel, the launch
site facilities and the visitors to the launch site for the launch services. The program has
several facets all based on a typical launch processing schedule for a commercial satellite
using conventional propellants and gases. The major aspects of the program are as follows:
a) Launch site safety control;
b) Safety approval based on the satellite safety submissions;
c) Training of the customer and satellite manufacturer’s team in safety procedures
implemented at XSLC;
d) Safety requirements during hazardous operations;
e) Response to accidents and medical support.
XSLC has overall responsibility for preparing and implementing the safety procedures and is
responsible for ensuring that the safety procedures are followed. The customer and satellite
manufacturer will have the responsibility for ensuring that their respective teams have all
participated in the safety training before being allowed to work within XSLC and are
responsible for ensuring that their respective teams observe all the safety regulations at
XSLC.
All customer operations at XSLC require the approval of the XSLC safety authorities, in
particular the hazardous operations, all transportation at XSLC and combined operations.
The customer is required to demonstrate that the satellite, the support equipment and all
operations at XSLC comply with the XSLC safety regulations. This is achieved in a
maximum of three stages by the submission of reports detailing all the hazardous
subsystems, hazardous materials, hazardous procedures used or implemented at XSLC.
The customer submits these reports to CGWIC for review and approval by the relevant
authorities and a typical submission schedule, with the requirements at different stages
according to the baseline specified in Table 11-2 of this User’s Manual.
LM-3A Series Launch Vehicle User’s Manual
Issue 2011 10-4
10.5 Satellite Mass and CoG Requirements
LM-3A Series launch vehicles can accommodate a wide range of satellite mass and CoG
positions. See Table 10-3.
Table 10-3 Satellite Mass and CoG Requirement
Tolerance of CoG
LV Mass (kg)
Axis (mm) Transverse (mm)
LM-3A 2,600 ±20 ±10
LM-3B 5,100 ±20 ±10
LM-3BE 5,500 ±20 ±10
LM-3C 3,800 ±20 ±10
10.6 Qualification and Acceptance Test Specifications
10.6.1 Static Loads Test (Qualification)
The main SC structure should pass the static load qualification tests without damage. The
test load level should not be lower than SC design load required in Paragraph 10.2.2.
10.6.2 Sinusoidal Vibration Test
During sinusoidal vibration tests, the SC should be rigidly mounted on the shaker. The table
below specifies the vibration amplitude and acceleration level (zero-peak) at the SC/LV
interface for the SC qualification and acceptance tests. (See Figure 10-1)
LM-3A Series Launch Vehicle User’s Manual
Issue 201110-5
Test Load
Frequency (Hz)
Acceptance Qualification
5-8 3.11 mm 4.66 mm
Longitudinal
8-100 0.8 g 1.2 g
5-8 2.33 mm 3.50 mm
Lateral
8-100 0.6 g 0.9 g
Scan rate (Oct/min) / 4 2
Notes:
a) Frequency tolerance is allowed to be 2%
b) Amplitude tolerance is allowed to be 10%
c) Acceleration notching is permitted after consultation with CALT and
concurred by all parties. In no case should the notched accelerations
be lower than the results of coupled loads analysis on the interface
plane. CALT recommends that the safety factor be ≥1.25.
Figure 10-1 SC Sinusoidal Vibration Test Specification
10.6.3 Acoustic Test
The qualification and acceptance levels of the acoustic test are given in the following table
(also see Figure 10-2).
LM-3A Series Launch Vehicle User’s Manual
Issue 2011 10-6
Central Frequency of
Octave Bandwidth
(Hz)
Acceptance
Test Level
(dB)
Qualification
Test Level
(dB)
Deviation of
Test Level
(dB)
31.5 124 128
63 129 133
125 134 138
250 138 142
500 133 137
1000 129 133
2000 128 132
-2 / +4
4000 127 131 -5 / +4
8000 122 126 -5 / +5
Total Acoustic
Pressure Level
141.5 145.5 -1 / +3
Notes:
0 dB referenced to 2×10-5
Pa.
Duration of acceptance test: one minute.
Duration of qualification test: two minutes.
Figure 10-2 SC Acoustic Test Specification
10.6.4 Shock Test
The shock test level is specified in this Paragraph (See Figure 10-3 and 10-4). Such test
shall be performed once for acceptance, and twice for qualification. A tolerance of ±6.0 dB in
test specification is allowed, however, the test levels applied shall ensure that the shock
LM-3A Series Launch Vehicle User’s Manual
Issue 201110-7
response spectral analysis is at least 1/6 octave above the maximum and the response
acceleration values at central frequencies shall be at least 30% greater than or equal to the
nominal values given in Figures 10-3 and 10-4.
Frequency (Hz) Shock Response Spectrum (Q=10)
100~1000 10.5 dB/octave
1000~4000 4000 g
Figure 10-3 Shock Response Spectrum at SC/LV Separation
Plane - C100 Clampband
LM-3A Series Launch Vehicle User’s Manual
Issue 2011 10-8
Figure 10-4 Shock Response Spectrum at SC/LV Separation
Plane - C60 Clampband
Additionally, CGWIC could also support the customer to procure low shock level separation
system (clampband and the pyros) developed by European suppliers, if needed.
Alternatively, the shock test can be performed through a SC/LV separation test by use of
flight SC, Payload Adapter (PLA), and separation system, all being flight hardware. This test
shall be performed once for acceptance, and twice for qualification.
10.6.5 Proto-flight Test
If the satellite is to be launched by the LM-3A Series launch vehicles for the first time but the
same type of satellite has been launched by other launch vehicles and has been
environmentally tested to levels that are equal to or greater than the qualification test level
described in Paragraph 10.6.1 to Paragraph 10.6.4, CALT will accept the following
Proto-flight test conditions:
a) Vibration test should be performed in accordance with the scan rate of the acceptance
test and at the qualification test level as specified in Paragraph 10.6.2.
b) Acoustic test should be performed in accordance with the test duration of the
acceptance test and at the qualification test level as specified in Paragraph 10.6.3.
c) Shock test should be performed once according to Paragraph 10.6.4.
The test conditions for proto-flight testing should be determined by the satellite manufacturer
and CALT, and should be higher than the acceptance test levels but lower than the
qualification test levels.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Satelite communication
Satelite communicationSatelite communication
Satelite communication
Syam Kumar
 
Satellite communication
Satellite communicationSatellite communication
Satellite communication
Mannu Khani
 
Satellites presentation
Satellites presentationSatellites presentation
Satellites presentation
Vikas Sharma
 

Andere mochten auch (13)

Launching the artifical satellite
Launching the artifical satelliteLaunching the artifical satellite
Launching the artifical satellite
 
How A Rocket is Launched into Space
How A Rocket is Launched into SpaceHow A Rocket is Launched into Space
How A Rocket is Launched into Space
 
Satellite link design
Satellite link designSatellite link design
Satellite link design
 
Design and implementation of qpsk modulator using digital subcarrier
Design and implementation of qpsk modulator using digital subcarrierDesign and implementation of qpsk modulator using digital subcarrier
Design and implementation of qpsk modulator using digital subcarrier
 
Hardware Implementation Of QPSK Modulator for Satellite Communications
Hardware Implementation Of QPSK Modulator for Satellite CommunicationsHardware Implementation Of QPSK Modulator for Satellite Communications
Hardware Implementation Of QPSK Modulator for Satellite Communications
 
نماذج التصميم التعليمي
نماذج التصميم التعليمينماذج التصميم التعليمي
نماذج التصميم التعليمي
 
Design of the satellite link
Design of the satellite linkDesign of the satellite link
Design of the satellite link
 
Satelite communication
Satelite communicationSatelite communication
Satelite communication
 
INTRODUCTION TO SATELLITE
INTRODUCTION TO SATELLITEINTRODUCTION TO SATELLITE
INTRODUCTION TO SATELLITE
 
Satellite communication
Satellite communicationSatellite communication
Satellite communication
 
Satellites presentation
Satellites presentationSatellites presentation
Satellites presentation
 
Satellite communications
Satellite communicationsSatellite communications
Satellite communications
 
Satellite communications ppt
Satellite communications pptSatellite communications ppt
Satellite communications ppt
 

Ähnlich wie satellite design requirements

T-X Requirements matrix
T-X Requirements matrixT-X Requirements matrix
T-X Requirements matrix
Nicolas Perron
 
C20 20090615-019-alu csfb-performance_enhance
C20 20090615-019-alu csfb-performance_enhanceC20 20090615-019-alu csfb-performance_enhance
C20 20090615-019-alu csfb-performance_enhance
Emmanuel Msumali
 
JAR 23 and FAR 23 Comparison part 2
JAR 23 and FAR 23 Comparison part 2JAR 23 and FAR 23 Comparison part 2
JAR 23 and FAR 23 Comparison part 2
Jio Gayon
 
Flex Maint Plan C 40 A
Flex Maint Plan C 40 AFlex Maint Plan C 40 A
Flex Maint Plan C 40 A
kingstonmj
 
Static load test method statement cm - ms- bw - 003
Static load test method statement  cm - ms- bw - 003Static load test method statement  cm - ms- bw - 003
Static load test method statement cm - ms- bw - 003
Minh Bui Si
 

Ähnlich wie satellite design requirements (20)

ajme-3-4-2.pdf
ajme-3-4-2.pdfajme-3-4-2.pdf
ajme-3-4-2.pdf
 
testing formats
testing formatstesting formats
testing formats
 
SELECTION AND ANALYSIS OF AN AIRFOIL FOR FIXED WING MICRO UNMANNED AERIAL VEH...
SELECTION AND ANALYSIS OF AN AIRFOIL FOR FIXED WING MICRO UNMANNED AERIAL VEH...SELECTION AND ANALYSIS OF AN AIRFOIL FOR FIXED WING MICRO UNMANNED AERIAL VEH...
SELECTION AND ANALYSIS OF AN AIRFOIL FOR FIXED WING MICRO UNMANNED AERIAL VEH...
 
Commercial-aircraft-operation.pptx
Commercial-aircraft-operation.pptxCommercial-aircraft-operation.pptx
Commercial-aircraft-operation.pptx
 
Anchor Handling Stability
Anchor Handling StabilityAnchor Handling Stability
Anchor Handling Stability
 
Improving time to-collision estimation by IMM based Kalman filter
Improving time to-collision estimation by IMM based Kalman filterImproving time to-collision estimation by IMM based Kalman filter
Improving time to-collision estimation by IMM based Kalman filter
 
alat penentu lokasi pada saat emergency (Emergency locator transmitter)
alat penentu lokasi pada saat emergency (Emergency locator transmitter)alat penentu lokasi pada saat emergency (Emergency locator transmitter)
alat penentu lokasi pada saat emergency (Emergency locator transmitter)
 
Drone project report
Drone project reportDrone project report
Drone project report
 
T-X Requirements matrix
T-X Requirements matrixT-X Requirements matrix
T-X Requirements matrix
 
IMPROVEMENT IN IRVR 'AGL Credit'
IMPROVEMENT IN IRVR 'AGL Credit' IMPROVEMENT IN IRVR 'AGL Credit'
IMPROVEMENT IN IRVR 'AGL Credit'
 
C20 20090615-019-alu csfb-performance_enhance
C20 20090615-019-alu csfb-performance_enhanceC20 20090615-019-alu csfb-performance_enhance
C20 20090615-019-alu csfb-performance_enhance
 
JAR 23 and FAR 23 Comparison part 2
JAR 23 and FAR 23 Comparison part 2JAR 23 and FAR 23 Comparison part 2
JAR 23 and FAR 23 Comparison part 2
 
Flex Maint Plan C 40 A
Flex Maint Plan C 40 AFlex Maint Plan C 40 A
Flex Maint Plan C 40 A
 
Lifting Operation.ppt
Lifting Operation.pptLifting Operation.ppt
Lifting Operation.ppt
 
CASD presentazione AVIO
CASD presentazione AVIOCASD presentazione AVIO
CASD presentazione AVIO
 
IRJET- Parametric Study on Behaviour of RCC Box Culvert for Dynamic Loading
IRJET- Parametric Study on Behaviour of RCC Box Culvert for Dynamic LoadingIRJET- Parametric Study on Behaviour of RCC Box Culvert for Dynamic Loading
IRJET- Parametric Study on Behaviour of RCC Box Culvert for Dynamic Loading
 
Static load test method statement cm - ms- bw - 003
Static load test method statement  cm - ms- bw - 003Static load test method statement  cm - ms- bw - 003
Static load test method statement cm - ms- bw - 003
 
ship rules
ship rulesship rules
ship rules
 
Difference between en iso 13849 and en iec 62061
Difference between en iso 13849 and en iec 62061Difference between en iso 13849 and en iec 62061
Difference between en iso 13849 and en iec 62061
 
FATIGUE ASSESSMENT OF DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM UNDER RANDOM VIBRATION LOAD FOR...
FATIGUE ASSESSMENT OF DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM UNDER RANDOM VIBRATION LOAD FOR...FATIGUE ASSESSMENT OF DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM UNDER RANDOM VIBRATION LOAD FOR...
FATIGUE ASSESSMENT OF DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM UNDER RANDOM VIBRATION LOAD FOR...
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
?#DUbAI#??##{{(☎️+971_581248768%)**%*]'#abortion pills for sale in dubai@
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Safe Software
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonData Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
 
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
 
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
 
Artificial Intelligence Chap.5 : Uncertainty
Artificial Intelligence Chap.5 : UncertaintyArtificial Intelligence Chap.5 : Uncertainty
Artificial Intelligence Chap.5 : Uncertainty
 
A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?
A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?
A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
 
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law DevelopmentsTrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
 
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdfGenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
 
A Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source Milvus
A Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source MilvusA Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source Milvus
A Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source Milvus
 
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
 
AXA XL - Insurer Innovation Award Americas 2024
AXA XL - Insurer Innovation Award Americas 2024AXA XL - Insurer Innovation Award Americas 2024
AXA XL - Insurer Innovation Award Americas 2024
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
 
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century educationpresentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
 
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor PresentationDBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
 
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin WoodPolkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
 
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
 
ICT role in 21st century education and its challenges
ICT role in 21st century education and its challengesICT role in 21st century education and its challenges
ICT role in 21st century education and its challenges
 

satellite design requirements

  • 1. LM-3A Series Launch Vehicle User’s Manual Issue 201110-1 CHAPTER 10 SATELLITE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS 10.1 Introduction This Chapter introduces the satellite design requirements from the launch vehicle compatibility perspective, which include load conditions, coupled load analysis, safety requirements, satellite mass and CoG, specifications of satellite qualification and acceptance tests. 10.2 Load Conditions for Satellite Design 10.2.1 Frequency Requirement To avoid the SC dynamic coupling with the launch vehicle, the primary frequency of SC structure should meet the following requirement (under the condition that SC/LV separation plane is considered as a rigid body): The first order lateral frequency of the main mode: > 10 Hz The first order longitudinal frequency of the main mode: > 30 Hz 10.2.2 Loads Applied for SC Structure Design The maximum lateral load occurs when the launch vehicle flies with a transonic speed or under Maximum Dynamic Pressure (MDP). The maximum longitudinal static load occurs at the first stage engines shutdown for LM-3A. The maximum longitudinal static load occurs at the boosters’ engines shutdown for LM-3B, LM-3BE and LM-3C. The maximum longitudinal dynamic load occurs immediately following the first and second stage separation. Therefore, the following limit loads corresponding to different flight conditions are recommended for SC design consideration. See Table 10-1 and Table 10-2.
  • 2. LM-3A Series Launch Vehicle User’s Manual Issue 2011 10-2 Table 10-1 LM-3A Limit Loads Flight Condition Transonic Phase & MDP Stage-1 Engines Shutdown 1st /2nd Stage Separation Static + 2.0 + 5.0 + 1.4 Dynamic + 0.8 - 0.8 + 0.8 - 5.5 + 3.0 - 3.8 Longitudinal Load Factor (g) Combined + 2.8 + 5.8 - 0.5 + 4.4 - 2.4 Lateral Load Factor (g) / 2.0 1.0 1.0 Table 10-2 LM-3B/3BE/3C Limit Loads Flight Condition Transonic Phase & MDP Stage-1 Engines Shutdown 1st /2nd Stage Separation Static + 2.2 + 5.3 + 1.0 Dynamic + 0.8 - 0.8 + 0.8 - 3.6 + 2.7 - 3.6 Longitudinal Load Factor (g) Combined + 3.0 + 6.1 + 3.7 - 2.6 Lateral Load Factor (g) / 1.5* 1.0 1.0 Notes for Table 10-1 and Table 10-2: a) * means that 1.5g is effective only under the following conditions: i) The SC frequency meets the requirement in Paragraph 10.2.1; ii) Mass of SC: ≤ 5,100 kg for LM-3B; ≤ 5,500 kg for LM-3BE; ≤ 3,800 kg for LM-3C. iii) The distance between SC CoG to the SC/LV separation plane: ≤1.6 m. For specific SC, the “1.5 g” may be larger. The users should consult with CALT to determine the actual load conditions according to the specific SC conditions. b) Usage of the above loads in the Tables: Loads for SC design = Limit loads x Safety Factor** ** The safety factor is determined by the SC designer. A safety factor ≥1.25 is recommended by CALT. c) The lateral load means the load acting in any direction perpendicular to the longitudinal axis. d) For a given flight condition, both lateral and longitudinal loads should be considered simultaneously. e) The plus sign "+" in longitudinal load factor means compression. 10.3 Coupled Load Analysis
  • 3. LM-3A Series Launch Vehicle User’s Manual Issue 201110-3 The SC manufacturer should provide its SC mathematical model to CALT for the Coupled Loads Analysis (CLA). CALT will predict the SC maximum dynamic response by coupled load analysis. The SC manufacturer should confirm that the SC can survive the predicted environment and has an adequate safety margin. The safety factor recommended by CALT is ≥ 1.25. 10.4 Safety Requirements XSLC has implemented a safety program to protect the launch site personnel, the launch site facilities and the visitors to the launch site for the launch services. The program has several facets all based on a typical launch processing schedule for a commercial satellite using conventional propellants and gases. The major aspects of the program are as follows: a) Launch site safety control; b) Safety approval based on the satellite safety submissions; c) Training of the customer and satellite manufacturer’s team in safety procedures implemented at XSLC; d) Safety requirements during hazardous operations; e) Response to accidents and medical support. XSLC has overall responsibility for preparing and implementing the safety procedures and is responsible for ensuring that the safety procedures are followed. The customer and satellite manufacturer will have the responsibility for ensuring that their respective teams have all participated in the safety training before being allowed to work within XSLC and are responsible for ensuring that their respective teams observe all the safety regulations at XSLC. All customer operations at XSLC require the approval of the XSLC safety authorities, in particular the hazardous operations, all transportation at XSLC and combined operations. The customer is required to demonstrate that the satellite, the support equipment and all operations at XSLC comply with the XSLC safety regulations. This is achieved in a maximum of three stages by the submission of reports detailing all the hazardous subsystems, hazardous materials, hazardous procedures used or implemented at XSLC. The customer submits these reports to CGWIC for review and approval by the relevant authorities and a typical submission schedule, with the requirements at different stages according to the baseline specified in Table 11-2 of this User’s Manual.
  • 4. LM-3A Series Launch Vehicle User’s Manual Issue 2011 10-4 10.5 Satellite Mass and CoG Requirements LM-3A Series launch vehicles can accommodate a wide range of satellite mass and CoG positions. See Table 10-3. Table 10-3 Satellite Mass and CoG Requirement Tolerance of CoG LV Mass (kg) Axis (mm) Transverse (mm) LM-3A 2,600 ±20 ±10 LM-3B 5,100 ±20 ±10 LM-3BE 5,500 ±20 ±10 LM-3C 3,800 ±20 ±10 10.6 Qualification and Acceptance Test Specifications 10.6.1 Static Loads Test (Qualification) The main SC structure should pass the static load qualification tests without damage. The test load level should not be lower than SC design load required in Paragraph 10.2.2. 10.6.2 Sinusoidal Vibration Test During sinusoidal vibration tests, the SC should be rigidly mounted on the shaker. The table below specifies the vibration amplitude and acceleration level (zero-peak) at the SC/LV interface for the SC qualification and acceptance tests. (See Figure 10-1)
  • 5. LM-3A Series Launch Vehicle User’s Manual Issue 201110-5 Test Load Frequency (Hz) Acceptance Qualification 5-8 3.11 mm 4.66 mm Longitudinal 8-100 0.8 g 1.2 g 5-8 2.33 mm 3.50 mm Lateral 8-100 0.6 g 0.9 g Scan rate (Oct/min) / 4 2 Notes: a) Frequency tolerance is allowed to be 2% b) Amplitude tolerance is allowed to be 10% c) Acceleration notching is permitted after consultation with CALT and concurred by all parties. In no case should the notched accelerations be lower than the results of coupled loads analysis on the interface plane. CALT recommends that the safety factor be ≥1.25. Figure 10-1 SC Sinusoidal Vibration Test Specification 10.6.3 Acoustic Test The qualification and acceptance levels of the acoustic test are given in the following table (also see Figure 10-2).
  • 6. LM-3A Series Launch Vehicle User’s Manual Issue 2011 10-6 Central Frequency of Octave Bandwidth (Hz) Acceptance Test Level (dB) Qualification Test Level (dB) Deviation of Test Level (dB) 31.5 124 128 63 129 133 125 134 138 250 138 142 500 133 137 1000 129 133 2000 128 132 -2 / +4 4000 127 131 -5 / +4 8000 122 126 -5 / +5 Total Acoustic Pressure Level 141.5 145.5 -1 / +3 Notes: 0 dB referenced to 2×10-5 Pa. Duration of acceptance test: one minute. Duration of qualification test: two minutes. Figure 10-2 SC Acoustic Test Specification 10.6.4 Shock Test The shock test level is specified in this Paragraph (See Figure 10-3 and 10-4). Such test shall be performed once for acceptance, and twice for qualification. A tolerance of ±6.0 dB in test specification is allowed, however, the test levels applied shall ensure that the shock
  • 7. LM-3A Series Launch Vehicle User’s Manual Issue 201110-7 response spectral analysis is at least 1/6 octave above the maximum and the response acceleration values at central frequencies shall be at least 30% greater than or equal to the nominal values given in Figures 10-3 and 10-4. Frequency (Hz) Shock Response Spectrum (Q=10) 100~1000 10.5 dB/octave 1000~4000 4000 g Figure 10-3 Shock Response Spectrum at SC/LV Separation Plane - C100 Clampband
  • 8. LM-3A Series Launch Vehicle User’s Manual Issue 2011 10-8 Figure 10-4 Shock Response Spectrum at SC/LV Separation Plane - C60 Clampband Additionally, CGWIC could also support the customer to procure low shock level separation system (clampband and the pyros) developed by European suppliers, if needed. Alternatively, the shock test can be performed through a SC/LV separation test by use of flight SC, Payload Adapter (PLA), and separation system, all being flight hardware. This test shall be performed once for acceptance, and twice for qualification. 10.6.5 Proto-flight Test If the satellite is to be launched by the LM-3A Series launch vehicles for the first time but the same type of satellite has been launched by other launch vehicles and has been environmentally tested to levels that are equal to or greater than the qualification test level described in Paragraph 10.6.1 to Paragraph 10.6.4, CALT will accept the following Proto-flight test conditions: a) Vibration test should be performed in accordance with the scan rate of the acceptance test and at the qualification test level as specified in Paragraph 10.6.2. b) Acoustic test should be performed in accordance with the test duration of the acceptance test and at the qualification test level as specified in Paragraph 10.6.3. c) Shock test should be performed once according to Paragraph 10.6.4. The test conditions for proto-flight testing should be determined by the satellite manufacturer and CALT, and should be higher than the acceptance test levels but lower than the qualification test levels.