The academic writing process and ways for Student Affairs scholar-practitioners, professionals, and graduate students to get involved with the TACUSPA Journal: www.studentaffairs.com
Becoming a Scholar and Author: Publish in the #TACUSPA Journal
1. Becoming a Scholar
and Author:
Publish in the TACUSPA
Journal
Jeff Jackson, Ed.D. @jeffjackson
Laura Pasquini, Ph.D. @laurapasquini
www.studentaffairsoncampus.com
#TACUSPA
6. 3 common thoughts:
I don't know how to start...
I'm not sure how to do it 'properly’
I don’t think I have the skills…
{Additionally: I’m in the wrong session}
7. HOW TO: Get Started as a Scholar
• Experience the Peer Review Process
• Identify Your Research Purpose/Focus/Goals
• Asking the Right Research Questions
• Search for Empirical Literature
• Design Research Methods:
o Data collection
o Data Analysis
• Interpret Findings + Practical Implications
Collaborate with Peers
11. The “Typical” SA Job Description
• Challenge and Support Learners
• Recruit, Hire, and Train Staff & Students
• Recruiting, Advising, Mediating, Teaming, etc
• Creating Programs, Projects, & More
• Check/Update social media accounts
• Participate in Committees/Counsels
• Attend Professional Conferences
• Facilitate LOADS of Meetings
• Administrative Paperwork
19. Organize ALL Your References,
Data, Thoughts, & Process
Save refs Zotero/Mendeley
Talk out loud on a podcast
Team ideas on Slack,
Blog it with Wordpress
Skype for research meetings
Use an Excel spreadsheet!
20. 3. Second-class citizen syndrome.
Stop Calling It the Dark Side (Lehfeldt, 2017, Inside Higher Ed)
21.
22. Generational Research (Stevens, 2012)
• 1st Generation
o Peer reviewed; Qualitative, Quantitative & Mixed Methods
o E.g. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice
(JSARP); Journal of College Student Development
(JCSD)
• 2nd Generation
o Peer reviewed; Qualitative, Quantitative & Mixed Methods
o E.g. Review of Educational Research
• 3rd Generation
o Might not be peer reviewed; editor/editorial board review
o E.g. About Campus
24. Academic’s top tips for publishing success
https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/academics-top-tips-publishing-success
25. • Write clearly – clarity starts with the abstract
• Put research in context – bigger issues in HE
• Justify your proposal/paper – why publish it?
• Be critical – be a ruthless self-editor
• Get involved in peer-review for journals!!
• Simplicity rules – “Explain to me like I’m 5”
• Write for a wide audience: central argument
• Tell a story: explain your key points
• Listen to the peer reviewers – take feedback
• Practice makes perfect –Always.Be.Writing.
• Settle for imperfection – remove writing roadblocks
• Network/Meet with scholars at conferences
• Choose editors & publishers wisely (books)
27. For SA Professionals to Write…
• Be Curious – Ask Questions/For Evidence
• Foster Habits – reading & writing
scholarships
• Find a Mentor – on campus, professional
organization or at a journal
• Be a Role Model – support early career
scholars-practioners!
• Collaboration – writing groups & research
teams, FTW!
(Adopted from Hattfield & Wise, 2015)
30. Write EVERY DAY to Form aHabit
The Morning Pages from The Artists Way ~ Julia Cameron www.750words.com
31.
32. Just write ONE paragraph at a time:
Evidence to
support or
refute
Reason you
should believe
this evidence
How this topic
relates to the
argument I am
making
Topic
sentence (no
quoting other
people now!)
What other
people say
about this
topic
c/o @ThesisWhisperer
33. SA Leadership for Scholarship
Directors, Managers, & SSAOS’s Need to:
• Nurture early career scholar-practitioners
• Create organizational expectations for
research, writing, & publications
• Provide professional development
• Reward scholarship efforts
• Work with graduate programs
• Promote scholarship & research at
conferences
(Hattfield & Wise, 2015)
34. “If we want people to
view themselves as
scholar practioners, we
need to foster this from
the beginning of their
professional careers.”
(Hattfield & Wise, 2015, p. 81)
35. Perhaps you need a few ideas to
get you motivated…
Open Textbook:
https://textbooks.lib.wvu.edu/badideas/index.htm
l
39. Where to Publish?
Journal of College Student Development (JCSD)
Journal of SA Research and Practice (JSARP)
Journal of College Orientation & Transition (NODA)
Career Development Quarterly (NCDA)
NACADA Journal (Academic Advising)
About Campus
The Chronicle of Higher Ed
Inside Higher Ed
43. #AcWri Tech Tools Mentioned…
Empirical Search
Scopus + Journal Metrics journalmetrics.scopus.com
SSCI Journal Index + Web of Science
Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/
Manage Your References + Storage
Mendeley https://www.mendeley.com/
Zotero https://www.zotero.org/
Dropbox https://www.dropbox.com/
Google docs https://www.google.com/docs/about/
Subscription Only
RefWorks https://www.refworks.com/ & EndNote http://endnote.com/
44.
45. #AcWri Tech Scholar Profile Sites…
Google Scholar Citations
https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/citations.html
Academia.edu https://www.academia.edu/
ResearchGate https://www.researchgate.net/
ORCiD https://orcid.org/
Figshare https://figshare.com/
Stay in touch with your team!
Slack Channel: https://slack.com/
46. A Few #AcWri Resources…
Bad Ideas About Writing
(eBook)https://textbooks.lib.wvu.edu/badideas/index.html
• PhD2Published http://www.phd2published.com/
• The Thesis Whisperer https://thesiswhisperer.com/
• PhDivas Podcast phdivaspodcast.wordpress.com
• Research Whisperer theresearchwhisperer.wordpress.com
• @BreakDrink #AcWri tips: http://breakdrink.com/
On the Twitters or Instagram? Follow these
writing/research hashtags: #phdchat, #AcWri, #gradchat,
#ShutUpAndWrite, & #ScholarSunday
47. References
• Belcher, W. L. (2009). Writing your journal article in twelve weeks: A
guide to academic publishing success. Sage.
• Delgado, A., & McGill, C. M. (2016). A guide to becoming a scholarly
practitioner in student affairs by Lisa J. Hatfield and Vicki L. Wise
(review). Journal of College Student Development, 57(7), 898-900.
• Hatfield, L. J., & Wise, V. L. (2015). A guide to becoming a scholarly
practitioner in student affairs. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
• Rocco, T. S., & Hatcher, T. G. (2011). The handbook of scholarly
writing and publishing. John Wiley & Sons.
• Silvia, P. J. (2007). How to write a lot: A practical guide to productive
academic writing. American Psychological Association.
• Wasserman, I. C., & Kram, K. E. (2009). Enacting the scholar—
practitioner role: An exploration of narratives. The Journal of Applied
Behavioral Science, 45(1), 12-38.
48. (Hatfield & Wise, 2015)
What is best
way to GET
STARTED on
your journey
to being a
scholar-
practitioner?
How will you
BEGIN to
research &
write?
49. Thanks, Y’all! WRITE ON!
Slide Deck & Resources: http://bit.ly/tacuspa17acwri
Jeff Jackson @jeffjackson Laura Pasquini @laurapasquini
JacksonJ3@uthscsa.edu Laura.Pasquini@unt.edu
#TACUSPA
Scholar-practitioners generate new knowledge to improve practice, yet how they prioritize and go about their work varies with where they are on this scholar-practitioner continuum (Wasserman & Kram, 2009). The challenge with this work is there is VERY LITTLE TIME professionals in higher ed have to do scholarly work. When you are working in an educational service role for a 12-month contract, it is a challenge to move through the research process. Wasserman and Kram (2009) observed how competencies, needs, and values align with the competing roles of the scholar-practitioner to match either the work or research interests. Scholarly habits and the writing process requires deep concentration and focus on thinking critically to endure through a research project -- from the study design, methodological planning, recruitment of participants, to publication and dissemination of findings.
We discussed the steps from submission preparation, through correspondence, and all the way to publication, including:
How to get involved in peer review and the scholarly writing process
Understanding Academic Journal Types: A, B, & C Level
Considering the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) and Scopus the journal levels
Using Google Scholar Citations & being critical with Google Scholar
Filtering with their own library databases
Understanding the scholarly publication process
Corresponding with editors & responding to peer-review
Key reason WHY papers get rejected from journals
Understanding how to conduct a systematic literature review for a research paper
Academic vs. Practitioner Conferences. From the book by Hatfield and Wise (2015), chapter three talks about presenting at professional conferences; however, none of the associations shared offer any published conference proceeding for presentations shared and are not the same as submitting a paper or academic poster for another association that is more scholarly in nature. I think Hatfield and Wise (2015) offer a decent introduction to scholarly writing for the novice student affairs professional -- but I think it is lacking in a few areas (as detailed in the podcast and notes below). If you are interested, feel free to read this book review (Delgado & McGill, 2016) and listen to our thoughts via the podcast here:
Not expected of positions and not valued - undervalued and underutilized research skills; some of these skills may have been minimal based on training, education, experience, etc. as it is not required in administrative positions
The literature review is a complex problem
Not enough reading - that is, not as knowledgeable of current research in (and out of) the field, theories, and evidence-based practices from academic outlets
Be consistent with your tagging strategy (use pick lists if possible)
Let me show you how it works in my Endnote database.... (demonstrate)
Second-class citizen syndrome - some might not have a terminal degree (Ph.D., Ed.D., etc.) or if they do, little academic scholarship has been completed beyond their dissertation work; also feel on a different level of the faculty at their institution (and often treated that way).
Stop Calling It the Dark Side
We need to stop emphasizing the things that divide the administration from the faculty and vice versa, argues Elizabeth A. Lehfeldt.
https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2017/06/14/closing-divide-between-faculty-and-administrators-essay
Inadequate academic preparation - research, evaluation and assessment training from each graduate program varies and many question skills and competency for research and publishing
Silos on campus - little interaction between departments, divisions, functions, and academic departments exist although we are trying to support the whole student.
Lack of motivation - when was the last time you saw "scholarship and research" in a practitioner's job description or expectation to participate in scholarly conferences and publishing?
We just wish we saw more of this at practitioner conferences. Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education (NASPA) also held their annual conference at the same convention center in San Antonio, TX back in March. Both Jeff and I were there, and we attended a session on publishing in the NASPA journals from this association [Sadly the new Technology in Higher Education: Emerging Practice was not represented in this session this year.] It’s not as though sessions at Student Affairs or Practitioner conferences do have a poster session, and I have seen “Research Papers” presented at ACPA Convention and NACADA has offered Research Symposiums at regional conferences. The conferences mentioned in Chapter 3 of Hatfield and Wise’s (2015) book: ACPA, NACA, NACADA, NASPA, ACUHO-I, NODA, & NIRSA
We just wish we saw more of this at practitioner conferences. Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education (NASPA) also held their annual conference at the same convention center in San Antonio, TX back in March. Both Jeff and I were there, and we attended a session on publishing in the NASPA journals from this association [Sadly the new Technology in Higher Education: Emerging Practice was not represented in this session this year.] It’s not as though sessions at Student Affairs or Practitioner conferences do have a poster session, and I have seen “Research Papers” presented at ACPA Convention and NACADA has offered Research Symposiums at regional conferences. The conferences mentioned in Chapter 3 of Hatfield and Wise’s (2015) book: ACPA, NACA, NACADA, NASPA, ACUHO-I, NODA, & NIRSA
Academic vs. Practitioner Conferences. From the book by Hatfield and Wise (2015), chapter three talks about presenting at professional conferences; however, none of the associations shared offer any published conference proceeding for presentations shared and are not the same as submitting a paper or academic poster for another association that is more scholarly in nature. I think Hatfield and Wise (2015) offer a decent introduction to scholarly writing for the novice student affairs professional -- but I think it is lacking in a few areas (as detailed in the podcast and notes below). If you are interested, feel free to read this book review (Delgado & McGill, 2016) and listen to our thoughts via the podcast here: