PsychoEducation Model - Joseph Zalman Sheppard (Science Poster).pdf

Fast processes (System 1) include beliefs (EM2)
that model sensory integrations like somatic
schemas and exteroceptive navigational land-
marks (EM10); or rationally accommodate or
schematically update unexpected sensory
feedback. Likewise, propositional attitudes
(EM8) guide navigational path integrations that
recontextualize perception and situational
awareness (EM4) or accommodate social men-
talizations (EM9) with effortful social reasoning.
“Focused attention”and“open moni-
toring”are two forms of mindfulness,
and“tuning out”and“zoning out”are
two forms of mind wandering. Rest-
ing mindfulness may be depicted as
the conscious decoupling of EM2 or
EM8 with EM10 (sensations). Whereas
dissociative mind-wandering may be
depicted as the conscious decoupling
of EM2 or EM8 with EM4 (perception).
The intrapersonal circumplex and dual internal
navigation illustration of EM-Core describe the
two primary interpersonal characteristics of
dominance and trust. Whereas the two primary
internal navigation systems of path integration
and landmark navigation are depicted diagonally.
Depression may be more associated with a decou-
pling of EM2 schema and EM10 sensory models,
and anxiety may be more associated with resis-
tance to perceived egocentric path integration.
Core-affect describes a cirumplex of
three hedonic drives (cognitive desire,
liking, and incentive salience) orthogo-
nally arranged with three types of
arousal (power, reward, and affiliation).
The three hedonic drives motivate
three columns of EM-Core cognitive
processing and the three arousal types
mediate conscious contents as a fourth
column of EMRed, EMGreen, & EMBlue.
The functional and task-driven EM-Core cognitive capacities are
dissociable into four reportable voices, including an illocutionary
(reinforcement learning)“actor”that is intentionally reportable
(EM3), a logical justification or“critic”voice that reports epistemic
feelings and epistemic judgments (EM5), an allomaternal voice
that interprets emotional experiences and feelings of attachment
(EM7), and reportable mind wandering that integrates visual and
auditory mental imagery into dream-like episodic memories (EM9).
Emotional empathy interprets syntactic meaning from three types of
arousal that mediate consciousness (intrinsic information), and cognitive
empathy intelligently applies syntactic meaning through skilled behaviour
(extrinsic information). Cognitive empathy outputs as three temporal
dynamics; (a) crystal intelligence as conceptual coherence (atemporal), (b)
co-authored autobiographical or episodic scenes (temporally extended),
and (c) fluid intelligence as somatically applied novel skill (the present
moment). Internal Merge is indexed according to dominance-subordina-
tion dynamics & external Merge is paired according to affiliation relations.
The four reportable error voices are perseverative versions of the
four reportable task-focused voices of EM-Core (EM3 reportable
intentions, EM5 reportable feelings of knowing, EM7 reportable
emotions, and EM9 reportable dreams & hallucinations). The
remaining four elements surrounding EM6 are the corner elements
that provide latent source signals (like moments in a quadrupole)
that synergize into reportable elements. These corner elements
include EM2 functional identity schemas, EM4 situational aware-
ness & perception, EM8 interoceptive somatic markers & attitudinal
propositions, and EM10 sensory integrations & instinctual urges.
Personality variations are indicative of elements that self-gener-
ate neural signals within individual EM-Core elements. Typically
allomaternal personality is situated on EM7, yet alternative
element-recursing personality constructs may self-generate
from any element with different characteristics. Each element is
internally incomplete due to Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems.
The four reportable voices of EM-Core may
be viewed as each clustering to five other
EM-Core elements. EM3 represents five
categories of intentional speech acts
associated with a hybridization of semantic
and procedural memory that directs kine-
matics and assertoric, or illocutionary, force.
EM5 epistemic logical justifications, feelings
of knowing, confidence judgments, heuris-
tic judgments, and intuitions are mediated
by epistemic secondary reward weighting.
EM5 is primarily categorized according to
five types of logical justification. Logical
justifications are typically used to rational-
ize EM3 actions expressed as illocutionary
force mediated by game theory. EM5 has
five phase transitions: (1) Machiavellian
strategies, (2) task regulation, (3) logical
justifications & the resting mind, (4) perse-
verative feedback, & (5) schizoid avoidance.
EM7 emotion-mediated personality is categorized by
the Big Five personality traits. EM7 is grounded in the
allomaternal circuit and mediates secure, avoidant,
disorganized, & anxious-ambivalent attachment styles.
EM9 language pragmatics and counter-
factual scene gestalt capacities are cate-
gorized according to five types of gestalt
integrations, as episodic coherence, and
as categories of language pragmatics
(excluding speech acts) that contextual-
ize the meaning of spoken language
according to the regulation of exterocep-
tive and interoceptive signals including
prosody, nonverbal communication,
implicature, and contextual relevance.
EM9 expresses spontaneous cognitions,
and EM3 expresses deliberate cognitions.
Chiral EM5 (mirror image) doxological
or epistemic personality is categorized
as an epistemic version of the Big Five
personality traits. The chiral version of
the Big Five personality traits is indica-
tive of the core traits associated with
Broad Autism Phenotype (BAP),
Autism, and Autism Savant Syndrome,
depending on the EM5 chiral phase
transitions of the epistemic personali-
ty in a similar pattern to non-chiral
EM5 phase-transitions. The“I”and“Me”
distinction is from William James.
The PsychoEducation Tensor (PET)® is a
diamond-shaped skew-hermitian 4x4 tensor
transformational matrix describing 16 elementary
brain processes. The PET divides into a 7-element
metacognitive component called EM-Path, repre-
sented by colours and letters, and a 9-element
cognitive component called EM-Core, represented
by numbers. The PET® describes a set of Vygotski-
an-like elementary mental processes that consti-
tute an integrated model of cognitive architecture.
The organization of the elements is consistent
with the scientific literature on mind wandering
and spontaneous cognitive processes. The PET®
was designed as a psychoeducational tool to help
reduce psychological distress and mental perplexi-
ty. The PET® further integrates with dual comple-
mentary classical and quantum models of physics.
Moreover, the PET® interfaces with dual physical
stimuli environments and socially constructed
propositional narratives. The PET® may also serve
as a minimalist program for cognitive architecture.
EM-Theory claims that conceptual and knowledge
consciousnesses are chiral and complementarity.

©, 2022
The PsychoEducation Tensor (PET)® describes a comprehensive set of 16
cognitive systems that combine Baars’(2015) division of 13 primary cognitive
systems with Trofimova and Robbins’(2016) division of 3 primary arousal
systems.“The 26 PsychoEducation Constructs”is a companion wellness
intervention that aids the learning of the 16 elemental modules, the 5-levels
of EM-Core, and the 5 Principles of APA Ethics as an EM5“Inner AI”sandbox.
Baars, B. J. (2015). Consciousness - , (8):2207.
Sheppard, J. Z. (2021). [Masters of Science
Thesis, University of Victoria]. (Provides a more in-depth account of EM-Theory)
Trofimova, I., Robbins, T. W. (2016). Temperament and arousal systems: a new synthesis of differential psychology
and functional neurochemistry. , 64, 382-402.
Developmental inner-voice speech includes social speech, private
speech, and inner speech (Vygotsky). Face expression mediates
human communication with variations in affect, informational
contexts, and cultural cues. EM-Theory subdivides four primary
categories of metacognition into a 4x4 grid of subscale capacities.

€
‚ ƒ„
†

‡ˆ
‰
ƒŠ ‹
‡
‡

‡
‰‡
‡

‡
Œ‡ƒ
‡
‡
Ž† ‡
‘ Ž† ‡
‡
Ž† ‡
Ž† ‡
‡
Ž† ‡
ƒŽ† ‡
‡
Œ‡ƒ
‡
‡
Œ‡ƒ
ƒ‡
‡
€
‡
‡
€
‡ ‡
‡
€
‡
‡
Œ
‡ˆ

‡
‡’
Œ†
‡
‡ ƒ“‡

‡
‡

‘

Œ
‚
”

ƒ
‡
ˆ ˆ
‡Ž†‡
‡ ‰‡
‡
ˆ
‡ ‡
‡‹
‡‚ ˆ
‡
ƒˆ
‡ ˆƒ
ƒŠ ‡Œ„ƒ
ƒ
ˆ ‡
ˆ

€
Œ•Œ† ‰

ˆ ‡

‚
Œ ˆ•‡

‰
Œ•–ƒ„ƒ

Œ•ˆ
Œ‡ƒ‡
ˆŠ —ˆ
ƒ ƒ
ƒ‚† ˆ ‡
„ˆ‡“
ƒ ˆ
‰‡ ˆ ‡
‚ ˆ —ƒˆ
Œ†
ƒŠ˜ ‰
ˆ

™Š˜ ‰
Œ‡ƒ‡
ˆ
Œ‡ƒ‚‡
‚
Œ Š‡
‚ ‰ •‡Œ ˆ
Narrative Ethnosphere
Physical Environment

ƒ
ƒ
š ›ƒ
ˆ
›ƒ
›ƒ
‘†
›ƒ
‡
›ƒ
ˆ
›ƒ

œƒ
ƒ
œƒ
ƒ
œƒ

”ƒ
ž
’Ÿ
’

ž¡
’¡Ÿ
’¡
ˆƒˆ
‘

‡
‘
ˆƒˆ
‘
ˆƒˆ
‘
‡„ƒ€ ‡„ƒ€ ‡„ƒ€

ƒ
ƒ
ƒ

ƒ ††•‡
‡ ˆ‚ˆ
‘ Ÿ ˆ‡
‘ ‡ ˆ
¢£¡
†† ˆƒ
•‡
•‡ƒ‡„ ƒ
‘œ‚

”
‚
ƒ
Œ
‘

ƒ ®
‰
Š
ƒ

ƒ
œ

‡
ƒ

€
‰
ƒ‡
‡
‰
–
‚ˆ
ƒ
‚ƒ
‡
—ƒ
‰‡

†
‚ƒ
Œ†
‚ƒ
‚“
‚ƒ
š’ƒ

ˆˆ
‰›ƒƒˆ‰ˆ
€ ™ ˆ
—‡
‘ƒŒ ¤—¤„‡¤
£¤
›ƒ‡‡¡‘ƒŠ ˆ € † ˆˆ
‡ ‡ˆ ¤¤‘
•‡ƒ‡„ ƒ‘’
‚‰”‚‡”‡™ƒ¤¥Œ ¤£¤
?
£
ˆ
‡ ©¤¦ žˆ ¤
›ƒƒˆ’ƒ Œ ˆ
‡
€
ƒ ƒƒ ‚ ‰‡ ’ ‡ˆ

’
ˆ ˆ
ˆ

€‚ ‚
ƒ
„ †

„ƒ†
ˆ ˆ
‡ ˆ
€‡ †
‡†
‡ †
‡ ‰†Šˆ ‹
‡ †
„‡ Œ‡†Ž

€‚

Œ ˆ
•‡‚‡
ˆƒ

ˆ ‡

‡•‡
‘
š Š
Œ†
’‡ ‡
ˆ
‹
„ †
ˆ
•‡ƒ‡
„ ƒ
ƒ
•‡

Š€
‰ •‡‰‡
¡„ §ƒ
ˆ
‡ƒ
ƒŸ ¨ˆƒˆ„ƒ€
†Ž‘
”© ¡‰ ˆ ˆ
‡ˆ† ‡ƒ¤œ‘ Š¤„™Š”š’ƒ £‘ ƒ
ˆ ˆ š’ƒ ”© ¡‰ ˆ ˆ‚ ˆˆ£
„
’

„‚‚
Š€
– ŒŠ
ƒ
ª
œˆ
ª„
Œ Š
ª‰‡
ª¦ƒ
ªŒ
¡Œ‡
‘‡

ˆ «‰¬
ˆ ¦ƒ ‡ˆ„ •‡ ¦ƒ

¦ƒ
‰ˆ‡
¦ƒ

¦ƒ
‰
¦ƒ
ˆ
¦ƒ
ˆ
Œ†
’‡ ‡
ˆ
Œ†
’‡ ‡
¦ƒ ‡ˆ
—ƒ

Œ†
’‡ ‡

‘“ ‘
‹ ‘
š ¦ƒ
ˆ

œ ˆ‘
™‰
™‘‘
™Š
™
‹ ‘
™
‘
–Š’
Œ
®
‘ ‘
š

™‘‘
ˆ ƒ
™
‘
™
—ƒ
‘
–ˆ ‘
—
ƒŠ˜
„™
ˆ
‚ ‘
ƒŠ˜
„‡
‚ ‘
ƒŠ˜ „‡

ˆ «¬
‚¤‚ƒˆ¤‚ƒ ˆ
™
ˆ ™
•‡ ¦ƒ‡
š ‡
‰
‘‡Š
Œ‡ ˆŠ
”
ˆ Œ
œƒ ˆ
„ ˆ
š
ƒ
–
‹
ˆ ‰
‰
€
š
† ˆ ™
™
‘‡ ‚ƒˆ
‰€Š
‚

‘‡ ‚ƒˆ
ˆ

•
ˆ‹‡
• ˆ
‚ƒˆ
The Shadow Triad of grandiose narcissism, Machiavellianism, and
psychopathy (hypo-allomaternal orientation) or type-A personality
(hyper-allomaternal orientation) further emerge as competitive
reward-seeking dominates EM-Core behaviours. Five manifestations
of EM-Core correspond to five phase transitions of EM5 epistemic
supervised learning styles, from over-amalgamated to fragmented.

‰ ƒ
‡ ‚ † ‚ „
€
ˆ
‚
‚ ‘
‘
€
ˆ
„‡
ˆˆ
‡
‘

‘
ˆ
ˆ
•€
ƒ
ˆ™Š˜
Œ ‡
ƒ ƒ
‰ˆ‡
ˆ

ˆ
ƒ
‰™Š˜
‘ ‚

œ‡Œ
‰™Š˜
Œ ‡
ƒ ‚
ˆŠ ‡
‚“
ˆ„ Š
„ ƒ ‚
‚

•

ˆ

œ

‡

®
ƒ†
‚“

•®
Š
‚“
ƒ
«‰¬®
„ƒ
‘ˆ
ƒ
« ƒ¬®
„ƒ
ƒŠ
ˆ
‚‡‚

‡

‰

‡

œ

‡

‚

†
ˆ
ˆ
¦ƒ
”
œ ˆ
ƒ
•‡
¦ƒ
š

™
‚
Š
”
‰
€ƒ‹

„
ˆ
Œ‡

„‚‡
ƒ
‚†

„
™Š˜
ƒ
‚“
„

Œ‡

«’
‚¬ˆ
”Š’
—ƒŠ

Œ Š–
Œ Š
ˆ
„‡
Œ Š
Žˆ
‰
Œ Š
ƒ
ˆ
Œ Š
–ƒ
‚ƒ
‰ˆ‡

•Š¡«‚
Œ˜ ¬–
ƒ

‰ ƒ™ƒ ƒ

€
‚
””ˆˆ
‰‡
—
‰ €‡
€‡
‚“
‚
‰‡
—
‰ €
€‡
‚“
‚
Œ ƒ
”
€
‘ ‰
‚
œ
• €
„ƒ ƒ
Šˆ ‡

‘
™ƒ ƒ
‰‡

‡ˆ
–ƒ€
Œ
”
ƒ
‰ ƒ
‡
‚ƒ ƒ ‡ ƒ‡
Œ ƒ ‰
‚®„ƒ ‡
ˆˆ
‚ƒˆ ‰
ˆ
‰
ƒ
‰
‰
’
•œ

’
œ•

’ˆ
’
’

‚ƒˆ
ƒ‡
Œƒˆ

‡ ‘
’
œ‡

‘
‚

€

‰

‡

Œ

‘

ˆ

‘

ƒ

‡

ˆ

‰

‡

„ Š
ˆ
š
‡Œƒˆ
™ƒ ˆ
š
’
ˆƒ‘
• ƒ
ž‡™ƒ
’ ‡
•–‡
„ Š
Œ
’‚ƒ •
Œ

‡ˆ ”
””ƒ ‡ •‡ƒ‡‡ˆ
‰
‡
œƒ ‡
Œ

€
‡
€ˆ
„
‚‡ˆ
„‡ƒ®”
ƒ
„‡ƒ
¦ƒ
ˆ
‰ˆ
ˆ
„‡ƒ
ˆ
„‡ƒ®”ƒ

Žˆ ‘Š ƒ‘
ˆ ƒƒƒ
ƒˆˆ„
Žˆ ”ƒ ‡
Ž† ‡
‰‡
ƒ
‰‡
–ƒ ˆˆ
•‡ˆˆ
–Š ˆˆ
‰ ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
”

‚
ƒ
Œ
‘

®

„

ƒ

‚

„
‚

‘

ƒ

š

‡

†
ƒ‡™ƒ™
‘ ƒ
™ ‡™
‘ ƒ
ž‡™ƒž™‘ ƒ
‰

‡
•
ˆ
€ ƒ
‚ƒ
™

†« ˆ¬ ˆ† ¡
’ ‡

‰‡
‡
‡
™
€

™

€

ž™
€
„‚€
’ ‡
Œ
ƒ‘
”ˆ §ƒŠ
‘
ƒ

‘
Š¥

‘
ƒ

‘
Š
‚ˆ
ˆ
Œ
Œ
ˆ Œƒ
Œ‡ƒ
ˆ
Œ
„ƒ ‡
‚ƒ
†
‘
ƒ

‚ƒ
†
‘
ƒ

ƒ‘
œ‡
–ƒ

” ¤ ¤
‚ƒ
‡Œ

– ‘
œ‡
Œ†
™
ˆ‹
ˆ
Œ† œ‡
€ ƒ
ž¨ ‘š†
ˆ‘ˆ‰ˆ‡ ƒ“
™¨–ƒ «‘ ¬™Š
•Žˆ ‡
„‚¨Œ‡
‚‡
Œ Š
ƒ
™¨– ”ƒ œ‡
ƒŒ
ˆˆ‚†‰
‘ ƒ
EM-Core includes five phase transition configura-
tions from high to low internal elemental integra-
tion. The five EM-Core levels correspond to four
large-scale brain networks including the CEN (1st
5th), the DAN (2nd), the DMN (3rd), and the VAN
(SN) (2nd). For example, the dorsolateral prefrontal
cortex of the CEN is implicated in either deliberate
on-task contextual decision-making when
engaged in task processing (DAN), or spontaneous
off-task contextual mind wandering when
engaged with personal saliences (VAN/SN).
M
e
n
t
a
l
S
e
t
-
S
h
i
f
t
i
n
g
C
o
g
n
i
t
i
v
e
E
m
p
a
t
h
y
(
T
r
a
n
s
l
a
t
e
s
M
e
a
n
i
n
g
i
n
t
o
P
r
o
b
l
e
m
S
o
l
v
i
n
g
)
E
m
o
t
i
o
n
a
l
E
m
p
a
t
h
y
(
T
r
a
n
s
c
r
i
b
e
s
M
e
a
n
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
A
r
o
u
s
a
l
)
E
m
p
a
t
h
i
c
R
e
s
o
n
a
n
c
e
‚Š
Œ Š
ˆ ¤
’ ‡ˆ¤
‡
‰‡
Œ
‰ˆˆ
‚ƒŠ‡
–Š
’ ‡ˆ
œ
£™
‚‡ ¤‰
™Š˜ Œ ‡¤
’ ‡
ˆ
€
„ ™
‚ƒ
œ
‚
€ ƒ
–‡ ‚ƒ
‘ ˆ

‘
‰‡
‚ƒ

Œ Š
‰
¤ ‚‡ ¤
”ˆ ¤
Žˆ

™Š˜ Œ ‡¤
ƒ‚†¤
‡ ¤
ƒ
ˆ
Œ Š
ˆ

‚ˆ ƒ
‰
„‡ € ˆ
‚ƒ ¤ ˆ „‡¤
ˆ
Œ Š
‘ˆ–ƒ
‰ˆ‡–ƒ‚ƒ
‰ˆ‡¤—ƒ ¤
’ ‡¤
”
S
e
n
s
e
Sense
M
eaning
M
e
a
n
i
n
g
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
K
i
n
e
t
i
c
A
r
o
u
s
a
l
A
f
fi
l
i
a
t
e
A
r
o
u
s
a
l
T
a
s
k
S
e
t
-
S
h
i
f
t
i
n
g
‚

‘
Œ
”
ƒ

Œ Š
„‡Ž†‡
¦ƒ ‡ˆ¤
•‡ ¦ƒ ¤
ƒ‡
‰
‰– ‰¤
”Š —ƒŠ¤
•‡ƒ‡„ ƒ
† ‡
I
n
v
a
r
i
a
n
t
O
b
j
e
c
t
S
e
t
-
S
h
i
f
t
i
n
g
„‡
„ ‡
‰‰ Š¤
–ƒ’ ‡ˆ
‚
€
Šƒ
™ ’
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
®
€

‰‡¤
ˆŠ ‡¤
ƒ ƒ

J
o
s
e
p
h
Z
a
l
m
a
n
S
h
e
p
p
a
r
d
,
2
0
2
2
‰

ƒ

®
E
p
i
s
t
e
m
i
c
C
o
l
u
m
n
E
p
i
s
o
d
i
c
C
o
l
u
m
n
E
m
b
o
d
i
e
d
C
o
l
u
m
n

‡

‘

•

‡
E
m
p
a
t
h
i
c
C
o
l
u
m
n

ˆŠ «¬
¤‚ƒˆ¤‚ ˆ
™
‡–
‚‡Š
•
¦ƒ
œƒ ˆ
•
’ ‰‡
‡„

ƒ
‡‰
‰
€
• ƒ
‰
‚ƒˆ
‚€ƒ‚ˆŠ ‘‡
‘‡
‚€ƒ‚ˆŠ
‚ ƒ‚ ˆ
ˆ ˆŠ
ˆ
‡
ˆ
‚ƒ
‘

„

‡

™
Š
˜

Œ

‡

„

‚

ˆ

‡

ˆ

™
Š
˜

‚ „
„ ‰
„ ‰ˆ‡
‚ ‘ˆ‡
„ ‹ Œ‡
‚ ƒ‹
„¨“ƒ‚ ˆˆ ‚¨ƒ‚ˆ
Œ Š
‰
ƒ
ˆƒ
Œ Š
ˆ
Œ Š
‘ˆ
Œ Š
„‡
Ž†‡
€

€

‰
„‡
‡ ‘
R
e
c
o
h
e
r
e
n
c
e
P
H
I
(
I
n
t
r
i
n
s
i
c
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
)
(I
n
te
g
ra
te
d
In
fo
rm
a
ti
o
n
T
h
e
o
ry
)
›ƒƒˆ
™Š
›ƒƒˆˆ ƒ‡
Œš †
›ƒƒˆ

ƒ
šŽ†Ž†
‡™
›ƒƒˆ
ˆ ƒ
Ž† ˆ‡
š †
ˆ ›ƒƒˆ
š
š † ˆ ˆ‡
Ž†„
™Š
›ƒƒˆ
‰ˆ
œ‡œ‘‡
ˆ
›ƒƒˆ
ˆˆƒ
‡
›ƒƒˆ
‡ˆ
• ‹
D
e
c
o
h
e
r
e
n
c
e
(
E
x
t
r
i
n
s
i
c
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
)
‚

‘
Œ
”
ƒ

›ƒ
(Consciousness as
9th Hybrid State)
P
H
I
P
H
I
›ƒ
Q
u
b
i
t
#
2
(T
w
o
S
ta
te
s

O
n
e
H
y
b
ri
d
)
Q
u
b
i
t
#
3
Q
u
b
i
t
#
1
(e
.g
.,
E
M
4

E
M
1
0
+
E
M
7
S
in
g
le
8
-
S
ta
te
Q
u
d
it
(E
M
2
-
E
M
1
0
R
o
ta
ti
n
g
A
ro
u
n
d
H
y
b
ri
d
E
M
6
)
E
n
c
o
d
e
s
T
h
re
e
Q
u
b
it
s
Q
u
a
n
t
u
m
C
o
m
p
u
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
i
t
y
P
E
T
T
e
n
s
o
r
®
1
s
t
L
e
v
e
l
E
M
-
C
o
re
A
c
ts
a
s
T
h
re
e
Q
u
b
it
s

5
th
L
e
v
e
l
E
M
-
C
o
re
A
c
ts
a
s
O
n
e
8
-
S
ta
te
Q
u
d
it
T
h
e
5
E
M
-
C
o
re
L
e
v
e
ls
C
o
o
re
s
p
o
n
d
to
th
e
F
iv
e
F
re
u
d
e
n
th
a
l-
K
a
n
to
r
T
ri
p
le
S
y
s
te
m
s
(K
-
F
K
T
S
)
R
a
n
k
s
fo
r
3
-
Q
u
b
it
E
n
ta
n
g
le
m
e
n
t

€

‚

ƒ

‚
€
„

™ ˆŠ ˆ
‡
ˆ —‡
—‹
›ƒƒˆ ›ƒ
ƒ‹‡‘ƒ
ˆ¨™Š‡
ˆ ˆ
‰ ˆ

EM-Theory was developed soley by Joseph Zalman Sheppard ©, 2012-2022.All Rights Reserved.
EM-Theory Dyad Aspect-Seeing:
EMA/EMB = Nonlinear Inner Eye/Scribe
Metacognitive Conceptual Observer
EM6/EM2 = Linear Inner Ear/Voice
Cognitive Knowledge Reference Frame
(Conceptualizations of Observer Independent Tensor
Transitions (EMA/EMB) Dualistic Knowledge of
Observer Dependent Complementarities
(EM6/EM2) as Dyad Aspect-Seeing is the
Primary Perspective of EM-Theory)
ƒ„ „
‚ † ‡
† ˆ‰Š €ƒ ‰
‹ƒ„ ‰„ ‰
‡ ‰ ‰ „
‰ Šƒ ‰ ‰
„ ‰ ‰
‰Œ€Ž‘ ‰ ‚
’‰ƒŠ‰ƒ
ˆ „ ‚
Šƒ ‰
‚‡ €Š ‰‰
ˆ „ ‡‰ €
‰‰„‰ €Š
Š‹ ‰ ‰ƒƒ Š
Š€‰Œ„

‚“ ƒˆ €
‡
‘
ƒ• ‡
‚ƒ‘ƒ ˆ™ ‡ — ‘
‡‘¤• ‡®ƒ¤‰ ®’‡
œ ‚ƒ
‘ ˆ
‚ƒ
‚ƒ

Œ
Œ†
™ ˆ‹
ˆŒ†
™ ˆ‹
œ

ƒ

‚

ƒ
‰

‚ƒ

ƒ
„‡ˆ

ƒˆ¨— ‘Œ†¨‚ƒ
ƒ ‚
™
‰ ‰ ƒˆ €

ƒ

€„

†
‡ˆ
‡‰
‡
Š
ƒ

‹

ƒ

€„

Œ

€
†
Ž‘

’
ˆ
Ž‘‡‘Ž‡Ž‘€

‘

“

‰
”Ž•€

–
’

—€

’
‰ ”Ž•€ – ’
‰ ”Ž•€
– ’
—€ ’
ˆ Ž‘‡‘Ž‡Ž‘€ ‘
—€ ’ ˆ Ž‘‡‘Ž‡Ž‘€ ‘
† Ž‘
’
‰˜™
”

˜š
ˆ Žˆ
‘ Œ‡ƒ‡
—ƒ
Œ ‚‡
‹
‰‡
Š
ˆš
‘† Žˆ
‚‘‘®‚‘—‘
ƒ‚‡
Š
‘ŠŽˆ
‰‡
ƒ
œƒ ‡
‰‡
ƒ † ƒ
„ Š –ƒ
‰ Œ‡ƒ
™Šˆ ƒ
˜

’

˜
‚

šŽ

˜

„

’

˜

˜˜

’

€›

‹

–
„

‹
‚€„

˜–

€„
œ

Š

ƒ
‚
š

‚

€ ‚€„Ž
€„
œ

†
ƒ
‚
š

ƒ
œ

‘ —Š
ˆ
‘ —Š ‘ —Š
‘ —Š
™ ˆ

Žˆ
ˆ
‚‡
ƒ
‚†
™ ˆ
‘
ˆ
„ Š
‚ƒ

ž

™

˜

–

™’

˜

–

š Ž
š ƒ €

™
™
‰

‡”ƒ

”ƒ

•ˆ ƒˆ
X
X
X
X
Ž

–
Ÿ

‚„

PHI
PHI
PHI
– ” Ž
˜ €› ƒ
€
‚€„ˆ‡€„‰‡
€„†

†¡¡

”

€¢

€¢

˜

ƒŽ

Maimonides
(1190)
“
‰”
Ž
Fast processes (System 1) include beliefs (EM2)
that model sensory integrations like somatic
schemas and exteroceptive navigational land-
marks (EM10); or rationally accommodate or
schematically update unexpected sensory
feedback. Likewise, propositional attitudes
(EM8) guide navigational path integrations that
recontextualize perception and situational
awareness (EM4) or accommodate social men-
talizations (EM9) with effortful social reasoning.
“Focused attention”and“open moni-
toring”are two forms of mindfulness,
and“tuning out”and“zoning out”are
two forms of mind wandering. Rest-
ing mindfulness may be depicted as
the conscious decoupling of EM2 or
EM8 with EM10 (sensations). Whereas
dissociative mind-wandering may be
depicted as the conscious decoupling
of EM2 or EM8 with EM4 (perception).
The intrapersonal circumplex and dual internal
navigation illustration of EM-Core describe the
two primary interpersonal characteristics of
dominance and trust. Whereas the two primary
internal navigation systems of path integration
and landmark navigation are depicted diagonally.
Depression may be more associated with a decou-
pling of EM2 schema and EM10 sensory models,
and anxiety may be more associated with resis-
tance to perceived egocentric path integration.
Core-affect describes a cirumplex of
three hedonic drives (cognitive desire,
liking, and incentive salience) orthogo-
nally arranged with three types of
arousal (power, reward, and affiliation).
The three hedonic drives motivate
three columns of EM-Core cognitive
processing and the three arousal types
mediate conscious contents as a fourth
column of EMRed, EMGreen, EMBlue.
The functional and task-driven EM-Core cognitive capacities are
dissociable into four reportable voices, including an illocutionary
(reinforcement learning)“actor”that is intentionally reportable
(EM3), a logical justification or“critic”voice that reports epistemic
feelings and epistemic judgments (EM5), an allomaternal voice
that interprets emotional experiences and feelings of attachment
(EM7), and reportable mind wandering that integrates visual and
auditory mental imagery into dream-like episodic memories (EM9).
Emotional empathy interprets syntactic meaning from three types of
arousal that mediate consciousness (intrinsic information), and cognitive
empathy intelligently applies syntactic meaning through skilled behaviour
(extrinsic information). Cognitive empathy outputs as three temporal
dynamics; (a) crystal intelligence as conceptual coherence (atemporal), (b)
co-authored autobiographical or episodic scenes (temporally extended),
and (c) fluid intelligence as somatically applied novel skill (the present
moment). Internal MERGE is indexed according to dominance-subordina-
tion dynamics external MERGE is paired according to affiliation relations.
The four reportable error voices are perseverative versions of the
four reportable task-focused voices of EM-Core (EM3 reportable
intentions, EM5 reportable feelings of knowing, EM7 reportable
emotions, and EM9 reportable dreams hallucinations). The
remaining four elements surrounding EM6 are the corner elements
that provide latent source signals (like moments in a quadrupole)
that synergize into reportable elements. These corner elements
include EM2 functional identity schemas, EM4 situational aware-
ness perception, EM8 interoceptive somatic markers attitudinal
propositions, and EM10 sensory integrations instinctual urges.
Personality variations are indicative of elements that self-gener-
ate neural signals within individual EM-Core elements. Typically
allomaternal personality is situated on EM7, yet alternative
element-recursing personality constructs may self-generate
from any element with different characteristics. Each element is
internally incomplete due to Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems.
The four reportable voices of EM-Core may
be viewed as each clustering to five other
EM-Core elements. EM3 represents five
categories of intentional speech acts
associated with a hybridization of semantic
and procedural memory that directs kine-
matics and assertoric, or illocutionary, force.
EM5 epistemic logical justifications, feelings
of knowing, confidence judgments, heuris-
tic judgments, and intuitions are mediated
by epistemic secondary reward weighting.
EM5 is primarily categorized according to
five types of logical justification. Logical
justifications are typically used to rational-
ize EM3 actions expressed as illocutionary
force mediated by game theory. EM5 has
five phase transitions: (1) Machiavellian
strategies, (2) task regulation, (3) logical
justifications the resting mind, (4) perse-
verative feedback, (5) schizoid avoidance.
EM7 emotion-mediated personality is categorized by
the Big Five personality traits. EM7 is grounded in the
allomaternal circuit and mediates secure, avoidant,
disorganized, anxious-ambivalent attachment styles.
EM9 language pragmatics and counter-
factual scene gestalt capacities are cate-
gorized according to five types of gestalt
integrations, as episodic coherence, and
as categories of language pragmatics
(excluding speech acts) that contextual-
ize the meaning of spoken language
according to the regulation of exterocep-
tive and interoceptive signals including
prosody, nonverbal communication,
implicature, and contextual relevance.
EM9 expresses spontaneous cognitions,
and EM3 expresses deliberate cognitions.
Chiral EM5 (mirror image) doxological
or epistemic personality is categorized
as an epistemic version of the Big Five
personality traits. The chiral version of
the Big Five personality traits is indica-
tive of the core traits associated with
Broad Autism Phenotype (BAP),
Autism, and Autism Savant Syndrome,
depending on the EM5 chiral phase
transitions of the epistemic personali-
ty in a similar pattern to non-chiral
EM5 phase-transitions. The“I”and“Me”
distinction is from William James.
The PsychoEducation Tensor (PET)® is a
diamond-shaped skew-hermitian 4x4 tensor
transformational matrix describing 16 elementary
brain processes. The PET divides into a 7-element
metacognitive component called EM-Path, repre-
sented by colours and letters, and a 9-element
cognitive component called EM-Core, represented
by numbers. The PET® describes a set of Vygotski-
an-like elementary mental processes that consti-
tute an integrated model of cognitive architecture.
The organization of the elements is consistent
with the scientific literature on mind wandering
and spontaneous cognitive processes. The PET®
was designed as a psychoeducational tool to help
reduce psychological distress and mental perplexi-
ty. The PET® further integrates with dual comple-
mentary classical and quantum models of physics.
Moreover, the PET® interfaces with dual physical
stimuli environments and socially constructed
propositional narratives. The PET® may also serve
as a minimalist program for cognitive architecture.
EM-Theory claims that conceptual and knowledge
consciousnesses are chiral and complementarity.

©, 2021(Reg. #1193277)
The PsychoEducation Tensor (PET)® describes a set of 16 cognitive systems that
combine Baars’(2015) division of 13 primary cognitive systems with Trofimova
and Robbins’(2016) division of 3 primary arousal systems. Within the 4x4 PET, a
3x3 cognitive architecture called EM-Core (EM2-EM10) can morph between five
phase-transitions, and may further optimize, or self-sandbox, according to the
Five Principles of APA Ethics. Metacognitive training may facilitate acquiring an
internal working model (Bowlby) of the PET as a theraputic memory palace.
Baars, B. J. (2015). Consciousness - , (8):2207.
Sheppard, J. Z. (2021). [Masters of Science
Thesis, University of Victoria]. (Provides a more in-depth account of EM-Theory)
Trofimova, I., Robbins, T. W. (2016). Temperament and arousal systems: a new synthesis of differential psychology
and functional neurochemistry. , 64, 382-402.
Developmental inner-voice speech includes social speech, private
speech, and inner speech (Vygotsky). Face expression mediates
human communication with variations in affect, informational
contexts, and cultural cues. EM-Theory subdivides four primary
categories of metacognition into a 4x4 grid of subscale capacities.

‚‡

€
‚ ƒ„
†

‡ˆ
‰
ƒŠ ‹
‡
‡

‡
‰‡
‡

‡
Œ‡ƒ
‡
‡
Ž† ‡
‘ Ž† ‡
‡
Ž† ‡
Ž† ‡
‡
Ž† ‡
ƒŽ† ‡
‡
Œ‡ƒ
‡
‡
Œ‡ƒ
ƒ‡
‡
€
‡
‡
€
‡ ‡
‡
€
‡
‡
Œ
‡ˆ

‡
‡’
Œ†
‡
‡ ƒ“‡

‡
‡

‘

Œ
‚
”

ƒ
‡
ˆ ˆ
‡Ž†‡
‡ ‰‡
‡
ˆ
‡ ‡
‡‹
‡‚ ˆ
‡
ƒˆ
‡ ˆƒ
•‡ˆ
’ ‡ˆ
€ ƒ
’ ‡ˆ
‘
’ ‡ˆ
ƒ
’ ‡ˆ
ƒŠ ‡Œ„ƒ
ƒ
ˆ ‡
ˆ

€
Œ•Œ† ‰

ˆ ‡

‚
Œ ˆ•‡

‰
Œ•–ƒ„ƒ

Œ•ˆ
Œ‡ƒ‡
ˆŠ —ˆ
ƒ ƒ
ƒ‚† ˆ ‡
„ˆ‡“
ƒ ˆ
‰‡ ˆ ‡
‚ ˆ —ƒˆ
Œ†
ƒŠ˜ ‰
ˆ

™Š˜ ‰
Œ‡ƒ‡
ˆ
Œ‡ƒ‚‡
‚
Œ Š‡
‚ ‰ •‡Œ ˆ
Narrative Ethnosphere
Physical Environment

ƒ
ƒ
š ›ƒ
ˆ
›ƒ
›ƒ
‘†
›ƒ
‡
›ƒ
ˆ
›ƒ

œƒ
ƒ
œƒ
ƒ
œƒ

”ƒ
ž
’Ÿ
’

ž¡
’¡Ÿ
’¡
ˆƒˆ
‘

‡
‘
ˆƒˆ
‘
ˆƒˆ
‘
‡„ƒ€ ‡„ƒ€ ‡„ƒ€

ƒ
ƒ
ƒ

ƒ ††•‡
‡ ˆ‚ˆ
‘ Ÿ ˆ‡
‘ ‡ ˆ
¢£¡
†† ˆƒ
•‡
ˆŠ ˆ Šœƒ
‘ ƒ —ˆ
•‡ƒ‡„ ƒ ˆ ¤
‘œ‚

”
‚
ƒ
Œ
‘

ƒ ®
‰
Š
ƒ

ƒ
œ

‡
ƒ

€
‰
ƒ‡
‡
‰
–
‚ˆ
ƒ
‚ƒ
‡
—ƒ
‰‡

†
‚ƒ
Œ†
‚ƒ
‚“
‚ƒ
š’ƒ

ˆˆ
‰›ƒƒˆ‰ˆ
€ ™ ˆ
—‡
‘ƒŒ ¤—¤„‡¤
£¤
›ƒ‡‡¡‘ƒŠ ˆ € † ˆˆ
‡ ‡ˆ ¤¤‘
•‡ƒ‡„ ƒ‘’
‚‰”‚‡”‡™ƒ¤¥Œ ¤£¤
?
£
ˆ
‡ ©¤¦ žˆ ¤
›ƒƒˆ’ƒ Œ ˆ
‡
¬¬
ƒ ƒƒ ‚ ‰‡ ’ ‡ˆ

’
ˆ ˆ
ˆ

€‚ ‚
ƒ
„ †

„ƒ†
ˆ ˆ
‡ ˆ
€‡ †
‡† ‰‡
†
‡ ‰†Šˆ•‹‘
‡ Šˆ• ‘
„‡–†—Œ‡–Ž—

€‚

Œ ˆ
•‡‚‡
ˆƒ

ˆ ‡

‡•‡
‘
ˆ
‹
„ †
ˆ
•‡ƒ‡
„ ƒ
ƒ
•‡

Š€
«‰‚‰¬ •‡
¡„ §ƒ
ˆ
‡ƒ
ƒŸ ¨ˆƒˆ„ƒ€
†Ž‘
–”© ¡‰ ˆ ˆ
™œ ‡ ‡
‡ˆ† ‡ƒ¤œ‘ Š¤„™Š”š’ƒ £‘ ƒ
ˆ ˆ š’ƒ ”© ¡‰ ˆ ˆ‚ œ‡ £
„’

„
‚‚
ƒ •‡‚‰ Š€
‚– ŒŠ
ƒ
ª
œˆ
ª„
Œ Š
ª‰‡
ª¦ƒ
ªŒ
¡Œ‡
‘‡ƒƒ‰ ƒ
š Š
Œ†
’‡ ‡
œˆ
— ‚ƒ ™
„ Œ Š
ƒ‚‡‚ ƒŠ
‰‡
ˆ„‚ ƒ
¦ƒ
‰ ƒ
Œ ¡
Œ‡ ‘‡
‰– ‚ ƒŠ
ˆ œ
„•‚ˆ „ ˆ‰ˆ
‰‘Š
€ ‰–
ˆ
„”ˆ
‚ Š¦
¦š ‚ƒ«ƒ ¬
„ ‡ƒ—‰
‚
‰ ‰ƒˆ
‰
‚ƒ „ƒƒ‚
ƒ‰‰
’ ‡
ˆ

‰
™Š˜
Œ ‡
•
‡‡‡š‡
Œ ¡ Œ —
œ‡‡™Š˜
‡ ‡ Œ Š

ƒ‹

œ•‡„Œ
‚ ƒ ¦ƒ
šˆ

ˆ «‰¬
ˆ ¦ƒ ‡ˆ„ •‡ ¦ƒ

¦ƒ
‰ˆ‡
¦ƒ

¦ƒ
‰
¦ƒ
ˆ
¦ƒ
ˆ
Œ†
’‡ ‡
ˆ
Œ†
’‡ ‡
¦ƒ ‡ˆ
—ƒ

Œ†
’‡ ‡

‘‘
‹ ‘
š ¦ƒ
ˆ

œ ˆ‘
™‰
™‘‘
™Š
™
‹ ‘
™
‘
–Š’
Œ
®
‘ ‘
š

™‘‘
ˆ ƒ
™
‘
™
—ƒ
‘
–ˆ ‘
— ‘
ƒŠ˜
„™
ˆ
‚ ‘
ƒŠ˜ „‡
‚ ‘
ƒŠ˜ „‡

ˆ «¬
‚¤‚ƒˆ¤‚ƒ ˆ
™
ˆ ™
•‡ ¦ƒ‡
š ‡
‰
‘‡Š
Œ‡ ˆŠ
”
ˆ Œ
œƒ ˆ
„ ˆ
š
ƒ
–
‹
ˆ ‰
‰
€
š
† ˆ ™
™
‘‡ ‚ƒˆ
‰€Š
‚
— ƒ
‘‡ ‚ƒˆ
ˆ

•
ˆ‹‡
• ˆ
‚ƒˆ
The Dark Triad of grandiose narcissism, Machiavellianism (Five-Factor
Model), and psychopathy (hypo-allomaternal orientation), or type-A
personality (hyper-allomaternal orientation) further emerge as compet-
itive reward-seeking dominates EM-Core behaviours. Five phase-transi-
tions of EM-Core correspond to five expressions of EM5 supervised
learning, from over-amalgamated columns to fragmented elements.

‰ ƒ
‡ ‚ † ‚ „
€
ˆ
‚
‚ ‘
‘
€
ˆ
„‡
ˆˆ
‡
‘
ˆ
‚‡‡

‘
‚‡‡
ˆ
ˆ
•€
ƒ
ˆ™Š˜
Œ ‡
ƒ ƒ
‰ˆ‡
ˆ

ˆ
ƒ
‰™Š˜
‘ ‚

œ‡Œ
‰™Š˜
Œ ‡
ƒ ‚
ˆŠ ‡
‚“
ˆ„ Š
„ ƒ ‚
‚

•

ˆ

œ

‡

®
ƒ†
‚“

•®
Š
‚“
ƒ
«‰¬ƒŠ®
„ƒ
‘ˆ
ƒ
« ƒ¬ƒŠ®
„ƒ
ƒŠ
ˆ
‚‡‚

‡

‰

‡

œ

‡

‚
«™‡¬
«‚‡¬
«€
ƒ‡¬
‚†
‚–‡
–ƒ ‚
‚†

ˆ
ˆ
„‡Ž†‡«
‚¬¦ƒ
”
œ ˆ
™ƒ
™ †
– •‡
¦ƒ
š

™
‚
Š
”
‰ –
›ƒ®—
€ƒ
ƒ ƒŒ

„
ˆ
Œ‡

„‚‡
ƒ
‚†

„«‚“ ¬
™Š˜ ¤
¤
«’
‚¬ˆ
”Š’
—ƒŠ
ƒ
ƒŠ˜ ™
ˆ
‚‡ˆ
ƒŠ˜ „‡
‚‡
ƒŠ˜ „‡
„„

¤¤
‘ ˆ

Œ Š–
Œ Š
ˆ
„‡
Œ‰ƒ
Œ Š
Žˆ
‰
ƒ
Œ Š
ƒ
ˆ
ˆƒ
Œ Š
–ƒ
‚ƒ
‰ˆ‡
‚ƒ ‡

•Š¡«‚
Œ˜ ¬–
ƒ
ŒŒ Š

‰ ƒ™ƒ ƒ

€
‚
””ˆˆ
‰Œ”
—
‰ €‡
€Œ”
‚“
‚
‰Œ”
—
‰ €
€Œ”
‚“
‚
Œ ƒ
”
€
‘ ‰
‚
œ
• €
„ƒ ƒ
Šˆ ‡

‘
™ƒ ƒ
‰‡

‡ˆ
–ƒ€
Œ
”
ƒ
‰ ƒ
‡
‚ƒ ƒ ‡ ƒ‡
Œ ƒ ‰
‚®„ƒ ‡
ˆˆ
‚ƒˆ ‰
’
•œ

’
œ•

’ˆ
’
’
™Š˜
„ƒ
‚‡ˆ
ƒŠ˜
„ƒ
‚‡ˆ
ˆ ¤

‚ƒˆ
ƒ‡
Œƒˆ

‡ ‘
’
œ‡

‘
‚

€

‰

‡

Œ

‘

ˆ

‘

ƒ

‡

ˆ

‰

‡

„ Š
™ƒ ˆ
š
’
ž‡™ƒ
’ ‡
•–‡
„ Š
Œ
’‚ƒ •
Œ
ˆ
š
‡Œƒˆ
ˆƒ‘
• ƒ

‡ˆ ”
””ƒ ‡ •‡ƒ‡‡ˆ
‰
‡
œƒ ‡
Œ

€
‡
€ˆ
„
‚‡ˆ
„‡ƒ®”
ƒ
„‡ƒ
¦ƒ
ˆ
‰ˆ
ˆ
„‡ƒ
ˆ
„‡ƒ®”ƒ

Žˆ ‘Š ƒ‘
ˆ ƒƒƒ
ƒˆˆ„
Žˆ ”ƒ ‡
Ž† ‡
‰‡
ƒ
‰‡
–ƒ ˆˆ
•‡ˆˆ
–Š ˆˆ
‰ ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
”

‚
ƒ
Œ
‘

®

„

ƒ

‚

„
‚

‘

ƒ

š

‡

†
ƒ‡™ƒ™
‘ ƒ
™ ‡™
‘ ƒ
ž‡™ƒž™‘ ƒ
‰

‡
•
ˆ
€ ƒ
‚ƒ
™

†« ˆ¬ ˆ† ¡
’ ‡

‰‡
‡
‡
™
€

™

€

ž™
€
„‚€
’ ‡
Œ
ƒ‘
”ˆ §ƒŠ
‘
ƒ

‘
Š¥

‘
ƒ

‘
Š
‚ˆ
ˆ
Œ
Œ
ˆ Œƒ
Œ‡ƒ
ˆ
Œ
„ƒ ‡
‚ƒ
†
‘
ƒ

‚ƒ
†
‘
ƒ

ƒ‘
œ‡
–ƒ

” ¤ ¤
‚ƒ
‡Œ

– ‘
œ‡
Œ†
™
ˆ‹
ˆ
Œ† œ‡
€ ƒ
ž¨ ‘š†
ˆ‘ˆ‰ˆ‡ ƒ“
™¨–ƒ «‘ ¬™Š
•Žˆ ‡
„‚¨Œ‡
‚‡
Œ Š
ƒ
™¨– ”ƒ œ‡
ƒŒ
ˆˆ‚†‰
‘ ƒ
‡ ‡
‘‡ ‡
EM-Core includes five phase transition configura-
tions from high to low internal elemental integra-
tion. The five EM-Core levels correspond to four
large-scale brain networks including the CEN (1st
5th), the DAN (2nd), the DMN (3rd), and the VAN
(SN) (2nd). For example, the dorsolateral prefrontal
cortex of the CEN is implicated in either deliberate
on-task contextual decision-making when
engaged in task processing (DAN), or spontaneous
off-task contextual mind wandering when
engaged with personal saliences (VAN/SN).
M
e
n
t
a
l
S
e
t
-
S
h
i
f
t
i
n
g
C
o
g
n
i
t
i
v
e
E
m
p
a
t
h
y
(
T
r
a
n
s
l
a
t
e
s
M
e
a
n
i
n
g
i
n
t
o
P
r
o
b
l
e
m
S
o
l
v
i
n
g
)
E
m
o
t
i
o
n
a
l
E
m
p
a
t
h
y
(
T
r
a
n
s
c
r
i
b
e
s
M
e
a
n
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
A
r
o
u
s
a
l
)
E
m
p
a
t
h
i
c
R
e
s
o
n
a
n
c
e
‚Š
Œ Š
ˆ ¤
’ ‡ˆ¤
‡
‰‡
Œ
‰ˆˆ
‚ƒŠ‡
–Š
’ ‡ˆ
œ
£™
‚‡ ¤‰
™Š˜ Œ ‡¤
€ ’ ‡
ˆ
€
„ ™
‚ƒ
œ
‚
€ ƒ
–‡ ‚ƒ
‘ ˆ

‘
‰‡
‚ƒ

Œ Š
‰
¤ ‚‡ ¤
”ˆ ¤
Žˆ

™Š˜ Œ ‡¤
ƒ‚†¤
‡ ¤
ƒ
ˆ
Œ Š
ˆ

‚ˆ ƒ
‰
„‡ € ˆ
‚ƒ ¤ ˆ „‡¤
ˆ
Œ Š
‘ˆ–ƒ
‰ˆ‡–ƒ‚ƒ
‰ˆ‡¤—ƒ ¤
’ ‡¤
”
S
e
n
s
e
Sense
M
eaning
M
e
a
n
i
n
g
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
K
i
n
e
t
i
c
A
r
o
u
s
a
l
A
f
fi
l
i
a
t
e
A
r
o
u
s
a
l
T
a
s
k
S
e
t
-
S
h
i
f
t
i
n
g
‚

‘
Œ
”
ƒ

Œ Š
„‡Ž†‡
¦ƒ ‡ˆ¤
•‡ ¦ƒ ¤
ƒ‡
‰
‰– ‰¤
”Š —ƒŠ¤
•‡ƒ‡„ ƒ
† ‡
I
n
v
a
r
i
a
n
t
O
b
j
e
c
t
S
e
t
-
S
h
i
f
t
i
n
g
„‡
„ ‡
‰‰ Š¤
–ƒ’ ‡ˆ
‚
€
Šƒ
™ ’
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
®
€

‰‡¤
ˆŠ ‡¤
ƒ ƒ

J
o
s
e
p
h
Z
a
l
m
a
n
S
h
e
p
p
a
r
d
,
2
0
2
2
‰

ƒ

®
E
p
i
s
t
e
m
i
c
C
o
l
u
m
n
E
p
i
s
o
d
i
c
C
o
l
u
m
n
E
m
b
o
d
i
e
d
C
o
l
u
m
n

‡

‘

•

‡
E
m
p
a
t
h
i
c
C
o
l
u
m
n

ˆŠ «¬
¤‚ƒˆ¤‚ ˆ
™
‡–
‚‡Š
•
¦ƒ
œƒ ˆ
•
’ ‰‡
‡„

ƒ
‡‰
‰
€
• ƒ
‰
‚ƒˆ
‚€ƒ‚ˆŠ ‘‡
‘‡
‚€ƒ‚ˆŠ
‚ ƒ‚ ˆ
ˆ ˆŠ
ˆ
‡
ˆ
‚ƒ
‘

„

‡

™
Š
˜

Œ

‡

„

‚

ˆ

‡

ˆ

™
Š
˜

‚ „
„ ‰
„ ‰ˆ‡
‚ ‘ˆ‡
„ ‹ Œ‡
‚ ƒ‹
„¨“ƒ‚ ˆˆ ‚¨ƒ‚ˆ
Œ Š
‰
ƒ
ˆƒ
Œ Š
ˆ
Œ Š
‘ˆ
Œ Š
„‡
Ž†‡
€

€

‰
„‡
‡ ‘
R
e
c
o
h
e
r
e
n
c
e
P
H
I
(
I
n
t
r
i
n
s
i
c
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
)
(I
n
te
g
ra
te
d
In
fo
rm
a
ti
o
n
T
h
e
o
ry
)
›ƒƒˆ
™Š
›ƒƒˆˆ ƒ‡
Œš †
›ƒƒˆ

ƒ
šŽ†Ž†
‡™
›ƒƒˆ
ˆ ƒ
Ž† ˆ‡
š †
ˆ ›ƒƒˆ
š
š † ˆ ˆ‡
Ž†„
™Š
›ƒƒˆ
‰ˆ
œ‡œ‘‡
ˆ
›ƒƒˆ
ˆˆƒ
‡
›ƒƒˆ
‡ˆ
• ‹
D
e
c
o
h
e
r
e
n
c
e
(
E
x
t
r
i
n
s
i
c
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
)
‚

‘
Œ
”
ƒ

›ƒ
(Consciousness as
9th Hybrid State)
P
H
I
P
H
I
›ƒ
Q
u
b
i
t
#
2
(T
w
o
S
ta
te
s

O
n
e
H
y
b
ri
d
)
Q
u
b
i
t
#
3
Q
u
b
i
t
#
1
(e
.g
.,
E
M
4

E
M
1
0
+
E
M
7
S
in
g
le
8
-
S
ta
te
Q
u
d
it
(E
M
2
-
E
M
1
0
R
o
ta
ti
n
g
A
ro
u
n
d
H
y
b
ri
d
E
M
6
)
E
n
c
o
d
e
s
T
h
re
e
Q
u
b
it
s
Q
u
a
n
t
u
m
C
o
m
p
u
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
i
t
y
P
E
T
T
e
n
s
o
r
®
1
s
t
L
e
v
e
l
E
M
-
C
o
re
A
c
ts
a
s
T
h
re
e
Q
u
b
it
s

5
th
L
e
v
e
l
E
M
-
C
o
re
A
c
ts
a
s
O
n
e
8
-
S
ta
te
Q
u
d
it
T
h
e
5
E
M
-
C
o
re
L
e
v
e
ls
C
o
o
re
s
p
o
n
d
to
th
e
F
iv
e
F
re
u
d
e
n
th
a
l-
K
a
n
to
r
T
ri
p
le
S
y
s
te
m
s
(K
-
F
K
T
S
)
R
a
n
k
s
fo
r
3
-
Q
u
b
it
E
n
ta
n
g
le
m
e
n
t

€

‚

ƒ

‚
€
„

™ ˆŠ ˆ
‡
ˆ —‡
—‹
›ƒƒˆ ›ƒ
ƒ‹‡‘ƒ
ˆ¨™Š‡
ˆ ˆ
‰ ˆ

‚ ›ƒƒˆ™Š‘ ‚‘
’ƒ ‰‘
† ˆ‡ ¨—‡
EM-Theory and the PsychoEducation Tensor were Developed by Joseph Zalman Sheppard ©, 2012-2022.All Rights Reserved.
EM-Theory Dyad Aspect-Seeing:
EMA/EMB = Nonlinear Inner Eye/Scribe (Reading
Writing) Metacognitive Conceptual Observer.
EM6/EM2 = Linear Inner Ear/Voice (Hearing
Speaking) Cognitive Knowledge Reference Frame.
(Conceptualizations of Observer Independent Tensor
Transitions (EMA/EMB) Dualistic Knowledge of
Observer Dependent Complementarities
(EM6/EM2) as Dyad Aspect-Seeing (Scientific
Theory-Data Seeing) is a Primary
Perspective of EM-Theory)
ƒ„ „
‚ † ‡
† ˆ‰Š €ƒ ‰
‹ƒ„ ‰„ ‰
‡ ‰ ‰ „
‰ Šƒ ‰ ‰
„ ‰ ‰
‰Œ€Ž‘ ‰ ‚
’‰ƒŠ‰ƒ
ˆ „ ‚
Šƒ ‰
‚‡ €Š ‰‰
ˆ „ ‡‰ €
‰‰„‰ €Š
Š‹ ‰ ‰ƒƒ Š
Š€‰Œ„

‚“ ƒˆ €
‡
‘
ƒ• ‡
‘Š ƒ
‚ƒ‘ƒ ˆ™ ‡ — ‘
‡‘¤• ‡®ƒ¤‰ ®’‡
œ ‚ƒ
‘ ˆ
‚ƒ
‚ƒ

Œ
Œ†
™ ˆ‹
ˆŒ†
™ ˆ‹
œ

ƒ

‚

ƒ
‰

‚ƒ

ƒ
„‡ˆ

ƒˆ¨— ‘Œ†¨‚ƒ
ƒ ƒ
‚
™ ‡—ˆ‡‡
‰ ‰ ƒˆ €

ƒ

€„

†
‡ˆ
‡‰
‡
Š
ƒ

‹

ƒ

€„

Œ

€
†
Ž‘

’
ˆ
Ž‘‡‘Ž‡Ž‘€

‘

“

‰
”Ž•€

–
’

—€

’
‰ ”Ž•€ – ’
‰ ”Ž•€
– ’
—€ ’
ˆ Ž‘‡‘Ž‡Ž‘€ ‘
—€ ’ ˆ Ž‘‡‘Ž‡Ž‘€ ‘
† Ž‘
’
‰˜™
”

˜š
ˆ Žˆ
‘ Œ‡ƒ‡
—ƒ
Œ ‚‡
‹
‰‡
Š
ˆš
‘† Žˆ
‚‘‘®‚‘—‘
ƒ‚‡
Š
‘ŠŽˆ
‰‡
ƒ
œƒ ‡
‰‡
ƒ † ƒ
„ Š –ƒ
‰ Œ‡ƒ
™Šˆ ƒ
˜

’

˜
‚

šŽ

˜

„

’

˜

˜˜

’

€›

‹

–
„

‹
‚€„

˜–

€„
œ

Š

ƒ
‚
š

‚

€ ‚€„Ž
€„
œ

†
ƒ
‚
š

ƒ
œ

‘ —Š
ˆ
‘ —Š ‘ —Š
‘ —Š
™ ˆ

Žˆ
ˆ
‚‡
ƒ
‚†
™ ˆ
‘
ˆ
„ Š
‚ƒ

ž

™

˜

–

™’

˜

–

š Ž
š ƒ €

™
™
‰

‡”ƒ

”ƒ

•ˆ ƒˆ
X
X
X
X
Ž

–
Ÿ

‚„

PHI
PHI
PHI
– ” Ž
˜ €› ƒ
€„ž€
€„ˆ‡€„‰‡
€„†

†¡¡

”£

€¢

£

€¢

˜

£ƒŽ

Maimonides
(1190)
“
‰”
Ž
‡
‘‡
¤
¤
“

„

‚
‰“”•
‰“•
€

„

€

‹

Ž

‚
“

¤
”©

“

¤
¥—

€
›

˜

’

‡˜

‡

‡

‡

‡‘

‡
˜

‡

€›

‚

¥
€
„
Ž

‹

™

“
’

‰‡ ™Š†
«„™Š¤¬™Š‡‡
™Š † „’¬€œ ¬
„¦

ƒ

ƒœ‘ œ ‡ˆ ‡‘“
Œ†
¤Œ‡¤
‰
“•
‰
“”•
„
‰
„ ’€„ „ ’€„‘
„ ’€„‘
„ ’€„
‚ˆ ‡ ‚
‚ —ƒˆ
™ ‡ƒ
Dedicated to the Anomaly of Singular Oneness

‹

™

€

‹

€

Ž€› § —¤Ž ™ ¥
Ž€› „ ˜ — € ¥
‹ ‹ — „

Ž

‡¨

’’
¥˜

Ž

Ž

‡¨
ƒŽ

¥‘

¥€

©

‡¨
„
„

—

¥€
š
‘
˜

‡¨
Ž

€
›
¥€

’
€
ª˜

“€

‘
€
¥
—

–

€
¥
€

€

€
“
œ
š
€

‡€„
˜
š

¥
€

”

€

€

”

‹

«

–

’

ŽŽ€
¥
‡ ”ˆ

PsychoEducation Model - Joseph Zalman Sheppard (Science Poster).pdf

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie PsychoEducation Model - Joseph Zalman Sheppard (Science Poster).pdf

Ähnlich wie PsychoEducation Model - Joseph Zalman Sheppard (Science Poster).pdf (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

PsychoEducation Model - Joseph Zalman Sheppard (Science Poster).pdf