Soton

Non-equilibrium phases of coupled matter-light
systems
Jonathan Keeling
University of
St Andrews
600YEARS
Southhampton, May 2013
Jonathan Keeling Non-eqbm. phases of matter-light systems Southhampton, May 2013 1 / 36

Coupling many atoms to light
Old question: What happens to radiation when many atoms interact
“collectively” with light.
Superradiance — dynamical and steady state.

Coupling many atoms to light
Old question: What happens to radiation when many atoms interact
“collectively” with light.
Superradiance — dynamical and steady state.
New relevance
Superconducting qubits
Quantum dots & NV centres
Ultra-cold atoms
κ
Pump
κ
Cavity
Pump
Rydberg atoms/polaritons
Microcavity Polaritons

Dicke effect: Enhanced emission
Hint =
k,i
gk ψ†
k S−
i e−ik·ri + H.c.

Hint =
k,i
gk ψ†
k S−
i e−ik·ri + H.c.
If |ri − rj| λ, use i Si → S
Collective decay:
dρ
dt
= −
Γ
2
S+
S−
ρ − S−
ρS+
+ ρS+
S−

Hint =
k,i
gk ψ†
k S−
i e−ik·ri + H.c.
Collective decay:
dρ
dt
= −
Γ
2
S+
S−
ρ − S−
ρS+
+ ρS+
S−
If Sz = |S| = N/2 initially:
I ∝ −Γ
d Sz
dt
=
ΓN2
4
sech2 ΓN
2
t
-N/2
0
N/2
tD
〈S
z
〉
tD
0
ΓN2
/2
I=-Γd〈S
z
〉/dt

Hint =
k,i
gk ψ†
k S−
i e−ik·ri + H.c.
Collective decay:
dρ
dt
= −
Γ
2
S+
S−
ρ − S−
ρS+
+ ρS+
S−
If Sz = |S| = N/2 initially:
I ∝ −Γ
d Sz
dt
=
ΓN2
4
sech2 ΓN
2
t
-N/2
0
N/2
tD
〈S
z
〉
tD
0
ΓN2
/2
I=-Γd〈S
z
〉/dt
Problem: dipole interactions dephase. [Friedberg et al, Phys. Lett. 1972]

Collective radiation with a cavity: Dynamics
Hint =
i
ψ†
S−
i + ψS+
i
Single cavity mode: oscillations
[Bonifacio and Preparata PRA ’70]

Collective radiation with a cavity: Dynamics
Hint =
i
ψ†
S−
i + ψS+
i
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
|ψ(t)|
2
Time
T=2ln(√N
__
)/√N
__
1/√N
__
Single cavity mode: oscillations
If Sz = |S| = N/2 initially
[Bonifacio and Preparata PRA ’70]

Dicke model: Equilibrium superradiance transition
H = ωψ†
ψ + ω0Sz
+ g ψ†
S−
+ ψS+
.
Coherent state: |Ψ → eλψ†+ηS+
|Ω
Small g, min at λ, η = 0
[Hepp, Lieb, Ann. Phys. ’73]

H = ωψ†
ψ + ω0Sz
+ g ψ†
S−
+ ψS+
.
|Ω
Spontaneous polarisation if: Ng2 > ωω0

H = ωψ†
ψ + ω0Sz
+ g ψ†
S−
+ ψS+
.
|Ω
0
0
ω
g-√N
⇓ SR

No go theorem and transition
[Rzazewski et al PRL ’75]

No go theorem:. Minimal coupling (p − eA)2/2m
−
i
e
m
A · pi ⇔ g(ψ†
S−
+ ψS+
),
i
A2
2m
⇔ Nζ(ψ + ψ†
)2

−
i
e
m
A · pi ⇔ g(ψ†
S−
+ ψS+
),
i
A2
2m
⇔ Nζ(ψ + ψ†
)2
For large N, ω → ω + 2Nζ. (RWA)

−
i
e
m
A · pi ⇔ g(ψ†
S−
+ ψS+
),
i
A2
2m
⇔ Nζ(ψ + ψ†
)2
Need Ng2 > ω0(ω + 2Nζ).

−
i
e
m
A · pi ⇔ g(ψ†
S−
+ ψS+
),
i
A2
2m
⇔ Nζ(ψ + ψ†
)2
Need Ng2 > ω0(ω + 2Nζ).
But Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn sum rule states: g2/ω0 < 2ζ. No transition

Dicke phase transition: ways out
Problem: g2/ω0 < 2ζ for intrinsic parameters. Solutions:
Interpretation
Ferroelectric transition in D · r gauge.
[JK JPCM ’07, Vukics & Domokos PRA 2012 ]
Circuit QED [Nataf and Ciuti, Nat. Comm. ’10; Viehmann et al. PRL ’11]
Grand canonical ensemble:
If H → H − µ(Sz
+ ψ†
ψ), need only:
g2
N > (ω − µ)(ω0 − µ)
Incoherent pumping — polariton
condensation.
Dissociate g, ω0,
e.g. Raman scheme: ω0 ω.
[Dimer et al. PRA ’07; Baumann et al. Nature
’10. Also, Black et al. PRL ’03 ]

Dicke phase transition: ways out
Problem: g2/ω0 < 2ζ for intrinsic parameters. Solutions:
Interpretation
Ferroelectric transition in D · r gauge.
[JK JPCM ’07, Vukics & Domokos PRA 2012 ]
Circuit QED [Nataf and Ciuti, Nat. Comm. ’10; Viehmann et al. PRL ’11]
Grand canonical ensemble:
If H → H − µ(Sz
+ ψ†
ψ), need only:
g2
N > (ω − µ)(ω0 − µ)
Incoherent pumping — polariton
condensation.
Dissociate g, ω0,
e.g. Raman scheme: ω0 ω.
[Dimer et al. PRA ’07; Baumann et al. Nature
’10. Also, Black et al. PRL ’03 ]
κ
Pump
κ
Cavity
Pump

Outline
1 Introduction: Dicke model and superradiance
2 Dynamics of generalized Dicke model
Summary of experiment and classical dynamcs
Fixed points and dynamical phases
Timescales and consequences for experiment
Persistent oscillating phases
3 Jaynes Cummings Hubbard model
JCHM vv Dicke
Coherently driven array
Disorder

Acknowledgements
GROUP:
COLLABORATORS: Simons, Bhaseen, Schmidt, Blatter, T¨ureci, Kr¨uger
EXPERIMENT: Houck, Wallraff, Fink, Mylnek
FUNDING:

Dynamics of generalized Dicke model
JCHM vv Dicke
Disorder

Reminder of cold-atom extended Dicke model
κ
Pump
κ
2 Level System
x
z
Ω
gψ
0
2 Level system, | ⇓ , | ⇑ :
⇓: Ψ(x, z) = 1
⇑: Ψ(x, z) =
σ,σ =±
eik(σx+σ z)
H = ωψ†
ψ + ω0Sz
+ g(ψ + ψ†
)(S−
+ S+
)+USzψ†
ψ.
∂t ρ = −i[H, ρ]−κ(ψ†
ψρ − 2ψρψ†
+ ρψ†
ψ)
[Baumann et al Nature ’10 ]

κ
Pump
κ
2 Level System
x
z
Ω
gψ
0
⇓: Ψ(x, z) = 1
⇑: Ψ(x, z) =
σ,σ =±
eik(σx+σ z)
Feedback: U ∝
g2
0
ωc − ωa
H = ωψ†
ψ + ω0Sz
+ g(ψ + ψ†
)(S−
+ S+
)+USzψ†
ψ.
∂t ρ = −i[H, ρ]−κ(ψ†
ψρ − 2ψρψ†
+ ρψ†
ψ)

κ
Pump
κ
2 Level System
x
z
Ω
gψ
0
⇓: Ψ(x, z) = 1
⇑: Ψ(x, z) =
σ,σ =±
eik(σx+σ z)
Feedback: U ∝
g2
0
ωc − ωa
H = ωψ†
ψ + ω0Sz
+ g(ψ + ψ†
)(S−
+ S+
)+USzψ†
ψ.
∂t ρ = −i[H, ρ]−κ(ψ†
ψρ − 2ψρψ†
+ ρψ†
ψ)
ω0 ∼ kHz ω, κ, g
√
N ∼ MHz. [Baumann et al Nature ’10 ]

Classical dynamics of the extended Dicke model
Open dynamical system:
H = ωψ†
ψ + ω0Sz
+ g(ψ + ψ†
)(S−
+ S+
)+USzψ†
ψ.
∂t ρ = −i[H, ρ]−κ(ψ†
ψρ − 2ψρψ†
+ ρψ†
ψ)
Neglects quantum ﬂuctuations — restore via Wigner distributed
initial conditions.
Linearisation about ﬁxed point:
Recover Retarded Green’s function (spectrum)
Cannot recover occupations

Classical dynamics of the extended Dicke model
Open dynamical system:
H = ωψ†
ψ + ω0Sz
+ g(ψ + ψ†
)(S−
+ S+
)+USzψ†
ψ.
∂t ρ = −i[H, ρ]−κ(ψ†
ψρ − 2ψρψ†
+ ρψ†
ψ)
Classical EOM
(|S| = N/2 1)
˙S−
= −i(ω0+U|ψ|2
)S−
+ 2ig(ψ + ψ∗
)Sz
˙Sz
= ig(ψ + ψ∗
)(S−
− S+
)
˙ψ = − [κ + i(ω+USz
)] ψ − ig(S−
+ S+
)
Neglects quantum ﬂuctuations — restore via Wigner distributed
initial conditions.
Linearisation about ﬁxed point:
Recover Retarded Green’s function (spectrum)
Cannot recover occupations

Fixed points (steady states)
0 = i(ω0+U|ψ|2
)S−
+ 2ig(ψ + ψ∗
)Sz
0 = ig(ψ + ψ∗
)(S−
− S+
)
0 = − [κ + i(ω+USz
)] ψ − ig(S−
+ S+
)
ψ = 0, S = (0, 0, ±N/2)
always a solution.
If g > gc, ψ = 0 too
A Sy
= − [S−
] = 0
B ψ = [ψ] = 0

0 = i(ω0+U|ψ|2
)S−
+ 2ig(ψ + ψ∗
)Sz
0 = ig(ψ + ψ∗
)(S−
− S+
)
0 = − [κ + i(ω+USz
)] ψ − ig(S−
+ S+
)
ψ = 0, S = (0, 0, ±N/2)
always a solution.
A Sy
= − [S−
] = 0
B ψ = [ψ] = 0
x
Sy
Sz
S
Small g: ⇑, ⇓ only.
(ω = 30MHz, UN = −40MHz)

0 = i(ω0+U|ψ|2
)S−
+ 2ig(ψ + ψ∗
)Sz
0 = ig(ψ + ψ∗
)(S−
− S+
)
0 = − [κ + i(ω+USz
)] ψ − ig(S−
+ S+
)
ψ = 0, S = (0, 0, ±N/2)
always a solution.
A Sy
= − [S−
] = 0
B ψ = [ψ] = 0
x
Sy
Sz
S
Small g: ⇑, ⇓ only. Larger g: SR too.
(ω = 30MHz, UN = −40MHz)

Steady state phase diagram
0 = i(ω0+U|ψ|2
)S−
+ 2ig(ψ + ψ∗
)Sz
0 = ig(ψ + ψ∗
)(S−
− S+
)
0 = − [κ + i(ω+USz
)] ψ − ig(S−
+ S+
) 0
0
ω
g-√N
UN=0, κ=0
⇓ SR
See also Domokos and Ritsch PRL ’02, Domokos et al. PRL ’10

0 = i(ω0+U|ψ|2
)S−
+ 2ig(ψ + ψ∗
)Sz
0 = ig(ψ + ψ∗
)(S−
− S+
)
0 = − [κ + i(ω+USz
)] ψ − ig(S−
+ S+
) 0
0
ω
g-√N
UN=0, κ=0
⇓ SR
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇓
⇑
SR
SR
UN=0
⇓ SR(A): Sy = 0

0 = i(ω0+U|ψ|2
)S−
+ 2ig(ψ + ψ∗
)Sz
0 = ig(ψ + ψ∗
)(S−
− S+
)
0 = − [κ + i(ω+USz
)] ψ − ig(S−
+ S+
) 0
0
ω
g-√N
UN=0, κ=0
⇓ SR
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇓
⇑
SRA
SRA
⇓+⇑ SRB
UN=-20
⇓ SR(A): Sy = 0
⇓ + ⇑ SR(B): ψ = 0

0 = i(ω0+U|ψ|2
)S−
+ 2ig(ψ + ψ∗
)Sz
0 = ig(ψ + ψ∗
)(S−
− S+
)
0 = − [κ + i(ω+USz
)] ψ − ig(S−
+ S+
) 0
0
ω
g-√N
UN=0, κ=0
⇓ SR
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇓
⇑
⇓+⇑
SRA
SRA
SRB
UN=-40
⇓ SR(A): Sy = 0
⇓ + ⇑ SR(B): ψ = 0

0 = i(ω0+U|ψ|2
)S−
+ 2ig(ψ + ψ∗
)Sz
0 = ig(ψ + ψ∗
)(S−
− S+
)
0 = − [κ + i(ω+USz
)] ψ − ig(S−
+ S+
) 0
0
ω
g-√N
UN=0, κ=0
⇓ SR
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇓
⇑
SRA
SRA
⇓+⇑ SRB
SRB+⇑
SRB+⇑
SRA+⇑
SRA+⇓
SRB
+⇓+⇑
UN=-40
⇓ SR(A): Sy = 0
⇓ + ⇑ SR(B): ψ = 0

Comparison to experiment
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
(ωp-ωc)(2πMHz)
g2
N (MHz)2
UN = −10MHz
Adapted from: [Bhaseen et al. PRA ’12]
ω = ωc − ωp +
5
2
UN, UN = −
g2
0
4(ωa − ωc)

JCHM vv Dicke
Disorder

Dynamics: Evolution from normal state
Gray: S = (
√
N,
√
N, −N/2)
Black: Wigner distribution of S, ψ
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
⇓
⇑
⇓+⇑
SRA
SRA
SRB
UN=-40
Oscillations: ∼ 0.1ms
Decay: 20ms, 0.1ms, 20ms
(i) SR(A)
0 20 40 60 80
t (ms)
0
40
80
|ψ|2
0 1 2
0
100
(ii) SR(B)
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
t (ms)
0
100
200
|ψ|
2
(iii) SR(A)
0 100 200
t (ms)
0
40
80
120
|ψ|
2
150 151
40
50

Asymptotic state: Evolution from normal state
(Near to experimental UN = −13MHz).
All stable attractors:
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇑
⇓ SRA
SRA
⇓+⇑ SRB
UN=-10

Asymptotic state: Evolution from normal state
(Near to experimental UN = −13MHz).
All stable attractors:
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇑
⇓ SRA
SRA
⇓+⇑ SRB
UN=-10
Starting from ⇓
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇑
⇓
SRA
SRB
SRA
10-1
10
0
10
1
102
103
|ψ|
2
Asymptotic state

Timescales for dynamics: Consequences for
experiment
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇑
⇓
SRA
SRB
SRA
10-1
10
0
10
1
102
10
3
|ψ|2
Asymptotic state

experiment
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇑
⇓
SRA
SRB
SRA
10-1
10
0
10
1
102
10
3
|ψ|2
Asymptotic state
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
ω(MHz)
g
2
N (MHz
2
)
10
-1
100
10
1
10
2
10310ms sweep

experiment
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇑
⇓
SRA
SRB
SRA
10-1
10
0
10
1
102
10
3
|ψ|2
Asymptotic state
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
ω(MHz)
g
2
N (MHz
2
)
10
-1
100
10
1
10
2
10310ms sweep
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
ω(MHz)
g
2
N (MHz
2
)
10
-1
10
0
10
1
10
2
10
3200ms sweep

Timescales for dynamics: What are they?
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇑
⇓
SRA
SRB
SRA
10
-1
10
0
10
1
10
2
103
|ψ|
2
Asymptotic state
Growth Most unstable eigenvalues
near S = (0, 0, −N/2)
Decay Slowest stable eigenvalues
near ﬁnal state
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
No unstable
directions
Two unstable directions
One unstable direction
10µs
100µs
1ms
10ms
100ms
1s
10s
Initial growth time

Timescales for dynamics: What are they?
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇑
⇓
SRA
SRB
SRA
10
-1
10
0
10
1
10
2
103
|ψ|
2
Asymptotic state
Growth Most unstable eigenvalues
near S = (0, 0, −N/2)
Decay Slowest stable eigenvalues
near ﬁnal state
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
No unstable
directions
10µs
100µs
1ms
10ms
100ms
1s
10s
Initial growth time
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇑
⇓
SRA
SRB
SRA
10µs
100µs
1ms
10ms
100ms
1s
10s
Asymptotic decay time

Timescales for dynamics: Why so slow and varied?
Suppose co- and counter-rotating terms differ
2 Level System
Ω
∆
Ω
ψ
b
a b
a
∆
ψg0
g0
H = . . . + g(ψ†
S−
+ ψS+
) + g (ψ†
S+
+ ψS−
) + . . .
SR(A) near phase boundary at small δg → Critical slowing down
SR(A), SR(B) continuously connect

2 Level System
Ω
∆
Ω
ψ
b
a b
a
∆
ψg0
g0
H = . . . + g(ψ†
S−
+ ψS+
) + g (ψ†
S+
+ ψS−
) + . . .
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇑
⇓ SRA
SRA
⇓+⇑ SRB
UN=-10

2 Level System
Ω
∆
Ω
ψ
b
a b
a
∆
ψg0
g0
H = . . . + g(ψ†
S−
+ ψS+
) + g (ψ†
S+
+ ψS−
) + . . .
δg = g − g, 2¯g = g + g
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇑
⇓ SRA
SRA
⇓+⇑ SRB
UN=-10
-40
-20
0
20
40
-0.01 -0.005 0 0.005 0.01
ω(MHz)
δg/g-
g-√N=1

JCHM vv Dicke
Disorder

Regions without ﬁxed points
Changing U:
2 Level System
Ω
gψ
0
U ∝
g2
0
ωc − ωa
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇓
⇑
⇓+⇑
SRA
SRA
SRB
UN=-40

Changing U:
2 Level System
Ω
ψg0
U ∝
g2
0
ωc − ωa
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇓
⇑
⇓+⇑
SRA
SRA
SRB
UN=-40

Changing U:
2 Level System
Ω
ψg0
U ∝
g2
0
ωc − ωa
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇓
⇑
SR
SR
UN=0

Changing U:
2 Level System
Ω
ψg0
U ∝
g2
0
ωc − ωa
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇓
⇑
SRA
SRA
UN=20

Changing U:
2 Level System
Ω
ψg0
U ∝
g2
0
ωc − ωa
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇓
⇑
SRA
SRA
UN=40

Changing U:
2 Level System
Ω
ψg0
U ∝
g2
0
ωc − ωa
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇓
⇑
SRA
SRA
Persistent Oscillations
UN=40
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
t (ms)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|ψ|
2
0 5 10 15
0
400
800
1200

Persistent (optomechanical) oscillations
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇓
⇑
SRA
SRA
Persistent Oscillations
UN=40
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
t (ms)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|ψ|
2
0 5 10 15
0
400
800
1200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
18.00 18.02 18.04 18.06 18.08
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
|ψ|
2
Sx,Sy,Sz
t(ms)
|ψ|2
Sx
Sy
Sz

Jaynes Cummings Hubbard model
JCHM vv Dicke
Disorder

Equilibrium: Dicke model with chemical potential
H − µN = (ω − µ)ψ†
ψ + (ω0 − µ)Sz
+ g ψ†
S−
+ ψS+
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
(µ-ω)/g
(ω0 - ω)/g
SR
Transition at:
g2N > (ω − µ)|ω0 − µ|
Reduce critical g
Unstable if µ > ω
Inverted if µ > ω0
[Eastham and Littlewood, PRB ’01]

H − µN = (ω − µ)ψ†
ψ + (ω0 − µ)Sz
+ g ψ†
S−
+ ψS+
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
(µ-ω)/g
(ω0 - ω)/g
unstable
SR
Transition at:
g2N > (ω − µ)|ω0 − µ|
Reduce critical g
Unstable if µ > ω

H − µN = (ω − µ)ψ†
ψ + (ω0 − µ)Sz
+ g ψ†
S−
+ ψS+
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
(µ-ω)/g
(ω0 - ω)/g
⇑
⇓
unstable
SR
Transition at:
g2N > (ω − µ)|ω0 − µ|
Reduce critical g
Unstable if µ > ω

Jaynes-Cummings Hubbard model
H = −
J
z
ij
ψ†
i ψj +
i
∆
2
σz
i + g(ψ†
i σ−
i + H.c.)

H = −
J
z
ij
ψ†
i ψj +
i
∆
2
σz
i + g(ψ†
i σ−
i + H.c.)
-2
-1
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
µ/g
J/g
Unstable
Normal
∆/g=1

H = −
J
z
ij
ψ†
i ψj +
i
∆
2
σz
i + g(ψ†
i σ−
i + H.c.)
-2
-1
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
µ/g
J/g
Unstable
Normal
∆/g=1
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
µ/g
J/g
Unstable
Normal
∆/g=-6

Dicke vs JCHM
JCHM
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
µ/g
J/g
Unstable
Normal
∆/g=-6
Dicke
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
(µ-ω)/g
(ω0 - ω)/g
⇑
⇓
unstable
SR
k = 0 mode of JCHM ↔ Dicke photon mode
⇑ ↔ n = 1 Mott lobe

Dicke vs JCHM
JCHM
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
µ/g
J/g
Unstable
Normal
∆/g=-6 E
k
UP
Photon
LP
2LS
∆JCHM
∆Dicke
Dicke
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
(µ-ω)/g
(ω0 - ω)/g
⇑
⇓
unstable
SR

Jaynes Cummings Hubbard model
JCHM vv Dicke
Disorder

Coherently pumped JCHM
H = −
J
z
ij
ψ†
i ψj +
i
∆
2
σz
i + g(ψ†
i σ−
i + H.c.)+f(ψieiωLt
+ H.c.)
∂t ρ = −i[H, ρ]−
κ
2
Lψ[ρ] −
γ
2
Lσ− [ρ]

Coherently pumped single cavity [Bishop et al. Nat. Phys ’09]
g H =
∆
2
σz
+ g(ψ†
σ−
+ H.c.)+f(ψeiωpumpt
+ H.c.)
∂t ρ = −i[H, ρ]−
κ
2
Lψ[ρ] −
γ
2
Lσ− [ρ]
Anti-resonance in | ψ |.
Effective 2LS:
|Empty , |1 polariton
IncreasingPumping
Mollow triplet ﬂuorescence
[Lang et al. PRL ’11]

Coherently pumped dimer & array
Chose detuning a la Dicke model
ωpump
ωpump
LP
UP
2g
CavityQubit
Single cavity
2J
LP
LP
UP
E
k
Photon
Qubit
Array
2g
Bistability at intermediate J
More/less localised states
Connects to Dicke limit
[Nissen et al. PRL ’12]

Coherently pumped dimer & array
Chose detuning a la Dicke model
ωpump
ωpump
LP
UP
2g
CavityQubit
Single cavity
2J
LP
LP
UP
E
k
Photon
Qubit
Array
2g
Evolution of anti-resonance vs J.
0
0.1
0.2
-1.06 -1.04 -1.02 -1
|<a>|
ωpump/g
Bistability at intermediate J
More/less localised states
Connects to Dicke limit

Photon blockade picture J g
Polariton basis
Nonlinearity | 2 − 2 1| ∝ g.
H =
i
2
τz
i + ˜fτx
i
Decouple hopping:
τ+
i τ−
j → ψτ+ + ψ∗τ−
Bistability for
J > Jc =
4
˜f2
2˜f2 + (˜κ/2)2
3
3/2
0
0.1
0.2
-1.06 -1.04 -1.02 -1
|<a>|
ωpump/g

Photon blockade picture J g
Polariton basis
Nonlinearity | 2 − 2 1| ∝ g.
H =
i
2
τz
i + ˜fτx
i −
˜J
z
ij
τ+
i τ−
j
Decouple hopping:
τ+
i τ−
j → ψτ+ + ψ∗τ−
Bistability for
J > Jc =
4
˜f2
2˜f2 + (˜κ/2)2
3
3/2
0
0.1
0.2
-1.06 -1.04 -1.02 -1
|<a>|
ωpump/g

Coherently pumped array: correlations & ﬂuorescence
0
0.5
1
g2(t=0)
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
|〈a〉|
Hopping zJ/g
Correlations
g2 : 0 → 1 crossover.
Small J: Mollow triplet
Large J: Off resonance
ﬂuorescence
Pump at collective
resonance
Mismatch if J = 0.

Coherently pumped array: correlations & ﬂuorescence
0
0.5
1
g2(t=0)
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
|〈a〉|
Hopping zJ/g
Correlations
g2 : 0 → 1 crossover.
Fluorescence
Small J: Mollow triplet
Large J: Off resonance
ﬂuorescence
Pump at collective
resonance
Mismatch if J = 0.

Coherent pumped array – disorder
Effect of disorder, ∆ → ∆i
Distribution of ψ – Washes out bistable jump
Bistability near resonance — phase of ψ depends on ∆i
Complex ψ distribution
Superﬂuid phases in driven system?
-1.02 -1.01 -1 -0.99 -0.98 -0.97 -0.96 -0.95
Pump frequency
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
ψ
0
20
40
60
80
100
||
[Kulaitis et al. PRA, ’13]

Coherent pumped array – disorder
Effect of disorder, ∆ → ∆i
Distribution of ψ – Washes out bistable jump
Bistability near resonance — phase of ψ depends on ∆i
Complex ψ distribution
Superﬂuid phases in driven system?
-1.02 -1.01 -1 -0.99 -0.98 -0.97 -0.96 -0.95
Pump frequency
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
ψ
0
20
40
60
80
100
||
-0.2
0
0.2
(a) ωp=-0.988 (b) ωp=-0.987 (c) ωp=-0.986
-0.2
0
0.2
(d) ωp=-0.985 (e) ωp=-0.982 (f) ωp=-0.978
-0.2 0 0.2
-0.2
0
0.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
(g) ωp=-0.975
-0.2 0 0.2
(h) ωp=-0.971
-0.2 0 0.2
(i) ωp=-0.968
Re( )
Im()
[Kulaitis et al. PRA, ’13]

Summary
Wide variety of dynamical phases
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇓
⇑
SRA
SRA
UN=40
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇓
⇑
SR
SR
UN=0
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇓
⇑
⇓+⇑
SRA
SRA
SRB
UN=-40
-40
-20
0
20
40
-0.01 -0.005 0 0.005 0.01
ω(MHz)
δg/g-
g-√N=1
Slow dynamics for U < 0 & Persistent oscillations for U > 0
0 100 200
t (ms)
0
40
80
120
|ψ|
2
150 151
40
50
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
No unstable
directions
10µs
100µs
1ms
10ms
100ms
1s
10s
Initial growth time
-40
-20
0
20
40
0 0.5 1 1.5
ω(MHz)
g√N (MHz)
⇑
⇓
SRA
SRB
SRA
10µs
100µs
1ms
10ms
100ms
1s
10s
Asymptotic decay time
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
t (ms)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|ψ|
2
0 5 10 15
0
400
800
1200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
18.00 18.02 18.04 18.06 18.08
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
|ψ|2
Sx,Sy,Sz
t(ms)
|ψ|2
Sx
Sy
Sz
JK et al. PRL ’10, Bhaseen et al. PRA ’12
Dicke model and JCHM: connection at J → ∞E
k
UP
Photon
LP
2LS
∆JCHM
∆Dicke
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
µ/g
J/g
Unstable
Normal
∆/g=-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
(µ-ω)/g
(ω0 - ω)/g
⇑
⇓
unstable
SR
Coherently pumped coupled cavity array
ωpump
ωpump
LP
UP
2g
CavityQubit
Single cavity
2J
LP
LP
UP
E
k
Photon
Qubit
Array
2g
0
0.1
0.2
-1.06 -1.04 -1.02 -1
|<a>|
ωpump/g
0
0.5
1
g2(t=0)
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
|〈a〉|
Hopping zJ/g
-1.02 -1.01 -1 -0.99 -0.98 -0.97 -0.96 -0.95
Pump frequency
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
ψ
0
20
40
60
80
100
||
-0.2
0
0.2
(a) ωp=-0.988 (b) ωp=-0.987 (c) ωp=-0.986
-0.2
0
0.2
(d) ωp=-0.985 (e) ωp=-0.982 (f) ωp=-0.978
-0.2 0 0.2
-0.2
0
0.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
(g) ωp=-0.975
-0.2 0 0.2
(h) ωp=-0.971
-0.2 0 0.2
(i) ωp=-0.968
Re( )
Im()
Nissen et al. PRL ’12, Kulaitis et al. PRA ’13

4 Ferroelectric transition
5 Dicke vs JCHM
6 Pumping without symmetry breaking
7 Collective dephasing

Ferroelectric transition
Atoms in Coulomb gauge
H = ωk a†
k ak +
i
[pi − eA(ri)]2
+ Vcoul

H = ωk a†
k ak +
i
[pi − eA(ri)]2
+ Vcoul
Two-level systems — dipole-dipole coupling
H = ω0Sz
+ ωψ†
ψ + g(S+
+ S−
)(ψ + ψ†
) + Nζ(ψ + ψ†
)2
−η(S+
− S−
)2
(nb g2, ζ, η ∝ 1/V).

H = ωk a†
k ak +
i
[pi − eA(ri)]2
+ Vcoul
H = ω0Sz
+ ωψ†
ψ + g(S+
+ S−
)(ψ + ψ†
) + Nζ(ψ + ψ†
)2
−η(S+
− S−
)2
(nb g2, ζ, η ∝ 1/V).
Ferroelectric polarisation if ω0 < 2ηN

H = ωk a†
k ak +
i
[pi − eA(ri)]2
+ Vcoul
H = ω0Sz
+ ωψ†
ψ + g(S+
+ S−
)(ψ + ψ†
) + Nζ(ψ + ψ†
)2
−η(S+
− S−
)2
(nb g2, ζ, η ∝ 1/V).
Ferroelectric polarisation if ω0 < 2ηN
Gauge transform to dipole gauge D · r
H = ω0Sz
+ ωψ†
ψ + ¯g(S+
− S−
)(ψ − ψ†
)
“Dicke” transition at ω0 < N¯g2/ω ≡ 2ηN
But, ψ describes electric displacement

H − µN = (ω − µ)ψ†
ψ + (ω0 − µ)Sz
+ g ψ†
S−
+ ψS+
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
(µ-ω)/g
(ω0 - ω)/g
SR
Transition at:
g2N > (ω − µ)|ω0 − µ|
Reduce critical g
Unstable if µ > ω

H − µN = (ω − µ)ψ†
ψ + (ω0 − µ)Sz
+ g ψ†
S−
+ ψS+
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
(µ-ω)/g
(ω0 - ω)/g
unstable
SR
Transition at:
g2N > (ω − µ)|ω0 − µ|
Reduce critical g
Unstable if µ > ω

H − µN = (ω − µ)ψ†
ψ + (ω0 − µ)Sz
+ g ψ†
S−
+ ψS+
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
(µ-ω)/g
(ω0 - ω)/g
⇑
⇓
unstable
SR
Transition at:
g2N > (ω − µ)|ω0 − µ|
Reduce critical g
Unstable if µ > ω

H = −
J
z
ij
ψ†
i ψj +
i
∆
2
σz
i + g(ψ†
i σ−
i + H.c.)

H = −
J
z
ij
ψ†
i ψj +
i
∆
2
σz
i + g(ψ†
i σ−
i + H.c.)
-2
-1
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
µ/g
J/g
Unstable
Normal
∆/g=1

H = −
J
z
ij
ψ†
i ψj +
i
∆
2
σz
i + g(ψ†
i σ−
i + H.c.)
-2
-1
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
µ/g
J/g
Unstable
Normal
∆/g=1
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
µ/g
J/g
Unstable
Normal
∆/g=-6

Dicke vs JCHM
JCHM
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
µ/g
J/g
Unstable
Normal
∆/g=-6
Dicke
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
(µ-ω)/g
(ω0 - ω)/g
⇑
⇓
unstable
SR

Dicke vs JCHM
JCHM
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
µ/g
J/g
Unstable
Normal
∆/g=-6 E
k
UP
Photon
LP
2LS
∆JCHM
∆Dicke
Dicke
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
(µ-ω)/g
(ω0 - ω)/g
⇑
⇓
unstable
SR

Raman pumping
How to pump without breaking symmetry
Counter-rotating terms — Raman pumping
Atom proposal [Dimer et al. PRA ’07]
Atom experiment [Baumann et al. Nature ’10]
Qubit — allowed transitions ∆n = 1
Qubit dephasing much bigger than atom
JK, T¨ureci, Houck in progress

Raman pumping
Tunable-coupling-qubit
00
01
10
11
02
20
g
g
0
1
Ω
Ωa
b
Pump
Cavity

Raman pumping
Tunable-coupling-qubit
00
01
10
11
02
20
g
g
0
1
Ω
Ωa
b
Pump
Cavity
0 0.5 1
g0
0
1
2
3
4
Ωa=Ωb=Ω
⇓
SR?

Collective dephasing
Real environment is not Markovian
[Carmichael & Walls JPA ’73] Requirements for correct equilibrium
[Ciuti & Carusotto PRA ’09] Dicke SR and emission
Cannot assume ﬁxed κ, γ
Phase transition → soft modes
Strong coupling → varying decay

Dicke model linewidth:
H = ωψ†
ψ+
N
i=1
i
2
σz
i +g σ+
i ψ + h.c.
+
i
σz
i
q
γq b†
q + bq +
q
βqb†
iqbq.
[Nissen, Fink et al. arXiv:1302.0665]

Dicke model linewidth:
H = ωψ†
ψ+
N
i=1
i
2
σz
i +g σ+
i ψ + h.c.
+
i
σz
i
q
γq b†
q + bq +
q
βqb†
iqbq.
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
1 2 3 4 5
linewidth/g
number of qubits, N
experiment
theory
〈a〉
2
(a.u.)
frequency (a.u.)
1
2
3
[Nissen, Fink et al. arXiv:1302.0665]

Soton

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Andere mochten auch

Andere mochten auch (20)

Ähnlich wie Soton

Ähnlich wie Soton (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Soton