1. Sanitation Infrastructure Enhancement Grants (IEGs) Jim Coucouvinis IndII Wrap-up Conference 14th June 2011

2. Sanitation IEGs What is different from the Hibah? What did we set out to do? How did we come to this design? What did we learn? Where do we go from here?

3. IEG is Different From the Hibah It is performance based not output based Grant is paid into the LG budget for implementation Quality assurance and compliance of completed works by ‘Post Review’ IEGs were designed after the Hibah – tried output based formats but could not do it. Because…

5. Fragmented and dispersed efforts by LG

6. Generally low level of competence at LG

10. Refinements to IEG Allocation

11. What did we learn The design is complicated? GoI and LGs are highly motivated by the program Quality of the 2010 program is a differentiating factor (a guideline for the standard of quality is planned for the next phase) LG sanitation programs are highly fragmented and lack a clear purpose Institutional responsibility is highly fragmented Community has lower intrinsic value for sanitation services

12. Where to from here? Greater coverage > mainstreaming Simplified performance based model Some output based components Multi year program > better control and governance outcomes So far linked to GoI programs – Develop links to AusAID programs e.g. WWMP