Respond to All Requirements - Make sure your response addresses every requirement and question asked in the RFP.- Ask Clarifying Questions Early - If anything is unclear, ask the issuer for clarification well before the deadline. - Provide Specific Details - Give concrete details about your solution, pricing, timelines, etc. Avoid vague responses.- Highlight Relevant Experience - Emphasize similar projects you've completed to demonstrate your capabilities.- Proofread Thoroughly - Have multiple people review your response for errors before submitting.DON'Ts
The document summarizes the Third Annual NYC In-Building Wireless Summit held on March 31, 2015 at the Museum of Jewish Heritage in Manhattan. It includes an agenda for an RFP Do's and Don'ts panel discussing challenges with wireless projects, needs analysis, business considerations, writing effective RFPs, responding to RFPs, and evaluating proposal responses. The panel provides tips on clearly defining technical and venue requirements to facilitate apples-to-apples comparisons between provider solutions.
Iron Mountain Presentation How Well Do You Know Your Data Seattle 2011
Ähnlich wie Respond to All Requirements - Make sure your response addresses every requirement and question asked in the RFP.- Ask Clarifying Questions Early - If anything is unclear, ask the issuer for clarification well before the deadline. - Provide Specific Details - Give concrete details about your solution, pricing, timelines, etc. Avoid vague responses.- Highlight Relevant Experience - Emphasize similar projects you've completed to demonstrate your capabilities.- Proofread Thoroughly - Have multiple people review your response for errors before submitting.DON'Ts
Alternative Communication Systems... During DisastersLindsey Campbell
Ähnlich wie Respond to All Requirements - Make sure your response addresses every requirement and question asked in the RFP.- Ask Clarifying Questions Early - If anything is unclear, ask the issuer for clarification well before the deadline. - Provide Specific Details - Give concrete details about your solution, pricing, timelines, etc. Avoid vague responses.- Highlight Relevant Experience - Emphasize similar projects you've completed to demonstrate your capabilities.- Proofread Thoroughly - Have multiple people review your response for errors before submitting.DON'Ts (20)
Night 7k Call Girls Noida Sector 128 Call Me: 8448380779
Respond to All Requirements - Make sure your response addresses every requirement and question asked in the RFP.- Ask Clarifying Questions Early - If anything is unclear, ask the issuer for clarification well before the deadline. - Provide Specific Details - Give concrete details about your solution, pricing, timelines, etc. Avoid vague responses.- Highlight Relevant Experience - Emphasize similar projects you've completed to demonstrate your capabilities.- Proofread Thoroughly - Have multiple people review your response for errors before submitting.DON'Ts
1. THIRD ANNUAL NYC IN-BUILDING WIRELESS SUMMIT
March 31, 2015
Museum of Jewish Heritage, Manhattan
‘PEERING INTO THE FUTURE’
MARCH 31, 2015
2. THIRD ANNUAL NYC IN-BUILDING WIRELESS SUMMIT
March 31, 2015
Museum of Jewish Heritage, Manhattan
Opening Remarks:
AMY SESOL, EVENT PRODUCER, NEDAS
3. Panel Event Sign
Training Session Charging Station Lanyard Coffee Break
Table Top
Platinum Networking Reception Gold Networking Reception
THANK YOU TO OUR EVENT SPONSORS
Webcast and Video
5. THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSOR
LIVE WEBCAST STREAMING AND VIDEO
LIVE WEBCAST RIGHT NOW!
http://new.livestream.com/internetsociety/nedasnyc
6. THANK YOU TO OUR ANNUAL SPONSORS
PLATINUM
GOLD
SILVER
7. THIRD ANNUAL NYC IN-BUILDING WIRELESS SUMMIT
March 31, 2015
Museum of Jewish Heritage, Manhattan
OPENING KEYNOTE:
‘PEERING INTO THE FUTURE’
PRESENTED BY:
ILISSA MILLER, PRESIDENT, NEDAS
8. THIRD ANNUAL NYC IN-BUILDING WIRELESS SUMMIT
March 31, 2015
Museum of Jewish Heritage, Manhattan
THIRD ANNUAL NYC IN-BUILDING WIRELESS SUMMIT
March 31, 2015
Museum of Jewish Heritage, Manhattan
‘PEERING INTO THE FUTURE’
9. EVERYWHERE WE GO, NO MAT TER WHERE WE ARE,
OUR MOB I L E PHONES ARE WI T H US.
These smartphones
enable access to people,
information, email, video,
cameras, data, and
much more.
10. T HE AB I L I T Y TO CONT ROL NEARLY EV ERYT HI NG
F RO M ANY SMART MO B I L E DEV I CE
11. SEE ANYT HI NG F ROM ANYWHERE. . .
PAY FOR ANYTHI NG FROM ANY DEVI CE
Like the GOJI™
SMART LOCK
LG’s
smartwatch is a
phone, mobile
wallet and uses
WebOS
12. A WO RL D T HAT ‘ WHERE’S WAL DO ’ DOESN’ T NEED TO EXI ST
13. F ROM F I ND MY PHONE TO F I ND MY SUI TCASE
Bluesmart’s
Suitcase with it’s
own SIM-card
(by Telefonica)
14. T HE AB I L I T Y TO B UY NEARLY ANYT HI NG AT ANYT I ME
CarsGroceries
Toys
Clothes
Assistants
Real Estate
Movies
Hosting Services
Computers
Taxis
Plane Tickets
Designers
Utilities
Insurance
Games
22. Over 170 Years Ago Morse introduced the
electric Telegraph.
32 years later, in 1876 Bell invented the
telephone.
128 years ago, the first coin-operated telephone
was installed – and now they’re becoming
extinct.
Less than 100 Years
with Desk Phones!
HOW DI D WE GET HERE?
Herbert Hoover the
1st U.S. President
with a Phone on his
desk in 1929
23. Fantasy books and science
fiction visionaries set the
scene for today’s mobile
world.
1931 a book that describes “a science
fiction nightmare city with mobile
phones and moving walkways”
1945, in a Wireless World article,
Arthur C. Clarke first proposed Satellite
communications.
MOB I L E PHONES AND SAT EL L I T ES
The 35th of May, or
Conrad’s Ride to
the South Seas
24. I N JUST T HE PAST 5 0 YEARS
• The Pager – 1957 in Allentown and
Bethlehem, PA
• Modems (datasets) – 1958 by AT&T
• Touch-tone phones – 1960
• Computers – 1964, IBM’s Model 360
• FCC begins to set aside spectrum for
land mobile communications - 1968
• The Internet is founded – ARPANET’s
four-node operations 1969
• Video and Audio transmitted from
the moon - 1969
26. 1 9 8 0 ’S T HE DAWN OF T HE MODERN I NT ERNET AND
I NTRODUC TI ON OF MOBI LE COMMUNI CATI ONS
• 1981 - First cellular mobile telephone service is
offered in Saudi Arabia and Scandinavia
• 1984 - Breakup of AT&T; AT&T and NASA space
shuttle Discover launch its second Telstar 3
satellite. September 1 - Domain Name Service
(DNS) is introduced.
• 1984 - First cellular phones (just 31 years ago!)
• 1985 - AT&T Bell Laboratories combines 10 laser
beams on a single optical fiber demonstrating
the capability of lightwave systems to carry 20
billion bits per second (equal to 300,000
telephone calls.)
• 1987 – IEEE publishes a paper on Distributed
Antennas for Indoor Radio Communications
• 1988 - First Internet Exchange Point established
27. T HE ADV ENT OF
TECHNOLOGY CONT I NUES
• 1998 - Ericsson, IBM, Intel, Nokia, and Toshiba
announce they will join to develop Bluetooth for
wireless data exchange between handheld computers
or cellular phones and stationary computers
• 1999 - Wi-Fi® brand adopted for technology based
upon IEEE 802.11 specifications for wireless local area
networking.
• 1999 - Wi-Fi Alliance® founded by six companies:
3Com, Aironet, Intersil, Lucent Technologies, Nokia and
Symbol Technologies.
• 1999 - With the Wireless Communications and Public
Safety Act of 1999, Congress designates 911 as the
universal emergency number of wireline and wireless
service promoting the use of technologies that help
public safety service providers locate wireless 911
callers.
• 2000 - Digital wireless users outnumber analog
subscribers.
29. TODAY INTO TOMORROW
Testing new Wi-Fi Spectrum
(since 2013) Set to become an MVNO
(announced MWC 2015)
Changing laws, enabling technologies,
opening up spectrum
34. • Voice
• Data
• Peering
• Data Centers
• Base Station
Hotels
• Cell Towers, etc.
AT T HE CORE OF WHAT WE DO – COL L EC T I V ELY –
I S OUR AB I L I T Y TO ENAB L E:
43. Just the tip of a DandelionWE’RE JUST A T I P O F A DANDEL I ON
44. THIRD ANNUAL NYC IN-BUILDING WIRELESS SUMMIT
March 31, 2015
Museum of Jewish Heritage, Manhattan
RFP DO’S AND DON’TS
Sponsored by:
MODERATOR: DOUGLAS FISHMAN, SQUAN
48. NEEDS ANALYSIS
o TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
PURPOSE
CELLULAR
FIRST RESPONDER (ARCS)
2-WAY COMMERCIAL (LMR)
COVERAGE
COORDINATION W/OTHER SYSTEMS (WIFI, ETC.)
FREQUENCIES
PROJECT (NEW/EXISTING)
RFP Do’s and Don’ts
49. BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS
STAKEHOLDERS
OWNER
WIRELESS SERVICE PROVIDERS
3RD PARTY NEUTRAL HOST PROVIDERS
BUILD-OUT
PATHWAYS/CABLE
AND THEY WILL (OR WON’T) COME?
FUNDING
REVENUE
OPERATIONS
UPGRADES
MAINTENANCE
RFP Do’s and Don’ts
50. WRITING RFPs
“APPLES to APPLES”
DEFINE REQUIREMENTS IN ENOUGH DETAIL TO GET
COMPARABLE RESPONSES
EXAMPLE “DO” – PROVIDE AN EXCEL-BASED PRICING
SPREADSHEET FOR ALL RESPONDENTS TO USE
EXAMPLE “DON’T” – PROVIDE OPEN-ENDED REQUIREMENTS
THAT ALLOW TOO MUCH FLEXIBILITY IN RESPONSES.
RFP Do’s and Don’ts
51. WRITING RFPs
SPECIFICITY VS. FLEXIBILITY
AVOID TOO MUCH SPECIFICITY TO GIVE RESPONDENTS FLEXIBILITY
IN DEVELOPING A CREATIVE RESPONSE
PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT ON DESIGN RFPs
EXAMPLE “DO” – DEFINE EXACT COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS,
TECHNOLOGIES TO BE USED/SUPPORTED, ETC.
EXAMPLE “DON’T” – DEFINE SPECIFIC ANTENNA MAKE/MODELS,
VENDOR REQUIREMENTS, ETC.
RFP Do’s and Don’ts
52. WRITING RFPs
VENUE REQUIREMENTS
ACCURATELY AND SPECIFICALLY DEFINE THE VENUE OWNER
REQUIREMENTS, E.G.
ANTENNA PLACEMENT RESTRICTIONS
AREAS EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS
CABLING RESTRICTIONS/REQUIREMENTS
AVAILABILITY OF EXISTING FIBER, ELECTRIC, COOLING
RISER ACCESS
WORKING HOURS
COORDINATION REQUIREMENT WITH OTHER TRADES
(ARCHITECTS, ELECTRICIANS, ETC.)
RFP Do’s and Don’ts
53. WRITING RFPs
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
BE SPECIFIC
WIRELESS CARRIERS TO BE INCLUDED
TECHNOLOGIES
FREQUENCY BANDS
CHANNEL COUNTS
COVERAGE AREA / % OF COVERAGE AREA
SIGNAL STRENGTH (RSSI VS RSRP, EC VS PILOT POWER)
PUBLIC SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
RFP Do’s and Don’ts
54. WRITING RFPs
TESTING REQUIREMENTS
SPECIFY HOW THE RESPONDENTS SHOULD PROVE THAT THEY
MEET THE COVERAGE & TESTING REQUIREMENTS
SWEEPS – RANGES, THRESHOLDS, RL VS DTF
PIM TESTING – SYSTEM VS SEGMENT, THRESHOLDS
CW TESTING
BASELINE TESTING - METRICS
FIBER TESTING – OTDR, LOSS REQUIREMENTS
RFP Do’s and Don’ts
55. WRITING RFPs
DAS DESIGN
INCLUDE DESIGN WITH RFP, OR LEAVE IT TO THE BIDDERS?
Include Design with RFP Bidders Provide Design
PRO: Allows for a true
“apples to apples”
comparison for construction
of the DAS
PRO: Allows for creative and
perhaps more effective
solutions for the venue
CON: Bidder “buy-in” to the
design with associated
coverage guarantees
CON: Variety of designs
more difficult to
compare/evaluateIF DESIGN IS REQUIRED
REQUEST IBW FILE FOR EVALUATION
DESIGN MUST BE APPROVED BY ALL PARTICIPATING WSPs
RFP Do’s and Don’ts
56. WRITING RFPs
WSP COORDINATION REQUIREMENTS
DESIGN APPROVALS
ACCESS AGREEMENTS
INTEGRATION WITH WSP SIGNAL SOURCES
ON-GOING COORDINATION
RFP Do’s and Don’ts
58. WRITING RFPs
WARRANTY / POST TURN-UP REQUIREMENTS
LABOR VS MATERIAL WARRANTIES
OPTIONAL EXTENDED WARRANTY
MAINTENANCE / SLAs
REMOTE MONITORING
SPARES
RFP Do’s and Don’ts
59. RESPONDING TO RFPs
INITIAL RFP REVIEW
DEVELOP SUMMARY OF KEY REQUIREMENTS
DEVELOP LIST OF QUESTIONS FOR RFP ISSUER
DRAFT RESPONSE INCLUDING ALL REQUIRED SECTIONS
(‘STRAWMAN”)
SOLICIT INPUT FROM SALES/MARKETING, ENGINEERING,
OPERATIONS, OEMs, ETC.
RFP Do’s and Don’ts
60. RESPONDING TO RFPs
COMPILE RESPONSES – MAKE SURE ALL REQUIREMENTS ARE
ADDRESSED
WRITE EFFECTIVE COVER LETTER – INCLUDING EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY, KEY SELLING POINTS, KEY CONTACT INFORMATION,
ETC.
COMPLETE RESPONSE AT LEAST 2-3 DAYS IN ADVANCE TO
ALLOW FOR REPRODUCTION, MAKING SOFT COPIES, SHIPPING
AND DELIVERY
RFP Do’s and Don’ts
61. EVALUATING RFP RESPONSES
CREATE EVALUATION MATRIX FOR “APPLES TO APPLES”
COMPARISON
DEVELOP SCORING/WEIGHTING SYSTEM
TECHNICAL
FINANCIAL
QUALIFICATIONS
WARRANTY/MAINTENANCE
WSP COORDINATION
ETC.
RFP Do’s and Don’ts
65. EVALUATING RFP RESPONSES
TECHNICAL EVALUATION
IBWAVE MODELING VS. REALITY
QUANTITIES OF ANTENNAS, REMOTES
CONFORMANCE TO REQUIREMENTS
EQUIPMENT EVALUATION (ADRF, COMMSCOPE, ETC) – QUALITY,
RELIABLILITY, MAINTAINABILITY, ABILITY TO HANDLE FUTURE
TECHNOLOGIES/BANDS, ETC.
COVERAGE – LOCATION OF GAPS VS. KEY COVERAGE AREAS
RFP Do’s and Don’ts
66. EVALUATING RFP RESPONSES
FINANCIAL EVALUATION
CAPEX VS. OPEX
INCLUSION OF ALL FEES – TAXES, S&H?
MAINTENANCE, WARRANTEE, RMA FEES
RFP Do’s and Don’ts
67. EVALUATING RFP RESPONSES
QUALIFICATIONS
YEARS IN WIRELESS VS. YEARS IN DAS
RECENT PROJECTS
LOCAL EXPERIENCE
RELATIONSHIP WITH WSPs
KEY PERSONNEL QUALS – PROJECT MANAGER, LEAD ENGINEER
RESPONDENT LOCATION VS. VENUE LOCATION
RFP Do’s and Don’ts
68. EVALUATING RFP RESPONSES
WARRANTY / MAINTENANCE
WHAT IS INCLUDED IN WARRANTY
LABOR
MATERIALS
WARRANTY PERIOD
POST-CUTOVER SUPPORT
EXTENDED WARRANTY OPTIONS
HOW WILL WARRANTY SERVICE BE SUPPORTED?
EXPERIENCE WITH MAINTAINING / MONITORING DAS?
RFP Do’s and Don’ts
70. THIRD ANNUAL NYC IN-BUILDING WIRELESS SUMMIT
March 31, 2015
Museum of Jewish Heritage, Manhattan
TOWER SAFETY: KEY DEVELOPMENTS
PRESENTED BY:
MIKE JONES
CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
HPC WIRELESS SERVICES
71. THIRD ANNUAL NYC IN-BUILDING WIRELESS SUMMIT
March 31, 2015
Museum of Jewish Heritage, Manhattan
DAS & WiFi- A SYMBIOTIC RELATIONSHIP
MODERATED BY:
FEDOR SMITH, PRESIDENT
ATLANTIC-ACM
72. DAS & WiFi- A Symbiotic Relationship
MODERATOR PANELISTS
Fedor Smith
Atlantic ACM
Mike Collado
SOLiD
Chintan Fafadia
PCTEL
Jeff Bonja
Corning
Bill DelGrego
ExteNet
73. Our practitioners have extensive experience in strategy and
diligence cases across carriers, technology companies and
financial institutions
Note: Graphic above provides a sample of our client list and is not an exhaustive representation of ATLANTIC-ACM clients
75. ExteNet Systems, Inc.
Bill “Shoes” Delgrego, Executive Director
LEADING PROVIDER OF DISTRIBUTED NETWORKS
TO THE WIRELESS INDUSTRY IN NORTH AMERICA
24x7
NOC
in our
Lisle HQ
WI-FI
SMALL CELLS
DISTRIBUTED
RAN
DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA
SYSTEM (DAS)
EXTENET
DISTRIBUTED NETWORK
DISTRIBUTED EPC
76. 76PCTEL –NEDAS NYC 2015
PCTEL RF Solutions
Products and Services for all your wireless network design, deployment, testing and
optimization
SeeWave
Test Solutions
Network Analytics
77. 77PCTEL –NEDAS NYC 2015
PCTEL RF Solutions
Network Benchmarking
VoLTE testing
Baseline Testing
CW Testing
Design
PIM Testing
RF Sweep Testing
OTDR Testing
Commissioning
Optimization
Acceptance
Interference Mitigation
Consulting
Network Engineering Services
Expert Knowledge, Exceptional Tools
PCTEL’s engineering services team provides
Wireless network services with an emphasis on in-
building distributed antenna systems (DAS).
79. THIRD ANNUAL NYC IN-BUILDING WIRELESS SUMMIT
March 31, 2015
Museum of Jewish Heritage, Manhattan
DAS DESIGN & DEPLOYMENT FROM
START TO FINISH
SPONSORED BY:
MODERATED BY:
JORDAN FRY
ASSOCIATE, SNYDER & SNYDER
80. DAS Design and Deployment
from Start to Finish
MODERATOR
SPONSORED BY:
PANELISTS
Jordan Fry
Snyder & Snyder
Ray Kramarcy
Alpha
Technologies
Jeff Reale
Intenna Systems
Art Meierdirk
INOC
Fred Bancroft
Corning
Carla Shaffer
Anixter
81. • KEYS TO SUCCESS ON A COMPLEX DAS PROJECT
– Good Planning
• Requirements definition, DAS design, ambient signal testing, wireless
service provider coordination, pre-construction activities
– Good Execution
• High quality installation, thorough testing & documentation, optimization
– Good Leadership
• Business development, design engineering, field engineering,
construction management (pre-sales through commissioning through
service & maintenance)
– Good Communication
• Design & testing documentation, carrier coordination packages, periodic
construction & progress updates, closing documentation (as-builts)
82.
83.
84.
85. Architecture Selection:
Passive, Hybrid Fiber Coax or All Fiber
Considerations:
Remote Output Power and Power Consumption
Physical Equipment Size
Upgrade Path
Neutral Host
Services to be deployed
91. Powering Indoor Distributed Antenna Systems
Headend
Coax
Cabling
Fiber
Cabling
• Power requirement for IDAS network split into two segments: Headend &
remote access unit (RAU)
• Main interface unit
• Optical converter unit
• System controller
• Battery recharge time
• Future growth
• Remote access units
• Remote hub units
Headend
RAU
92. Basics of DAS Power
• Local – AC UPS or DC Plant with Batteries at each remote hub
• Remote – All equipment is fed from a centralized power system in the Headend
Key Considerations
• Length of Back-up time required
• Availability of AC power at each remote
• Cable Distance from Head End to farthest remote
• Space availability for power equipment and batteries
• Individual remote loads and voltage
• Maintenance
• Class 2 Architecture
93. NEC CLASS 2 Fundamentals
• NEC Class 2 Circuits – 20V to 60V & < 100VA
• Class 2 circuits are considered safe from a fire initiation standpoint and provide
acceptable protection from electrical shock
• Class 2 circuits can be installed using conventional surface-mounted cable (no
conduit, MC or armored cable)
• Class 2 circuits do not require the authorization of a certified electrical personnel
(permitting and licensing)
• Two methods of circuit protection - Article 725 of the National Electric Code
[not article 800]
Composite fiber/copper cable
CL2P-OF (Class 2 Plenum Cable Optical Fiber)
94. • Current limiting panels distribute centralized power over copper cable to multiple
remote iDAS nodes
• Panels include circuitry to limit the total power per circuit to 100VA or must use
an aggregation unit
• Maximum distance dictated by wire gauge and voltage
Headend/Host Site
Current Limited
48Vdc Panel
-48Vdc
Power
System
1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
36
AC
Battery
~
=
Class 2 Power Layout
450 VA
70 VA
95. Non-Class 2 Power Drivers
• AC Powered Remotes
• High power consumption remotes
• Distances exceeded 2500ft
• Jurisdictional restrictions
• Same conceptual layout as Class 2 Solution, except single circuit cable for
conductor & conduit/armored cable installed by electrician
• AC remote fed layouts driven a large UPS in the Headend offers many of the
same benefits of a Class 2 DC solution
96. Headend Power
• Standard runtime is generally 4 to 8 hours
• Vast range in loads, from 1000W to 15kva
• Equipment voltage commonly -48 vDC
– Can create a dual power system requirement with AC for remotes & DC for
Headend
• Reliability / Modularity / Scalability
• Space and environmental conditions
100. Anixter’s Elite DAS Network
Integrators
• iBwave certified
• DAS OEM certifications
• Operator Relationships
Contractors
• Cabling certifications
• PIM certifications
• DAS OEM Installation certifications
101.
102. Operations Support is for the life of the service, it should be a key
consideration during the design phase, with a focus on key SLA
requirements from the contract.
SLAs are usually written for each carrier on a Neutral Host system, be prepared to
manage each as unique:
• Uptime (outage time, should not include impairments)
• Response time to alarms
• Response time to calls / email / portal communication
• Mean Time To Restore (usually based on severity)
• Time to Dispatch / On-site
• Exception / Force Majeure
Design a cost effective solution to meet those requirements.
Operations Support is for the Life of the Service
103. Operations Support Planning – Hardware & Management
• Business planning / budgeting
• Purpose / objectives / SLAs to support
• SLA – Uptime / Response time - 3rd party support agreements
• Hardware selection – include neutral host support requirements
• Network (including management network) design in redundancy
HOST
MGT
MGT
MGT
INFRASTRUCTURE
Industry Standard
alarms and
management
GUI – Effective
Navigation
For Troubleshooting &
Restoration
Management information (by
Carrier) to the remotes
Operations Support – Hardware & Management
104. FIRST LEVEL TIER 1 TEAM
24x7 Service Desk, Incident Management
(Trouble Ticketing, Notification, Escalation, Troubleshooting, Reporting…)
TIER 2 AND 3 SUPPORT ENGINEERS
DAS Backhaul Environmental
Carriers Security Dispatch
REPORTING&ANALYSIS
INFRASTRUCTURE/FACILITIES
MONITORING SYSTEMS & TOOLS
WIRELESS CARRIERSMANAGEMENT / USERS
HOST
MGT
MGT
Design for Neutral
Host Support
Design for Neutral Host Support
105. Operation Support is for the life of the service
Design a Cost Effective Solution to meet Business Requirements / Expectations
• Hardware is selections include operations support requirements
• Support requirement designed to meet SLA / business requirements
• Back to back operations agreements to meet those needs
• Design in redundancy for “management network”
• Build information (network, site, contact, etc.) database from beginning
• 24x7 Network Operations Center
• Capable of opening, updating and closing incidents with carriers
• Tiered structure (Level 1, 2 & 3) for cost effective resource allocation
• Fully documented work instructions & management data bases
• Workflow management tools in place for effective support
• Consider outsourcing – manage the quality, cost and risk of service delivery
• On site support
• NOC support (typically Tier 1 / Service Desk)
Summary
106. THIRD ANNUAL NYC IN-BUILDING WIRELESS SUMMIT
March 31, 2015
Museum of Jewish Heritage, Manhattan
BASE STATION HOTELING- MICRO
SOLUTION DEPLOYMENTS
MODERATED BY:
JAKE RASWEILER, COO
SUBLIME WIRELESS
107. Base Station Hoteling- Micro Solution
Deployments
MODERATOR PANELISTS
Mark Parr
Bandwidth Logic
Joshua Broder
Tilson
Ken Sandfeld
SOLiD
Jake Rasweiler
Sublime Wireless
Ray LaChance
ZenFi Networks
108. • How much capacity on a pole?
• What drives capacity?
• RAN resource locations?
• Future scalability?
5G What? LTE-U Who?
• Where is the SILVER bullet?
109. High Density Urban Network Options
BBU
CPRI fed RHU’s
Dedicated Fiber per RHU
2-4 Bands MIMO per RHU – 1 Operator
Full carrier spectrum per band
Switch
BBU
BBU
SC
SC SC SCSCSwitch
Daisy Chain using WDM optics
16-48 Channels preferred
Ethernet fed Small Cells
Dedicated Fiber per SC
2-4 Bands MIMO per SC – 1 Operator
DAS DAS DAS
BBU +
Radio
Daisy Chain using WDM optics
24 Remotes per fiber
Ring Capable
GbE Small Cells
Next Gen DAS
Head
End
RHU
Agg
HUB
8
Branches
Routing
Function Digital optics feed DAS remotes
CPRI Fed RHU’s
Dedicated Fiber per remote or Daisy
Up to 5 Bands MIMO + GbE
Multiple operators
RHU RHU RHU RHU
RHU
RHU
Daisy Chain using WDM optics
16-48 Channels preferred
CPRI Radio Heads
110. About me
• Network engineering
background as an Army
signal officer
• Deployed large fiber
and wireless smart grid
networks during
stimulus
• Leading a team of DAS
and small cell
deployment pros
111. Tilson
• 100 employees deploying
DAS, small cells, and
macro sites for carriers
• 5 national office,
including NNJ
• Deploying smart grid
wireless on poles
• Pole attachment people-
65,000 in past three years
112. Base Station Hoteling
Existing EnodeB
Service Router
oDAS Headed
Hotelled EnodeB
Hotelled Radios
Shared Backhaul
oDAS remote nodes
Existing macro site
113. THIRD ANNUAL NYC IN-BUILDING WIRELESS SUMMIT
March 31, 2015
Museum of Jewish Heritage, Manhattan
THIRD PARTY VALIDATION FOR DAS
SYSTEMS: AN INSIDE OR OUTSIDE JOB?
SPONSORED BY:
MODERATED BY:
DOMINIC VILLECCO, PRESIDENT, V-COMM
114. Third-Party Validation for DAS Systems: An
Inside or Outside Job?
MODERATOR PANELISTS
Dominic Villecco
V-COMM
Nathan Cornish
Transit Wireless
David Evans
AT&T
SPONSORED BY:
115. TRANSIT WIRELESS OVERVIEW
CONNECTING THE UNDERGROUND
#1 busiest & largest transit system in North America
4% increase of NYC subway ridership from 2012 to 2013
2.6+ billion NYC subway riders annually
Phase 1&2: 76
Stations
COMPLETE
Midtown Manhattan &
Queens
Phase 3: 39 Stations
IN-PROGRESS
Uptown/Downtown
Manhattan
Phase 4: 39 Stations
IN-PROGRESS
Bronx, Upper East Side
& Midtown Manhattan
Phase 5: 41 Stations
SPRING 2016
Midtown Manhattan &
Brooklyn
Phase 6: 41 Stations
WINTER 2016
Downtown Manhattan
& Brooklyn
Phase 7: 42 Stations
SPRING 2017
Midtown/Downtown
Manhattan & Brooklyn
New Yorkers are always “on the go” and always
connecting – but the one place they have been
disconnected is the subway.
• Robust, high capacity wireless network with
industry-leading speeds
• Wireless service within 83 Manhattan and
Queens stations
• 279 underground stations covered by 2017
NETWORK BUILD PLAN
117. PARALLEL SYSTEM
• Parallel system – Mobile
& Wi-Fi
• Distributed antennas for
Mobile System
• Access points for Wi-Fi
and 4.9GHz Public Safety
• Fiber to the edge parallel
to coaxial network
118. DESIGN APPROVAL: CARRIER
• CMRS requirement for AT&T,
Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon
Wireless
• Current bands:
• 700
• 800 SMR
• 850 CELL
• 1900 PCS
• 2100 AWS
• -85 dBm @ 95% of the
coverage area
Transit Wireless coverage for the carriers includes all public space as well as ingress/egress
• Ingress/egress
areas are where
handoff occurs
119. IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS
1. Construction:
Physical Installation by electrical contractors
• Coaxial and Passive Intermod (PIM)
2. Carrier Wave (CW) Testing:
• Confirms coverage against RF design
• Confirms coverage meets customer SLAs
3. Carrier Integration:
• Installation of carrier equipment & connection to Transit Wireless DAS
• Confirmation of handoff to outside macro and ability to make 911 calls
• Carrier optimization
4. Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) Testing:
• Confirmation of quality of carrier services
• Call quality, dropped calls, handoffs, signal levels and throughput speeds
121. CARRIER WAVE (CW) TESTING
Between Antennas
Lower Signal Levels
Cell Band
AWS Band
122. CW TESTING: COMPARISON TO DESIGN
Coupler Issue Identified via
comparison to iBwave
CW Report (Issue)
CW Report (Resolved)
iBwave Prediction
123. CMRS METRICS TESTING
• Contractual Agreements between Transit Wireless and CMRS provider requires
Transit to meet specific RF metrics.
•RSRP (LTE); RSCP (UMTS/HSPDA); RSSI (GSM, EVDO);
Pilot Power (CDMA)
Downlink RF Signal Strength
•SINR (LTE); EC/IO (CDMA/EVDO); Ec/NO
(UMTS/HSPDA); RxQual (GSM)Downlink RF Quality
•BER (LTE/UMTS/HSPA), FER (CDMA/EVDO/GSM)
Downlink Error Rates
•PCI (LTE); Scrambling Code (UMTS/HSPDA); PN
(CDMA/EVDO); BCCH (GSM)
Downlink Cell ID for Trouble
Shooting
Uplink TX Power
Typical Quality Metrics Required (taken with commercial devices):
124. SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS (SLA)
• Service Level Agreement to define specific KPIs (Key
Performance Indicators) that measure the CMRS customer’s
experience
• Testing performed with commercial devices to demonstrate
User Experience (UX)
• Typical KPIs
• Voice: Dropped Calls, Block Calls (Access Failures),
Handover Failures
• Data: Throughput (both Downlink and Uplink) Averages
and Peaks, Dropped Connections, Failed Connections
126. CONTRACTOR TRAINING
• Individually trained construction team to ensure
quality standards
• Contractor skill sets do not “translate” well for
RF work
• RF concepts
• RF equipment handling and installation
• RF commissioning
• Certification program
• Implementation of an extensive Quality
Assurance program “a must” to reduce
expensive “rework” for successful deployments
128. EMF TESTING
• DAS systems are not exempt from FCC EMF requirements
• Predictive and Measured Studies have been conducted
Measured Results
Adjusted Results
RF Exposure MPE Public Limit
129. AT&T WIRELESS
• AT&T operates wireless networks in the New
York BTA, MTA and CMA in the following
frequency bands:
– 700 MHz
– 850 MHz (cellular)
– 1900 MHz (PCS)
– 2300 MHz (WCS)
• AT&T NY Metro DAS installations 50+
• 50% neutral host tenant
• 50% neutral host operator
130. AT&T DAS DESIGN APPROACH
Internal
(AT&T)
3rd Party
Project summary X
Design summary information
(system requirements)
X
Validation of venue capacity X
BTS dimensioning X
Design scope X
Validate pre-design data
(benchmark data)
X
Design quality assurance X
Design coverage objectives X
System configuration X X
Coverage plots X X
Regulatory requirements X X
132. TECHNICAL SELECTION
• Design approach:
• RF Passive DAS
• Low-power Optical DAS
• High-power Optical DAS
• Overcoming Interference
• Using iBwave to predict RSSI
• Practical considerations:
• Building drawings are never available for all floors
• Tenants will impose restrictions on antennas
• Space
• Head end
• Remote locations
• Cable runs
• Fiber plant
133. EMPTY FLOOR PLANS
• Design Criteria: Design for -55dBm
or higher RSSI in iBwave to account
for undocumented walls
• Prediction: iBwave design predicted
-55dBm RSSI for 94% of floor
• Measurement: Walk test results
show -70dBm or higher RSSI
covering 100% of floor
RSSI (dBm)
Floor Layout
134. SAME BUILDING – ALTERNATE DESIGNS
Collaboration with third-party designer
Original Design
Alternative Design
135. AT&T DESIGN CRITERIA
UMTS
Dominance Over Surrounding Macro
• Dominance Over Surrounding Macro
• Best indoor server RSCP >= best macro server RSCP + 6dB for 95% of the transition area where
traffic is located, including stairs and elevators.
• Best indoor server RSCP >Best macro server RSCP for remaining 5% of the venue transition area
LTE
Dominance Over Surrounding Macro
• Dominance Over Surrounding Macro
• Best indoor server RSRP >= best macro server RSRP + 6dB for 95% of the area where traffic is
located, including stairs and elevators.
• Best indoor server RSRP >Best macro server RSRP for remaining 5% of the area
137. THIRD-PARTY VALIDATION DISCUSSION
• Transit Wireless
• MTA contractual requirements
• Carrier tenant contractual requirements
• V-COMM third-party validation for both
• AT&T
• Tenant of neutral host
• Operator of neutral host
• Operator of independent DAS
• Third-party help on all
140. THIRD ANNUAL NYC IN-BUILDING WIRELESS SUMMIT
March 31, 2015
Museum of Jewish Heritage, Manhattan
ZONING, JURISDICTIONS, RIGHTS OF WAY-
NAVIGATING PERMITS FOR DEPLOYMENTS
MODERATED BY:
ILISSA MILLER, TRUSTEE
VILLAGE OF MAMARONECK
141. Zoning, Jurisdictions, Rights of Way- Navigating
Permits for Deployments
MODERATOR PANELISTS
Marvin Webster
Environmental
Corporation of America
David Bronston
Phillips Lytle
Lino Sciaretta
Wilson, Elser, Moskwitz,
Edelman & Dicker LLP
Ilissa Miller
Trustee
Village of
Mamaroneck
and NEDAS President
142. ACCELERATION F BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT
(FEBRUARY 9, 2015)
• Provided definition of “Antenna”.
• Clarifies that Collocation exclusions apply to all non-tower structures,
not just buildings.
• Clarifies that interior deployments are subject to the same exclusions
(and inclusions) as exterior deployments.
• NEPA exclusion for new & replacement facilities in Aboveground
Utility ROW if no substantial increase. No NHPA exclusion here.
• Eliminates the requirement for SHPO review of Collocations on Utility
poles based solely on age, provided that size limits are met (3/6/17)
• Allows for modification of some existing facilities on non-tower
structures over 45 years old.
143. ACCELERATION OF BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT – NEW AND
REPLACEMENT STRUCTURES IN UTILITY ROW
• The FCC adopted new NEPA categorical exclusion for new and
replacement small structures within active above-ground utility
corridors, provided there is no substantial increase in size (10% or 20
vertical feet) over existing structures and that ground disturbance is
limited to the proximity of the new or replacement structure within
the easement.
• Important - This is a NEPA exclusion, not an NHPA exclusion. SHPO
Review Required in Same Manner as Prior Utility Exclusion, so that
Exclusion does not hold in a historic district, for instance. Tribal
consultation is required for all new, non-replacement Tower
Structures.
144. ACCELERATION OF BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT – UTILITY
COLLOCATIONS
• FCC adopted exclusion for collocation on existing Utility poles/structures
where there is no new ground disturbance and the antennas and
equipment do not exceed a specified volume (3 cf. each
antenna/enclosure, not to exceed 6 cf. in the aggregate and a total 17 cf.
for all equipment enclosures across all wireless implementations at a
specific location or node). Not applicable to:
• Collocations on light poles, traffic lights, or any non-Utility structures.
• Not applicable within 250 feet of a historic district
• Not applicable on utility structures that are listed in or eligible for
the National Register, or where there is a documented complaint
relative to historic properties.
145. ACCELERATION OF BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT – ON
EXISTING NON-TOWER STRUCTURES OVER 45 YEARS OLD
• FCC adopted an exclusion for collocation/modification of a facility located
on a Non-Tower Structure where there are pre-existing antennas and no
new ground disturbance.
• Exclusion provides size and height restrictions (antennas no more than 3
feet wider or taller).
• New visible antennas must be within 10 feet, as measured from
centerlines for visible antennas.
• Views of new and replacement antennas must encompass existing
antennas.
• No new equipment cabinets may be visible from adjacent streets and
public spaces. (see next slide).
146. ACCELERATION OF BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT – ON
EXISTING NON-TOWER STRUCTURES OVER 45 YEARS OLD
• Pre-existing antennas must not have been deployed
using this exclusion.
• New/replacement antennas must comply with existing
zoning and historic preservation requirements for
existing antennas (i.e., concealment, painting to match
existing surfaces, etc.).
• Exclusion not applicable within 250 feet of a historic
district, on Non-Tower Structures that are listed in or
eligible for the National Register, or where there is a
documented complaint relative to adverse effects to
historic properties.
147. 2014 FCC Infrastructure Report
& Order
Acceleration of Broadband Deployment by Improving Wireless Facilities
Siting Policies, Report & Order
(WC 11-59; WT 13-238, 13-32)
NEDAS NYC Summit
148. • “a State or local government may not deny,
and shall approve, any eligible facilities
request for a modification of an existing
wireless tower or base station that does not
substantially change the physical dimensions
of such tower or base station.”
Section 6409 entitled “Facility Modifications”
149. • “eligible facilities request” is defined as any
request for modification of an existing
wireless tower or base station that involves
(a) collocation of new transmission
equipment;
(b) removal of transmission equipment; or
(c) replacement of transmission equipment.
Section 6409 Provisions (cont’d)
150. • Eliminate ambiguities in interpretation and
facilitate the zoning and permitting process for
collocations and other modifications to
existing towers and base stations
• Avoid delay of addressing these issues in the
courts
Section 6409 Purposes of Regulation:
151. A modification would be a substantial change if it meets any of the following
criteria:
(1) For towers outside public right-of-way, an increase in height of the tower
by more than 10%, or by the height of one additional antenna array with
separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed twenty feet,
whichever is greater; for towers within public right-of-way and for all base
stations, an increase in the height of the tower or base station by more than
10% or ten feet, whichever is greater;
(2) For towers outside public right-of-way, it protrudes from the edge of the
tower more than twenty feet, or more than the width of the tower structure
at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater; and for those towers
within the right-of-way and for all base stations, it protrudes from the edge of
the structure more than six feet;
Section 6409: Substantial Change
152. (3) An installation of more than the standard number of new equipment
cabinets for the technology involved, but not to exceed four cabinets;
(4) Any excavation or deployment outside the current site of the tower or
base station;
(5) An installation that would defeat the existing concealment elements of the
tower or base station; or
(6) An installation not complying with conditions associated with prior
approval of construction or modification of the tower or base station, unless
non-compliance is due to an increase in height, increase in width, addition of
cabinets, or new excavation that does not exceed the corresponding
“substantial change” thresholds identified above.
Section 6409: Substantial Change (cont’d)
153. • State/local government may only require applicants to provide
documentation reasonably related to determining whether the request is
an eligible facilities request.
• State/local government has 60 days for review, timeframe can be tolled
by:
Mutual agreement; or
If reviewing body informs applicant within 30 days that application is
incomplete
Section 6409: Application Review
162. THIRD ANNUAL NYC IN-BUILDING WIRELESS SUMMIT
March 31, 2015
Museum of Jewish Heritage, Manhattan
THE MACRO VIEW: BACK-HAUL SOLUTIONS
& STRATEGIES
PRESENTED BY:
HUNTER NEWBY, CEO, ALLIED FIBER
163. Wireless Backhaul
Non- Allied Fiber towers with
mobile wireless carrier tenants-
No fiber presence
5-10 Miles
1-10 Miles
1-2 Miles
1. Subsea Landing Point 4A. Third Party Towers with New Third Party Fiber Lateral Construction
2. Dual Fiber Ducts 4B. Third Party Towers with Third Party Microwave Backhaul
3. Allied Fiber Colocation 5. Data Center / Carrier Hotel
4. Allied Fiber Cell Towers
1
2
3
4
5
4A4B
Small Cell Backhaul = X 1,000
164. Allied Fiber Southeast Segment
Colocation AccessRoute Access
727 total route miles
- 364 +/- route miles from Miami, FL, to Jacksonville, FL
- 363 +/- route miles from Jacksonville, FL, to Atlanta, GA
Florida East Coast Railway (“FECR”) Right-of-Way
(“RoW”) agreement completed; Norfolk Southern Railway
(“NS”) Right-of-Way agreement completed and executed
Last “fully-built” underground conduits available along
corridor
3 new undersea cables terminating in Jacksonville and
Boca Raton, FL, provide fiber access to South America,
Europe and the Caribbean
Fiber Access
Intermediate access points at least every 3,000 / 5,000 (feet
depending on the route)
- Allows wireless operators and enterprises to efficiently
connect to a network-neutral fiber backbone
Dark fiber access points enable much needed rural broadband
solution
More than 250 towers already connected to the Allied Fiber
system
Network-neutral facilities located every 60 miles
- Accommodates long-haul signal regeneration equipment,
short-haul customer and local colocation customer
interconnection
Improves network control, performance and reduces latency
Distributed Internet Exchange architecture begin designed to carry
FL-IX
Netflix, Google, Microsoft, Twitter, etc..
165. THIRD ANNUAL NYC IN-BUILDING WIRELESS SUMMIT
March 31, 2015
Museum of Jewish Heritage, Manhattan
Questions?
Thank you!
166. THIRD ANNUAL NYC IN-BUILDING WIRELESS SUMMIT
March 31, 2015
Museum of Jewish Heritage, Manhattan
CLOSING REMARKS
167. THIRD ANNUAL NYC IN-BUILDING WIRELESS SUMMIT
March 31, 2015
Museum of Jewish Heritage, Manhattan
THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING
168. THANK YOU TO OUR PLATINUM
NETWORKING RECEPTION SPONSORS
169. THANK YOU TO OUR GOLD
NETWORKING RECEPTION SPONSORS
170. Panel Event Sign
Training Session Charging Station Lanyard Coffee Break
Table Top
Platinum Networking Reception Gold Networking Reception
THANK YOU TO OUR EVENT SPONSORS
Webcast and Video
Everywhere we go, no matter where we are (on the ground, at an event, work, home, plane, etc.) we are always connected.
We share what we eat, where we go, we price shop as we shop, send reminders, stay connected, search for nearby friends, answer emails, talk on the phone, snap chat away, and more. The anxiety we have when we can’t find our phone, lose it or god forbid leave it at home on our desk or in our car.
We can control when information is shared with us, manage events, ,read the news, make the news, track weather, monitor our homes. These devices were supposed to help us simplify our world but with so much access to information we can make nearly anything happen at any time.
Controlling things from mobile devices
Underwater – ‘Xperia Z4 Tablet by Sony’
You can see anything – like the GOJI Smart Lock which allows you to see who is at your door, even if you aren’t! And LG’s smartwatch – for just $229 you can get information by simply tapping your wrist!
Need to know when your package shipped – it’s there!
But there’s more!
If your flight is running late – it’s there!
How many emails came in while you were at the meeting
And you can talk to it! ‘Ok Google, how many calories are in a New York City Bagel’
Remember this game? The guess for where items are at how to find them is over. Because your devices will let you know where it is anyway!
My 11 year old son was home waiting for me to get back from a meeting in the city and he calls me and asks, Mom, why are you on the Hutch? He can track where I am by pinging my smart phone. He doesn’t like to be home alone so he was watching me make my journey home to keep him comforted. Is this the new wave of babysitting? I think not, but it certainly is remarkable to know that he will be able to find my phone for me even when I can’t!
I should have gotten paid for all the product plugs in this presentation, right?
We live in a world that has just started to enable the ability to buy nearly anything at any time. We seek control in all we do – we can buy, sell, trade, re-fill, price shop, compare, research, talk, eat, pray , share with a few elegant finger taps. And folks.. This is just the beginning.
We all know about the self driving cars. They drive, detect, stop for you, anticipate movements tell you when you have gone over the line, where danger may be lurking.
Retail – Amazon, Nordstrom, eBay
Food – FreshDirect, PeaPod,
Delivery services- Seamless web, etc.
Car services – Uber, Lift,
You tell me – shout it out!
Other
We, in this room, are enabling the ability to access information from anywhere. The Intenet of Things revolution is upon us and we are the experienced, knowledgeable thought leaders that know how to enable what businesses and consumers want - which is – it all.
The people in this room design networks, architect technology, connect wireless and wire line systems, building signaling and amplification platforms to ensure information can be shared – quickly, efficiently and effectively.
We are the people who enable others as well as ourselves to get information from point A to point B – ensuring the path they take are not only well constructed but optimized for immediacy. Our end-users, are people like your cousins, nephews, sisters, neighbors. They have no clue what it takes the ensure a highly connected world, but they do know when they aren’t connected. You can’t go to a stadium or arena today without expecting to post a photo on Facebook, live stream the TV broadcast or even scan that cool ad using your QR code. Hospitals, fuggedaboutit! We can work from hospital beds, Doctors can monitor operations across oceans, and our offices and homes MUST BE ON ALL THE TIME. You know that feeling when you have no signal on your cell phone, no Internet access, you feel shut off, shut out, shut down – a single entity without the ability to know.. Anything. And municipalities – they have enough to deal with but with Public safety a huge concern and residents requiring access to any kind of information at any time while complaining about taxes but expecting more all the time… We are on the go – while constantly ON THE KNOW!
We’re going to take a few steps back in time. I’m about to remind you how short of a time space it has been since we have had the wherewithall to do what we are doing with the technology we have… this is really interesting.
For most of us here today, these revolutionary inventions occurred within our life time – and not all that long ago.
I may have been born in 1971 but I am only 25!
Most of the history we just ran through was the wireline world. The wireless world we are enabling is only just beginning.
Anyone here 31 years old? Well, you’re as old as the very first celluar phone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_antenna_system
In 1998 I worked for Ericsson and was excited to be in an office trialing blue tooth. I didn’t even have my own cell phone until 1999! Think about when you got your first cell phone, wireless modem, looking in that rear view mirror I hate to say it, the objects are closer than they really are!
2008 - There are more than 270 million wireless subscribers who use more than 2.2 trillion minutes; more than 1 trillion SMS messages are sent and received in the U.S.
2008 - October 13 marks the 25th anniversary of commercial wireless communications and the launch of the Wireless History Foundation. (31 years old!)
2009 - Wireless subscribers use more than 6.2 billion minutes per day and send and receive more than 5 billion SMS messages per day.
2010 – China dominates the internet with over 450 million Chinese Internet users
2010 - First 4G handset is introduced at International CTIA WIRELESS show.
2013 – FCC moves to give more spectrum to Wi-Fi
2013 – Google gets FCC approval to hunt through wireless spectrum for whitespace
2013 – Amazon tests new Wi-Fi network spectrum
2013 – FCC changes rules governing the 60 GHz (57–64 GHz) band, making it one of the key technologies for LTE backhaul.[26] The move will "facilitate the use of this unlicensed spectrum as a backhaul alternative in densely populated areas where 4G and other wireless services are experiencing an ever-increasing need for additional spectrum.”
TODAY
There are more than 356 Million wireless subscribers in the U.S. alone
More than 100 billion SMS messages are sent daily
That doesn’t event touch the amount of wireless data we are sending in each and every moment – including RIGHT NOW!
http://www.slideshare.net/fredrcjr/telecommunications-evolution-timeline
http://www.computerhistory.org/timeline/?category=net
http://www.mikundan.com/Portfolio/winstaru/WUContents/courses/intro/1history1.htm
http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2009/05/the-evolution-of-cell-phone-design-between-1983-2009/
http://www.networkworld.com/article/2174642/wireless/wireless-timeline--2013--and-a-bit--in-the-world-of-spectrum.html
https://nichilee.wordpress.com/category/timeline-of-wireless-communication/
http://www.statista.com/statistics/283507/subscribers-to-top-wireless-carriers-in-the-us/
This brings us to today. In 2014 it was confirmed that Google begin to rent wireless access from Verizon and Sprint as it becomes its own mobile virtual network operator (MVNO)
Then there are Google Fiber Boxes. There are reports that claim Google will rely on Wi-Fi calling made through Google Fiber Wi-Fi hotspots. The Information believes that Google’s wireless service would use carriers’ networks only when service is either insufficient or not available. To take real advantage of this, you’d have to live in a Fiber-supported area, which, at the moment, only include Kansas City, Missouri and Provo, Utah, though Fiber will be expanded to more metro areas in the near future. If this is actually true (and only Google really can answer this) It seems as if Google is slowly piecing a wireless network together. Next year, a spokesperson from Google will do this speech!
Read more: http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/google-wireless-news/#ixzz3Q5jD67Eh
Follow us: @digitaltrends on Twitter | digitaltrendsftw on Facebook
http://www.slideshare.net/fredrcjr/telecommunications-evolution-timeline
http://www.computerhistory.org/timeline/?category=net
http://www.mikundan.com/Portfolio/winstaru/WUContents/courses/intro/1history1.htm
http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2009/05/the-evolution-of-cell-phone-design-between-1983-2009/
http://www.networkworld.com/article/2174642/wireless/wireless-timeline--2013--and-a-bit--in-the-world-of-spectrum.html
https://nichilee.wordpress.com/category/timeline-of-wireless-communication/
http://www.statista.com/statistics/283507/subscribers-to-top-wireless-carriers-in-the-us/
Facebook Aquila Drone beam down Internet Access with Lasers
By now you either read or seen the news reports. Just last week at Facebook’s F8 conference in San Francisco they announced an open sourced development tool – REACTIVE NATIVE, showed off new artificial intelligence systems that can identify and understand the meaning of video and text content. And this Aquila Drone – Solar Powered – able to be in flight for up to 3 months at a time,- pushing internet access down to people 60-90,000 feet below using LASERS. It’s not a bird or a plane, it’s an Internet drone! Test flights start this summer.
It’s a remarkable world we are in.
A new era is upon us. We have to stop thinking the old ways and start thinking new ways. What we know is great, but what we don’t know yet is better.
We are the people that are collectively making communications happen. This old diagram only touches upon what capabilities we have built. We live in a world where we can talk to anyone anywhere, we can see them, send messages to them simultaneously. We peer with them – from a network stand point – we house information about our collective selves in data centers. We beam signals to and from base station hotels that must interconnect with the wireless world. But there’s more than this that needs to happen…
We are – just today – looking at the horizon. We can’t even FATHOM what is beyond that point. Each step we take closer to it reveals something new… different.
Data is everywhere. Literally and figuratively. The wireless signals traversing this room alone is incredible to think about.
Today we are here to think beyond. Work together, imagine what the world will look like and map a path to get there. We can’t do it in isolation or alone – we need everyone to realize what our capabilities need to be and work toward enabling that to happen. This is much bigger than we can ever imagine ourselves to be. But we are doing it. We are here. Because in the end…
Just to add some perspective, typical DAS installation of 400,000 sqft enterprise building requires 15K feet of coax.
CLICK To support the IT needs for LAN and WLAN, you will need to add additional 180k feet of category cabling. This amounts to 195Kft of cabling with a weight of 5500 pound.
Going back to our pervious example, to support the cellular and WiFI services of a 400,000 sqft enterprise building you only need 7K ft of composite cable .To add the IT infrastructure with PoL, you only need to add 30K ft of fiber.
This amounts to 37K ft of cabling with a weight of 700 pound.
About 1/5 of the cable footage and 1/8 of the weight vs. traditional in building networks.
The Solution
All digital platform
Transport RF, Ethernet, CPRI, etc
THOR+, Green Mode
PIM, VSWR, CW, SA, optical measurements, delay equalization, performance monitoring per remote
Integrated SON features, performance reporting, dynamic sectoring
Automated first line of defense
Benefit
Do more with less
Stronger ROI on CAPEX
Reduces OPEX
Reduces required labor and testing tools
Higher utilization of RAN resources
Reduces required labor and testing tools
All digital platform
Transport RF, Ethernet, CPRI, etc
Do more with less
Stronger ROI on CAPEX
Reduces OPEX
Reduces required labor and testing tools
Higher utilization of RAN resources
Reduces required labor and testing tools