2. The Hindu Kush Himalaya
Global asset for food, energy, water, carbon,
and cultural and biological diversity
3. • 8 countries
• 240 million
people in the
HKH
• Source of
10 major Asian
river systems
• 1.9 billion
people in the
river basins
4. Erosion
GLOF
Water Storage
High altitude wetland
Hydropower
Irrigation
Industry
Large settlements
Navigation
Flood
GW depletion
Boundary
Boundary
Agriculture
Hydropower
Aquifer recharge
Flood/ flash floods/
landslides
Erosion and
sedimentation
Sedimentation
Upstream-downstream
Linkages
5. HKH basins support some of the world’s most populated areas
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2010
2015
Basin
2.2 1.1
1.5
2.0
1.3
0.7
1.4
1.1
0.5
Avg increase 1% per year
Population(10^6)
• Population 1.9 billion in 2015
• Up to 2.3 billion by 2050, 65%
urban
• Increasing water and energy
intensity in agriculture
• Water demand will double by
2050
6. Too much and too little water
Floods and droughts have
become more frequent
Some floods are transboundary
in nature
Strong Seasonality
7. In Numbers
10% of all floods are
transboundary
These cause over 30% of all
flood casualties
Those affected account for
60% of the total displaced
population
8. Why regional cooperation on water?
Manage varied distribution of water
Reduce risk of climate related effects making water
supply erratic
Opportunity for overcoming economic,
environmental, technological, and institutional
barriers
Multiple benefits of infrastructure development
9. Current Water Cooperation
Nepal and India: Sharada (1920), Koshi (1954) and
Gandak (1960); Equity in water sharing often
questioned;
Indus water treaty (1960): successful examples;
complications due to increasing demand and desire to
build more infrastructure
Ganges water treaty (1996): Based on old flow data;
no dispute resolution method;
Afghanistan and Pakistan: no treaty; 70% of Afghan
water flow outside the country but treaty only with
Iran
10. Challenges in regional collaboration
Hydropolitics – mistrust, top down approach
Knowledge gaps – misinformation leading to
misinterpretation
Conventional approach – sectoral vs integrated;
resources vs benefits
Inadequate institutional arrangements and
capacities: Lack of joint institutions
12. Regional Platforms
CryoHub – collaborative effort that
shares and disseminates cryosphere-
related data and information
HYCOS – four countries participate in
flood information sharing – could be
expanded
[http://www.icimod.org/hycosrfis]
ICIMOD Experiences
[http://www.icimod.org/?q=22937]
13. Knowledge Networks
Koshi – 3 countries of Koshi basin
cooperating in knowledge
development.
Preparing for Koshi DRR Knowledge Hub
[http://www.icimod.org/kbp]
UIBN – a knowledge and research
network of regional countries in HKH
to improve understanding
cryosphere changes
[http://www.icimod.org/?q=11537]
15. Before flood After flood
Flood Situation in Bhitamore, Bihar – livestock and people shifted to safer
places such as school buildings
12 August 2017, Ratu River
An example of local level cross border cooperation between Nepal and India
16. An Agenda for co-operation
increasing drivers of change compels
transboundary cooperation for
knowledge development and resource
management
exchange of information on climate
hazards and risks as well as mitigation
harmonized monitoring mechanisms,
data management, and uniform
reporting
Recognition of the importance of transboundary
cooperation is a prerequisite for realizing the water related
SDG targets. Can we be more ambitious?
Water is distributed very differently spatially and temporally.
Poor management and climate-related effects are making water supplies erratic
Provides important opportunities for overcoming economic, environmental, technological, financial, and institutional barriers to water resources development
Could reduce risk of flood and drought, augment dry season river flows, expand irrigation and navigation facilities, and enhance energy and environmental security
Strengthen resilience to climate change
Prevent and resolve conflicts over water resources
Hydropolitics: inward looking laws and acts; mistrust, unwillingness to share information; top down approach, limited role of civil society/private sector
Conventional perspectives: sectoral vs integrated/nexus approach; resources vs benefits
Knowledge gaps: many misinformation leading to misinterpretation; knowledge development limited to admin boundaries;
Inadequate institutional arrangements and capacities: Lack of established joint institutions for transboundary water governance. recognizing both common interests and differences of co-riparian countries
Infrastructure and market: cross border transmission line; power market
Capacity gaps:??
Changing driving forces
Sub-regional cooperation
Cooperation on sharing benefits
Energy cooperation
BIMSTEC
Less sensitive water issues
Energy
Navigation
Erosion, sedimentation
DRR
Recognition of the importance of transboundary cooperation is a prerequisite for realizing the water related SDG targets and the broader Sustainable Development Goals. Therefore, its significance goes beyond water sharing itself.
Increasing drivers of change compels transboundary cooperation for knowledge development and resource management
A common basis for decision-making requires harmonized monitoring mechanisms, compatible assessment methods and data management, as well as uniform reporting procedures.
Exchange of information – including on water allocation, floods, and pollution caused by accidents - on infrastructure projects that could affect downstream countries, on extreme events (such as floods and droughts), as well as on operations such as hydropower, navigation and irrigation, and the chemical and quantitative status of groundwater resources etc
Some good examples of cooperation and some low hanging fruits
What are the other opportunities? Can we be more ambitious?