![Evaluation of a network ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Was ist angesagt? (8)
Andere mochten auch
Andere mochten auch (14)
Ähnlich wie Presentation November Trier
Ähnlich wie Presentation November Trier (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Presentation November Trier
- 1. From facilitation to self-governing learning networks What are the factors that influence the continuation of a learning network? Miriam Goes
- 6. Respondent 1 of cluster K (Kandinsky) has relationships with 2 persons from cluster CP (members of the own project) and 1 team of cluster CP and with 1 team from cluster CO (persons from the own organisation) Respondent 2 of cluster K has relationships with: 7 persons from cluster CP, 3 teams from cluster CO (one the same as respondent 1) and 1 person from cluster R (Roelof van Echten etc.) 1 person from cluster P (Petrus Canisius etc) 1 person from cluster O (Oostvaarderscollege) Visualisation of relationships within the consortium TCP TCO K1 1CP 1CP TCO K2 1CP 1CP 1CP 1CP 1CP 1CP 1CP TCO 1R 1P 1O
Hinweis der Redaktion
- For example they were asked how cooperation in the network has been, which sticking points they detected and how they have solved them, what kind of results were produced and how the learning network itself functioned. For example they were asked how cooperation in the network has been, which sticking points they detected and how they have solved them, what kind of results were produced and how the learning network itself functioned.