Más contenido relacionado

Más de ESD UNU-IAS(20)

Último(20)

Closed Loop Recycling

  1. Closed Loop Recycling Presenter: Ezra Onyango WSCSD-Kenya UKUNDA
  2. Background • The rate of consumer plastic recycling are low • Due to a lack awareness among stakeholders. • Plastic recycling is a well-established technology that contributes to a circular economy. • New recycling techniques, such as disintegrating plastics in a solvent to purify and preserve its properties of materials, will improve plastic waste management practices. • Polymers can also be depolymerized into monomers in solution, which can be used to re - create virgin-grade material. • The circularity of plastic is limited by current policies and investments in waste management, detachment, and recycling. • Different Loops For Plastics In A Circular Economy are illustrated in the figure provided
  3. Statement of the Issue • The development of new plastic materials adds complexity to the plastic waste market, • Generally counterproductive to recycling efforts. • In the Kenya, recycling failure rates are already rising, • Over 12% of post-consumer plastic wastes from industries and households being rejected. • Small volume plastics contaminate PET, PE, and PP recycling creeks at the end of their lives, • Increasing the likelihood that waste will not be recycled due to poor quality.
  4. CLOSED LOOP RECYLING TECHNOLOGIES • The technologies fall into three distinct categories. • Classification is based on the position of their outputs in the plastics supply chain: • Purification: • The use of solvents for removing additives from the polymers. • Suitable for polymers • Depolymerization: • Breaks down the long hydrocarbon chains in plastics into shorter hydrocarbon fractions • Suitable for monnomers • Feedstock (thermal conversion) recycling: • Suitable for petrochemicals and refined hydro chemicals • Breaks down the long hydrocarbon chains in plastics into shorter hydrocarbon fractions. • Divided into three categories depending on whether hydrocarbons are broken down into monomers using chemical, thermal or catalytic processes • Gasification (Catalytic process) • Hydrothermal Treatment (Thermal process) • Pyrolysis (Chemical process) Closed loop recycling technologies
  5. Chemical recycling Process • Divert plastic waste from landfill or incineration. • Prepare waste polymers for reuse • Changes the chemical structure of the material. • Solvent extraction allows for the removal of PVC from PET, • It may be necessary to eliminate PLA from PET waste in the future. • Solvent-based approaches make recycling more cost-effective. • It dissolve and densify polystyrene Chemical recycling process
  6. Feedstock Recycling Purification Recycling • Enables the production of food grade plastics from post-consumer waste. • Enables the further extraction of value from polymers. • Targets polymers that have exhausted their economic potential for mechanical processing. • Complements mechanical recycling processes. • Is an alternative to landfill and incineration. • Is suitable for erstwhile hard-to-recycle plastic products such as films, multi-layered and laminated plastics. • Supplies virgin-quality raw materials to the plastics supply chain. Purification Process
  7. Feedstock Recycling Cont, PET (PolyEthylene Terephthalate) Depolymerization • PET depolymerization is a very efficient plastic recycling technology that converts PET (PolyEthylene Terephthalate) into its basic monomer starting points namely: • DiMethyl Terephthalate (DMT) • MonoEthylene Glycol (MEG) • This process will assist the long term in recycling PET used in beverage and water bottles and will lead to high recycle content (25-40%) containers in these applications 3-5 years out. However, it is currently three times more expensive than mechanical recycling. • Also, it is dependent on a low-cost PET flake regrind in harness with patented formulations currently under development at major bottle developers like Coca- Cola and Pepsi. • Overall PET depolymerization will remain an important but niche recycling technology long term.
  8. Feedstock Recycling Pyrolysis Recycling Process • Pyrolysis is derived from the Greek word, “pyro” which means heat and “lysis” means to break down. • It finds use as a recycling technique with mixed plastic waste streams, totally not adaptable to mechanical recycling. • Roughly speaking with economies of scale, every ton of mixed plastic waste will yield approximately four barrels of pyrolysis oil. • Although energy-intensive by nature, pyrolysis fills the preceding gap best when oil prices are decreasing • Its distillation streams are targeted towards higher value- added chemical products, • Insulates recycling from market price fluctuations.
  9. Pyrolysis • Pyrolysis is derived from the Greek word, “pyro” which means heat and “lysis” means to break down. • It finds use as a recycling technique with mixed plastic waste streams, totally not adaptable to mechanical recycling. • It is energy-intensive by nature. • Fills the preceding gap in oil production • Best when oil prices are decreasing • Its distillation streams are targeted towards higher value- added chemical products • Safe from market price fluctuations. • Every ton of mixed plastic waste will yield approximately four barrels of pyrolysis oil (economies of scale) • Polystyrene recycling has a high potential • Dramatically improve recycling rates.
  10. Solution Suggestion • Primary recycling techniques such as the use of solvent works particularly well for high-performance and technical plastics, and should be encouraged. • Primary mechanical recycling solutions are not available for WEEE plastics with additives. • However, adoption of appropriate recycling techniques with the lowest environmental impact at a high TRL level. • Closed loop recycling will have a positive environmental impact and contribute to CO2 reduction. • Effect of plastic recycling is anticipated to be lowered further in the future • When solvent recycling technique is combined with green power mixtures, • since green electricity has fewer environmental consequences than fossil energy sources.
  11. Solution Suggestion • Tertiary recycling of monomers through pyrolysis and gasification are the only option available. • Enhanced recycling of complex polymers with additives • Disintegration is pushed to high TRL levels. • Technologies that recover feedstock or wax from polymers act as • Bridge between waste streams such as complicated engineering polymers and thermosets. • Promote optimum recycling of substantially polluted or mixed streams of waste.
  12. Suggestion Solution Solvent Recycling • Limonene and Switchable-polarity are appropriate binary solvent systems that can help dissolve polystyrene. • Solvent-based recycling techniques effectively remove brominated flame retardants from plastics. • By first dissolving the trash and then adding an extra solvent to selectively precipitate the polymers • Higher purity and enhanced sorting improve the performance of primary recycling techniques • by removing impurities and enhancing beneficial environmental consequences. • As a result, optimum recycling performance is achieved when pre-treatment (sorting, cleaning) is tailored to the recycling method.
  13. Suggested Solution Solvent-based Recycling • An emerging alternative to dispose of mixed plastic waste • An alternative for plastics not handleable by mechanical recycling. • Its operational niche is post-industrial, • Applicable for mixed plastic waste where contamination challenges are not relevant. • Common in post-consumer plastic waste. • Primary limitation is a very heavy dependence on solvent costs that in turn will limit its market growth.
  14. Conclusion • None of the preceding major plastic materials recycling technologies will totally dominate in the marketplace. • Plastic waste and type of waste availability by given global geography will dictate the specific recycling technology mix. • For the foreseeable future, a combination of recycling technologies will be in use. • In any global geographic region, where efficiently sorted, higher quality, and potentially clear plastic waste is available, it will be best matched by lower-cost mechanical recycling. • Limited polypropylene and polystyrene plastic waste streams lend themselves to pyrolysis and solvent-based recycling techniques. • More specifically, geographies with high volumes of low-cost plastic wastes will gravitate to pyrolysis. • In the same vein geographic regions where high volume, low quality PET predominates, depolymerization is the answer. • Only by improving pre-treatment in accordance with the most appropriate recycling process for a polymer can the environmental performance of recycling be maximized. • Polymer quality comprising of mixed source, mixed materials is essential • Polymer influences a technology's overall environmental impact; nevertheless, it has no effect on the technology's efficiency score.
  15. END • To explore the newest plastics recycling technologies, I invite you to visit our waste recycling plant in Ukunda under the project banner “Material Innovations Supporting Plastics Recycling”. THANKYOU