Qumas Collaboration to Innovation Quality QMS PIMS 2014
How Enterprise Quality Management can protect your customers, keep you compliant, and have a positive effect on your bottom line.
www.pims.gb.com
www.gbx.uk.com
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Qumas Collaboration to Innovation Quality QMS PIMS 2014
1. Leveraging Compliance and Collaboration Strategies to
overcome pitfalls across the Manufacturing lifecycle:
Enhancing your collaboration maturity across sponsors and suppliers
Ken Hayward, CTO, QUMAS
2. 2
Proposition & Agenda
To gain competitive advantage, organizations must
establish a robust, enterprise-scale, mature collaboration
model for sharing critical information (in a way that meets
global regulatory requirements).
This session will outline why this is needed and how to
achieve collaboration maturity:
Establishing a framework for compliant collaboration
Recognizing the current challenges and problems
Understanding technology innovations and current
availability
Defining a path for compliant, collaborative engagement
3. 3
QUMAS at a Glance
Capability
- Leader in Quality and Compliance Solutions to
Life Sciences since 1994
- High-Profile Customer Base in Leading
Pharmaceutical, Biotech and Medical Device
companies
- Analysts recognize QUMAS as a Compliance
Leader and Visionary
Enterprise Scale
- Over 270 customer deployments
- Largest Client > 120,000 users on-premise
(smallest client 20 users in the Cloud)
- Systems with > 5,000,000 Documents
- Cross Department usage from preclinical to
manufacturing and supply chain
US HQ in Jersey City, New Jersey
Global HQ, Research & Development in
Cork, Ireland
Sales Offices in Boston, Jersey City,
Philadelphia, Atlanta, San Francisco,
London, Dublin, Munich, Singapore,
Paris
Global Services
4. 4
Big Changes in Ways of Working
ACME Pharma
Customers and
Patients
Supply Chain
5. 5
Big Changes in Ways of Working
ACME Pharma
Social Interaction with &
between Customers
Integrated Supply Chain
Big Data Analytics
Transition to
Cloud Platforms
6. 6
Where is the gap?
Expectations Operation Audit
• Internal systems cover the setting of expectations and
audit / close out of the operation
• You have limited visibility and control over the operation
itself
• Bridging the gap between responsibility and control is
becoming more critical as complexity and quantity of
partnerships increase
7. 7
Supply and Distribution Network
Primary
Market Approval
Holder
API
CMO
Excipients
Packaging /
Third Party
Logistics
4PL
Packaging /
Third Party
Logistics
Ingredients
Excipients
Excipients
Ingredients
Ingredients
API
CMO
8. 8
Supply and Distribution Network
Primary
Market Approval
Holder
API
CMO
Excipients
Packaging /
Third Party
Logistics
4PL
Packaging /
Third Party
Logistics
Ingredients
Excipients
Excipients
Ingredients
Ingredients
API
CMO
Scope of Product Quality Responsibility
11. 11
Core Future Strategy
Implement systems to mediate and manage the deliverables of the
relationships in the context of an agreed, orchestrated process:
Move from one to one relationships to one to many
Implement automation and agreed processes
Move content from internal to external systems
Delegate specific authority to 3rd parties
Move from Document Driven Processes to Data Driven
Processes
15. 15
What should be included?
Documents
- The most obvious place to start is with Content
- Initial view would be for safe transfer of approved Documents
- Subsequently allowing for editing and review
- Ultimately leading to full scale exchange including withdrawals, training etc.
Processes
- Ability to exchange automated Forms and Workflows
- Audit findings and responses would be a great starting point
- Deviations
- CAPA’S
- OOS’s
- Complaints etc.
16. 16
Who owns this problem?
Lack of clarity on ownership is part of the problem:
• QA?
• Regulatory Affairs?
• Operations?
• CIO?
All of the above and more…
17. 17
How do we make it easy?
Acknowledgement of the issue in a wider sense:
Definition of Policy and approach across the company
Acceptance of the need to address systems/processes
Definition of overall requirements
Apply an owner (of some standing)
Begin to implement a longer term solution
Audit for exposure, risk and correction
18. 18
How do we know it’s working?
There are some anticipated advantages to look for:
Speed of updates between parties
Ease of Audit
More “Evidence”, less “Expectation”
Faster adoption on projects, changes
Real time visibility on CAPA’s, Deviations etc.
More predictable Supply Chain
19. 19
Where is the strategic advantage?
Ability to assess and compare various parties
Far greater predictability on execution/delivery
JV’s, Partnerships have system to support them
= Running Ecosystem is no different than own Company!
Enormous Benefits begin to accrue in terms of:
Speed
Trust
Agility
Certainty
21. 21
Summary
Supply Chains are not getting any simpler and cost pressures remain
high
We need to bridge the gap between expectation and evidence
Connecting multiple 3rd parties through our firewalls is not workable
Cloud based platforms allowing peer-peer relationships (flattening the
supply chain) allow us to reach 2nd and 3rd tier partners
Compliance throughout this network can be achieved without raising
costs prohibitively
22. 22
Questions?
Thank you for your time today!
Contact us for more information & to arrange a detailed discussion.
Free Phone US: 800 577 1545
NJ, US: 973-805-8600
Cork, Ireland: +353 (0)21 4915100
info@qumas.com
www.qumas.com
Follow QUMAS
Hinweis der Redaktion
Having Consolidated Compliance Inside the Organization, we have to:
Look Beyond the Company Walls
Look Beyond the Firewall
Look at the Entire Supply Chain
Every Life Sciences Company Relies on a Vast Array of Partners and Manages a Large Partner Ecosystem:
Each Partner Carries a Piece of Your Brand
Each Partner Extends Your Compliance Obligations
Each line represents one complete business relationship, with the inclusion of sub contractors this network of relationships can extend to great breadth and depth
Each line represents one complete business relationship, with the inclusion of sub contractors this network of relationships can extend to great breadth and depth
Each Business Relationship may require
Contractual Records
Initial Distribution of key manufacturing instructions (SOPs, Test Methods, Assays, Specifications etc)
Evidence of production conformance (Test Results CAPAs, Deviations etc)
Compliance with technical regulatory rules (21 CFR 11 etc)
Protection of Intellectual property
Document Archiving and long term retention
Collaborative development of key content
Controlled distribution of material changes and amendments
Audit Facilities for both internal and external auditors
As organizations mature and transform how they handle quality management, many rapidly realize
that they have multiple applications supporting their quality efforts. Figure 3 highlights the lead
classes of applications that clients regularly use to support their quality initiatives. Some cross over
multiple areas, such as pure-play quality management systems (QMSs), ERP, product life cycle
management (PLM) and manufacturing execution systems (MESs). This frequently creates a
situation in which teams trying to solve a quality-related problem bring different perspectives on
data and systems to the table, and excessive time is wasted on reconciling the differences (best
case) or battling over the differences (worst case). Productive decision making is delayed (best
case) or impossible (worst case), because all parties did not use the same approaches to look at the
same data.
Sponsor organizations helping ecosystem to evolve
Start with documents
Progress to forms and processes
Strong reporting and metrics
All greatly improving business performance