6th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2016 Integrative Risk Management - Towards Resilient Cities. 28 August - 01 September 2016 in Davos, Switzerland
Study on the Impact of Economic Growth on Meteorological Disaster Losses in C...
Resilience in IRGCs Recommendations for Risk Governance, Marie-Valentine FLORIN
1. http://irgc.epfl.ch
www.irgc.org
RESILIENCE
in IRGC concepts and
recommendations
Articulating risk and
resilience management
from the perspective of a
risk manager
Florin - IDRC 30.08.2016
Marie-Valentine Florin
marie-valentine.florin@epfl.ch
2. https://www.irgc.org/irg
c-resource-guide-on-
resilience/
• Edited by Igor Linkov
• Published online by IRGC
The occurrence of disasters and
crises, following both natural
extreme events and technology-
related accidents, demonstrates
the limitations of traditional risk
assessment and management.
In the context of risk, resilience
has been discussed as both a
supplement and an alternative
to conventional risk
management.
On the side of governments and
industry, many organisations
explicitly call for resilience-
based strategies to help cope
with unexpected and sudden
shocks.
August 2016
IRGC resource guide
on resilience
3. IRGC resource guide on resilience
https://www.irgc.org/irgc-resource-guide-on-
resilience/
• A web-based resource guide on resilience.
• A collection of short authored pieces to
– Review existing concepts, approaches and illustrations or case-studies
– Compare, contrast and integrate risk and resilience, and
– Support practitioners.
• Focus on:
– Measuring resilience: evaluating resilience in systems and the performance of
methods to build and improve resilience.
– Review of on-going efforts for developing resilience indicators and metrics, which is
needed to trigger interest and investment from decision-makers.
• Audience:
– Scientists and practitioners
– Stressing the importance of including resilience building in relation to the
process of governing risk, including in research, policy, strategies,
and practices.
August 2016
4. IRGC resource guide on resilience
• Each paper includes
an annotated
bibliography ‘for further
reading’.
• It thus provides
background
information on the
various perspectives
and guides readers to
other available
literature sources.
December 2015
6. In the world of risk
RISK
Negative
consequence of
uncertainty on
something that
people value
(IRGC)
RESILIENCE
[Property of a system
that indicates its] ability
to prepare and plan for,
absorb, recover from,
and more successfully
adapt to adverse events
(NAS 2012)
[and transform itself if
needed].
Florin - IDRC 30.08.2016
In the world of resilience
Risk analysis is used to inform a process
by which resilience is built, when and as needed
ISO 31000: effect of
uncertainty on objectives
7. In the world of risk
work to build resilience in
the system before the event
(this is a process)
prepare for "risk" by
building flood protection
structures
in order that the system is
resilient after a shock
(this is a property of the
system)
prepare for "resilience"
by ensuring that, once
damage occur, we can
rebuild them fast and have
other measures in place to
sustain critical functions of
the system
Florin - IDRC 30.08.2016
In the world of resilience
8. In the world of risk
RESILIENCE BUILDING
Involves:
• Preparing and planning
for, absorbing,
recovering from adapting
to adverse events
• transforming the
system
Florin - IDRC 30.08.2016
In the world of resilience
RISK MANAGEMENT
Involves risk identification,
assessment, evaluation,
management and communication.
• Avoidance (eliminate, withdraw
from or not become involved)
• Reduction (optimize – mitigate)
• Sharing (transfer – outsource or
insure)
• Retention (accept and budget)
9. Characterizing the knowledge we have about the risk
Complexity
Refers to the difficulty
of identifying and
quantifying causal
links between a
multitude of potential
causal agent and specific
observed effects
Large infrastructure
network, e.g. electricity
grid, internet
Uncertainty
A state of knowledge in
which, although the
factors influencing the
issues are identified, the
likelihood of any adverse
effect or the effects
themselves cannot be
precisely described.
E.g. climate change,
biodiversity loss
Ambiguity
Giving rise to several
meaningful and
legitimate
interpretations of
accepted risk
assessments results
Risks related to genetically
modified crops
Florin - IDRC 30.08.2016
10. Robustness-
focused
/ build stronger
Resilience-
focused
/ prepare to cope
with surprises
Risk-informed
/ seek more
information
Precaution-
based
/ be prudent
/ do not make
irreversible
decisions
Impact
of the risk
- exposure
- vulnerability
Strategies directed at
the risk absorbing
system
Source
of the risk
- hazard
Agent-based
strategies
Complexity Uncertainty
(adaptedfrom:IRGCriskgovernanceframework,2005)
Characteristic of the risk
Target
Risk Management Strategies
Florin - IDRC 30.08.2016
Simplicity
Routine-
based
/ regulate
Reduce GHG
emissions
• Build levees and dykes
• Earthquake-resistant building
• Building codes / land-use planning
Anticipating future
triggers for hazards +
dealing with the
contributing factors
Emerging
Adaptive
management +
resilience planning
/ prepare to cope with
surprises
Planned
Adaptive
Manage
ment
• Avoid buildings in
coastal areas
• Exclusion clauses in
insurance policies
• Dig canals to let the water enter cities
• Water can enter buildings
• Build redundancy
• Transfer risk to insurance
11. Robustness vs. Resilience
Water exclusion strategies:
Building resistance
Water entry strategies :
Building resilience
http://www.architecture.com/Images/RIBAHoldings/ http://tech.floodresilience.eu http://www.planningportal.gov.uk
Florin - IDRC 30.08.2016
12. IRGC White Paper on
Risk Governance, 2005:
(Risk Governance Framework)
“Resilience is a protective
strategy to build in
defences to the whole
system against the impact of
the realization of an
unknown or highly uncertain
risk.”
Instruments for resilience include
strengthening the immune system,
designing systems with flexible
response options, improving
emergency management, etc.
Florin - IDRC 30.08.2016
Resilience as a (dynamic,
proactive) strategy for
adaptive risk
management.
E.g. Planned Adaptive Regulation
(cf. EC institutional process for ex-
post impact assessment, integrating
feedback from experience into the
regulation, including flexibility in
regulation.)
IRGC guidelines for
emerging risk governance
(2014)
13. Robustness-
focused
/ build stronger
Resilience-
focused
/ prepare to cope with
surprises
Risk-informed
/ seek more
information
Precaution-based
/ be prudent
/ do not make
irreversible decisions
Impact of the
risk
- exposure
- vulnerability
Strategies directed at
the risk absorbing
system
Source of the
risk
- hazard
Agent based
strategies
Complexity Uncertainty
(adaptedfrom:IRGCriskgovernanceframework,2005)
Anticipating future
triggers for hazards +
dealing with the
factors contributing to
risk
Emerging
Characteristic of the risk
Target
Adaptive
management +
resilience planning
/ prepare to cope with
surprises
Florin - IDRC 30.08.2016
IRGC describes resilience strategies as strategies that
are needed when there is much uncertainty about risk
impacts, but potential catastrophic consequence
(from Igor’s summary of the Azores June 2016 workshop):
utilize the collective experience and insight from various scholars and experts in industry, government, academia, and other organizations to explore various interpretations and understandings of resilience in order to provide a more comprehensive and universal understanding of how the methodology may be applied to critical infrastructure systems in various disciplines and applications.
general discussion of resilience theory and analysis along with inquiry into various applications of resilience in topics ranging from cybersecurity to infrastructural resilience to ecosystem health. In this vein, uncertain yet consequential shocks and stresses that challenge a system’s resilience require immediate response and thus real time decision making. As such, this workshop sough to discuss how methods and tools are able to address such concerns by reconciling conflicting information, overcome high uncertainty, and facilitate context-driven decision making within various resilience applications
the significant potential that resilience may have upon various disciplines and fields in response to emerging threats.
In SDCR, Resilience here is the capacity of a system to absorb disturbance and reorganize while undergoing change so as to still retain key functions either in the same or different stability domain.
The development of resilient social and economic structures, able to respond and adapt rapidly to sudden change, is the best (and often the only) way to cope effectively with SDCRs;
We do prepare for "risk" by building flood protection structures. We do need to prepare for "resilience" by ensuring that, once damage occur, we can rebuild them fast and have other measures in place to sustain critical functions of the system
Thank you also for pointing out there is some confusion in the literature about whether resilience "begins" before (e.g. with prevention) or after the event (an unexpected problem), to help the system cope with that problem (either by bouncing back or by adapting to the change).
I think that risk managers (practitioners) are comfortable with the simple idea that they:
- will work to build resilience in the system before, (this is a process) – this is where law can help (but only if we can have an idea of what substantive and procedural measures are needed)
- in order that the system is resilient after a shock (this is a property of the system).
I would suggest that the viewpoint of practitioners is taken into account for clarifying the ambiguity. This would also help bridge the theory or the concepts and the practice.