2. Vision
To assist decision makers in programme
countries to integrate climate change concerns
as they affect agricultural sector-based
livelihoods into associated national and sectoral
planning and budgeting processes
3. At the end of 4 years, the programme
should demonstrate evidence of innovative
approaches developed and adopted by
countries, that are recognized as effective
and sustainable by knowledge institutions
and independent experts
5. Target group
Senior policymakers and technical staff at the national and sub-national
levels, involved in the planning, priority setting, and budgeting for
sustainable development leading the process of mainstreaming climate
change concerns into the agricultural-sectors within existing planning and
budgeting processes and frameworks.
Key institutions include:
Agriculture (including Forestry and Fisheries)
Environment
Planning and Finance
Important stakeholders include :
Housing
Land and Community Development
Water, Women’s Affairs, Urban Development
inter-departmental working groups on climate change and national
meteorological institutions
Private sector
Civil society
6. Innovative features
• Unique collaboration between FAO and UNDP:
synergy with complementary expertise
• Addresses both technical and functional
capacities for mainstreaming climate change
adaptation in planning and budgeting processes
• Incentivizes fast moving countries and catalytic
ideas with funds reserved at HQ
• Global and national/sub-national level feedback
built into implementation logic
7. National
Level
Subnational
Level
• Case studies
• Lessons learned
• Guidance
• Training
• VA & Adaptation Plans
• Applied Economic Valuation
& Cost Benefit Case Studies
• Monitoring & Impact
• Training
• Policies and
Institutions
• Advocacy
• Training
Implementation Logic
Feedback
Feedback
Feedback
Global
Level
• Stocktaking
• Entry points
• Methods
8. Global budget and breakdown
Global Programme Budget US$12 million
Direct support to each country US$700,000
Global support to country US$6 million
Incentive fund for fast moving countries US$600,000
Additional funds (to be programmed): €5 million
FAO
UNDP
UNDP national expertise/activities $2,240,000
FAO national expertise/activities $3,360,000
10. To integrate climate change risks and
opportunities as they relate to
agriculture sector-related livelihood
options within existing national planning
and budgeting processes
Programme
Objective and Outcomes
Outcome 2:
Integrated
roadmaps for NAPs
developed
Outcome 4:
Advocacy and
knowledge-sharing
on NAPs promoted
Outcome 3:
Evidence-based
results for NAPs
improved
Programme Outcomes
Outcome 1:
Technical capacity
and institutions on
NAPs strengthened
11. Outcome 1: Technical capacity and institutions on NAPs strengthened
Indicator:
% of technical staff and public service officers supporting AG-based livelihood adaptation in relevant
ministries trained in national adaptation planning and budgeting, including the technical aspects of
formulating roadmaps, and conducting economics of adapt assessments
Output 1.1
Training in
adaptation sensitive
planning and
budgeting
UNDP • Skills and capacity assessment - NAP
• NAP training, climate scenario-building
• Technical groups formed
• Workshops on impacts of climate change and adaptation options for
the agricultural sector
Output 1.2
Training in
economic valuation,
CBA for adaptation
options in the AG
sectors
FAO • Skills and capacity assessment of climate change adaptation in the
agricultural sector
• Training on adaptation cost-benefit analysis and budgeting
• Training on adaptation options and cost-benefit analysis
• Handbook on lessons learnt
Output 1.3
Developed training
materials based on
needs identified
UNDP • Outreach meetings to connect public sector experts from relevant
ministries to the technical group and available training programs.
12. Monitoring and evaluation
Outcome 1 Outcome 2 Outcome 3 Outcome 4
I
n
d
ic
a
t
o
rs
% staff
trained in
adapt.
planning &
budgeting
i) Nr plan & bgt roadmaps;
ii) Nr Institutions with increased
capacity on cc agri-based livelihoods;
iii) % bgt allocated to CCA in Ag
Nr Min of AG with impact
evaluation frameworks for
CCA based on quasi
experimental design
principles adopted.
i) Nr best practices & lessons
learned disseminated;
ii) Nr comm platforms in which
best practices and lessons learnt
were disseminated
T
a
r
g
e
ts
At least
additional
30%
i) All countries have roadmaps for
NAPs & at least 3 nat’l and 2 sub-nat’l
plan & bgt instruments;
ii) At least 5 key institutions at nat’l &
sub-nat’l level;
iii) 20% increase in bgt allocations to
CCA priorities
8 Ministries of Agriculture i) At least 4 national exchange
consultations and 8 case studies
shared per country
ii) 10 events in total
S
O
V
s
Evaluation
reports;
surveys
i) Survey of documents, strat plans &
reports by Min/institutions
ii) Survey of institutions with plan &
bgt instruments in place
iii) Nat’l & sect’l plan & bgt
documents
Planning and policy
documents for M&E for
adaptation practices
Knowledge products
B
a
s
el
Limited -
Establishing
baseline at
country level
Variable – limited
Establishing baseline at country level
Variable – limited
Establishing baseline at
country level
Variable – limited
Establishing baseline at country
level
13. Country
Priorities
Uruguay
Linking
intra-ministerial
coordination with
impact assessments of
ongoing agricultural
projects and capacity
development of
national institutions.
Nepal
Strengthen CCA priorities in
sub-national planning and
implementation of the
Agricultural Development
Plan
Thailand
Support to the next Strategic Plan for
climate change in Agriculture (2017-
2021), as well as capacity
development and impact assessment
of adaptation options for the
agricultural sectors.
Zambia
Build capacities of technical
staff on cost-benefit analysis;
skills assessments and stock-
takes; and develop impact
monitoring frameworks for
pilot agriculture-based
livelihood projects.
Vietnam
Improvement of the evidence
base on adaptation and the
formulation of a potential
national strategic investment
plan for the agricultural sector.
Uganda
Strengthening capacities, operationalising the
Uganda Agricultural Sector NAP roadmap and
development of Performance Monitoring
Frameworks for the agriculture sector guided
by the Climate Change Department’s national
frameworks.
Kenya
Capacity development and
intra-ministerial
coordination, as well as
support to the Kenya
Climate-Smart Agriculture
Framework programme
(KCSAFP) .
14. Overview of progress
UNDP Country Offices and FAO Country Offices have a common
understanding of roles and responsibilities to deliver joint work-plans
5 FAO-Government Agreements have been signed, advanced discussions
are taking place in other countries
National inception workshops to validate the WP will take place in March-
June 2016
National teams (Technical coordinators and specialists) under recruitment
and to be placed mostly in Ministries of Agriculture
Global UNDP and FAO programme teams in place
Roster of global experts for climate science, economics of adaptation,
communication and knowledge management experts in place to support
country teams
15. Overview of progress
Draft country work-plans prepared through national consultations led by
FAO/UNDP led in dialogue with Ministries of Agriculture and UNFCCC focal
points
Country plans focus on supporting integration of climate adaptation in existing
frameworks and processes rather than standalone activities.
Links to broader NAP processes forged in several countries – Nepal and
Thailand as well as to other donor supported initiatives relevant to NAPs.
Institutional buy-in at the country level cemented
Formation of technical steering committees to oversee the work-plan in
programme countries
Nomination of government focal points
Programme gains visibility at the LDC Expert Group Meetings and at
Adaptation Committee through links with the UNDP/UNEP NAP GSP
16. Trends in country priorities
• Strengthen capacities to link climate policy and public finance
• Mainstream climate change adaptation and disaster risk
reduction into agriculture sector plans, policies, budgets (both
national and provincial)
• Improve impact monitoring frameworks
• Understand climate benefits of adaptation options and their
planning/budgeting implications
• Improve evidence base for adaptation plans for the
agricultural sector
• Improve evidence base for agricultural sector inputs into
National Climate Change strategy/policy
17. Example Thailand – draft workplan
Outcome 1 Outcome 2 Outcome 3 Outcome 4
• Enhanced MOAC
capacity to undertake
CC vulnerability
assessment and
adaptation-sensitive
planning
• Mainstream CCA into
the Strategic Plan for
CC in Agriculture
(2017-2021)
• Enhance monitoring
and evaluation
frameworks for CCA
• Interdepartmental
and inter-ministerial
coordination in
MOAC for CCA
improved
• Enhanced MOAC
capacity with
economic valuation
and investment
appraisal tools for
adaptation-sensitive
planning
• Mainstreaming CCA
into sector budgeting
• Strengthened
capacity of MOAC
monitoring units for
monitoring the
impact and
effectiveness of
adaptation
• Project lessons learnt
and outputs
integrated into
broader Thailand
NAP process
18. Work-plan Milestones 2016
Level Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Global Finalisation of
in Work
Programming;
4-7 April
Capacity
development
workshop,
Rome;
finalization of
NAP
Supplement
NAPs Expo;
Reporting back
from country
progress;
Launch of
incentive/top
up fund for fast
moving country
work-plans
Outreach at
COP 22 Morocco
with country
representives
Global
programme
steering
committee
meetings
Country
Country
Global/country
Global/country
Inception meetings/stock-taking/institutional needs assessments
(national team)
Steering (Technical working groups)
Monitoring and reporting (national and global teams)
Communication at SBIs, Adaptation committee, LEG/COP (global
teams), Supplement on Ag NAP guidelines, Info briefs
19. 19
Stock-taking
Skills assessment
Policy analysis
Capacity development
Impact monitoring
Additional support:
global technical specialists
Agricultural economics
Climate science
Climate downscaling and
modelling
Economics of adaptation
Cost-benefit analysis
Impact monitoring
National adaptation planning
Planning and budgeting
Communications & knowledge
management
20. Joint FAO/UNDP
Knowledge Management Strategy
Stakeholders
•Partner Countries
•Donors
•Peer Agencies
•Other UN agencies
Aim: To support knowledge sharing between partner countries at national,
regional and international level on the integration of agriculture in the NAP
process, while increasing wider outreach.
Key products
• Websites to feature tools and country
information
• Knowledge products – case studies,
decision tools, and best practices
• Application of agriculture supplement
• Partnering with knowledge networks
such as LEG, NAP-GSP, NAP Global
Network, NAP Central, UNITAR
21. Partnerships
• Collaboration with the Least-Developed countries Expert Group (LEG) of the
UNFCCC has been strengthened at global level on the supplement to the NAP
guidelines on Agriculture
• At country level, programme teams are exploring opportunities to partner
with the GIZ, Climate Technology Centre & Network (CTCN) and the World
Bank-PPCR.
• Partnerships with International Climate Initiative (ICI), Global NAP Network,
GIZ, Oxfam and other bilateral and multilateral partners.
22. Additional Funds Programming
• Maximise depth:
– Strengthened data gathering and evidence based M&E
– Catalytic technical in-country support on an on-demand basis and
promoting peer to peer knowledge exchange and learning between
countries
– Shaping up visually - country stories
– Country level – Building gender and climate change component
through additional support to existing countries.
• Maximise reach:
– Deepen innovation and gender concerns in 3 programme countries
– Select up to 3 new countries
23. For further information on the programme:
www.adaptation-undp.org/naps-agriculture
www.fao.org/climate-change/programmes-and-projects/detail/en/c/328984/
Rohini Kohli rohini.kohli@undp.org
Julia Wolf julia.wolf@fao.org