SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 1
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Pasture Mob Grazing Effects on Soil Carbon: A Modeling Case Study of Snowville Creamery 
Introduction 
Land use for modern, high-­‐‑yield agriculture has led to losses of 50-­‐‑70% or 40-­‐‑90 Pg worldwide of soil’s pre 
modern agriculture organic carbon (Lal, 2007; Smith, 2008a). With application of best-­‐‑management practices, 
global agricultural soils have the potential to sequester 0.9 ± 0.3 Pg C per year in the short term (Lal, 2004 a, b). 
This represents the largest potential sink after the oceans and could significantly reduce the global increase in 
atmospheric CO2, equivalent to 5-­‐‑15% of fossil fuel emissions (Lal, 2004 a, b). We studied a pasture-­‐‑grazed dairy 
operation in Meigs County, OH, self-­‐‑promoted as a sustainable yet high-­‐‑yield creamery, to determine whether 
their grazing and manuring practices have improved soil quality and sequestered soil carbon. 
The first element of the study measured current soil carbon from creamery grazed pastures of 15-­‐‑20 years and 
nearby ungrazed pastures and lawns for comparison. The farm is called The Brick, for its reddish, eroded and 
impoverished soils when the dairy was established in 1998. Unfortunately we did not locate modern land use 
and soil conditions reflective of that time. The second element of the project utilized DNDC (Denitrification 
Decomposition), an agricultural process-­‐‑based biogeochemical modeling program, to simulate past and project 
future outputs of the farm given current practices. The model uses soil climate, agricultural management 
practices, crop growth, and decomposition parameters to predict soil physical and chemical conditions and 
nitrification, denitrification and fermentation submodels to predict gas emissions (Li 2000, User’s Guide 2009). 
Procedures 
Field Sampling 
Ø 2-­‐‑4 sampling sites chosen from selected fields, dependent on field size, focusing on 
uplands of low to moderate slope. 
Ø Four 1.8 cm diameter cores spaced ~2 m apart collected from each site. Cores sampled at 
0-­‐‑20 cm and 20-­‐‑50 cm depths. 
20 cm 
Ø GPS coordinates, slope angle and field conditions were recorded. 
Loss on Ignition: Measuring Soil Organic Carbon 
Ø Soil samples air dried and ground to pass a 2mm sieve, a subsample then heated at 105°C overnight to 
determine water content. 
Ø A subsample ground to <0.25mm and a ~3g sample weighed on analytical balance, heated in muffle furnace 
at 450°C for 4 hours, cooled to 250°C, moved to desiccator to cool to room temperature without gaining 
moisture, then reweighed to determine loss of organic carbon. (C6H12O6 (OM) + 6O2 + Heat à 6CO2 + 6H2O) 
(Anderson and Krysell 2005, Konare et al. 2010). 
Denitrification-­‐‑Decomposition Model 
A process-­‐‑driven model of C and N biogeochemistry that integrates 4 submodels based on input parameters (User’s Guide 2009). 
Submodels 
1. Thermal-­‐‑hydraulic: soil temperature and moisture, from mean daily temperature records and daily rainfall events. 
2. Plant growth: biomass partitioning, C/N ratios, N uptake, and water demand/stress. 
3. Denitrification: N leaching and denitrification rates (NO, N2O and N2 production under saturated or reducing conditions). 
4. Decomposition: microbial biomass, plant residue, ammonia volatilization, and ammonium mineralization, nitrification, humad and humus formation. Plant C 
is lost to CO2, SOC and fermentation-­‐‑producing CH4. 
Model Inputs 
Daily temperature and precipitation data for Athens, OH, about 15 miles from the creamery (hhp://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/). 
Land management and plant growth parameters, such as grazing intensity and timing, additional plantings of grasses and legumes, field fertilization, and manure 
additions based on farmer interviews. Biomass partitioning, N fixation indices, water demands and maximum yields of grasses taken from literature review and 
DNDC standard values. 
Sample Sites 
The Brick Farm, and Bill Dix and Stacy 
Hall’s Farm 
Grazed Pasture Sampling Sites 
Ø One site (Bill Dix and Stacy Hall’s farm on Rainbow 
Lake Road in Shade, OH, not shown on map) 
rotationally grazed as dairy since 1993. The remainder 
of sites from the Brick Farm on OH 143 north of 
Pomeroy, OH) grazed since 1998—shown on map as 
white markers. 
Ø Soils of Upshur-­‐‑Gilpin complex. The Upshur silty clay 
has shale parent material and the Gilpin silt loam to 
channery silt loam has parent material of interbedded 
shale, siltstone and some sandstone (Web Soil Survey). 
Ø Pastures presently “mob” rotationally grazed with an 
average of 240 cows. Milked every 12 hours and given 
a fresh field to graze afterwards. Graze all day during 
late spring to fall, graze half day in early spring and 
late fall, and given hay in paddock/barn during most 
winter months. 
Ø Winter manure from their shelter mixed with sawdust, 
piled and composed, then spread in 2” layer onto 
about 6 ha each year. 
Ø Additional clover sowed in fields every 3 years. 
Non-­‐‑Dairy Sampling Sites 
Ø Two sites of residential lawns on farm property that 
were mowed, never grazed, and one site of fallow 
pasture, ungrazed, adjacent to the Brick pastures— 
shown in maps as yellow markers. 
Ø One site of horse-­‐‑grazed pasture adjacent to Dix-­‐‑Hall’s 
property for comparison, though lihle known of 
history or management of land (not shown on map). 
Range of % C of the Brick samples (grazed 15 years) 
and Dix-­‐‑Hall Farm (grazed 20 years) in comparison 
to model projections with different initial % C 
Initial %C in 0-­‐‑20 cm depth interval 
Average 2.69% 
Average 3.16% 
6! 
5! 
4! 
3! 
2! 
1! 
0! 
0! 5! 10! 15! 20! 25! 30! 
% Carbon 
Time (years) 
1.3% C! 
1% C! 
0.75% C! 
Grazed 15 years! 
Grazed 20 years! 
7! 
6! 
5! 
4! 
3! 
2! 
1! 
0! 
SOC (0-­‐‑20 cm) modeled by DNDC 
150 cows (0-­‐‑10 years) 240 cows (10-­‐‑30 years) 
Manuring at year 6 and 26 
Initial %C in 0-­‐‑20 cm depth interval 
0! 5! 10! 15! 20! 25! 30! 
% Carbon 
Time (years) 
1.9% C! 
1.6% C! 
1.3 % C! 
1% C! 
0.75% C! 
0.5% C! 
0.25% C! 
Present day (2014) 
Emily Siegel, advised by Tod Frolking 
Department of Geosciences, Denison University 
Discussion 
Initial SOC levels came from OSU soil data of the same soil series 
sampled 30-­‐‑40 years ago in counties surrounding the farm. We estimate 
that the Brick soils may have had similar SOC values (~1.5% C), or 
could have had lower values with severe erosion of A horizons (~0.75% 
C). Using these initial C percentages, DNDC shows how Snowville’s 
management changes SOC over their 20 years of management, with 10 
years of projected values. 
Smith (2008b) suggests that proper grazing intensity can improve soil 
carbon more than ungrazed or overgrazed pastures. My research 
concludes through DNDC modeling and soil samples that the mob 
grazing of the creamery does not drastically improve soil carbon in 
comparison to ungrazed fields. The creamery has improved soil quality 
by increasing SOC, yet no more than other observed practices. Our 
study was concentrated on soil carbon, yet these analyses could be 
applied to track gas fluxes or grass yields. 
Further Research 
Use DNDC to model optimal mob grazing practices to improve C 
sequestration capacity to equal that of nongrazing. 
Track manure amendment timing to test if it could be applied more 
often without raising gas emissions. 
DNDC simulated outputs of model run 
Climate 
variables 
Works Cited 
Anderson, K.J. and M. Krystell. Dry maher (DM), loss on ignition (LOI), and total organic carbon (TOC): Report on an evaluation study. Horizontal 17 (2005). 
Dyer, J. Land-­‐‑use legacies in a central Appalachian forest: differential response of trees and herbs to historic agricultural practices. Applied Vegetation Science 13 (2010): 195-­‐‑206. 
Konare, H., R. S. Yost, M. Doumbia, G.W. McCarty, A. Jarju and R. Kablan. Loss on ignition: Measuring soil organic carbon of the Sahel, West Africa. African Journal of Agricultrual Research Vol. 5 (2010), 22: 
3088-­‐‑3095. 
Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123 (2004):1–22. 
Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304 (2004b):1623–1627. 
Lal, R. Carbon management in agricultural soils. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12, (2007) no. 2:303 – 322. 
Li, CS. Modeling trace gas emissions from agricultural ecosystems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 58 (2000): 259-­‐‑276. 
User’s Guide for the DNDC Model. Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space: University of New Hampshire. 2009. 
Smith, P. Land use change and soil organic carbon dynamics. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 81, (2008a) no. 2:169-­‐‑178. 
Smith, P. Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363 (2008b): 789-­‐‑813. 
Tiev, N. Prime Pastures. Hay and Forage Grower 26, (2011) Issue 2: 11-­‐‑12. 
Web Soil Survey. USDA: National Resources Conservation Service. hhp://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm. 
2.22%! 
1.80%! 
2.40%! 
The map above shows The Brick farm at Snowville Creamery with the distribution 
of SOC percentages from our sample sites. 
Ø Higher values for sites near yard in center of property could be because of their 
proximity to manure/compost pile (values around 3.38 and 3.74% in yellow) 
Higher values in north and west fields, with lower values in the south fields. 
Ø SOC sampling data show a spatial variation that could be due to soil parent 
material causing slight differences in clay content or subsoil carbonate content. 
Not enough known about the land history to speculate whether the pahern is a 
result of land management. 
The graph below suggests that timing of manuring with compost during the year 
does not make a significant difference in SOC, however, manuring does increase soil 
carbon. More frequent applications of manure would improve soil carbon, though 
this would also increase nitrous oxide emissions (seen in DNDC). Even if the 
beginning SOC levels were 0.75%, leaving pastures ungrazed would improve soil C 
beher over the 30 years. 
7! 
6! 
5! 
4! 
3! 
2! 
1! 
0! 
Soil carbon (0-­‐‑20 cm) for different management scenarios in DNDC 
150 cows (0-­‐‑10 years), then 240 cows (10-­‐‑30 years) 
0! 5! 10! 15! 20! 25! 30! 
% Carbon 
Time (years) 
Manuring at year 6 and 26 
Other scenarios 
Overlapping curves, due to no difference in 
values of SOC from manuring timing 
Present day (2014) 
Acknowledgements 
I would like to thank Snowville Creamery for participating with us in this study. Especially, Jeremiah Shields for taking the time to show us around the farm and accommodate our 
interviews and Warren Taylor for the delicious yogurt and milk. Thanks to my advisor, Tod Frolking, for all of his assistance and guidance. 
This research was funded by the Anderson Summer Science Program, I give many thanks for the opportunity. 
Ø Using initial SOC values based on OSU data and subsoil 
samples from Snowville, the current conditions seem to fall 
in line with DNDC projections. 
Ø Mob grazing has promoted soil C sequestration from 
manuring and residual biomass. 
Ø DNDC model suggest that a higher initial SOC percentage 
leads to slightly higher rates of C sequestration. 
Ø More intense grazing reduces the amount of C 
sequestration (break in slope at 10 years). 
Above: Cows 
coming in from 
pasture for 
afternoon milking. 
Left: Emily Siegel 
taking soil core in 
yard of Jeremiah 
Shields, farm 
manager, with his 
herding dogs. 
Soil carbon 
partitioning 
with depth 
Biomass 
partitioning 
Gas fluxes 
Soil thermo-­‐‑ 
hydro chemistry 
2.85%! 
3.24%! 
3.31%! 
3.32%! 
2.59%! 
2.39%! 
1.97%! 
2.00%! 
2.15%! 
2.49%! 
3.14%! 
3.78%! 
2.44%! 
2.64%! 
3.74%! 
3.38%! 
3.54%! 4.34%! 
3.38%! 
Land Use History 
The pH of soils tested ranged from 4.7-­‐‑6.9 in A Horizon 
and 3.9-­‐‑7.4 in B Horizon. Optimal pH for farms are near 
neutral (pH 6.5-­‐‑7.5). 
Southeastern Ohio land was 90% forested during early 
habitation and reduced by 25% in 1800’s as the rural 
population increased. Subsistence farming practices led 
to continual removal of forests, erosion of steeper lands 
and widespread soil depletion. Peak population and 
agricultural activity was between 1890-­‐‑1910, and both 
pasture and cultivated lands reverted to forest through 
the 1900’s as people migrated from rural sehings (Dyer, 
2010). 
Mob Grazing 
The practice of mob grazing for cahle puts a higher number of head on a smaller pasture, yet moves the cows through the pasture more quickly once the grasses are 
fully grazed. For Snowville Creamery, they partition paddock size according to productivity of the grasses for each plot and rotate their cows (of 200-­‐‑275 head for 
120 hectares on the Brick) every 12 hours after each milking. It is important to monitor the pastures year-­‐‑to-­‐‑year to alter stocking rates and recovery periods for 
each plot properly. The benefits of mob grazing can include increased grass utilization of 20-­‐‑30%, longer recovery periods for pastures, no fly problems, more plant 
diversity, and healthier soils with beher water-­‐‑holding capacity since grasses are able to protect fields from evaporative losses beher in summer while keeping soils 
warmer in fall and spring to keep micro-­‐‑organisms active (Tiev 2011). 
5.0! 
4.5! 
4.0! 
3.5! 
3.0! 
2.5! 
2.0! 
1.5! 
1.0! 
0.5! 
0.0! 
% Carbon 
% C from Different Sampling Areas

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Effects of integrated water and nutrient management technologies on crop and ...
Effects of integrated water and nutrient management technologies on crop and ...Effects of integrated water and nutrient management technologies on crop and ...
Effects of integrated water and nutrient management technologies on crop and ...Joanna Hicks
 
Measuring and monitoring soil carbon stocks from point to continental scale i...
Measuring and monitoring soil carbon stocks from point to continental scale i...Measuring and monitoring soil carbon stocks from point to continental scale i...
Measuring and monitoring soil carbon stocks from point to continental scale i...ExternalEvents
 
Potential soil organic matter benefits from mixed farming: evidence from long...
Potential soil organic matter benefits from mixed farming: evidence from long...Potential soil organic matter benefits from mixed farming: evidence from long...
Potential soil organic matter benefits from mixed farming: evidence from long...Sustainable Food Trust
 
CGMDC CICL IFFCO_Tara Coal Block presentation_09.03.2011
CGMDC CICL IFFCO_Tara Coal Block presentation_09.03.2011CGMDC CICL IFFCO_Tara Coal Block presentation_09.03.2011
CGMDC CICL IFFCO_Tara Coal Block presentation_09.03.2011RavindraSaksena
 
Land management impact on soil organic carbon stocks – what do we really know?
Land management impact on soil organic carbon stocks – what do we really know?Land management impact on soil organic carbon stocks – what do we really know?
Land management impact on soil organic carbon stocks – what do we really know?ExternalEvents
 
Land Use Changes on Soil Carbon Dynamics, Stocks in Eastern Himalayas, India
Land Use Changes on Soil Carbon Dynamics, Stocks in Eastern Himalayas, IndiaLand Use Changes on Soil Carbon Dynamics, Stocks in Eastern Himalayas, India
Land Use Changes on Soil Carbon Dynamics, Stocks in Eastern Himalayas, IndiaExternalEvents
 
On soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: potentials and drawb...
On soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: potentials and drawb...On soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: potentials and drawb...
On soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: potentials and drawb...SIANI
 
Climate Smart Agriculture and forest conservation to foster SOC sequestration...
Climate Smart Agriculture and forest conservation to foster SOC sequestration...Climate Smart Agriculture and forest conservation to foster SOC sequestration...
Climate Smart Agriculture and forest conservation to foster SOC sequestration...ExternalEvents
 
Plot and Spatial Scale Data Available for the Brazilian Amazon
Plot and Spatial Scale Data Available for the Brazilian AmazonPlot and Spatial Scale Data Available for the Brazilian Amazon
Plot and Spatial Scale Data Available for the Brazilian AmazonWorld Agroforestry (ICRAF)
 
Dynamics of Cd, Cu and Pb added to soil through different kinds of sewage sludge
Dynamics of Cd, Cu and Pb added to soil through different kinds of sewage sludgeDynamics of Cd, Cu and Pb added to soil through different kinds of sewage sludge
Dynamics of Cd, Cu and Pb added to soil through different kinds of sewage sludgeSilvana Torri
 
Status of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks in the Small Island Developing States (S...
Status of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks in the Small Island Developing States (S...Status of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks in the Small Island Developing States (S...
Status of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks in the Small Island Developing States (S...ExternalEvents
 
Soil organic carbon and nitrogen sequestration by long-term of CA in Mollisol...
Soil organic carbon and nitrogen sequestration by long-term of CA in Mollisol...Soil organic carbon and nitrogen sequestration by long-term of CA in Mollisol...
Soil organic carbon and nitrogen sequestration by long-term of CA in Mollisol...Joanna Hicks
 
Soil Organic Carbon as observed in lowlands of Continuous Rice Cropping in Gu...
Soil Organic Carbon as observed in lowlands of Continuous Rice Cropping in Gu...Soil Organic Carbon as observed in lowlands of Continuous Rice Cropping in Gu...
Soil Organic Carbon as observed in lowlands of Continuous Rice Cropping in Gu...QUESTJOURNAL
 
E missions from land use change and soil carbon changes in c arbon footprints...
E missions from land use change and soil carbon changes in c arbon footprints...E missions from land use change and soil carbon changes in c arbon footprints...
E missions from land use change and soil carbon changes in c arbon footprints...SIANI
 
Christine Brown - Canadian Livestock Producers Efforts to Improve Water Quality
Christine Brown - Canadian Livestock Producers Efforts to Improve Water QualityChristine Brown - Canadian Livestock Producers Efforts to Improve Water Quality
Christine Brown - Canadian Livestock Producers Efforts to Improve Water QualityJohn Blue
 
AJDierolfEtAlSoverKMgmtRic
AJDierolfEtAlSoverKMgmtRicAJDierolfEtAlSoverKMgmtRic
AJDierolfEtAlSoverKMgmtRicTom Dierolf
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Effects of integrated water and nutrient management technologies on crop and ...
Effects of integrated water and nutrient management technologies on crop and ...Effects of integrated water and nutrient management technologies on crop and ...
Effects of integrated water and nutrient management technologies on crop and ...
 
Quantifying Soil Loss & Redeposition in Field Experiments
Quantifying Soil Loss & Redeposition in Field ExperimentsQuantifying Soil Loss & Redeposition in Field Experiments
Quantifying Soil Loss & Redeposition in Field Experiments
 
Measuring and monitoring soil carbon stocks from point to continental scale i...
Measuring and monitoring soil carbon stocks from point to continental scale i...Measuring and monitoring soil carbon stocks from point to continental scale i...
Measuring and monitoring soil carbon stocks from point to continental scale i...
 
Barrera_SMBposter_ASA2012
Barrera_SMBposter_ASA2012Barrera_SMBposter_ASA2012
Barrera_SMBposter_ASA2012
 
Potential soil organic matter benefits from mixed farming: evidence from long...
Potential soil organic matter benefits from mixed farming: evidence from long...Potential soil organic matter benefits from mixed farming: evidence from long...
Potential soil organic matter benefits from mixed farming: evidence from long...
 
CGMDC CICL IFFCO_Tara Coal Block presentation_09.03.2011
CGMDC CICL IFFCO_Tara Coal Block presentation_09.03.2011CGMDC CICL IFFCO_Tara Coal Block presentation_09.03.2011
CGMDC CICL IFFCO_Tara Coal Block presentation_09.03.2011
 
Land management impact on soil organic carbon stocks – what do we really know?
Land management impact on soil organic carbon stocks – what do we really know?Land management impact on soil organic carbon stocks – what do we really know?
Land management impact on soil organic carbon stocks – what do we really know?
 
Land Use Changes on Soil Carbon Dynamics, Stocks in Eastern Himalayas, India
Land Use Changes on Soil Carbon Dynamics, Stocks in Eastern Himalayas, IndiaLand Use Changes on Soil Carbon Dynamics, Stocks in Eastern Himalayas, India
Land Use Changes on Soil Carbon Dynamics, Stocks in Eastern Himalayas, India
 
On soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: potentials and drawb...
On soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: potentials and drawb...On soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: potentials and drawb...
On soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: potentials and drawb...
 
Climate Smart Agriculture and forest conservation to foster SOC sequestration...
Climate Smart Agriculture and forest conservation to foster SOC sequestration...Climate Smart Agriculture and forest conservation to foster SOC sequestration...
Climate Smart Agriculture and forest conservation to foster SOC sequestration...
 
Plot and Spatial Scale Data Available for the Brazilian Amazon
Plot and Spatial Scale Data Available for the Brazilian AmazonPlot and Spatial Scale Data Available for the Brazilian Amazon
Plot and Spatial Scale Data Available for the Brazilian Amazon
 
Dynamics of Cd, Cu and Pb added to soil through different kinds of sewage sludge
Dynamics of Cd, Cu and Pb added to soil through different kinds of sewage sludgeDynamics of Cd, Cu and Pb added to soil through different kinds of sewage sludge
Dynamics of Cd, Cu and Pb added to soil through different kinds of sewage sludge
 
Status of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks in the Small Island Developing States (S...
Status of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks in the Small Island Developing States (S...Status of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks in the Small Island Developing States (S...
Status of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks in the Small Island Developing States (S...
 
Soil organic carbon and nitrogen sequestration by long-term of CA in Mollisol...
Soil organic carbon and nitrogen sequestration by long-term of CA in Mollisol...Soil organic carbon and nitrogen sequestration by long-term of CA in Mollisol...
Soil organic carbon and nitrogen sequestration by long-term of CA in Mollisol...
 
Soil Organic Carbon as observed in lowlands of Continuous Rice Cropping in Gu...
Soil Organic Carbon as observed in lowlands of Continuous Rice Cropping in Gu...Soil Organic Carbon as observed in lowlands of Continuous Rice Cropping in Gu...
Soil Organic Carbon as observed in lowlands of Continuous Rice Cropping in Gu...
 
E missions from land use change and soil carbon changes in c arbon footprints...
E missions from land use change and soil carbon changes in c arbon footprints...E missions from land use change and soil carbon changes in c arbon footprints...
E missions from land use change and soil carbon changes in c arbon footprints...
 
Imarano Bec2
Imarano Bec2Imarano Bec2
Imarano Bec2
 
Christine Brown - Canadian Livestock Producers Efforts to Improve Water Quality
Christine Brown - Canadian Livestock Producers Efforts to Improve Water QualityChristine Brown - Canadian Livestock Producers Efforts to Improve Water Quality
Christine Brown - Canadian Livestock Producers Efforts to Improve Water Quality
 
Mitigation potential of soil carbon sequestration
Mitigation potential of soil carbon sequestrationMitigation potential of soil carbon sequestration
Mitigation potential of soil carbon sequestration
 
AJDierolfEtAlSoverKMgmtRic
AJDierolfEtAlSoverKMgmtRicAJDierolfEtAlSoverKMgmtRic
AJDierolfEtAlSoverKMgmtRic
 

Ähnlich wie SiegelResearchPoster2014-Final

Greenhouse Gas Accounting: NCAS
Greenhouse Gas Accounting: NCASGreenhouse Gas Accounting: NCAS
Greenhouse Gas Accounting: NCASCarbon Coalition
 
Fredrick Wandera CLIFF Workshop
Fredrick Wandera CLIFF WorkshopFredrick Wandera CLIFF Workshop
Fredrick Wandera CLIFF WorkshopMerylRichards
 
Challenges of soil organic carbon sequestration in drylands
Challenges of soil organic carbon sequestration in drylandsChallenges of soil organic carbon sequestration in drylands
Challenges of soil organic carbon sequestration in drylandsExternalEvents
 
Impact of Agricultural Management on Quality of Soil, Carbon Storage and Carb...
Impact of Agricultural Management on Quality of Soil, Carbon Storage and Carb...Impact of Agricultural Management on Quality of Soil, Carbon Storage and Carb...
Impact of Agricultural Management on Quality of Soil, Carbon Storage and Carb...Agriculture Journal IJOEAR
 
Bioenergy and Land use change: Local to Global Challenges
Bioenergy and Land use change: Local to Global ChallengesBioenergy and Land use change: Local to Global Challenges
Bioenergy and Land use change: Local to Global ChallengesJeanette Whitaker
 
Early effect of no - tillage on land profitability, soil fertility and microb...
Early effect of no - tillage on land profitability, soil fertility and microb...Early effect of no - tillage on land profitability, soil fertility and microb...
Early effect of no - tillage on land profitability, soil fertility and microb...Joanna Hicks
 
Climate Change and Carbon sequestration in the Mediterranean basin ,contribut...
Climate Change and Carbon sequestration in the Mediterranean basin ,contribut...Climate Change and Carbon sequestration in the Mediterranean basin ,contribut...
Climate Change and Carbon sequestration in the Mediterranean basin ,contribut...African Conservation Tillage Network
 
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the AtmosphereSteven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmospheregabriellebastien
 
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the AtmosphereSteven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmospherebio4climate
 
Global management of soil organic matter
Global management of soil organic matterGlobal management of soil organic matter
Global management of soil organic matterExternalEvents
 
Using Soil Respiration Tests to Measure Plant Available Nitrogen - Chanda
Using Soil Respiration Tests to Measure Plant Available Nitrogen - Chanda Using Soil Respiration Tests to Measure Plant Available Nitrogen - Chanda
Using Soil Respiration Tests to Measure Plant Available Nitrogen - Chanda Soil and Water Conservation Society
 
Protection of soil from the loss of organic carbon by taking into account ero...
Protection of soil from the loss of organic carbon by taking into account ero...Protection of soil from the loss of organic carbon by taking into account ero...
Protection of soil from the loss of organic carbon by taking into account ero...ExternalEvents
 

Ähnlich wie SiegelResearchPoster2014-Final (20)

Greenhouse Gas Accounting: NCAS
Greenhouse Gas Accounting: NCASGreenhouse Gas Accounting: NCAS
Greenhouse Gas Accounting: NCAS
 
1 rattanlal
1 rattanlal1 rattanlal
1 rattanlal
 
1 rattanlal
1 rattanlal1 rattanlal
1 rattanlal
 
Soil Carbon Sequestration Potentials of Semi-arid soils at the CCAFS Site in ...
Soil Carbon Sequestration Potentials of Semi-arid soils at the CCAFS Site in ...Soil Carbon Sequestration Potentials of Semi-arid soils at the CCAFS Site in ...
Soil Carbon Sequestration Potentials of Semi-arid soils at the CCAFS Site in ...
 
Fredrick Wandera CLIFF Workshop
Fredrick Wandera CLIFF WorkshopFredrick Wandera CLIFF Workshop
Fredrick Wandera CLIFF Workshop
 
Building Better Soils with Cover Crops
Building Better Soils with Cover CropsBuilding Better Soils with Cover Crops
Building Better Soils with Cover Crops
 
The viability of growing shrub willow as bioenergy buffer
The viability of growing shrub willow as bioenergy bufferThe viability of growing shrub willow as bioenergy buffer
The viability of growing shrub willow as bioenergy buffer
 
Challenges of soil organic carbon sequestration in drylands
Challenges of soil organic carbon sequestration in drylandsChallenges of soil organic carbon sequestration in drylands
Challenges of soil organic carbon sequestration in drylands
 
Impact of Agricultural Management on Quality of Soil, Carbon Storage and Carb...
Impact of Agricultural Management on Quality of Soil, Carbon Storage and Carb...Impact of Agricultural Management on Quality of Soil, Carbon Storage and Carb...
Impact of Agricultural Management on Quality of Soil, Carbon Storage and Carb...
 
Climate change mitigation and agricultural development scenarios for the high...
Climate change mitigation and agricultural development scenarios for the high...Climate change mitigation and agricultural development scenarios for the high...
Climate change mitigation and agricultural development scenarios for the high...
 
Bioenergy and Land use change: Local to Global Challenges
Bioenergy and Land use change: Local to Global ChallengesBioenergy and Land use change: Local to Global Challenges
Bioenergy and Land use change: Local to Global Challenges
 
Early effect of no - tillage on land profitability, soil fertility and microb...
Early effect of no - tillage on land profitability, soil fertility and microb...Early effect of no - tillage on land profitability, soil fertility and microb...
Early effect of no - tillage on land profitability, soil fertility and microb...
 
Compost Benefits to the Soil
Compost Benefits to the SoilCompost Benefits to the Soil
Compost Benefits to the Soil
 
Climate Change and Carbon sequestration in the Mediterranean basin ,contribut...
Climate Change and Carbon sequestration in the Mediterranean basin ,contribut...Climate Change and Carbon sequestration in the Mediterranean basin ,contribut...
Climate Change and Carbon sequestration in the Mediterranean basin ,contribut...
 
Malting Sludges as Soil Amendment
Malting Sludges as Soil AmendmentMalting Sludges as Soil Amendment
Malting Sludges as Soil Amendment
 
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the AtmosphereSteven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
 
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the AtmosphereSteven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
Steven Apfelbaum - Wetlands: Sinking Carbon and Keeping It Out of the Atmosphere
 
Global management of soil organic matter
Global management of soil organic matterGlobal management of soil organic matter
Global management of soil organic matter
 
Using Soil Respiration Tests to Measure Plant Available Nitrogen - Chanda
Using Soil Respiration Tests to Measure Plant Available Nitrogen - Chanda Using Soil Respiration Tests to Measure Plant Available Nitrogen - Chanda
Using Soil Respiration Tests to Measure Plant Available Nitrogen - Chanda
 
Protection of soil from the loss of organic carbon by taking into account ero...
Protection of soil from the loss of organic carbon by taking into account ero...Protection of soil from the loss of organic carbon by taking into account ero...
Protection of soil from the loss of organic carbon by taking into account ero...
 

SiegelResearchPoster2014-Final

  • 1. Pasture Mob Grazing Effects on Soil Carbon: A Modeling Case Study of Snowville Creamery Introduction Land use for modern, high-­‐‑yield agriculture has led to losses of 50-­‐‑70% or 40-­‐‑90 Pg worldwide of soil’s pre modern agriculture organic carbon (Lal, 2007; Smith, 2008a). With application of best-­‐‑management practices, global agricultural soils have the potential to sequester 0.9 ± 0.3 Pg C per year in the short term (Lal, 2004 a, b). This represents the largest potential sink after the oceans and could significantly reduce the global increase in atmospheric CO2, equivalent to 5-­‐‑15% of fossil fuel emissions (Lal, 2004 a, b). We studied a pasture-­‐‑grazed dairy operation in Meigs County, OH, self-­‐‑promoted as a sustainable yet high-­‐‑yield creamery, to determine whether their grazing and manuring practices have improved soil quality and sequestered soil carbon. The first element of the study measured current soil carbon from creamery grazed pastures of 15-­‐‑20 years and nearby ungrazed pastures and lawns for comparison. The farm is called The Brick, for its reddish, eroded and impoverished soils when the dairy was established in 1998. Unfortunately we did not locate modern land use and soil conditions reflective of that time. The second element of the project utilized DNDC (Denitrification Decomposition), an agricultural process-­‐‑based biogeochemical modeling program, to simulate past and project future outputs of the farm given current practices. The model uses soil climate, agricultural management practices, crop growth, and decomposition parameters to predict soil physical and chemical conditions and nitrification, denitrification and fermentation submodels to predict gas emissions (Li 2000, User’s Guide 2009). Procedures Field Sampling Ø 2-­‐‑4 sampling sites chosen from selected fields, dependent on field size, focusing on uplands of low to moderate slope. Ø Four 1.8 cm diameter cores spaced ~2 m apart collected from each site. Cores sampled at 0-­‐‑20 cm and 20-­‐‑50 cm depths. 20 cm Ø GPS coordinates, slope angle and field conditions were recorded. Loss on Ignition: Measuring Soil Organic Carbon Ø Soil samples air dried and ground to pass a 2mm sieve, a subsample then heated at 105°C overnight to determine water content. Ø A subsample ground to <0.25mm and a ~3g sample weighed on analytical balance, heated in muffle furnace at 450°C for 4 hours, cooled to 250°C, moved to desiccator to cool to room temperature without gaining moisture, then reweighed to determine loss of organic carbon. (C6H12O6 (OM) + 6O2 + Heat à 6CO2 + 6H2O) (Anderson and Krysell 2005, Konare et al. 2010). Denitrification-­‐‑Decomposition Model A process-­‐‑driven model of C and N biogeochemistry that integrates 4 submodels based on input parameters (User’s Guide 2009). Submodels 1. Thermal-­‐‑hydraulic: soil temperature and moisture, from mean daily temperature records and daily rainfall events. 2. Plant growth: biomass partitioning, C/N ratios, N uptake, and water demand/stress. 3. Denitrification: N leaching and denitrification rates (NO, N2O and N2 production under saturated or reducing conditions). 4. Decomposition: microbial biomass, plant residue, ammonia volatilization, and ammonium mineralization, nitrification, humad and humus formation. Plant C is lost to CO2, SOC and fermentation-­‐‑producing CH4. Model Inputs Daily temperature and precipitation data for Athens, OH, about 15 miles from the creamery (hhp://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/). Land management and plant growth parameters, such as grazing intensity and timing, additional plantings of grasses and legumes, field fertilization, and manure additions based on farmer interviews. Biomass partitioning, N fixation indices, water demands and maximum yields of grasses taken from literature review and DNDC standard values. Sample Sites The Brick Farm, and Bill Dix and Stacy Hall’s Farm Grazed Pasture Sampling Sites Ø One site (Bill Dix and Stacy Hall’s farm on Rainbow Lake Road in Shade, OH, not shown on map) rotationally grazed as dairy since 1993. The remainder of sites from the Brick Farm on OH 143 north of Pomeroy, OH) grazed since 1998—shown on map as white markers. Ø Soils of Upshur-­‐‑Gilpin complex. The Upshur silty clay has shale parent material and the Gilpin silt loam to channery silt loam has parent material of interbedded shale, siltstone and some sandstone (Web Soil Survey). Ø Pastures presently “mob” rotationally grazed with an average of 240 cows. Milked every 12 hours and given a fresh field to graze afterwards. Graze all day during late spring to fall, graze half day in early spring and late fall, and given hay in paddock/barn during most winter months. Ø Winter manure from their shelter mixed with sawdust, piled and composed, then spread in 2” layer onto about 6 ha each year. Ø Additional clover sowed in fields every 3 years. Non-­‐‑Dairy Sampling Sites Ø Two sites of residential lawns on farm property that were mowed, never grazed, and one site of fallow pasture, ungrazed, adjacent to the Brick pastures— shown in maps as yellow markers. Ø One site of horse-­‐‑grazed pasture adjacent to Dix-­‐‑Hall’s property for comparison, though lihle known of history or management of land (not shown on map). Range of % C of the Brick samples (grazed 15 years) and Dix-­‐‑Hall Farm (grazed 20 years) in comparison to model projections with different initial % C Initial %C in 0-­‐‑20 cm depth interval Average 2.69% Average 3.16% 6! 5! 4! 3! 2! 1! 0! 0! 5! 10! 15! 20! 25! 30! % Carbon Time (years) 1.3% C! 1% C! 0.75% C! Grazed 15 years! Grazed 20 years! 7! 6! 5! 4! 3! 2! 1! 0! SOC (0-­‐‑20 cm) modeled by DNDC 150 cows (0-­‐‑10 years) 240 cows (10-­‐‑30 years) Manuring at year 6 and 26 Initial %C in 0-­‐‑20 cm depth interval 0! 5! 10! 15! 20! 25! 30! % Carbon Time (years) 1.9% C! 1.6% C! 1.3 % C! 1% C! 0.75% C! 0.5% C! 0.25% C! Present day (2014) Emily Siegel, advised by Tod Frolking Department of Geosciences, Denison University Discussion Initial SOC levels came from OSU soil data of the same soil series sampled 30-­‐‑40 years ago in counties surrounding the farm. We estimate that the Brick soils may have had similar SOC values (~1.5% C), or could have had lower values with severe erosion of A horizons (~0.75% C). Using these initial C percentages, DNDC shows how Snowville’s management changes SOC over their 20 years of management, with 10 years of projected values. Smith (2008b) suggests that proper grazing intensity can improve soil carbon more than ungrazed or overgrazed pastures. My research concludes through DNDC modeling and soil samples that the mob grazing of the creamery does not drastically improve soil carbon in comparison to ungrazed fields. The creamery has improved soil quality by increasing SOC, yet no more than other observed practices. Our study was concentrated on soil carbon, yet these analyses could be applied to track gas fluxes or grass yields. Further Research Use DNDC to model optimal mob grazing practices to improve C sequestration capacity to equal that of nongrazing. Track manure amendment timing to test if it could be applied more often without raising gas emissions. DNDC simulated outputs of model run Climate variables Works Cited Anderson, K.J. and M. Krystell. Dry maher (DM), loss on ignition (LOI), and total organic carbon (TOC): Report on an evaluation study. Horizontal 17 (2005). Dyer, J. Land-­‐‑use legacies in a central Appalachian forest: differential response of trees and herbs to historic agricultural practices. Applied Vegetation Science 13 (2010): 195-­‐‑206. Konare, H., R. S. Yost, M. Doumbia, G.W. McCarty, A. Jarju and R. Kablan. Loss on ignition: Measuring soil organic carbon of the Sahel, West Africa. African Journal of Agricultrual Research Vol. 5 (2010), 22: 3088-­‐‑3095. Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123 (2004):1–22. Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304 (2004b):1623–1627. Lal, R. Carbon management in agricultural soils. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12, (2007) no. 2:303 – 322. Li, CS. Modeling trace gas emissions from agricultural ecosystems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 58 (2000): 259-­‐‑276. User’s Guide for the DNDC Model. Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space: University of New Hampshire. 2009. Smith, P. Land use change and soil organic carbon dynamics. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 81, (2008a) no. 2:169-­‐‑178. Smith, P. Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363 (2008b): 789-­‐‑813. Tiev, N. Prime Pastures. Hay and Forage Grower 26, (2011) Issue 2: 11-­‐‑12. Web Soil Survey. USDA: National Resources Conservation Service. hhp://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm. 2.22%! 1.80%! 2.40%! The map above shows The Brick farm at Snowville Creamery with the distribution of SOC percentages from our sample sites. Ø Higher values for sites near yard in center of property could be because of their proximity to manure/compost pile (values around 3.38 and 3.74% in yellow) Higher values in north and west fields, with lower values in the south fields. Ø SOC sampling data show a spatial variation that could be due to soil parent material causing slight differences in clay content or subsoil carbonate content. Not enough known about the land history to speculate whether the pahern is a result of land management. The graph below suggests that timing of manuring with compost during the year does not make a significant difference in SOC, however, manuring does increase soil carbon. More frequent applications of manure would improve soil carbon, though this would also increase nitrous oxide emissions (seen in DNDC). Even if the beginning SOC levels were 0.75%, leaving pastures ungrazed would improve soil C beher over the 30 years. 7! 6! 5! 4! 3! 2! 1! 0! Soil carbon (0-­‐‑20 cm) for different management scenarios in DNDC 150 cows (0-­‐‑10 years), then 240 cows (10-­‐‑30 years) 0! 5! 10! 15! 20! 25! 30! % Carbon Time (years) Manuring at year 6 and 26 Other scenarios Overlapping curves, due to no difference in values of SOC from manuring timing Present day (2014) Acknowledgements I would like to thank Snowville Creamery for participating with us in this study. Especially, Jeremiah Shields for taking the time to show us around the farm and accommodate our interviews and Warren Taylor for the delicious yogurt and milk. Thanks to my advisor, Tod Frolking, for all of his assistance and guidance. This research was funded by the Anderson Summer Science Program, I give many thanks for the opportunity. Ø Using initial SOC values based on OSU data and subsoil samples from Snowville, the current conditions seem to fall in line with DNDC projections. Ø Mob grazing has promoted soil C sequestration from manuring and residual biomass. Ø DNDC model suggest that a higher initial SOC percentage leads to slightly higher rates of C sequestration. Ø More intense grazing reduces the amount of C sequestration (break in slope at 10 years). Above: Cows coming in from pasture for afternoon milking. Left: Emily Siegel taking soil core in yard of Jeremiah Shields, farm manager, with his herding dogs. Soil carbon partitioning with depth Biomass partitioning Gas fluxes Soil thermo-­‐‑ hydro chemistry 2.85%! 3.24%! 3.31%! 3.32%! 2.59%! 2.39%! 1.97%! 2.00%! 2.15%! 2.49%! 3.14%! 3.78%! 2.44%! 2.64%! 3.74%! 3.38%! 3.54%! 4.34%! 3.38%! Land Use History The pH of soils tested ranged from 4.7-­‐‑6.9 in A Horizon and 3.9-­‐‑7.4 in B Horizon. Optimal pH for farms are near neutral (pH 6.5-­‐‑7.5). Southeastern Ohio land was 90% forested during early habitation and reduced by 25% in 1800’s as the rural population increased. Subsistence farming practices led to continual removal of forests, erosion of steeper lands and widespread soil depletion. Peak population and agricultural activity was between 1890-­‐‑1910, and both pasture and cultivated lands reverted to forest through the 1900’s as people migrated from rural sehings (Dyer, 2010). Mob Grazing The practice of mob grazing for cahle puts a higher number of head on a smaller pasture, yet moves the cows through the pasture more quickly once the grasses are fully grazed. For Snowville Creamery, they partition paddock size according to productivity of the grasses for each plot and rotate their cows (of 200-­‐‑275 head for 120 hectares on the Brick) every 12 hours after each milking. It is important to monitor the pastures year-­‐‑to-­‐‑year to alter stocking rates and recovery periods for each plot properly. The benefits of mob grazing can include increased grass utilization of 20-­‐‑30%, longer recovery periods for pastures, no fly problems, more plant diversity, and healthier soils with beher water-­‐‑holding capacity since grasses are able to protect fields from evaporative losses beher in summer while keeping soils warmer in fall and spring to keep micro-­‐‑organisms active (Tiev 2011). 5.0! 4.5! 4.0! 3.5! 3.0! 2.5! 2.0! 1.5! 1.0! 0.5! 0.0! % Carbon % C from Different Sampling Areas