Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Die SlideShare-Präsentation wird heruntergeladen. ×

Got the Blues, then find some Greenspace: The Mental Health Benefits of Green Exercise Activities and Green Care

Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007




Got the Blues, then find some Greenspace
The Mental Health Benefits of Green Exercise Activi...
Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007



Background
Mind commissioned Professor Jules Pretty, Jo Peacock and Rachel Hine, lead researc...
Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007



Contents
1. Key findings                                                                     ...
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige

Hier ansehen

1 von 49 Anzeige

Weitere Verwandte Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Got the Blues, then find some Greenspace: The Mental Health Benefits of Green Exercise Activities and Green Care (20)

Weitere von ElisaMendelsohn (20)

Anzeige

Aktuellste (20)

Got the Blues, then find some Greenspace: The Mental Health Benefits of Green Exercise Activities and Green Care

  1. 1. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 Got the Blues, then find some Greenspace The Mental Health Benefits of Green Exercise Activities and Green Care Mind week report, February 2007 Jo Peacock, Rachel Hine and Jules Pretty Centre for Environment and Society, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Essex Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ Photographs courtesy of Cyrillia Francis and Steph Berns of Mind 1
  2. 2. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 Background Mind commissioned Professor Jules Pretty, Jo Peacock and Rachel Hine, lead researchers of the green exercise programme at the University of Essex, to investigate the mental health benefits Mind members derive from participating in a range of green exercise activities. One hundred and eight Mind members took part in our research looking at the effects of existing green exercise activities which they are already engaging in locally. In addition, a further 20 members participated in a smaller study which compared the mental health benefits experienced from participating in a green walk outdoors, with an equivalent walk indoors. Both the statistical findings from this process together with the qualitative narrative are included in the report. Mind and the University of Essex would like to thank all Mind members for their assistance with the research published in this report. We are very grateful to all the people who completed the questionnaires and those who took part in the walking study and agreed to share details about their experiences. 2
  3. 3. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 Contents 1. Key findings 4 2. Introduction 8 3. Review of existing literature 10 3.1 The value of greenspaces and contact with nature 10 3.2 The value of exercise 11 3.3 The emergence of green exercise 12 3.4 What do we know so far? 14 3.5 What are we yet to fully understand? 16 3.5.1 Application of green exercise in the mental health population 3.5.2 Green exercise as a treatment for mild to moderate depression 3.5.3 Green care for marginalised populations 3.5.4 Limitations of research to date 4. Assessment of existing Mind green exercise activities 23 4.1 Findings - green exercise activities 23 4.2 Findings - people involved in the activities 24 5. A Mind study to compare a green outdoor walk and an indoor walk 32 5.1 Backgound and methodology 32 5.2 Results 35 6. Conclusions and recommendations 41 6.1 Issues affecting progress of research 41 6.1.1 Ethical issues 6.1.2 Evaluation issues 6.2 Key issues for policy 42 6.2.1 Amount of greenspace 6.2.2 Accessibility issues 6.2.3 Barriers to participation 6.2.4 Acceptance from service providers 6.2.5 Working in partnership 6.2.6 The need for further research 7. References 47 3
  4. 4. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 1. Key findings  The current health status of the UK population is becoming problematic due to our increasingly sedentary lifestyles, our poor diets and the prevalence of mental illness. Mental ill health severely compromises quality of life and sadly, sufferers of anxiety and depression are all too commonplace today.  The total costs of mental illness in England have been reported to be has high as £77.4 billion. This includes the human costs of mental illness due to reduced quality of life, suffering, pain, disability and distress; and the costs of output losses in the economy due to peoples’ inability to work and costs of health and social care.  Therefore, mental illness is a burgeoning concern and public spending on mental health services is continually rising. Perhaps it is about time we started to question the cost- effectiveness of existing treatment options, such as therapy and drug prescriptions? Should we be thinking about preventative treatments and if so, what should we be prescribing? Is it inconceivable to think that we might already have a solution on our doorstep, which is available to everyone at minimal cost? The simple answer might exist in encouraging people to interact with nature and greenspace and to get active outdoors?  A myriad of persuasive evidence demonstrates the positive relationship between exposure to nature and an individual’s health and well-being. Nature and greenspaces are often perceived as places to relax, escape and unwind from the daily stresses of modern life. This opportunity for relaxation and recreation has a positive influence on our emotional and physical well-being. Equally, participating in physical activity is known to result in positive physical and mental health outcomes.  Therefore, engaging in physical activities whilst simultaneously being directly exposed to nature (“green exercise”) could offer an alternative preventative and curative option to address the worrying problem of mental illness. There is an emerging and compelling argument for green exercise therapy to be advocated as preventative medicine or the primary treatment option for some mental illnesses, as exercise has less negative side effects than many traditional drug therapies and it can positively treat patients experiencing a combination of physical and mental health problems.  However, at present, there is limited evidence concerning the application of green exercise in the mental health population. With incidences of mental illness and especially depression on the increase how much do we know about green exercise as a potential treatment? There has been little research conducted which compares green exercise with more traditional treatment options, such as antidepressants or cognitive behavioural therapy but from initial findings we can confidently anticipate that green exercise is likely to be equally as effective.  Some may argue that the option of green exercise therapy or green care may prove to be an even more effective treatment response than exercise alone as it encourages people to re- connect with nature and experience the additional positive health benefits that are associated with this. Contact with nature and greenspace is often uplifting and restorative, helps to reduce stress and improve mood and combining this with physical activity will offer a very efficacious treatment option. Green exercise also promotes social inclusion and enables people to make healthier choices and adopt a sustainable healthier lifestyle. 4
  5. 5. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 However, the robust scientific evidence to support this hypothesis is still lacking. For the idea to gain credibility and influence government policy and the health sector, more detailed research needs to be undertaken. Some of these research limitations were addressed in this study.  108 Mind members took part in our research and completed a specifically designed questionnaire, which assessed the positive physical and mental health benefits people derived from engaging in a range of green exercise activities. It was found that the combination of exercising outside in the presence of nature (i.e. green exercise) was the most influential factor, with 89.6% of respondents stating that this was very important or important in determining how they felt. This supports the idea that it is the synergistic amalgamation of the exercise in a green environment that produces added health benefits, rather than either one alone.  Many key themes emerged when assessing how taking part in these activities made participants feel. They enjoyed becoming part of a group and socialising with likeminded people. They took pleasure in the conversation and company and the activities left them feeling refreshed. They felt less stressed, more alert and alive, happier and more relaxed. Many people stated that they felt mentally healthier and a lot more motivated and positive. They felt that the activities helped to lift their depression levels and instil a feeling of calm and peacefulness. Their overall mood improved as did their confidence levels and self- esteem. Many spoke of the benefits to their fitness levels and how they felt stronger, less lethargic and more energetic. Others commented on the changes to their body profile through losing weight, easing stiffness in their joints and becoming more agile, so there were a range of physical health benefits reported.  The findings from this assessment clearly showed that participating in a range of green exercise activities provided substantial social, health and well-being benefits. The contact with nature and greenspace is a necessity in enriching the experience and creates a restorative environment which people can seek pleasure in escaping to. A lot of enjoyment was derived from getting out into the fresh air, admiring the scenery and taking pleasure in the wildlife, plants and trees.  Participating in these activities was often perceived as therapeutic and engendered feelings of relaxation and peacefulness. The whole process was very calming; it reduced stress levels and encouraged people to feel good about themselves by improving their self-worth, confidence and self-esteem. It inspired people to embrace their problems and start to deal with them and learn how to cope. There was a great sense of achievement when an activity was completed, as participants felt they had achieved something worthwhile and therefore felt useful. Figure 1: The change in self-esteem following participation in the  In addition, 20 local Mind group members walks participated in a separate small study which 18 addressed the research question: “Will Green outdoor walk exercising outdoors in a green environment 19 Index of self-esteem significantly improve participant’s mental health and well-being (using standardised 20 and well-recognised mood and self-esteem measures) compared to the equivalent 21 exercise indoors?” They took part in two Type of walk 22 Indoor walk 5
  6. 6. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 separate walks, a green outdoor walk and an indoor walk at a local shopping centre. Figure 1 clearly shows the significant improvement in self-esteem following the green outdoor walk and the detrimental effect after the indoor walk.  Participating in a green outdoor walk also Figure 2: The change in feelings of anger following participation significantly reduced feelings of anger in the walks (Figure 2), depression (Figure 3) and 43 tension (Figure 4) in comparison to the 42 indoor walk. In fact, after the indoor walk participants were left feeling tenser than Indoor walk Index of anger 41 when they had started. Feelings of fatigue also reduced even though they had been 40 walking for an hour. Participants also felt 39 more active and energetic, so it offers an Green outdoor walk ideal way of getting rid of those blues. 38 Type of walk  The findings undoubtedly showed that exercising outdoors in a green Figure 3: The change in feelings of depression following environment is a lot more effective in participation in the walks enhancing your mood and improving your 42 self-esteem compared to the equivalent amount of exercise indoors. 41 Indoor walk Index of depression  Participating in the green outdoor walk 40 was a lot more effective in reducing feelings of anger, depression, tension and 39 confusion, in comparison to the indoor Green outdoor walk walk. It also increased feelings of vigour and left participants feeling more active 38 Type of walk and energetic.  The enjoyment of engaging in green Figure 4: The change in feelings of tension following participation exercise activities in groups was a in the walks Indoor walk valuable part of the experience, as well as 39 the opportunity to breathe in fresh air, 38 admire the scenery and enjoy the wildlife. 37 Index of tension  The findings add significant value to the 36 ever expanding green exercise research 35 programme as it focuses on individuals experiencing mental health issues and 34 separates the elements that constitute the Green outdoor walk 33 Type of walk green exercise experience.  In today’s world, where sufferers of mental ill health are more commonplace, nature can act as a vital health resource. With significant costs incurred due to lost outputs, increased expenditure in the provision of care and the inestimable cost to the individual, the importance of access to nature and greenspaces is paramount. 6
  7. 7. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007  Green exercise and green care therefore have implications for many sectors, suggesting the need for cross-disciplinary and sectoral strategies and action. Increasing support for and access to, a wide range of green exercise activities for all sectors of society should produce substantial economic and public health benefits. Such support could include the provision and promotion of healthy walks projects, green exercise on prescription, healthy school environments, green views in hospitals, care farms, city farms and community gardens, urban green space, and outdoor leisure activities in the countryside. 7
  8. 8. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 2. Introduction The current health status of the UK population is becoming problematic due to our increasingly sedentary lifestyles, our poor diets and the prevalence of mental illness. It is believed that at least one in six individuals' suffer from a “significant” mental health problem at any one time and some reports quote this figure as high as one in four. Mental ill health can severely compromise an individual’s quality of life and it is a leading cause of disability. Sufferers of anxiety and depression are commonplace and by 2020 it is predicted that depression will be the second most common cause of disability in the developed world. Mental ill health is therefore a major issue and sadly problems surrounding social exclusion, vilification and discrimination of the mentally ill are still real challenges to overcome. Mental illness is not solely a challenge for the health sector to address as it inflicts additional economic and social costs. It is estimated that the total costs of mental illness in England in 2002-03 were approximately £77.4 billion (The Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 2003). To put this in perspective, the cost of crime for our society in the same period was substantially less, so mental illness is costing us more than crime. The costs of mental illness can be segregated into three key areas, impacting upon human costs, health and social care and output losses (Box 1). Box 1: The burden of mental illness in the UK  At least 1 in 6 individuals are affected at any one time  10% of children aged 5-15 yrs suffer from a mental disorder  Instances of depression and mixed anxiety rose from 7.8% in 1993 to 9.2% in 2000  £41.8 billion represents the human cost of mental illness due to reduced quality of life, suffering, pain, disability and distress  £23.1 billion is the cost of output losses in the economy due to peoples inability to work  £12.5 billion is the cost of health and social care provided by the NHS and Local Authorities and informal care given by family and friends  £4.9 billion is spent on NHS hospital and community health services  £1.4 billion is spent on Local Authority social services  £898 million is spent on GP consultations  £754 million is spent on drug prescriptions  £3.1 billion per year represents the net saving across the government as a whole if better mental health care is introduced (Wanless, 2002). This conservative estimate does not include the additional savings gained from promoting mental health and preventing problems in the first instance. It is evident that mental illness is a burgeoning concern and public spending on mental health services is continually rising. It is estimated that £7.9 billion was spent in England in 2002-03 on mental health services including £754 million on drug prescriptions. The cost of antidepressants has risen dramatically. In 1992, the number of antidepressant prescriptions dispensed was 9.9 8
  9. 9. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 million but by 2003 this figure had increased to 27.7 million. This represents a cost of £395.2 million and implies an increase in cost of 2,083% in only 11 years. The government is also currently spending more money on training therapists to co-ordinate cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) sessions, so mental ill health is emerging as a costly predicament. Perhaps it is about time we started to explore alternative preventative and curative therapies which, while comparable in their success rates, are cheaper to employ. The importance of the health of the individual and affected family members involved in care provision supersedes any financial cost, but if there is a potential solution which addresses both issues, this could significantly reduce public spending and human costs. Is it inconceivable to think that we might already have a solution on our doorstep, which is available to everyone at minimal cost? The simple answer might exist in encouraging people to interact with nature and greenspace and get active outdoors? The positive relationship between exposure to nature and greenspace and an individual’s health is continually being evidenced. The quality and quantity of nature and greenspace in the surrounding environment transforms a person’s mental health, both at home, at work and at the places they visit. This concept is not revolutionary but it has yet to significantly influence the planning of urban and rural environments or public health and social care priorities. However, nature and greenspaces are often perceived as places to relax, escape and unwind from the daily stresses of modern life. This opportunity for relaxation and recreation has a positive influence on our emotional and physical well-being. Therefore, in today’s world, where sufferers of mental ill health are more commonplace, nature can act as a vital health resource. With significant costs incurred due to lost outputs, increased expenditure in the provision of care and the inestimable cost to the individual, the importance of access to nature and greenspaces is paramount. 9
  10. 10. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 3. Review of existing literature 3.1 The value of greenspaces and contact with nature There is a myriad of persuasive evidence which connects regular contact with the natural environment and greenspace to enhanced physical health and mental well-being. This incorporates a variety of outdoor settings, from the open countryside, fields and forests, remote wildlands, parks and open spaces, to street trees, allotments and gardens. The key message emerging is that contact with these greenspaces improves psychological health by reducing stress levels, enhancing mood and offering a restorative environment which enables you to relax, unwind and recharge your batteries. Greenspaces also provide an ideal opportunity and incentive for exercise and can be especially valuable in urban areas for facilitating social contact and helping to bring people together. A significant relationship between the proximity of urban open green spaces, visiting frequency, duration of stay and the level of self-reported stress experienced has been reported (Grahn and Stigsdotter, 2003). The quantity of available greenspace has also been correlated with longevity and a reduced risk of mental ill health (Takano et al., 2002; De Vries et al., 2003). Open space is also vitally important for children and studies have shown that children with Attention Deficit Disorder worked better and their concentration improved after participating in activities in green surroundings (Taylor et al., 2001). So, if research strongly indicates that exposure to nature and greenspace positively affects our physical health and mental well-being, do we fully understand why? What are peoples motivations for engaging with nature? With a multitude of choices available, why do so many people still seek out green places (both rural and urban) on a regular basis? As hominids were hunter-gatherers for over 300,000 generations, having daily contact with nature and the land, are the reasons co-evolutionary? In comparison, the increasingly urbanised and industrialised environment we currently live in has only emerged in the past six to ten generations. Many of us already recognise and appreciate the health benefits we derive from spending time engaging with nature. In the UK we make 1.2 billion day visits to the countryside each year, with a further 5 billion visits to urban parks. 5 million people are regular anglers, and some 15 million garden regularly; 6 of every 10 households have a pet; and many millions of others are bird watchers, wild-fowlers, pigeon-racers, dog-walkers, ramblers, runners, horse-riders, cyclists and game shooters. Why do we do all these things? What motivates us to take the trouble to be in the presence of green nature and living things, when we can now easily stay at home and watch it on the television? Why do we say that we feel great after green activities? And if we feel so good doing it, why do we not spend more time visiting greenspaces and put time aside to enjoy it? Equally, we may question what consitutes a green experience? Do artificial plastic trees and plants have the same effect as rainforest trees or hay meadows in the spring? In what way does nature affect us emotionally as opposed to intellectually – is the experience different if you are aware the nature is simulated? What difference does spending five minutes a day in contact with nature make to two weeks in the wild? Does an individuals personal history affect their experience? Is there a contrast between urban and rural dwellers, or someone visiting their own local environment compared to someone coming from another culture? Does the culture of origin affect the experience, or is the desire to connect with nature the same irrespective of 10
  11. 11. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 cultural context? These thought-provoking questions need to be explored so that we can begin to shape our reasons for engaging with nature and greenspace. 3.2 The value of exercise Participating in regular physical activity is generally accepted as a highly effective method for preventing illness and offers a therapeutic intervention for tacking existing illness. Physical activity has been evidenced to be an important determinant of both physical health and psychological well-being. Moderate regular exercise reduces morbidity rates by 30-50% and has a particularly protective effect against maturity onset Type II diabetes, coronary heart disease, musculo-skeletal diseases and cancer. It lowers blood pressure, improves blood lipid and glucose profiles and boosts the immune system. It also enhances mental health by improving mood and self-esteem, reducing stress, enriching an individual’s quality of life and diminishing the chance of depression. We are now gaining a better understanding of the intimate inter- relationship between mental and physical health, as the status of one considerably affects the other. Therefore, exercise can be used as a successful tool to ensure preferable health states are experienced. Throughout the last fifty years, the UK has witnessed a dramatic fall in the levels of daily physical activities, despite the robust evidence for staying active. On average, adults expend 500 kcal less energy per day in comparison to their ancestors fifty years ago. This is comparable to undertaking a marathon a week on top of current activity levels, just to restore this reduction in energy expenditure. This is primarily because people have become increasingly sedentary in all aspects of daily life, including during leisure time, in travelling to and from work and during work itself. Home life has also become more sedentary and although gym and fitness club membership has risen (although many have a low adherence rate) in the past twenty years, there are indications that people are becoming less likely to engage in organised sports and leisure activities. The level of weekly physical activity required to achieve general health benefits has led to the development of a universal recommendation. It advises that individuals should participate in “at least 30 minutes a day of at least a moderate intensity on 5 or more days of the week” (Department of Health, 2004). However, it is estimated that only 35% of men and 24% of women actually meet this recommendation. The major problem is the misconception that current physical activity levels are sufficient to avoid ill-health. 80% of individuals are aware that regular exercise is beneficial for their health, but most inaccurately believe that they participate in enough exercise to reap these rewards. For these targets to be met a dramatic modification is necessary and perceptions need to be revolutionised. Due to this activity transition, populations have suffered very significant public health consequences. The annual costs of physical inactivity in England are reported to be approximately £8.2 billion (Department of Health, 2004). This figure excludes individuals who are obese due to inactivity, which contributes an extra £2.5 billion annual cost to the economy. These figures incorporate both costs to the NHS and costs associated to the economy (e.g. work absenteeism). This rise in inactivity levels and the associated problems with obesity are a priority on the government’s agenda and although there is a general acknowledgement that greenspaces rich in biodiversity encourage physical activity, the relationship needs further investigation to develop a deeper understanding. Undertaking physical activities in outdoor green environments seems to be a more sustainable option in maintaining long-term activity levels, as it is the interaction with the environment and the social contact that are the main 11
  12. 12. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 incentives. In this situation, the health benefits derived from the exercise are not the sole focus and become a secondary outcome. With the current inactivity predicament, exploring the use of rural and urban greenspaces as ideal locations to encourage physical activity could prove to be a benefit for all. 3.3 Emergence of green exercise There is a growing body of empirical evidence which proclaims that exposure to nature induces substantial mental health benefits. Equally, participating in physical activity is known to result in positive physical and mental health outcomes. Therefore, at the University of Essex we have combined these ideas into a programme of research which investigates the synergistic benefits of engaging in physical activities whilst simultaneously being directly exposed to nature. We refer to this as “green exercise” (Figure 5). This programme addresses current concerns about the adverse health effects of modern diets and sedentary lifestyles, along with growing evidence that stress and mental ill-health have become substantial health problems for many people in industrialised societies. Figure 5: The concept of green exercise and the health benefits it engenders Engaging in Exposure to nature physical activity and greenspaces Green Exercise 1. Improves 2. Generates 3. Facilitates social psychological well- physical health networking and being benefits connectivity Healthier communities and avoided public health costs From a wide variety of University of Essex research involving more than three thousand people, we have discerned three key outcomes from participating in green exercise activities: 1) improvement of psychological well-being (by enhancing mood and self-esteem, whilst reducing feelings of anger, confusion, depression and tension); 2) generation of physical health benefits (by reducing blood pressure and burning calories) and 3) facilitation of social networking and 12
  13. 13. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 connectivity (by enhancing social capital). Box 2 shows a selection of qualitative comments that have been collected during the research which supports this idea. Box 2: A selection of comments collated during our research programme supporting the key health outcomes identified 1: Improves psychological well-being “It is relaxing mentally where I can get away from responsibilities of a managerial job and being a parent. I find it refreshes me for everyday life and its problems. A great day” “I feel it helps my well being and I feel more healthy” “In good spirits and very relaxed” “Good to be out and meet people. Boosts your ego and makes you feel good” 2: Generates physical health benefits “Exercise, being outdoors, enjoying the environment” “Relaxing, exercises the body, clears the head” “Fun to do, great exercise and in a beautiful location which helps keep me fit and happier” “To try to keep fit and lose weight, good company” 3: Facilitates social networking and connectivity “Enjoyment especially the social interaction and meeting and talking to people we wouldn’t ordinarily meet!” “Feel refreshed – better for taking part, enjoy social aspect” “I feel much more alive and my spirits have lifted by the walk and the company of other walkers” “As a retired person it is valuable for me to meet other people for recreation and conversation” Our research has also enabled us to gain an insight into some of the underlying reasons for engaging in green exercise activities. Table 1 illustrates these ideas by identifying four key principles and separating these into ten sub categories, which describe some of the pleasures we commonly refer to. Green exercise seems to be effective in generating a variety of health benefits which lead to healthier communities and avoided public health costs. With the understanding of the close inter-relationship between mental and physical health gaining acknowledgement, engaging in green exercise activities presents an ideal way of advancing collective health states. Three of the government’s six key priorities in their recent Public Health White Paper were to “reduce obesity”, “increase exercise” and “improve mental health”. Therefore, encouraging more people to adopt green exercise behaviour may contribute to the compliance of these objectives whilst also enhancing the health of the nation. 13
  14. 14. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 Table 1: Four key principles describing why people enjoy engaging in green exercise activities Sub- Principles Descriptors categories Being with friends and family, companionship and social interaction, a. Social creation of collective identity, making new friends, conviviality Direct bonding with companion animals (e.g. dogs, horses) and wild b. Animals animals (both observing and hunting), feeding birds, recognising, counting 1. Natural and wildlife and collecting (greater value of rarities) and social connections c. Memories Visiting special places where memories and stories are provoked and and recalled (childhood associations), story-telling, personal identity, links to knowledge myths, stimulation of imagination, ecological literacy Large scale and longevity of nature in contrast to humans, transformative d. Spiritual capacity of green nature, oneness with nature and animals Diverse colours of nature and landscapes, views of landscape, beauty of a. Colours scenery, bird-song and sounds of other animals, light (especially sunrise / and sounds sunset), visual and aesthetic appreciation of landscapes 2. Sensory Smell and other senses, being outdoors, exposed to all types of weather, stimulation b. Fresh air changing of seasons, a contrast to indoor and city life, escape from urban pollution c. Adrenalin rush, exhilaration, fun, arising from a physical activity or Excitement experience of risk (e.g. rock climbing, mountain biking), sense of adventure Learning a skill and completing a manual task (e.g. conservation activity), a. Manual challenging, fulfilling and rewarding, sense of achievement, leading to a tasks 3. Activity sense of worth and value b. Physical Enjoyment of the activity itself and the physical and mental health benefits activity associated with it, makes people feel good, more energetic, less lethargic Getting away from modern life, relaxing (as a contrast), time alone or with a. Escape family, a time to think and clear the head, peace and quiet, tranquillity and 4. Escape from freedom, privacy, escape from pressure, stress and “rat-race”, recharging modern life batteries 3.4 What do we know so far? Even just viewing nature through a window or in a painting can positively influence people’s well-being. Research has shown this in hospitals, prisons, the workplace and whilst travelling to work1. Green views from the window help to buffer stresses, reduce frustration and enhance concentration. Viewing green landscape paintings aids recovery from illness, improves mood, reduces stress and improves mental well-being. At the University of Essex we have demonstrated that engaging in physical activities whilst viewing a series of green rural or urban pictures reduces blood pressure and enhances mood and self-esteem (Pretty et al., 2005). Incidental exposure to nearby nature whilst engaging in some other activity also assists in reducing stress, enhancing mood status and promoting relaxation. This nearby nature incorporates countryside and neighbourhood greenspaces, parks, grounds of hospitals and care homes, along with healing gardens2. Healing gardens are designed to aid recovery from stress and are often present in hospitals and care homes, whereby stressful experiences are encountered by patients, visitors and staff. Therefore, outdoor natural settings are often 1 (Verderber and Reuman, 1987; Tennessen and Cimprich, 1995; Leather et al., 1998; Parsons et al., 1998; Kaplan, 2001; Laumann et al., 2003) 2 (Cooper-Marcus and Barnes, 1995, 1999; Wells, 2000; Whitehouse et al., 2001; Ulrich, 2002; Wells and Evans, 2003) 14
  15. 15. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 perceived as therapeutic “healing places” and a wide range of research has demonstrated this effect (Pretty, 2007). Direct participation in some green exercise activity, such as gardening, walking, running, cycling or fishing also yields a series of unequivocal physical and psychological health benefits. Studies have looked at the benefits of wilderness experiences, adventure therapy, forest schools, social and therapeutic horticulture (which is based on the value of gardening for mental and physical health), care farming and private and community gardens. The University of Essex has undertaken research involving 263 participants which measured the effects of ten green exercise activities (including walking, cycling, horse riding, fishing, canal boating and conservation activities) in four countries of the UK (Pretty et al., 2006; Pretty et al., 2007). We found that participants felt significantly less angry, depressed, confused and tense after engaging in the activities and their self-esteem levels all significantly improved. These improvements were not affected by the type, intensity, or duration of the green exercise activity, indicating the potential for a wider health and well-being dividend from green exercise. It is often argued that the underlying reasons for nature’s ability to help people recover from stress and mental fatigue is due to its restorative powers. Terry Hartig has pioneered the notion that nature can restore deficits in attention arising from overwork or over-concentration, making people both feel and think better. He has found that sitting in a room with tree views promotes more rapid blood pressure decline than sitting in a windowless room, and also that walking in a nature reserve reduces blood pressure more than a walk along an urban and non-green street. In both contexts, the green room and green walk, people recover more rapidly from attention- demanding tasks and the long-term effects may be important. Another five-year study of older people found that access to green space in which they could walk was an accurate predictor for longevity, as those who walked in green places lived longer (Takano et al., 2002). It has been suggested that spending time in ecologically restored areas and having a heightened knowledge of nature can encourage more frequent visits outdoors for longer periods of time. Young people are currently becoming more and more disconnected with nature and, therefore, are currently making fewer visits to the countryside than ever before, and engaging children with nature from a young age can encourage them to participate in more outdoor exercise and make more frequent countryside visits throughout adulthood leading to the associated health benefits. It is apparent that there is an emerging body of evidence supporting green exercise and green care and it is becoming increasingly recognised as an idea which can be linked to current government health and social care policies. The research holds implications for human health, environmental protection and national policies alike. Engaging in green exercise activities conveys substantial mental, physical and social health benefits, even from relatively short exposures. These health benefits will lead to avoided public health costs, which will ultimately save the NHS money. Although there are many opportunities already available, they are accessed predominantly by reasonably healthy individuals. The cohorts of people studied to date are those already choosing to engage in green exercise activities and therefore can be considered healthy. We are yet to engage and research the harder to reach sedentary population or those experiencing mental ill-health. If we can develop a methodology for engaging these populations, the potential financial savings are immeasurable. 15
  16. 16. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 3.5 What are we yet to fully understand? 3.5.1 Application of green exercise in the mental health population There is limited evidence concerning the application of green exercise in the mental health population. Initial steps are being taken to try and engage individuals experiencing mental illness in green exercise activities. For example, greater participation by the public in green exercise has led to the introduction of new initiatives, such as the “Green Gym’s” set up by the British Trust of Conservation Volunteers (BTCV). These outdoor gyms encourage participation in local nature conservation activities to improve health and well-being and establish social networks. The projects vary, including creating community gardens, managing local woodlands, tree-planting and maintenance of public footpaths. These Green Gym groups often attract individuals experiencing mental illness and initial evaluation findings have reported significant increases in mental health state scores, a reduction in depression and a trend towards weight loss (Reynolds 1999, 2002). A further national evaluation of the health benefits of participating in Green Gyms was conducted by the School of Health and Social Care at Oxford Brookes University during 2006 and is expected to be published shortly. Another example of a green exercise initiative for people suffering from mental health problems is the Stepping Out project. This is funded by Natural England (formerly the Countryside Agency) and supports and enables both informal carers of people suffering from mental ill health, and those that they care for, to explore and discover green spaces and the countryside in and around Coventry. The project is managed by Warwickshire Wildlife Trust in close partnership with Coventry Carers and the Asian Mental Health Action Project and through a series of confidence building and awareness activities forming a ‘stepping stones’ journey, Stepping Out supports and encourages participants to access the local environment3. Findings of research suggest that therapeutic applications of green exercise could therefore be effective and this is termed “green care”. There is a growing movement towards green care in many contexts, ranging from green exercise activities, social and therapeutic horticulture, animal assisted therapy, eco-therapy and care farming. Green care in agriculture or “care farming” is defined as the use of farms and agricultural landscapes as a base for promoting mental and physical health (Hassink, 2003; Braastad, 2005). Farming is used to provide mental and physical health benefits for a wide range of people. These may include those with defined medical or social needs (e.g. psychiatric patients, those suffering from mild to moderate depression, people with learning disabilities, people with a drug history, disaffected youth or elderly people) as well as those suffering from the effects of work-related stress or ill-health arising from obesity. Care farming is a partnership between farmers, health care providers and participants, and so combines the care of people with the care of the land. Care farming is part of a growing recognition that the land is multifunctional, providing a range of environmental and social goods and services. Green care on farms is thus part of a movement to reconnect people to the land, and to the food produced by domestic farming. There are now several hundred green care farms in Norway, the Netherlands, Italy, Germany, Austria, Belgium and Slovenia4. Such green care farms are formally tied to local social services and hospitals, and provide a new component of care in the community. Farmers are paid for providing a kind of “health service” whilst continuing with agriculture. This can help to maintain 3 http://www.warwickshire-wildlife-trust.org.uk/SteppingOut/index.htm 4 See Farming for Health (Europe) www.farmingforhealth.org 16
  17. 17. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 the economic viability of farms, farmers benefit from the extra labour and they can still sell their produce. There are many different terms for green care in agriculture across Europe including Farming for Health, Care Farming and Social Farming but all essentially refer to the same concept. Much of the research into Green Care had until recently been largely qualitative and anecdotal, but research initiatives are currently underway examining the physical, mental and social health benefits of green care for various populations and groups. Research which is particularly relevant for people with mental health issues includes a Dutch study for example. Researchers at Wageningen University in the Netherlands are looking at the effect of green care farms on quality of life of demented elderly and for people with a psychiatric and/ or drug addiction background5. Studies in Norway (Norwegian University of Life Sciences) are looking at the health benefits of animal assisted therapy on farms for people with mental health disorders and similar studies with animals assisted interventions are being conducted in the Netherlands (Wageningen)6. While the term “care farming” is well-recognised in Europe, here in the UK, the concept is relatively new. There is an increasing amount of interest from many sectors including farmers, health care professionals and social care providers, the prison and probation services and there are a number of care farms already operating throughout the UK. However the numbers of care farms are thought to be small and the movement is very embryonic at present, with no national framework. The National Care Farming Initiative (UK)7 aims to promote and support the expansion of care farming throughout the UK and is currently undertaking research to establish the scale of care farming in the UK. Like the UK, Denmark, Finland, Italy, Austria and Germany have also initiated research into the health benefits of care farming and this is expected to combine with the research underway in the Netherlands and Norway to produce evidence to support the use of care farming for health benefits. The European Farming for Health Community of Practice(CoP) 8 , a network of those involved with care farming in Europe and beyond recognised the need for a sound body of evidence to support the health and “therapeutic” benefits of care farming in order to influence health and social care professionals and policy-makers alike (Hassink and van Dijk, 2006). The Farming for Health CoP has been instrumental in developing a COST Action on green Care in Agriculture9 which is an EU funded action to increase the scientific knowledge on the best practices for implementing green care in agriculture with the aim of improving human mental and physical health and the quality of life. In particular one of the areas of priority for the action is to coordinate research in this field by the comparison and discussion of ongoing projects related to health effects on people and the establishment of a set of good research methodologies. There has been most research into another form of green care, social and therapeutic horticulture (STH). Social and therapeutic horticulture has been used as a therapy or as an add- on to therapy for many years and in the UK there has been a steady rise since the 1980s in the numbers of garden projects that offer horticultural therapy to many different groups of people. The associated health benefits to those who participate in STH are well documented and also 5 Simone de Bruin, Marjolein Elings, Nicole van Erp, Jan Hassink, Eric Baars 6 Bjarne Braastad and Bente Berget (Norway) and Reina Ferwerda and Jorine Rommers (Netherlands) 7 See National Care farming Initiative (UK) website www.ncfi.org.uk 8 see www.farmingforhealth.org for more information 9 www.umb.nor/greencare 17
  18. 18. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 include studies which focus on those who are suffering from mental health problems in particular. A recent collaboration between the Centre for Child and Family Research at Loughborough University and Thrive called “Growing Together” has concluded a major piece of research examining the physical, mental and social health benefits of STH (Sempik et al., 2003, 2005). In this study Sempik et al., (2003) carried out a comprehensive survey of literature of STH and discovered a wealth of descriptive literature on horticulture, health and well-being. STH projects are widely used for patients suffering from Alzheimer’s disease and a study of over 2000 older people living in the Gironde area of France conducted by Fabrigoule et al., (1995) found that it is also possible that regular participation in gardening may offer some protection against the development of dementia. In a prospective study showed that those who took part in gardening (or who travelled, carried out odd jobs or knit) were significantly less likely to develop dementia than those who did not. Later studies have shown that the exercise provided by gardening activities may also be significant in delaying the onset of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (Rovio et al., 2005 and Larson et al., 2006). However, as is the case with green care and Green exercise projects in general although there is much descriptive and qualitative data available there is a relative scarcity of quantitative research. Sempik et al., (2003, 2005) concluded that there was also a need for more “hard” evidence to support the findings. Green care, care farming, SHT, green gyms and other green exercise projects are worthy examples of how engaging in green exercise and care activities can help people with mental health problems. Therefore, the initial successes of green care in Europe combined with innovative green exercise initiatives poses the question – should people experiencing mental illness be prescribed “green care” such as green exercise therapy, social and therapeutic horticulture or time at a care farm instead of, or in addition to, traditional medicine? 3.5.2 Green exercise as a treatment option for mild to moderate depression With incidences of mental illness and especially depression on the increase how much do we know about green exercise as a potential treatment? It is estimated that 25% of women and 10% of men in the UK will experience a period of depression requiring treatment, at some point in their lives (Halliwell, 2005). Often, visiting their GP is the first step they take in addressing the situation and it is usually the GP who is primarily responsible for organising their treatment. A recent report conducted by the Mental Health Foundation reported that in cases of mild to moderate depression, 55% of GP’s prescribe antidepressants as their first choice of treatment response (Halliwell, 2005). However, only 35% actually believe that antidepressant medication is the most effective intervention in these situations. It was reported that although GP’s deemed alternative treatments to be more suitable, 78% of them had still prescribed antidepressants as the treatment option in the last three years. In comparison, only a minority of patients experiencing mild or moderate depression are offered the choice of exercise therapy as a primary treatment response. A mere 5% of GP’s offer exercise therapy as one of their three most common treatment responses, in comparison to 92% of GP’s who commonly prescribe antidepressants as a treatment response. Yet, research has demonstrated that a supervised programme of exercise can be equally as effective as antidepressants in treating mild to moderate depression (Halliwell, 2005; 18
  19. 19. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 Richardson et al., 2005). In a report by the Chief Medical Officer it was stated that “physical activity is effective in the treatment of clinical depression and can be as successful as psychotherapy or medication, particularly in the longer term” (Department of Health, 2004). Therefore, a compelling argument for exercise therapy to be advocated as the primary treatment option can be formulated. Exercise has less negative side effects and can positively treat patients experiencing a combination of physical and mental health problems. A common concern is that people experiencing a period of depression will not have the desire or motivation to exercise, but compliance rates are often much better than for medication, especially if they are receiving adequate support and encouragement. The option of green exercise therapy or green care may prove to be an even more effective treatment response than exercise alone as it encourages people to re-connect with nature and experience the additional positive health benefits that are associated with this. Contact with nature and greenspace is often uplifting and restorative, helps to reduce stress and improve mood and combining this with physical activity will offer a very efficacious treatment option. Green exercise is very cost effective and participation is often free or at a minimal cost. Unlike fitness centres and gymnasiums it does not require an initial joining fee or a monthly subscription, as you can walk around your local park or woodlands at no cost. Exercising in traditional gyms often incurs an extremely low adherence rate due in part to lycraphobia (a fear of undertaking physical activity in a commercial fitness industry setting). Outdoor exercise provides the opportunity to escape this setting and the additional confinements of indoor activities. Green exercise also promotes social inclusion and enables people to make healthier choices and adopt a sustainable healthier lifestyle. However, to date, there has been little research conducted which compares green exercise with more traditional treatment options, such as antidepressants or cognitive behaviour therapy. We anticipate that green exercise will be equally as effective, but the robust scientific evidence to support this hypothesis is still lacking. For the idea to gain credibility and influence government policy and the health sector, more detailed research needs to be undertaken. Therefore, at the University of Essex we have collaborated with South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust to design a feasibility study which compares a green exercise programme with a series of CBT sessions as treatment options for patients suffering from mild to moderate depression. A total of sixteen participants will be recruited to the study and eight will be randomly allocated to the green exercise group and the remaining eight to the CBT group. Each group programme will consist of a two hour session, once a week for a period of six weeks and we will evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the two different programmes. The green exercise programme will involve one hour of moderate walking in the local countryside and woodlands. This will be a led walk and a certain level of social interaction will be encouraged but monitored. The CBT programme will follow the traditional pattern and involve small group discussions and a mini- lecture. A series of standardised psychological instruments will be used to measure levels of depression, mood, self-esteem, social adaptation and general mental health. These will be administered at regular intervals over the six week period to monitor any changes. The initial findings from the feasibility study will be used to obtain further funding to conduct the study on a larger scale and generate a wider interest. Colleagues in Australia have also initiated some research into the participation in forest and woodland management as a treatment for depression (Townsend, 2006). Their pilot project engages people experiencing depression in nature-based activities in a woodland environment. The project is on-going but initial findings suggest encouraging improvements to physical and mental health, along with a reduction in social isolation. 19
  20. 20. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 3.5.3 Green care for marginalised populations There is also limited evidence concerning the use of green exercise therapy for populations most marginalised in mental health, for example, those residing in hospitals, prisons and institutions whereby mental ill health is problematic. Two classic studies from the 1980’s (Moore, 1981; Ulrich, 1984) initiated research into the health benefits for both prisoners and hospital patients of windows overlooking greenspace compared to those facing brick walls. The first found that prisoners in Michigan whose cells overlooked farmland and trees reported 24% less sick cell visits compared to those in cells facing the prison yard. The second was a ten year comparative study of post-operative patients in Pennsylvania whose rooms either overlooked trees or a brick wall. The hospital stay for those patients with tree views was significantly less, they also required fewer painkillers and used less strong or moderate medication and nursing staff reported fewer negative evaluation comments in the medical records. An initial study in a Swedish psychiatric hospital reported the amount of damage to paintings on walls over a 15 year period. Damage was only ever inflicted on abstract paintings and there were no recorded attacks on paintings depicting nature and landscapes. In a more recent study of hospital patients, (Diette et al., 2003) demonstrated the clear value of a landscape picture accompanied by the sounds of nature. Prior to their operation, a group of bronchoscopy patients overlooked a large landscape picture present at their bedside whilst listening to sounds of birdsong and a babbling brook. This group’s level of good or excellent pain control was 50% higher in comparison to those without access to the picture or sounds. This simple intervention has financial implications if it suggests that less money can be spent on pain killing drugs for patients. These studies imply that greenspaces and nearby nature should be seen as a fundamental health resource. One of the nine major reasons that cause ex-offenders to re-offend has been identified as poor mental and physical health (SEU, 2002) and a significant number of prisoners in the UK suffer from a variety of mental health issues. “Offender and Nature” (O&N) schemes can address several of the underlying factors contributing to re-offending and are another example of an initiative to improve mental and physical health and well-being by using green exercise activities. O&N initiatives involve partnerships between offender-management organisations10 and natural-environment organisations11. Offenders and Nature schemes involve offenders working as volunteers on nature conservation and woodland sites, carrying out tasks such as creating and maintaining footpaths, opening up dense vegetation to create more diverse habitats, establishing ponds and building boardwalks. O&N schemes are seen as reparative work that benefits the public, while providing experience of teamwork, life and skills training to offenders and also boosting their confidence and self- esteem (Carter and Hanna, 2007). Many offenders and supervisors have observed a ‘calming’ and ‘focusing’ effect in volunteers. Some O&N schemes explicitly apply ‘ecotherapy’, which uses working in natural environments to support people with mental health issues and addiction problems, specifically drawing on the capacity of nature to calm, heal and inspire (Hall, 2004; Burls, 2005; Burls and Caan, 2005). As is the situation for many other green exercise and green care initiatives, although there is much qualitative and anecdotal evidence supporting these projects, there is a lack of “hard” or quantitative data and there is a need for further evaluation of these schemes. 10 Such as National Offender Management Service, Her Majesty’s Prison Service and National Probation Service 11 For example Natural England, Forestry Commission, BTCV and National Trust 20
  21. 21. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 Traditionally hospitals have been renowned for their surrounding beautiful gardens and array of plants (Nightingale, 1860, 1996). Similarly, monasteries often designed intricate gardens to offer a pleasant relaxing environment for the ill to visit for a respite (Gerlach-Spriggs et al., 1998). Sadly, over time, hospital funding has become more concerned with reducing the risk of infection and focusing on efficiency and this has been reflected in design and lack of greenery. Consequently, they have evolved into stressful establishments which do not fulfil the emotional needs of patients, their families and staff (Lindheim and Syme, 1983; Ulrich et al., 1991; Horsburgh, 1995). This problematic transformation needs to be addressed as research implies that gardens and nature in hospitals enhance mood, reduce stress and improve the overall appreciation of the health care provider and quality of care. Healing gardens are designed to aid recovery from stress and are often present in hospitals and care homes, where stressful experiences are often encountered by patients, visitors and staff. Sempik et al. (2002) comprehensively reviews studies that analyse positive effects of these types of gardens. In addition, Cooper Marcus and Barnes (1999) extensively review research into the positive impact of healing gardens on the patient’s health and well-being. Whitehouse et al. (2001) found that a healing garden in a children’s hospital in California had numerous positive effects on users. 54% stated that they felt more relaxed and less stressed, 24% refreshed and rejuvenated, 18% more positive and able to cope and only 10% had experienced no difference in mood. Nearly half of all observed visitors spent less than 5 minutes per visit in the garden, so even vary short visits were beneficial. Visitors to the garden want to “escape the stresses of the hospital and enjoy the relaxing and restorative elements of nature”. A lot more research needs to be conducted within the area of marginalised populations, especially targeting those with mental health problems in addition to those populations in hospitals and prisons in general. However, the findings do suggest that perhaps those involved in hospital design and planning should consider the value to patients and visitors of pleasant views from windows, of landscape artwork in wards and of hospital gardens. The majority of the research has been conducted in the USA and Scandinavia, so we need to learn from this and initiate our own research here in the UK. 3.5.4 Limitations of research to date i) Type of evidence In the fields of Social and Therapeutic Horticulture, Green care, Care Farming and Green Exercise there are several similarities to the limitations of research to date. Although there is much valuable qualitative evidence describing the physical, mental and social health benefits of exposure to exercise and nature there remains a shortage of scientifically robust, quantitative evidence. This “hard” data is necessary to convince healthcare professionals, social care providers and sceptics of the merit of green exercise and green care. ii) Exposure time to green exercise The research has also not yet fully addressed the issues of exposure time and sustainability. Research has demonstrated that short or occasional exposures to nature and physical activity are potentially highly beneficial in improving mental health and physical well-being. However, we are yet to establish whether cumulative short exposures, such as viewing nature out of a window or taking a short walk equate to longer, less frequent exposures to nature, such as a weekend trekking in the hills (Hartig et al., 2003). We do not know if short exposures alone will lead to long-term improvements, but there is some evidence to suggest that behavioural and lifestyle changes can be provoked by such activities, leading to continuing re-exposure which 21
  22. 22. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 would result in a healthier population. Secondly, the findings do not explore enhanced or different effects of exposure to specific places for certain people because they hold memories and stories which are associated with them. It could be hypothesised that some environments may me green and beneficial, but anonymous, whereas others may evoke pleasant memories which affect the experience (Tuan, 1977; Gallagher, 1994). An important unanswered question for those concerned for sustainability is to what extent do the benefits of such green experiences continue off-site? How long do the physical and psychological benefits last once you return to your urbanised more stressful environment? Do the benefits last for the day, the next day or for the next week? Does contact with nature provoke long-term changes in thinking, which could lead to deep social and political transformations? iii) Economic considerations The full economic benefits of promoting nature and greenspaces as a health resource are not yet fully understood. We still lack the health economic data to accurately estimate the total savings that a public mental health strategy could yield. A recent report written by Willis and Liesl (2005) highlighted four major gaps in the current evidence base which prevents a full economic assessment of the health benefits of greenspace being evaluated. These include: 1) quantifying the value of the psychological benefits from greenspace; 2) improved evaluation of green exercise activity programmes; 3) the time profile of risks when exercise is continued or discontinued for different age groups and 4) assessing benefits from increased physical activity between the sedentary populations and those participating in intermediate or frequent activity. Therefore, large scale surveys are required which relate greenspace accessibility and use to improved health outcome measures, to enable a full economic costing to be undertaken. The Department of Health (2004) has estimated that a 10% increase in adult physical activity would benefit the UK by £500 million per year, saving 6000 lives. The potential economic impact of emotional benefits and improved mental well-being has not yet been quantified but would be additional to these physical health benefits, and might indeed outweigh them. If these activities are achieved through “green activities” that might also provoke long-term changes in attitudes to nature and the environment in both rural and urban contexts, then wider support for pro- sustainability policies is more likely to arise. Can green exercise and green care, therefore, be considered a good buy for pubic health, providing physical, social and mental health benefits? Can green exercise and green care be used in a preventative way before we become ill to safeguard our mental well-being? Can care farming provide another option for treating mental ill-health? Could some of the annual £10 billion of costs of obesity, coronary heart disease and physical inactivity be avoided? Could the £77 billion annual cost incurred in 2002-03 for mental illness be significantly reduced in the future? One of the central needs now is to ensure that the assessment of the value of greenspace and the countryside includes the potential mental and physical health benefits to those both working and visiting those areas. The NHS budget is several hundred times more than current spending on conservation and access to greenspaces, yet spending on these will help to prevent illness and to save the UK money. 22
  23. 23. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 4. Assessment of existing Mind green exercise activities There are a wide range of very successful green exercise activities and projects already in existence amongst Local Mind Associations (LMA’s). These activities include walking, gardening activities (especially on allotments), social and therapeutic horticulture, garden design, conservation activities, bush craft (exploring local woodlands and building fires etc) and dog walking. A lot of the gardening activities encourage clients to grow and learn about the plants and flowers on local allotments in the community. Many conservation groups assist garden teams working at local formal gardens, woodlands and the open countryside. They always employ a socially inclusive approach, so the activities are open to staff, service users and volunteers alike. Many of the walks take place regularly in the open countryside, at local parks or woodlands, along the beach or canalside, in all weathers. Whilst participants are walking they are often encouraged to engage in other activities such as bird watching, photography, admiring the wildlife and enjoying the scenery. Therefore with this in mind, we designed a universal tool which could be used to evaluate this wide range of green exercise activities to illustrate what positive effects they were having on participants’ physical and mental health. A specifically designed questionnaire was sent out to all Mind members who were engaging in a selection of green exercise activities and 108 completed questionnaires were returned from 19 different Mind groups (see Box 3). Box 3: Mind groups included in the assessment of green exercise activities  Birmingham  Mid-Staffordshire  Brighton  Mid-Warwickshire  Dartford, Gravesham and Swanley  Redcar and Cleveland  East Berkshire  St Helens  Great Yarmouth  Tameside and Glossop  Havering  Taunton  Hull and East Yorkshire  Thurrock  Kensington and Chelsea  Wallingford  Lewes District and Wealden  West Cornwall  Maidstone 4.1 Findings - green exercise activities The green exercise activities were predominantly made up of gardening projects, conservation activities and walking groups. 52% of the respondents were engaging in gardening activities on allotments or specific projects. These activities included weeding, digging, planting, grass mowing, watering, pruning and composting. A further 7% of participants were involved in specific conservation activities including scrub clearances and laurel thinning. 37% of respondents were participating in regular walks around local gardens, along the river bank or “cross country”. The remaining 3% were running in greenspaces regularly and 1% had been cycling. 23
  24. 24. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 The duration of a typical activity session varied considerably, ranging from a minimum of 15 minutes to a maximum of 6 hours. The average length of a session was 2 ¾ hours (163.2 ± 89.4 minutes) and the most common session duration was 2 hours. 29% of the activities lasted over 4 hours. Respondents attended Figure 6: How often respondents attend the sessions 60 sessions fairly frequently, with the majority of people engaging 50 in these activities on a weekly basis (55%). A total of 26% of 40 participants attended sessions at least twice a week or more (%) 30 frequently, whereas only 6% 20 engaged in the activities occasionally (Figure 6). 10 Respondents were asked how 0 Daily Three times Twice a Weekly Fortnightly Monthly Occasionally long they had been attending a week week the green exercise activity Frequency sessions. Responses varied from a minimum of one month to a maximum of 16 years. The Figure 7: How long respondents have been attending the green average time was just over 2 exercise sessions years (25.5 ± 35.7 months); 35 with the most common answer 30 also being reported as 2 years. 25 Figure 7 categorises the answers into specific groups 20 (%) which highlight the percentages 15 calculated for each time period. 10 5 4.2 Findings - people involved in the activities 0 6 months or less 6 months - 1 year 1-2 years 2-5 years Over 5 years Length of time Out of the 108 completed questionnaires returned, 72% of respondents were male and Figure 8: Age categories of the respondents 28% were female. Figure 8 1% reports the percentage of 2% 15% individuals within each age 11-18 yrs band. It is clear that the most 19-30 yrs common age group was the 31- 31-50 yrs 35% 50 years, closely followed by 51-70 yrs the 51-70 year age group. 71+ yrs Together this made up 82% of the sample population, with a further 15% aged between 19- 30 years. 47% 24
  25. 25. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 Respondents were asked to Figure 9: Key qualities that respondents gain out of participating reflect on the qualities they in the activity hoped to get out of What they hoped to get before starting the activity (%) participating in the activities 90 What they actually get now they before they started engaging 80 are doing the activity (%) in them and compare these 70 to the qualities they actually 60 get, now they have been 50 (%) 40 participating in the activities 30 on a regular basis (Figure 9). 20 The most popular answer 10 overall was to “get out in the 0 fresh air” (83%), followed by Meet new people Learn new skills Get out in the Get fitter Other “meeting new people” (76%) fresh air and “getting fitter” (69%). The Qualities percentage of respondents deriving pleasure out of the 4 aspects listed increased once they were engaging in the activities regularly in comparison to their initial expectations. 17% of respondents stated “other” hopes that they anticipated getting out of the activities, before they started participating in them. These included improving their concentration, enhancing their self-esteem, keeping them occupied, keeping them sane, building their confidence, keeping them motivated, building friendships and losing weight. 16% of respondents listed “other” qualities that they actually got out of participating in the activities, since engaging in them on a more regular basis. These included improving their confidence, helping with their depression, a sense of achievement, contributing to organic growing and biodiversity, immense enjoyment and fun, socialising, friendship and keeping them occupied. Participants were also asked the question “how does taking part in these activities normally make you feel?” 103 respondents provided comments to address this question and their answers were grouped into 9 key themes: Key theme Examples of comments from respondents “Socialising and talking about your problems helps me a great deal” 1. Becoming part of a group – enjoyment “It gives me company which I don’t have where I live” of socialising with “Being part of a team, getting out on a nice bright day, feeling refreshed. likeminded people, Often don't feel confident to be out alone. Don't have my own garden so having company and would otherwise stay indoors” conversation and “Refreshed and feeling more like facing things. Having been with likeminded feeling refreshed. people and had company and conversation” “Like being part of the workforce in the community, feeling good” 25
  26. 26. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 Key theme Examples of comments from respondents “Pleased and a sense of achievement that I have done a task that I have 2. Sense of been asked to do and finished it” achievement – completing a task “Better about myself, feeling a sense of achievement” and achieving “Feel good about doing an activity that has definite results” something worthwhile, feeling “That I have achieved something worthwhile” useful “It makes me feel I am doing something useful” Key theme Examples of comments from respondents “Before attending Mind I only went out if I had to, I now find it less stressful” 3. Feeling relaxed and less stressed “Relaxed, peace of mind” “Relaxed, more focus of mind and greater co-ordination, greater self esteem” Key theme Examples of comments from respondents “Improves my depression, helps me be more motivated and gives me 4. Feeling able to deal satisfaction in doing things. Since starting the project I have been able to with problems and improve on my quality of life. Coming here has helped me overcome most of begin to cope my problems” “Happier and able to cope again” “Less depressed, revitalised and more able to cope with my issues” “It takes me out of my depression for a while and gives me something to look forward to” “It takes my mind off my worries” Key theme Examples of comments from respondents “It improves my fitness and is very beneficial for my mental and physical 5. Feeling healthier and health” fitter – both physically and “Healthier, more active, fitter” psychologically “Positive and healthy” “Healthier psychologically and physically” “Much fitter and I feel especially good immediately after a session. I feel able to chat to other runners easily and feel generally less anxious” 26
  27. 27. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 Key theme Examples of comments from respondents “It makes me feel good about myself and it improves my confidence” 6. Feeling good about myself – improving “A lot happier in myself, also there is a great sense of peacefulness here and self-worth, the nature is wonderful” confidence, self- “More positive about myself, better for being with people and out in fresh air” esteem “After being out in the fresh air and doing gardening I feel better in my self - eat well and sleep well” “It gives a feeling of self worth because you have made a difference / improvement no matter how small! Slowly builds confidence which in turn has a knock on effect and improves all aspects of life” Key theme Examples of comments from respondents “Great - life's worth living, clears the mind” 7. Feeling great – more alive and confident. “Alive and confident” The word “great” “More focused, feeling confident, much happier” was used very frequently “Makes me feel good, it is good, makes you get out of the house, look forward to all the activities” Key theme Examples of comments from respondents “It makes me feel good and happy and lifts my mood” 8. Feeling “happy” – this word was also “I enjoy the fresh air and conversation, it makes me happy” used very frequently “It makes me happy” Key theme Examples of comments from respondents “Its nice to get out and go for a walk, to get out of the house” 9. A sense of escape – getting out of the “I love to get away from the hustle and noise of the town and out into the house and having Chase wilderness, I feel great out there” something to do “It gives me something to do during the week which makes me happy to be out socialising. I don’t tend to go out much so it gives me something to do” “Sleeping better at night, gets me out of the house, socialising better, gaining new skills, coming to the project has given me new confidence and a belief in myself” “I enjoy being in the countryside away from the stresses of the town, traffic, crowds, noise etc and the people are nice and friendly and good company” Other comments included feeling a sense of satisfaction, feeling refreshed, at peace with nature, having a new lease of life and being set free and that it was a preferred option to sitting staring at the walls. It is clear that engaging in a range of green exercise activities generates a myriad of positive healthy feelings. 27
  28. 28. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 Respondents were then asked how important being outside with nature was in determining how they felt and 88.1% stated that this was very important or important. Similarly, 88.8% felt that participating in some form of exercise was very important or important in influencing how they felt. However, the combination of exercising outside in the presence of nature (i.e. green exercise) was even more influential, with 89.6% of respondents stating that this was very important or important in determining how they felt. This supports the idea that it is the synergistic amalgamation of the exercise in a green environment that produces added health benefits, rather than either one alone. The next question in the questionnaire asked respondents to identify the differences that participating in these green activities made to how they felt and they were asked to distinguish between the mental and physical aspects. 102 comments were received concerning the mental health benefits and once again familiar messages emerged. Many respondents talked about the positive effect on their minds and how it helped them to think more clearly, provided a focus for concentration and offered overall peace of mind. They felt less stressed, more alert and alive, happier and more relaxed. Many people stated that they felt mentally healthier and a lot more motivated and positive. They felt that the activities helped to lift their depression levels and instil a feeling of calm and peacefulness. Their overall mood improved as did their confidence levels and self-esteem and some of the key comments are listed in Box 4. Box 4: Participants comments concerning what differences the activities made to how they felt mentally “More stable, able to think for myself more” “Less worried, co-ordination of body and mind, better sense of well being” “It stimulates the mind and gives me something to concentrate my mind on” “Memory has improved and I think clearer and more positively” “I am more alert, less stressed” “Helps me to relax and stop worrying” “More relaxed and able to sleep at night” “I always feel better - more relaxed, less tense after a good session of exercise, more able to talk to people” “Lifts depression gives me a good feeling” “They help me focus on positive things rather than negative” “Makes you want to get out of bed and I’m not as low as I have been” “It feels calm and satisfying on my allotment, I look forward to going” “Improves my mood, more self-esteem and makes me feel good about myself” “Feel more confident (alive) not looking at four walls” 97 comments were received concerning the physical health benefits of engaging in green exercise activities. Overall, respondents felt a lot healthier, more alive and refreshed. Many spoke of the benefits to their fitness levels and how they felt stronger, less lethargic and more energetic. Others commented on the changes to their body profile through losing weight, easing stiffness in their joints and becoming more agile (see Box 5 for examples of typical comments). 28
  29. 29. Mind report 1.0, Feb 2007 Box 5: Participants comments concerning what differences the activities made to how they felt physically “ I feel a lot stronger and fitter” “My fitness has improved, I feel refreshed and alive” “I feel fitter for getting out more often” “Feel lifted and less lethargic” “More energetic and less lifeless” “I feel as though I can do things without being tired. I am more active, less lethargic, I want to join in things and my body is looser and more agile” “More stamina and less physically restless” “I use my hands so it helps my hands to move better as they are painful and stiff due to arthritis” “Stops the stiffness in the joints, that I get when I just sit around doing nothing” “Lost weight, more agile, helps to keep my body moving” “Becoming involved in outdoor activities, also good therapy for body and soul” “Helped me to get more active” “Makes me feel good to get my heart pumping” Finally, participants were asked to comment on what they felt was special about the activity and 102 responses were received. It was clear from the collated narratives that there were 5 main aspects which were special about the green activities. These were the: 1) Social benefits; 2) Benefits from contact with nature; 3) Benefits from the activity itself; 4) Psychological benefits and 5) Physical benefits. These findings clearly support the green exercise model and the following tables illustrate some of the key comments supporting each feature. Key feature Examples of comments from respondents “Excellent teamwork, meeting new people to make friends, we are a family 1. Social benefits – and look out for each other” meeting and socialising with “I think it is because I take part with people I know well, who enjoy doing the people out in the same things and nobody judges you or criticises you” fresh air, team work, “Everyone is friendly and I feel part of something collectively positive” companionship, “I have made new friends and am able to communicate better, staff members camaraderie, being are very helpful and listen to my problems, everybody is very friendly towards part of a group me” “It gives me the opportunity to be active and social, team work, being outside with others, making friends, enjoying their company” “The chance to meet people, plus a chance to exchange news and views” N.B: 44% of respondents made comments concerning social benefits 29

×