SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 24
UNIVERSITE DE DSCHANG
UNIVERSITY OF DSCHANG
Lessons on Benefit Sharing Schemes in Cameroon: A
Case of Mount Cameroon National Park, South West
Region.
PRESENTED BY
AGBORTOKO BATE ASHU
B.Sc.( Hons) in Environmental Science
January 2015
Plan of Presentation
1-INTRODUCTION
2-MATERIALS AND METHODS
3-RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4-CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVE
1.INTRODUCTION
1.1. BACKGROUND (1/3)
The notion of benefit sharing in natural
resources management was first formalized
in 1992 through the Convention on
Biological Diversity (CBD), to address
problems with the governance of
socio ecological systems in developing‑
countries (Nkhata et al., 2012).
1.1. BACKGROUND (2/3)
o Benefit sharing under this arrangement is often
the outcome of national policies and legislation,
which establish minimum requirements for
setting up benefits and transfers and do not
require an agreement between local and external
entities (Behr et al., 2012).
o Hence if access to forests and changes in land use
are limited, local populations will have to be
compensated for the loss of income and resources
(COP15, 2009) .
1.2. PROBLEM STATEMENT (1/2)
EFFECT
CAUSE
1.2. PROBLEM STATEMENT (2/2)
 Research Question
 What is the status of the benefit sharing schemes in Mount
Cameroon National Park(MCNP), South West Region of
Cameroon?
 Secondary Questions
 What are the benefits sharing schemes used in the Mount Cameroon
National Park?
 Who are the stakeholders involved and their level of implementation
in Benefit Sharing Schemes in the Mount Cameroon National Park?
 What is the contribution of the benefit sharing schemes in current
livelihoods in the villages around Mount Cameroon National Park?
 What is the level of implementation for benefit-sharing schemes in
Mount Cameroon National Park, South West of Cameroon?
1.3. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
 Main Objective
 Contribute to the sustainable management of natural resources via
analyzing the existing benefit-sharing schemes in Mount
Cameroon National Park.
 Specific Objectives
 To identify benefit sharing schemes existing in Mount
Cameroon National Park, South West Region of
Cameroon.
 To identify and evaluate stakeholders’ involve in various
benefit sharing schemes in Mount Cameroon National
Park, South West Region of Cameroon.
 To determine the roles benefit sharing schemes play in
current livelihoods in the villages around Mount
Cameroon National Park.
 To determine gaps related to the implementation of each
benefit-sharing scheme in Mount Cameroon National
Park, South West Region of Cameroon.
1.4. RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
 Main Hypothesis
 Achieving effectiveness, efficiency and equity is the main
driver of community benefit sharing schemes gaps in Mount
Cameroon National Park.
 Secondary Hypothesis
 Prunus africana benefits sharing scheme is the main benefit
sharing scheme existing in the Mount Cameroon National Park.
 The local population is the main stakeholder involved in
benefit-sharing schemes in Mount Cameroon National Park.
 Improving living standards is the main role benefit sharing
schemes play in current livelihoods in the villages around
Mount Cameroon National Park.
 The local community is satisfied with the benefits received
from Mount Cameroon National Park.
2.MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Location of study area(1/1)
2.2 DATA COLLECTION (1/2)
Specific Objectives Primary Data Collection Data Analysis
To identify benefit
sharing schemes
existing in Mount
Cameroon National
Park, South West
Region of Cameroon.
Reports in the MCNP showed the various
benefit sharing schemes that exist.
Focus group discussion meetings were
held (participatory appraisal method) to
confirm the benefits with the communities.
-Statistical package
for social sciences
(SPSS) Ver. 19
-Microsoft Excel
To identify and evaluate
stakeholders’ involve in
various benefit sharing
schemes in Mount
Cameroon National
Park, South West
Region of Cameroon.
Focus group discussion meetings were
held (participatory appraisal method) in ten
villages with interview various
stakeholders’.
156 open and closed questionnaires were
administered to affected individuals
(Villages include Bova 1, Bonakanda,
Bwassa, Mapanja, Liola-Buea, Lilale, Bova-
Bomboko, Ebie, Bakingili and Etome).
-Statistical package
for social sciences
(SPSS) Ver. 19
-Microsoft Excel
-Stakeholders’
Analysis toolkit.
Table.1. Procedures of Primary Data Collection
2.2 DATA COLLECTION (2/2)
Specific Objectives Primary Data Collection Data Analysis
To determine the roles
benefit sharing schemes
play in current livelihoods
in the villages around
Mount Cameroon National
Park.
Focus group discussion meetings were held
(participatory appraisal method) in ten villages
with interview guides coupled with direct field
observation.
156 open and closed questionnaires were
administered to affected individuals (Villages
include Bova 1, Bonakanda, Bwassa,
Mapanja, Liola-Buea, Lilale, Bova-Bomboko,
Ebie, Bakingili and Etome).
-Statistical package
for social sciences
(SPSS) Ver. 19
-Microsoft Excel
To determine gaps related
to the implementation of
each benefit-sharing
scheme in Mount
Cameroon National Park,
South West Region of
Cameroon.
-Statistical package
for social sciences
(SPSS) Ver. 19
-Microsoft Excel
-Benefit sharing
performance using
3E (efficiency,
effectiveness and
equity)
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1. BENEFIT SHARING SCHEME IN MCNP
Benefit Sharing Schemes
p=0.003
p=0.001
p=0.000
p=0.002
3.2. STAKEHOLDERS’ INVOLVEMENT IN BENEFIT
SHARING SCHEMES
 Stakeholders in Ecotourism Benefit sharing scheme in
the Mount Cameroon region in general include: the
local population, local tour operator, Government of
Cameroon through MINFOF, MINTOUR, World Bank,
GIZ and KFW.
 Stakeholders in Prunus africana management scheme
in the Mount Cameroon region in general include: the
local population, MOCAP, AFRIMED, Government of
Cameroon through MINFOF, GIZ and KFW.
 Stakeholders in the Conservation Incentives Systems
in the Mount Cameroon National Park include: the
local population, Government of Cameroon through
MINFOF, GIZ, KFW, GFA, PMNSR-SW, ICRAF, and
ITTO.
3.3 ROLES BENEFIT SHARING SCHEMES PLAY IN
LIVELIHOODS (1/2)
3.3.1. ROLES PRUNUS AFRICANA SCHEME PLAY
17.24% of the respondents in the West Coast cluster said the benefits received
improve their incomes.
6.25% of respondents in the Buea cluster said the benefits are used for village
developmental projects
1.64% of the respondents in the Bomboko cluster said the benefits are used to
cure illness acquired during the exploitation
3.3 ROLES BENEFIT SHARING SCHEMES PLAY IN LIVELIHOODS
(2/2)
3.3.2. ROLES CONSERVATION INCENTIVE SCHEME PLAY
83.33% of respondents in the Muyuka
cluster said the benefits were used to
purchase chairs.
1.64% of respondent in the Bomboko
cluster said the benefit were used for
village development projects
13.97% of respondents in the West
coast cluster while 1.64% in the
Bomboko cused the benefits for
village development projects.
SCHEMES
TABLE4. 3E PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
BSM in
MCNP
EFFECTIVENESS EFFICIENCY EQUITY
Ecotourism
Benefit
Sharing
scheme
Ecotourism benefit
sharing activities are
now the focus of the
MCNP management
plan which is legalized
and valid for 5years.
-1.136 visitors in 2013
making a total of
5,579,475FCFA
-1.585 visitors in 2014
making a total of
7,284,500 FCFA paid as
park entry fee
-300 jobs have been
created
-The equity criteria is
not evident as 7.7%
of respondents have
benefited.
Prunus
africana Mgt
sharing
Scheme
-A common initiative
group MOCAP is
functional according to
the norms for creating a
benefit sharing scheme.
-52.160 tons of Prunus
and generated a total of
18.256.175 FCFA.
-10.3% of
respondents benefit
from the exploitation
of Prunus.
SCHEMES
TABLE 4. 3E PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
BSM in
MCNP
EFFECTIVENESS EFFICIENCY EQUITY
Conservation
Incentive
sharing
Scheme
-34 villages have
received Conservation
Bonus
-Conservation Credit for
all the villages have
been for 2013.
-42 VFMCs were
created in the village
communities
-The sum of one hundred
and sixty-five million
francs CFA (165 000
000 francs CFA) was
used to fund community
based development
activities in the MCNP.
-The money for the
payment of
conservation bonus and
credit are available till
2017.
-The equity criteria is
evident as most
communities have
received benefits.
4. CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVE4. CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVE
4.1. CONCLUSION
 Conservation Incentive benefits sharing scheme/ system is the main
benefit sharing scheme existing in the Mount Cameroon National
Park with 55.1% of respondents benefiting from conservation bonus
 The local population is mostly made up of farmers hence 88% of
respondents showing that there is a lot of pressure on the nature
resources in the National Park
 Livelihoods of the communities around the park has been affected as
moneys have been received and projects carried out.
 Communities are satisfied with the benefits they receive which aids
in developing their livelihood hence 58.33% for ecotourism scheme,
56.25% for Prunus africana scheme, 65.11% for Conservation
Bonus and 53.33% for Conservation Credit.
4.2. PERSPECTIVE
o Benefit Sharing Schemes in the MCNP
should be use as a baseline in future
REDD+ projects.
o Benefit Sharing Schemes in MCNP should
be an inspiration to other national parks in
Cameroon.
THANKS FOR YOUR
ATTENTION

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Koirala
KoiralaKoirala
Koirala
WSC SD
 
16th conference hellenic forestry society
16th conference hellenic forestry society16th conference hellenic forestry society
16th conference hellenic forestry society
inform-life
 

Was ist angesagt? (19)

Ghan Shyam Pandey: The Role of Forest Communities in the Forest Tenure Reform...
Ghan Shyam Pandey: The Role of Forest Communities in the Forest Tenure Reform...Ghan Shyam Pandey: The Role of Forest Communities in the Forest Tenure Reform...
Ghan Shyam Pandey: The Role of Forest Communities in the Forest Tenure Reform...
 
Measuring of carbon stocks
Measuring of carbon stocksMeasuring of carbon stocks
Measuring of carbon stocks
 
Day 1 session 3.1 evalutions of pilot payments for forest environmental serv...
Day 1 session 3.1  evalutions of pilot payments for forest environmental serv...Day 1 session 3.1  evalutions of pilot payments for forest environmental serv...
Day 1 session 3.1 evalutions of pilot payments for forest environmental serv...
 
Koirala
KoiralaKoirala
Koirala
 
26 1115 laos 2 vfi calm experience
26 1115 laos 2 vfi calm experience26 1115 laos 2 vfi calm experience
26 1115 laos 2 vfi calm experience
 
Inform eu forest directors
Inform eu forest directorsInform eu forest directors
Inform eu forest directors
 
Lessons and experiences from implementation of PFES in Viet Nam
Lessons and experiences from implementation of PFES in Viet NamLessons and experiences from implementation of PFES in Viet Nam
Lessons and experiences from implementation of PFES in Viet Nam
 
Bufferzone Community Forest
Bufferzone Community ForestBufferzone Community Forest
Bufferzone Community Forest
 
Water related indicators for sustainable forest management planning in greece
Water related indicators for sustainable forest management planning in greeceWater related indicators for sustainable forest management planning in greece
Water related indicators for sustainable forest management planning in greece
 
26 1115 laos 3 land and forest law by hackman and derbidge
26 1115 laos 3 land and forest law by hackman and derbidge26 1115 laos 3 land and forest law by hackman and derbidge
26 1115 laos 3 land and forest law by hackman and derbidge
 
The Amazon Eco-Regional Research Program
The Amazon Eco-Regional Research ProgramThe Amazon Eco-Regional Research Program
The Amazon Eco-Regional Research Program
 
Ingram & Fon Strategic environmental assessment & Environmental impact asessm...
Ingram & Fon Strategic environmental assessment & Environmental impact asessm...Ingram & Fon Strategic environmental assessment & Environmental impact asessm...
Ingram & Fon Strategic environmental assessment & Environmental impact asessm...
 
Brent swallow 6th october
Brent swallow 6th october Brent swallow 6th october
Brent swallow 6th october
 
Brent swallow, 6th october
Brent swallow, 6th october Brent swallow, 6th october
Brent swallow, 6th october
 
Knowledge and Innovation for Impact
Knowledge and Innovation for ImpactKnowledge and Innovation for Impact
Knowledge and Innovation for Impact
 
Session 2 thoumthone vongvisouk_landtenurewithouttitle_v2
Session 2 thoumthone vongvisouk_landtenurewithouttitle_v2Session 2 thoumthone vongvisouk_landtenurewithouttitle_v2
Session 2 thoumthone vongvisouk_landtenurewithouttitle_v2
 
16th conference hellenic forestry society
16th conference hellenic forestry society16th conference hellenic forestry society
16th conference hellenic forestry society
 
Sustainable Forestry for Food Security and Nutrition
Sustainable Forestry for Food Security and Nutrition  Sustainable Forestry for Food Security and Nutrition
Sustainable Forestry for Food Security and Nutrition
 
Heng da s3 community forestry
Heng da s3 community forestryHeng da s3 community forestry
Heng da s3 community forestry
 

Ähnlich wie Bate ppt

The Siplas FOCAS Strategy
The Siplas FOCAS StrategyThe Siplas FOCAS Strategy
The Siplas FOCAS Strategy
JOHNY NATAD
 
FAN memory 20 years
FAN memory 20 yearsFAN memory 20 years
FAN memory 20 years
Paula Andrea
 
Pros and cons of community based natural resource management.
Pros and cons of community based natural resource management.Pros and cons of community based natural resource management.
Pros and cons of community based natural resource management.
Dr. Pauline Gitonga
 
Integrated Soil Fertility Management
Integrated Soil Fertility ManagementIntegrated Soil Fertility Management
Integrated Soil Fertility Management
CIAT
 

Ähnlich wie Bate ppt (20)

Costs, benefits and impacts of community forests on livelihoods in Cameroon
Costs, benefits and impacts of community forests on livelihoods in CameroonCosts, benefits and impacts of community forests on livelihoods in Cameroon
Costs, benefits and impacts of community forests on livelihoods in Cameroon
 
Promoting Community-Based Adaptation in Uganda; experiences, lessons, emergin...
Promoting Community-Based Adaptation in Uganda; experiences, lessons, emergin...Promoting Community-Based Adaptation in Uganda; experiences, lessons, emergin...
Promoting Community-Based Adaptation in Uganda; experiences, lessons, emergin...
 
The Siplas FOCAS Strategy
The Siplas FOCAS StrategyThe Siplas FOCAS Strategy
The Siplas FOCAS Strategy
 
Ghana EPIA REEP Final Sept11
Ghana EPIA REEP Final Sept11Ghana EPIA REEP Final Sept11
Ghana EPIA REEP Final Sept11
 
FAN memory 20 years
FAN memory 20 yearsFAN memory 20 years
FAN memory 20 years
 
Climate Change Adaptation Project - Cordillera
Climate Change Adaptation Project - CordilleraClimate Change Adaptation Project - Cordillera
Climate Change Adaptation Project - Cordillera
 
Souza ipam methods ws oct 2011
Souza ipam methods ws oct 2011Souza ipam methods ws oct 2011
Souza ipam methods ws oct 2011
 
27 0915 2_snv_cafe redd experience on fpic
27 0915 2_snv_cafe redd experience on fpic27 0915 2_snv_cafe redd experience on fpic
27 0915 2_snv_cafe redd experience on fpic
 
Pros and cons of community based natural resource management.
Pros and cons of community based natural resource management.Pros and cons of community based natural resource management.
Pros and cons of community based natural resource management.
 
UTANRMP_Presentation to learning route on Natural Resource Management July 2014
UTANRMP_Presentation to learning route on Natural Resource Management July 2014UTANRMP_Presentation to learning route on Natural Resource Management July 2014
UTANRMP_Presentation to learning route on Natural Resource Management July 2014
 
COSME Project - Community Engagement Experiences & Best Practice
COSME Project - Community Engagement Experiences & Best PracticeCOSME Project - Community Engagement Experiences & Best Practice
COSME Project - Community Engagement Experiences & Best Practice
 
Session 5.6 MANAGEMENT OF GHANA’S MODIFIED TAUNGYA SYSTEM: CHALLENGES AND STR...
Session 5.6 MANAGEMENT OF GHANA’S MODIFIED TAUNGYA SYSTEM: CHALLENGES AND STR...Session 5.6 MANAGEMENT OF GHANA’S MODIFIED TAUNGYA SYSTEM: CHALLENGES AND STR...
Session 5.6 MANAGEMENT OF GHANA’S MODIFIED TAUNGYA SYSTEM: CHALLENGES AND STR...
 
Integrated Soil Fertility Management
Integrated Soil Fertility ManagementIntegrated Soil Fertility Management
Integrated Soil Fertility Management
 
The impact of agro industry on great ape conservation and livelihoods in came...
The impact of agro industry on great ape conservation and livelihoods in came...The impact of agro industry on great ape conservation and livelihoods in came...
The impact of agro industry on great ape conservation and livelihoods in came...
 
AFFORESTATION AND NATIONAL AFFORESTATION PROGRAMME AND ACT - 2016
AFFORESTATION AND NATIONAL  AFFORESTATION  PROGRAMME  AND ACT - 2016AFFORESTATION AND NATIONAL  AFFORESTATION  PROGRAMME  AND ACT - 2016
AFFORESTATION AND NATIONAL AFFORESTATION PROGRAMME AND ACT - 2016
 
Clifford Ajayi - Potentials of agroforestry to meet food security & environme...
Clifford Ajayi - Potentials of agroforestry to meet food security & environme...Clifford Ajayi - Potentials of agroforestry to meet food security & environme...
Clifford Ajayi - Potentials of agroforestry to meet food security & environme...
 
Final report radio program-ccap- steper consulting co. ltd
Final report radio program-ccap- steper consulting co. ltdFinal report radio program-ccap- steper consulting co. ltd
Final report radio program-ccap- steper consulting co. ltd
 
Profile of Climate Smart Agricultural Technologies in the Dry Guinea Savannah...
Profile of Climate Smart Agricultural Technologies in the Dry Guinea Savannah...Profile of Climate Smart Agricultural Technologies in the Dry Guinea Savannah...
Profile of Climate Smart Agricultural Technologies in the Dry Guinea Savannah...
 
Community Forestry and EbA Experience in The Gambia
Community Forestry and EbA Experience in The Gambia Community Forestry and EbA Experience in The Gambia
Community Forestry and EbA Experience in The Gambia
 
Community based natural resource management
Community based natural resource managementCommunity based natural resource management
Community based natural resource management
 

Bate ppt

  • 1. UNIVERSITE DE DSCHANG UNIVERSITY OF DSCHANG Lessons on Benefit Sharing Schemes in Cameroon: A Case of Mount Cameroon National Park, South West Region. PRESENTED BY AGBORTOKO BATE ASHU B.Sc.( Hons) in Environmental Science January 2015
  • 2. Plan of Presentation 1-INTRODUCTION 2-MATERIALS AND METHODS 3-RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 4-CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVE
  • 4. 1.1. BACKGROUND (1/3) The notion of benefit sharing in natural resources management was first formalized in 1992 through the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), to address problems with the governance of socio ecological systems in developing‑ countries (Nkhata et al., 2012).
  • 5. 1.1. BACKGROUND (2/3) o Benefit sharing under this arrangement is often the outcome of national policies and legislation, which establish minimum requirements for setting up benefits and transfers and do not require an agreement between local and external entities (Behr et al., 2012). o Hence if access to forests and changes in land use are limited, local populations will have to be compensated for the loss of income and resources (COP15, 2009) .
  • 6. 1.2. PROBLEM STATEMENT (1/2) EFFECT CAUSE
  • 7. 1.2. PROBLEM STATEMENT (2/2)  Research Question  What is the status of the benefit sharing schemes in Mount Cameroon National Park(MCNP), South West Region of Cameroon?  Secondary Questions  What are the benefits sharing schemes used in the Mount Cameroon National Park?  Who are the stakeholders involved and their level of implementation in Benefit Sharing Schemes in the Mount Cameroon National Park?  What is the contribution of the benefit sharing schemes in current livelihoods in the villages around Mount Cameroon National Park?  What is the level of implementation for benefit-sharing schemes in Mount Cameroon National Park, South West of Cameroon?
  • 8. 1.3. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY  Main Objective  Contribute to the sustainable management of natural resources via analyzing the existing benefit-sharing schemes in Mount Cameroon National Park.  Specific Objectives  To identify benefit sharing schemes existing in Mount Cameroon National Park, South West Region of Cameroon.  To identify and evaluate stakeholders’ involve in various benefit sharing schemes in Mount Cameroon National Park, South West Region of Cameroon.  To determine the roles benefit sharing schemes play in current livelihoods in the villages around Mount Cameroon National Park.  To determine gaps related to the implementation of each benefit-sharing scheme in Mount Cameroon National Park, South West Region of Cameroon.
  • 9. 1.4. RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS  Main Hypothesis  Achieving effectiveness, efficiency and equity is the main driver of community benefit sharing schemes gaps in Mount Cameroon National Park.  Secondary Hypothesis  Prunus africana benefits sharing scheme is the main benefit sharing scheme existing in the Mount Cameroon National Park.  The local population is the main stakeholder involved in benefit-sharing schemes in Mount Cameroon National Park.  Improving living standards is the main role benefit sharing schemes play in current livelihoods in the villages around Mount Cameroon National Park.  The local community is satisfied with the benefits received from Mount Cameroon National Park.
  • 11. 2.1. Location of study area(1/1)
  • 12. 2.2 DATA COLLECTION (1/2) Specific Objectives Primary Data Collection Data Analysis To identify benefit sharing schemes existing in Mount Cameroon National Park, South West Region of Cameroon. Reports in the MCNP showed the various benefit sharing schemes that exist. Focus group discussion meetings were held (participatory appraisal method) to confirm the benefits with the communities. -Statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) Ver. 19 -Microsoft Excel To identify and evaluate stakeholders’ involve in various benefit sharing schemes in Mount Cameroon National Park, South West Region of Cameroon. Focus group discussion meetings were held (participatory appraisal method) in ten villages with interview various stakeholders’. 156 open and closed questionnaires were administered to affected individuals (Villages include Bova 1, Bonakanda, Bwassa, Mapanja, Liola-Buea, Lilale, Bova- Bomboko, Ebie, Bakingili and Etome). -Statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) Ver. 19 -Microsoft Excel -Stakeholders’ Analysis toolkit. Table.1. Procedures of Primary Data Collection
  • 13. 2.2 DATA COLLECTION (2/2) Specific Objectives Primary Data Collection Data Analysis To determine the roles benefit sharing schemes play in current livelihoods in the villages around Mount Cameroon National Park. Focus group discussion meetings were held (participatory appraisal method) in ten villages with interview guides coupled with direct field observation. 156 open and closed questionnaires were administered to affected individuals (Villages include Bova 1, Bonakanda, Bwassa, Mapanja, Liola-Buea, Lilale, Bova-Bomboko, Ebie, Bakingili and Etome). -Statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) Ver. 19 -Microsoft Excel To determine gaps related to the implementation of each benefit-sharing scheme in Mount Cameroon National Park, South West Region of Cameroon. -Statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) Ver. 19 -Microsoft Excel -Benefit sharing performance using 3E (efficiency, effectiveness and equity)
  • 14. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
  • 15. 3.1. BENEFIT SHARING SCHEME IN MCNP Benefit Sharing Schemes p=0.003 p=0.001 p=0.000 p=0.002
  • 16. 3.2. STAKEHOLDERS’ INVOLVEMENT IN BENEFIT SHARING SCHEMES  Stakeholders in Ecotourism Benefit sharing scheme in the Mount Cameroon region in general include: the local population, local tour operator, Government of Cameroon through MINFOF, MINTOUR, World Bank, GIZ and KFW.  Stakeholders in Prunus africana management scheme in the Mount Cameroon region in general include: the local population, MOCAP, AFRIMED, Government of Cameroon through MINFOF, GIZ and KFW.  Stakeholders in the Conservation Incentives Systems in the Mount Cameroon National Park include: the local population, Government of Cameroon through MINFOF, GIZ, KFW, GFA, PMNSR-SW, ICRAF, and ITTO.
  • 17. 3.3 ROLES BENEFIT SHARING SCHEMES PLAY IN LIVELIHOODS (1/2) 3.3.1. ROLES PRUNUS AFRICANA SCHEME PLAY 17.24% of the respondents in the West Coast cluster said the benefits received improve their incomes. 6.25% of respondents in the Buea cluster said the benefits are used for village developmental projects 1.64% of the respondents in the Bomboko cluster said the benefits are used to cure illness acquired during the exploitation
  • 18. 3.3 ROLES BENEFIT SHARING SCHEMES PLAY IN LIVELIHOODS (2/2) 3.3.2. ROLES CONSERVATION INCENTIVE SCHEME PLAY 83.33% of respondents in the Muyuka cluster said the benefits were used to purchase chairs. 1.64% of respondent in the Bomboko cluster said the benefit were used for village development projects 13.97% of respondents in the West coast cluster while 1.64% in the Bomboko cused the benefits for village development projects.
  • 19. SCHEMES TABLE4. 3E PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS BSM in MCNP EFFECTIVENESS EFFICIENCY EQUITY Ecotourism Benefit Sharing scheme Ecotourism benefit sharing activities are now the focus of the MCNP management plan which is legalized and valid for 5years. -1.136 visitors in 2013 making a total of 5,579,475FCFA -1.585 visitors in 2014 making a total of 7,284,500 FCFA paid as park entry fee -300 jobs have been created -The equity criteria is not evident as 7.7% of respondents have benefited. Prunus africana Mgt sharing Scheme -A common initiative group MOCAP is functional according to the norms for creating a benefit sharing scheme. -52.160 tons of Prunus and generated a total of 18.256.175 FCFA. -10.3% of respondents benefit from the exploitation of Prunus.
  • 20. SCHEMES TABLE 4. 3E PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS BSM in MCNP EFFECTIVENESS EFFICIENCY EQUITY Conservation Incentive sharing Scheme -34 villages have received Conservation Bonus -Conservation Credit for all the villages have been for 2013. -42 VFMCs were created in the village communities -The sum of one hundred and sixty-five million francs CFA (165 000 000 francs CFA) was used to fund community based development activities in the MCNP. -The money for the payment of conservation bonus and credit are available till 2017. -The equity criteria is evident as most communities have received benefits.
  • 21. 4. CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVE4. CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVE
  • 22. 4.1. CONCLUSION  Conservation Incentive benefits sharing scheme/ system is the main benefit sharing scheme existing in the Mount Cameroon National Park with 55.1% of respondents benefiting from conservation bonus  The local population is mostly made up of farmers hence 88% of respondents showing that there is a lot of pressure on the nature resources in the National Park  Livelihoods of the communities around the park has been affected as moneys have been received and projects carried out.  Communities are satisfied with the benefits they receive which aids in developing their livelihood hence 58.33% for ecotourism scheme, 56.25% for Prunus africana scheme, 65.11% for Conservation Bonus and 53.33% for Conservation Credit.
  • 23. 4.2. PERSPECTIVE o Benefit Sharing Schemes in the MCNP should be use as a baseline in future REDD+ projects. o Benefit Sharing Schemes in MCNP should be an inspiration to other national parks in Cameroon.