Agentic RAG What it is its types applications and implementation.pdf
Language analysis 2
1. UNIVERSIDAD PEDAGÓGICA EXPERIMENTAL LIBERTADOR
INSTITUTO PEDAGÓGICO DE CARACAS
DEPARTAMENTO DE IDIOMAS MODERNOS
PROGRAMA INGLÉS
INGLÉS PARA FINES ESPECÍFICOS
Language Description
in English for Specific Purposes
Alexis Centrella Vegas
May, 2012
2. LANGUAGE DESCRIPTION
Classical or Traditional Grammar.
Structural Linguistic.
Transformational Generative Grammar.
Language Variation and Register Analysis.
Functional/Notional Grammar.
Discourse (Rhetorical) Analysis.
Taken from: Hutchinson , T & Waters, A. (1991). English for Specific Purposes. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press
3. Clasical or Traditional Grammar
Correctness.
Emphasize Linguistic purisim.
Literacy excellence.
Categories Number, gender, person, tense and voice.
Model Latin and Greek.
Interest Form of the language.
Taken from: Hutchinson , T & Waters, A. (1991). English for Specific Purposes. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press
4. Structural Linguistic
Saussure.
Developers Bloomfield.
Sapir.
Interest The surface structure of the language.
Language is described in isolation
There is a kind of formula
Taken from: Hutchinson , T & Waters, A. (1991). English for Specific Purposes. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press
5. Transformational Generative Grammar
Deep Organization of thoughts = Competence
Levels
Surface The expressions of thoughts = Performance
Analized from the human mind.
Language
Viewed as a function.
Sintax, non-verbal communication,
Study of language medium, channel, role relationships, topic,
purpose of communication.
Taken from: Hutchinson , T & Waters, A. (1991). English for Specific Purposes. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press
6. Language Variation and Register Analysis
Knowledge Medical, Social, Scientific, Legal English
Context
Area of use Technical manuals, Business meeting, etc.
Formal/Informal; Spoken/Written; Self-
Context of use
sufficient/Content-dependent.
Register Selecting of syllabus items.
Taken from: Hutchinson , T & Waters, A. (1991). English for Specific Purposes. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press
7. Functional/Notional Grammar
Functional Social behaviour.
Notional How humans think.
ESP uses the kwnoledge
Taken from: Hutchinson , T & Waters, A. (1991). English for Specific Purposes. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press
8. Discourse (Rhetorical) Analysis
Sociolinguistic Context Meaning changes.
An utterance acquires meaning by
Discoursal meaning virtue of what utterances it precides
or follows.
Taken from: Hutchinson , T & Waters, A. (1991). English for Specific Purposes. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press
9. Discourse (Rhetorical) Analysis
- Can I go out to play? - Have you cut the grass yet ?
- It s raining. - It s raining.
- I think I ll go out for a walk.
- It s raining.
- It s raining.
- I think I ll go out for a walk.
Taken from: Hutchinson , T & Waters, A. (1991). English for Specific Purposes. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press
10. Discourse (Rhetorical) Analysis
a) Learners are made aware of the stages in certain set-piece
transactions associated with particular specialist fields.
b) The central feature in ESP has been materials which aim to
explain how meaning is created by the relative position of the
sentences in a written text.
Taken from: Hutchinson , T & Waters, A. (1991). English for Specific Purposes. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press
11. Conclusion
All communication has a structural level, a functional
level and a dirscoursal level. They complement each
other.
It is important to make a distinction between what a
person does (performance) and what enables them to do
it (competence).
Taken from: Hutchinson , T & Waters, A. (1991). English for Specific Purposes. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press