2. INTRODUCTION
In Ghana, rice is the second most important cereal
after maize which is cultivated in all the regions of
the country.
Though local rice production has been increasing,
inefficient post-harvest practices have not allowed
local producers to take advantage for the
increased demand for rice.
Typically, a sizable proportion of locally produced
rice in Ghana has a high percentage of broken
grains.
3. INTRODUCTION (contd)
Therefore exploring other use of broken local rice grains
will lead to;
diversification in rice utilization which will significantly
increase the livelihoods of rice actors in the industry.
development of new rice-based products would add
value to rice through extension of shelf life and satisfy
the drive and demand for convenience foods.
reduction in both post-harvest losses and importation
of noodle products
4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Source of sample
Rice varieties from farmers located in Ashaiman, Afife
and Kpong on rice irrigation projects through the
facilitation of the Ghana Rice Inter-Professional Body
(GRIB)
Five (5) varieties used :
•
•
•
•
•
Marshall
Ex-Hohoe
Jasmine 85
Jet 3
Viwonor
5. Production of Noodle Samples
Composite flour of
rice and wheat
Egg, Salt, Xanthan
gum, Water
Mixing of ingredients
Resting of dough (20 min)
Extrusion of dough
Cutting into stands
Drying of strands
Raw noodle
Fig 1: Process flow for noodle production
8. Methods for determining cooking
quality, chemical and sensory properties
1) Cooking qualities
Optimum cooking time - (Li et al., 2011)
Weight increase - (Li et al., 2011)
Cooking loss - (Jayaena et al., 2010)
2) Proximate composition- (AOAC, 2000)
moisture, protein, ash, fat, fibre,
carbohydrate, energy calculation
3) Sensory properties – colour, smoothness, taste, aroma, mouth feel,
firmness, elasticity, stickiness of both cooked and uncooked noodle
samples
Descriptive test – 9 trained panelists with score sheets
Acceptability test – 37 untrained panelists using 7-point hedonic
scale
9. RESULTS
1. Table 2: Cooking qualities of rice noodles
Variety
a, b, c ,d, e.
8±0.00
3.40±0.11 a
6.35±0.66 b
100
8±0.00
3.40±0.12 a
6.35±0.66 b
9±0.00
3.41±0.12 a
6.35±0.66 b
100
8±0.00
3.34±0.24 a
7.04±0.07 b
9±0.00
3.34±0.24 a
7.04±0.07 b
100
8±0.00
3.34±0.24 a
7.04±0.07 b
9±0.00
3.34±0.24 a
7.04±0.07 b
100
7±0.00
3.33±0.17 a
6.86±0.10 b
150
Viwonor
6.35±0.66 b
150
Jet 3
3.39±0.12 a
150
Jasmine 85
Cooking loss
(%)
150
Ex-Hohoe
Weight
increase (g)
100
Optimum
cooking time
(min)
7±0.00
150
Marshall
Particle size
(µm)
8±0.00
3.33±0.17 a
6.86±0.10 b
Varieties with the same superscript in a column are not significantly different at p≤0.05
10. 2. Table 3: Proximate composition of rice noodles
Variety
Moisture
Fat
Fibre
Ash
Carbohy
Energy
(g/100g)
(g/100g)
(g/100g)
(g/100g)
(g/100g)
drate
(Kcal/10
(g/100g)
Marshall
Protein
0g)
7.37±
11.84±
1.34±
0.73±
2.28±
76.45±
365.20±
0.08 a
0.02b
0.08 c
0.14 d
0.00e
0.16 a
1.30 b
Ex-
9.70±
11.76±
1.72±
0.04±
2.67±
74.12±
358.97±
Hohoe
0.10 b
0.01b
0.05 b
0.01 c
0.01d
0.10 b
0.79 c
Jasmine
7.04±
11.70±
1.46±
0.55±
2.40±
76.86±
367.35±
85
0.00 c
0.25b
0.06 c
0.36 d
0.02c
0.04 a, d
1.65 b
Jet 3
7.81±
10.99±
1.44±
0.09±
3.09±
76.59±
363.27±
0.05 d
0.21a
0.00 c
0.56b, c
0.01b
0.32 a, d
0.48 b
5.06±
10.99±
3.17±
0.09±
3.08±
77.31±
381.72±
0.05 e
0.21a
0.08 a
0.56b, c
0.01b
0.26 c
0.56 d
Viwonor
a, b, c ,d, e.
p≤0.05
Varieties with the same superscript in a column are not significantly different at
11. 3. Sensory evaluation of uncooked rice noodles
Colour
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
Marshall
2
Ex-hohoe
1
Jasmine 85
0
Jet 3
Viwonor
Control
Aroma
Smoothness
Fig 2: Intensity rating of sensory attributes of uncooked rice noodles by trained panelists
12. 3. Sensory evaluation of cooked rice noodles
Colour
9
8
Elasticity
7
6
Smoothness
5
4
3
marshall
2
Ex-hohoe
1
Stickiness
Aroma
0
Jasmine 85
Jet 3
viwonor
control
Firmness
Taste
Mouthfeel
Fig 8: Intensity rating of sensory attributes of cooked rice noodles by trained
panelists
13. 3. Table 4: Sensory characteristics of rice noodles- consumer
preference test
Variety
Colour
Smoothness
Taste
Aroma
Mouth-feel
Overall
acceptability
Marshall
2.38±0.92 a
4.16±0.76 b
2.51±0.80 c
2.97±0.9
2.68±0.63 d
2.76±1.07 a
3.41±0.73 c
3.08±0.80 a
2.92±0.72 d
2.78±1.16 a
2.92±0.98 d
2.03±0.76 b
3.03±1.04 d, c
4.78±0.75 c
0a
Ex-hohoe
2.24±0.90 a
4.22±0.79 b
2.54±0.80 c
3.14±0.9
2a
Jasmine 85 2.19±0.97 a
4.30±0.70 b
2.49±0.99 c
3.03±0.9
3a
Jet 3
2.22±0.67 a
4.16±0.76 b
3.41±0.86 b
3.24±0.9
0a
Viwonor
5.08±1.28 b
a, b, c. d: Rice
3.73±0.73 c
2.65±0.72 c
3.97±0.8
0b
noodles with the same superscript in a column are not significantly different at
p≤0.05 Scale: 1-like extremely, 2-like slightly, 3-like, 4-neither like nor dislike, 5-dislike, 6dislike slightly, 7-dislike extremely
14. CONCLUSIONS
Noodles developed from the composite flours of rice and wheat were
acceptable by panellists even though an imported commercial noodle
(used as control) was rated higher with reference to key desirable
sensory attributes like elasticity, smoothness and stickiness
Though noodle formulated with Viwonor used the least amount of
wheat flour which will have been the most preferred for commercial
use, unfortunately some of the panellists were put off with the
brown/red colour of the products.
The cooking qualities including percent cooking loss, optimum
cooking time and weight increase of the rice noodles were
acceptable. Values obtained were within the reference points or limits.
This study showed the potential for commercial production of noodles
from some rice varieties produced in Ghana.