This document discusses location-based services (LBS) and evaluates different positioning techniques used in LBS. It begins by introducing common LBS applications and services. It then examines the components and architecture of LBS systems, including LBS middleware and location tracking. Privacy concerns with LBS are also addressed. The document evaluates and compares several positioning systems used in LBS, including satellite-based GPS, network-based methods like GSM, and indoor positioning techniques. It concludes by discussing limitations and opportunities for future work improving LBS positioning accuracy and privacy.
4. Aim and Objectives
Introduction
LBS Components
Privacy of LBS
Positioning Systems
Comparison of Positioning Systems
Conclusion and Future Work
5. • To evaluate a Location Based Services (LBS) positioning techniques.
To investigate the characteristic of the LBS.
Gaining an understanding of components of LBS and underlying technologies.
To study the existing LBS systems.
Investigating the challenge of protecting the privacy of LBS users
To comparing between the LBS systems.
9. Three important standards (OpenLS, GML and KML)
The Open Location Services (OpenLS) standard proposes an overall
system architecture for various components :
location collection services .
LBS application providers .
Geography Markup Language (GML): This is an XML-based language
for representing various geography data such as points of interest.
Keyhole Markup Language (KML): This complements GML by providing
information about annotations and markings on maps (visualization).
10. •
Why privacy is a concern with LBS ?
•
Identification Requirements of LBS .
Anonymous LBSs.
Identity-driven LBSs.
Pseudonym-driven LBSs.
•
Privacy Solutions
Anonymization.
Cryptographic Techniques.
Transformation of Location request data.
11. • Cell of Origin (COO): This technique is used if the positioning system has a
cellular structure.
• Time of Arrival (TOA): Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA).
• Angle of Arrival (AOA): If we use antennas with direction characteristics.
12. Triangulation:: needs two fixed positions (p1 and p2). , we measure the angle
to the location u.
Trilateration:: also needs two fixed positions, but uses two distances to the
unknown location.
Traversing: uses several distance–angle pairs. We start with a known point p1
and measure the bdistance and direction
13. Positioning Systems
Satellite Based
e.g. GPS
Network Based
GSM
(Global Positioning System )
(Radio Frequency Identification )
Indoor Positioning
Infrared , RFID & WLAN
(Wireless Local Area Network
(Global System for Mobile)
14. • Cover huge geographical areas.
• Standalone infrastructure and terminal-based
Advantages
High accuracy
World-wide coverage
Disadvantages
Positioning requires line-of-sight between satellite and receiver
High power consumption at the receiver
High operation costs
Examples
GPS (Global Positioning System)
Galileo
15. Principle of satellite positioning.
The user knows the distance of the satellite
to him, as well as the position of the
satellite
r =c*∆t
So he can calculate a radius is
somewhere on. But he does not know
where on the radius he is.
By looking at the intersection of the coverage radius of
at least 3 satellites, he can discover his exact position
16. Focuses on positioning services within the coverage area of a cellular network.
• Advantages
• Good yield (in most cases even indoors).
• Some positioning methods require either no or only minor modifications at mobile
devices (firmware upgrade).
Disadvantages
High signaling overhead.
Moderate accuracy.
Examples
Cell-Id.
Enhanced Observed Time Difference (E-OTD).
Assisted GPS (A-GPS).
17. Deployment in buildings, university campuses, and company premises
Stand-alone and integrated infrastructures (e.g., RFID vs. WLAN)
Advantages
Low power consumption
High accuracy
Disadvantages
Proprietary systems, i.e., no standardization
Examples
WLAN positioning
Ultrasound positioning
RFID positioning
18. Position can be detected by measuring Signal Strength of all wireless LAN access
points.
Wi-Fi: Wireless Fidelity
21. Many LBS applications use GPS to determine the current location.
however: It only works outdoors because the receiver must have a direct view
to at least four GPS satellites.
no positioning system is accessible everywhere.
If a service wants to have high coverage, it has to rely on several positioning
techniques.
22. More investigations are required to assess the behavior of the LBS under
different positioning techniques.
To explore the limitations of the LBS paradigm .
To develop real LBS systems which are more intelligent and accurate.
More investigations are required to assess user experiences in regard to
privacy and security.
23. [1] L. Perusco and K. Michael, "Control, Trust, and Security: Evaluating Location-Based Services", IEEE Technology
and Society Fvlagazine, Spring 2007
[3] M. Takeda, "Will GPS Mobile Phones Become the Driving Force in the GPS Applications Market?", nG Mobile in
Japan and Asia, 1(7), July 22, 2002.
[4] J. Green, D. Betti, and J. Davison. Mobile Location Services: Market Strategies, OVUM, London, 2000.
[5] G. Alonso, F. Casati, H. Kuno, and V. Machiraju. Web Services: Concepts, Architectures and Applications. Springer
Verlag Publishers, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2003.
[6] I. Burcea, H.-A. Jacobsen, E. DeLara, V. Muthusam, and M. Petrovic. "Disconnected Operations in
Publish/Subscribe." IEEE Mobile Data Management, IEE Publication, pages 39–50, 2004.
[7] H.-A. Jacobsen. "Middleware Services for Selective and Location-based Information Dissemination in Mobile
Wireless Networks." Advanced Topic Workshop on Middleware for Mobile Computing, November 12–16, 2001.
[8] K. V. B. Andersen, M. Cheng, R. Klitgaard-Nielsen. "Online Aalborg Guide: Development of a Location-Based
Service." Student Report, 102 pages, Aalborg University, 2003.
[9] K. Dueker and J. A. Butler. "GIS-T Enterprise Data Model with Suggested Implementation Choices," Journal of the
Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, 10(1):12–36, 1998.