Weitere ähnliche Inhalte Mehr von ASQ Reliability Division (20) Kürzlich hochgeladen (20) Overview of highly accelerated life test (halt)1. OVERVIEW OF HIGHLY
OVERVIEW OF HIGHLY
ACCELERATED LIFE
ACCELERATED LIFE
TEST
Chet Haibel
©2011 ASQ & Presentation Chet
Presented live on Jan 18th, 2012
http://reliabilitycalendar.org/The_Re
liability_Calendar/Webinars_
liability Calendar/Webinars ‐
_English/Webinars_‐_English.html
2. ASQ Reliability Division
ASQ Reliability Division
English Webinar Series
English Webinar Series
One of the monthly webinars
One of the monthly webinars
on topics of interest to
reliability engineers.
To view recorded webinar (available to ASQ Reliability
Division members only) visit asq.org/reliability
) /
To sign up for the free and available to anyone live
webinars visit reliabilitycalendar.org and select English
Webinars to find links to register for upcoming events
http://reliabilitycalendar.org/The_Re
liability_Calendar/Webinars_
liability Calendar/Webinars ‐
_English/Webinars_‐_English.html
3. OVERVIEW OF HIGHLY
ACCELERATED LIFE TEST
Chet Haibel
Hobbs Engineering Corporation
www.hobbsengr.com (303) 465-5988
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
4. What Is Reliability?
CLASSICAL DEFINITION
Reliability is the probability that a component,
subassembly, instrument, or system will perform
its specified function for a specified period of time
under specified environmental and use conditions.
1
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
5. What is a Product Failure?
Failure is the inability of a device to perform its intended functions
under stated environmental conditions for a specified time.
Failures are classified into three types based on time:
• Early-Life (Infant Mortality)
• Useful-Life (Random-in-time)
• Wear-Out (End of useful life)
Each failure type has different kinds of causes and therefore different
tests to discover them and different methods of correction / prevention.
2
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
6. What is a Product Failure?
Failures are also classified into three types based on their persistence:
• Hard Failure (Persistent)
Typically a component must be replaced, but trouble-shooting may be
done at room temperature with no vibration or other stimulus
• Soft Failure (Temporary)
Often merely removing the environmental stimulus clears the problem,
but sometimes it is necessary to cycle power, clear fault logs, etc.
Product must be stressed to duplicate and trouble-shoot soft failures
Many very important reliability issues are SOFT FAILURES.
• Intermittent Failure (Elusive)
This is permanent but the failure mode must be put into a detectable state
3
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
7. What Causes Product Failure?
A component fails when applied load exceeds design strength.
Applied Load Design Strength
Failure
Units of Applied Load, Strength
4
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
8. Applied Loads
Examples of applied load might be:
Force Voltage
Torque Current
Tension Wattage
Shear Clock Speed
Pressure Electrostatic
Discharge
Electromagnetic
Interference
5
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
9. Design Strength
Examples of design strength:
Torque rating of a bolt
Voltage rating of a capacitor
Current rating of a diode
Power rating of a resistor
Shear strength of solder
Tensile rating of plastic
Temperature rating of transformer insulation
6
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
10. Load / Strength Interference
Desirable
Load Strength
Obvious
Strength Load
More Subtle
Load Strength
7
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
11. Load / Strength Interference
Early-Life Load Strength
Useful-Life Load Strength
with time
Wear-Out Load Strength
8
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
12. Bathtub Curve
Early-Life Wear-Out
Hazard Rate - h(t)
Failures Failures
Useful-Life
Failures
Random-in-Time Failures
Life to the Beginning of Wear-Out Operating Time (t)
9
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
13. Wear-Out Failures
with time
Load Strength
Increasing Hazard Rate h(t)
Failures due to cycle fatigue
Corrosion Hazard
Rate
Frictional wear
Shrinkage, cracking in plastic components Time
Typical of mechanical systems
10
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
14. Cycle Fatigue
Stresses: Cycled by:
• Pressure • Product Operation
• Tension • Thermal Cycling
• Torsion • Vibration
• Shear • Shock
• Etc. • Etc.
Use up Fatigue Life
11
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
15. Observed Failure Behavior
For a given stress level, the number of cycles to failure in a sample
will occur in a distribution due to specimen variation
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Cycles to Failure
12
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
16. Observed Failure Behavior
Higher stress level requires fewer cycles to failure
Higher Stress Lower Stress
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Cycles to Failure
13
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
17. Observed Failure Behavior
For the same failure mode, stress level and the number of cycles
to failure are related by a straight line on log scales
S - N Diagram
1.6
1.5
Log S, Stress
1.4
S1 N1
1.3
1.2 S2 N2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0 1 2 3 4 5
Log N, Cycles to Failure
14
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
18. One Failure Mode: Fatigue Damage
Vibration Analysis of Electronic Equipment by Dave Steinberg, Wiley, 1973
D n b, where
• D is the Miner’s Criterion fatigue damage accumulation,
• n is the number of cycles of stress,
• is the stress in force per unit area,
• b is the negative, inverse slope of the S-N diagram for the material.
For wrought Aluminum, doubling the stress decreases the
fatigue cycles by a factor of 1000 b is approximately 10
15
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
19. S-N Diagram for 7075 Aluminum
Vibration Analysis of Electronic Equipment by Dave Steinberg, Wiley, 1973
O
O
~ 2 thousand cycles at 80 KSI, but at 40 KSI it takes 2 million cycles
16
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
20. Fatigue Damage from Vibration
Assume a resonance at 1,000 Hz
At 40,000 psi, failure would occur at 2 million cycles
2 million ÷ 1 kHz = 2000 seconds or 33 minutes
At 80,000 psi, failure would occur in 2 seconds
Doubling the G rms level would achieve a time compression
factor of 1,000.
This TIME COMPRESSION is normal for HALT
17
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
21. Time Compression
Reference: GE Lighting, private telecon with Jim Harsa in 2000
Dtvb Increased voltage stress shortens
time to see the same dominant
t is time Wear-Out failure mode
v is the voltage
b =13 for incandescent lights
b = 8 for fluorescent lights
18
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
22. Discovering Wear-Out Failures Without Using HALT
If possible, set up a repetitive “cycle test” which removes the “dead
time” between cycles. But brainstorm what test artifact may be
added and / or what the test may be concealing
Test until a minimum of five failures are produced [Haibel’s rule]
Use Weibull Analysis to fit a distribution to the failure data
If life is not sufficient, determine the reservoir of material and the
process consuming the reservoir. Increase the reservoir of material
and / or slow down the process consuming it
If necessary, replace the reservoir of material periodically with a
scheduled preventive maintenance program
19
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
23. Discovering Wear-Out Failures Without Using HALT
Electromigration
(photo courtesy Alcatel-Lucent)
Standard test for
electromigration in
MIL-STD-883 is
Dynamic Burn-In:
125°C for 160 hours
with all voltages,
currents, and clock
speed maximized
20
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
24. Useful-Life Failures
Load Strength
Constant Hazard Rate h(t)
Random-in-time failures
Hazard
Parts are new until they fail
Rate
Strength-Load interference
Insufficient design margin Time
Typical of electronic hardware
21
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
25. Quantifying Strength / Load Interference
Subtracting two Normal
distributions produces
another Normal
distribution whose mean
is the difference of the
means, but whose
standard deviation is the
root-sum-square of the
two standard deviations
We define Safety Margin
MS ML
SM
( S L )1/ 2
2 2
22
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
26. Useful-Life Failures
Load Strength
For simple mechanical products with few parts, we can calculate
reliability one part at a time using Safety Margin for Normal
distributions, or using Monte Carlo simulations for non-Normal
distributions.
For electro-mechanical products with thousands of components
(each of which may have several relevant strength characteristics),
we need an efficient technique to catch the few component
applications that have marginal strength / load relationships. So far,
the most efficient technique is Highly Accelerated Life Test (HALT).
23
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
27. HALT
Highly Accelerated Life Test
Used in the Design Phase
24
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
28. HALT Finds Useful-Life Failures
Load Strength
Load Strength
constantly
increasing load
Increase probability of seeing an existing failure mode
25
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
29. HALT
HALT is the method of seeing the existing failure modes
with the minimum number of prototypes (4 or 8)
in the minimum time (typically a week)
By experience with early prototypes or with similar
products, determine which environmental factors will
“stimulate” the relevant failure modes
Many failure modes in typical electromechanical
products are well stimulated by temperature and
rapid temperature cycling simultaneous with six
degree-of-freedom random vibration
26
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
30. Temperature (Celsius) Goal “limit of technology”
80
60
ENV2
40
ENV1
20 G rms
5 10 15 20 25 30
0
-20
-40 Goal “limit of technology”
27
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
31. HALT
Every stimulus of potential value is used during New Product
Development to find the weak links in the product design
These stresses are not meant to simulate field environments but to find
the weak links in the design using only a few units in a very short
period of time
Stress levels are taken well beyond the normal mission profile
Sometimes one kind of stress will produce a failure mode in HALT,
but a different kind of stress will produce that same failure mode
in the hands of customers
Crossover Effect
Focus on fixing the failure mode, don’t focus on the stimulus
28
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
33. Stimulus-Flaw Precipitation Relationships
Reference: “Flaw-Stimulus Relationships”, G. K. Hobbs, Sound and Vibration, August 1986
All Combined
Vibration
High Temp
Burn in
Thermal Voltage
Cycle Cycle
Margining
30
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
34. Perhaps a Different Order
More than one failure mode may be affected by the same stress
Failure modes will not necessarily be exposed according to the field
Pareto chart, but maybe in some other order
Field HALT
Pareto Order
The time compression factor for the failure modes will be different
31
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
35. Failure % by Stress Type
“Summary of HALT and HASS Results at an Accelerated Reliability Test Center” by Mike Silverman
Based on 49 products from 19 different industries
Order of application and discovery:
Cold Step Stress 14%
Hot Step Stress 17%
Temperature Transition 4%
6-Axis Vibration 45%
Combined Temp and Vibe 20%
Without simultaneous, all axis vibration,
65% would have been missed!
32
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
36. “Our Path to Reliability Using HALT”
Chuck Laurenson, Parker Hannifin 1999 Hobbs Engineering ARTS USA Award Winning Paper
Where Design Flaws Were Discovered
Cold Step Stress 10%
Hot Step Stress 12%
Rapid Thermal Cycling 4%
Vibration Step Stress 43%
Combined Temp and Vibe 31%
74% of the flaws would have been missed
without simultaneous, all axis vibration!
33
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
37. Let’s Focus on Vibration
Swept Sine, Single Axis
Random, Single Axis
Six Degree of Freedom
34
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
39. Z-Axis Mode of Vibration
36
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
40. Driven Harmonic Motion
d 2z dz
M 2 D Kz A cos 2ft
dt dt
Transfer Function
10
1
0.1
Z-axis 0.01
excitation
A cos 2πft 0.001
1 10 100 1000
Shaker frequency in Hz
37
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
41. Swept Sine Vibration
Essentially one frequency at a time,
sweeping at one octave per minute
Typically uses a Hydraulic shaker (limited upper frequency) or an
ElectroDynamic shaker (high powered voice coil)
Using a Stroboscope, one can observe behavior at resonance
But can only see one resonance at a time, in one translation
axis at a time; must mount the product for X, Y, & Z
Miss interactions between resonances at different
frequencies or in different directions
No guarantee of stimulating rotational resonances at all !
38
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
42. Voice Coil Can be Rotated to Drive the Slip Table for X or Y
39
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
43. An Oil Bearing Supports the Slip Table
40
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
44. Random Vibration
Broadband, Pseudo Random (noise-like)
vibration generated by a computer
Typically uses an ElectroDynamic shaker, therefore one translation
axis at a time; still have to mount the product three times for X, Y,
& Z and that doesn’t stimulate rotational resonances very well
But this is a major improvement to see all frequencies at once,
therefore see the interaction of resonances in one direction
Crest factor (ratio of peak to average acceleration) is around 3
Major advantage is to shape the spectrum for qualifying to some
external standard (e.g., RCTA/DO-160D Category U Helicopter)
41
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
45. Random Vibration Shaped Spectrum
1.000
Vertical axis is
Power Spectral
Power Spectral Density
0.100
Density in units
of g2/Hz
g2/Hz
To convert to G
0.010
rms, integrate
the power (g2)
over frequency
0.001 and take the
10 100 1000
Freqency (Hz) square root
Shown is approximately 5G rms
42
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
46. TIME COMPRESSORTM TC-1 Ocelot by
HALT & HASS Systems Corporation
43
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
47. Features of the TC-1 Ocelot
Temperature change rates of plus or minus 120 Celsius degrees per
minute, the highest in the industry, from -100°C to +200°C
Vibration will start and run anywhere from 0.1 to 150 G rms
Low G levels are important for executing Modulated Excitation™
which is a breakthrough for detecting intermittent failures
X, Y, and Z acceleration balance is near 1:1:1
Sound level is only 50 dBA at 30 G rms, the lowest in the industry,
no ear protection is necessary, can be used on production lines
Will operate on 110 volts, 50-60 Hz with reduced heating for trouble
shooting – this is important for duplicating soft failures
44
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
48. TC-1 Ocelot Vibration System
These are
pneumatically-
driven pistons
which generate
six-axis (6 DoF)
vibration from
approximately
20Hz to 10kHz
(one spring is
removed to
show the table
Bottom View construction
detail)
45
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
49. Repetitive Shock Spectrum
T d
Mathematically, a string of
rectangular pulses of period T and
duration d in the Time Domain
Time in seconds
1
Transforms into a “comb” of 0.1
frequencies whose fundamental 0.01
frequency is 1/T with harmonics 0.001
Sin df
weighted by in the 0.0001
πdf
Frequency Domain 0.00001
Frequency in Hz
46
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
50. Six-Axis Random Vibration
Using several pneumatic pistons, with air flow modulated in a
proprietary fashion, produces overlapping smeared spectrums
The different angles of the pneumatic pistons generate a feedback
controlled, broadband level of random vibration in X, Y, and Z
translational directions and yaw, pitch, and roll angular directions
Feedback for the control system is provided from one z-direction
accelerometer on the bottom (piston side) of the table
This results in all frequencies in all directions, simultaneously
exciting all resonances for complete failure mode stimulus
The Crest Factor, the ratio of peak to average acceleration is ~10,
which rapidly precipitates design and manufacturing flaws
47
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
51. Some Defects Precipitated by Vibration
Poorly mounted components
Poorly formed leads
Poor solder joints
Fretting Corrosion
Loose hardware
Loose wires
Adjacent parts contacting
Wires over sharp edges
Stacked resonances
48
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
53. Some Defects Precipitated by Thermal Cycling
Poorly matched expansion coefficients
• Boards and components should match
• Structures should match
Poor solder joints
Improperly formed leads
Improper crimps
PCB shorts, opens
Plated through hole defect
50
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
55. Effect of Temperature Rate on Number of Cycles
“Effective and Economics-Yardsticks for ESS Decisions”, S. A. Smithson, IES, 1990
52
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
56. Time Compression for Data from the Previous Slide
Calculations by G. K. Hobbs
At a Ramp Rate of 5⁰C per minute, 400 cycles with a range of 165⁰C
(with no dwells) would take 440 hours
At a Ramp Rate of 25⁰C per minute, 4 cycles with a range of 165⁰C
(with no dwells) would take less than 60 minutes
(At a Ramp Rate of 40⁰C per minute, 1 cycle with a range of 165⁰C
(with no dwells) would take less than 10 minutes)
This is real TIME COMPRESSION !
53
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
57. Stresses Used in HALT
Wide range temperature Humidity
High rate temp. cycling Dimensional parameters
All axis random vibration Viscosity of a fluid
Power cycling Vary pH of a fluid
Power voltage and frequency Salinity of a fluid
Secondary voltage Add particulates to the fluid
Digital clock frequency Back Pressure
54
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
58. More Stresses Used in HALT
Vary magnetic tape thickness Inject electrical noise
Vary gear diameter Mistune the channel
Off axis alignment Radiation (E & M)
Mismatch / Overload Nuclear radiation
Imbalance Multiple sterilizations
Off-track Whatever else makes
Higher RPM sense for the
particular product
55
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
59. Crossover Effect
A flaw may be exposed by a different stress in HALT than the
stress which exposes the flaw in the field environment
Focus on the failure modes and mechanisms, not the stresses
used to expose them or the margin beyond field environment
Focusing on margin may lead to missing an opportunity for
improvement followed by field failures of the same mode
This is a frequent, serious mistake in HALT!
56
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
60. What Level of Stresses to Use
57
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
61. Product Response is of Prime Importance, the Inputs Are Not
Vibration
• All modes excited
• Second modes are very important
Thermal
• All sites reach the desired temperatures
• All sites reach the desired rates of change
Voltage
Humidity
Current density
Other stresses or parameters
58
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
62. What Level of Stresses to Use
In HALT, one must go beyond customer-specified stress level to
compress the time to see the dominant failure modes
Stress level has been substituted for sample size!
This is one of the MAJOR BENEFITS of HALT
We do not need many units to HALT (four is good)
We can HALT a few at each stage of development and manufacturing.
• Prototype (as early as feasible)
• Pre-production (after corrections)
• Early production (after design transfer)
• Ongoing production (re-HALT)
59
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
63. Understand First
Again, the key is to focus on the failure mode, not the stress type
used, or the margin beyond the field environment
Through failure analysis, gain root cause understanding first and
then decide if the weakness would cause field failures or whether
the weakness would put limitations on manufacturing screening
It’s often easier to fix it than prove it’s not a customer issue!
60
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
64. HALT Attitude
Every weakness found represents an opportunity for improvement
HALT is proactive, but no action means no improvement
We try to break the product in order to find its weak links
This is discovery testing compared to qualification (success) testing
This is a total paradigm shift!
Opportunities not taken will probably lead to field failures much
more expensive than the improvement would have been. This fact
has been documented in thousands of cases
If you find it in HALT, it is probably relevant !
61
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
66. Example of Success
Ed Minor, Boeing, in a presentation at a Hobbs Engineering Seminar
Boeing 777 was the first
commercial airplane
ever certified for Extended
Twin-engine Operations
(ETOPS) at the outset of
service
“Dispatch reliability after only two months of service was
better than the next best commercial airliner after six years”
63
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
67. Some Product Types Successfully Improved by HALT
Accelerometers Magnetic Resonance Scanners
Analysis &Test Equipment Medical Products
ASICs / Processors / Drives Military / NASA (mixed)
Land / Air / Water Craft Monitors / Displays / TVs
A/V Products & Systems Ovens
Avionics / Aerospace Pneumatic Vibration
Compressors/Generators Point of Sale Systems
PCs to Mainframes Power Supplies
Lipstick Radar / GPS Systems
Electronics / Electrical Telecommunications
Gears / Transmissions Thermal Controls
Instruments / Gauges Jet Engines / Missiles
64
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
68. The Complete HALT Process
HALT consists of:
• Precipitation
– Stresses
– Stress Levels
• Detection All must be present or no
– Detectable State improvement happens !
– Coverage
• Failure Analysis
• Corrective Action
– Corrective Action Verification
65
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
69. The First Part of Detection
Achieve a Detectable State, the “Magic Level” or the “Sweet Spot”
where the intermittent is detectable
• Detection Screens are a well established technique commonly
practiced by the experts
• Requires equipment designed for HALT and HASS for best results
• Modulated ExcitationTM frequently improves detection by two
orders of magnitude, sometimes even more
66
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
70. Detection Excellence
Some damage from the HALT stresses may not be
immediately discernable – it may be LATENT !
HAST (Highly Accelerated Stress Test -- Pressure Cooker) may
precipitate latent damage, making it patent -- discernable
• Cracked component bodies (e.g. MLCC)
• Other long term failure modes not yet completed
If feasible, expose all HALT units to HAST
Or perform a biased (power on with signals toggling) exposure
to 60°C and 90% RH for one week
67
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
71. Multi-Layer Ceramic Capacitor
CALCE Electronic Products and Systems Center, University of Maryland
PCBA Flexing
68
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
72. Equipment Required
Combined all-axis, broad-band vibration and high-rate thermal
cycling. Low frequencies must be present in sufficient amplitude
to precipitate the defects.
Electrical stressing (power supply, clock frequency, loads)
Monitoring with high coverage is absolutely essential
Temperature, pressure, and humidity (HAST) equipment
Traditional 85/85 takes 1,000 to 5,000 hours
HAST takes only 48 hours!
Other stressors (such as corrosive atmosphere or radiation) as
appropriate for the product and its environments
69
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
73. Appreciating HALT
To Appreciate
HALT, let’s look at
prototype test
quantities required
under normal
conditions
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
74. Reasonable Example
Suppose an R&D project has a product reliability
goal to have less than 5% Annual Failure Rate.
(this is not a lofty goal)
How many prototype units would have to be put
on test to have 70% probability of seeing all the
problems that must be resolved to be successful?
71
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
75. Infinite, Decreasing, Geometric Series
Mathematical Model for a Pareto
2 3
F1 , F1R , F1R , F1R , ...
Sum = F1 / (1 - R) 0<R<1
Example:
If sum = 5%, R = 0.8, solve for F1
Answer:
(Sum)(1 - R) = F1 = (5%)(0.2) = 1%
72
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
76. Infinite, Decreasing, Geometric Series
4
“allowed”
3
PERCENT
failure
modes
2
1
0
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P
FAILURE MODE
73
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
77. 70% Chance of Seeing Failures for 5% Annual Failure Rate
1000
Number of units on test 0.50 0.70 0.90 0.99
100 O
10
0.001 0.01 0.1
Failure mode's failure probability
74
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
78. Minimum Prototypes and Time
To see the failure modes that must be eliminated
for even mediocre reliability (5% AFR),
Test 120 units for a year
at normal mission (customer, field) conditions,
or
HALT 4 units for a week
75
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
79. How to Prove that HALT Works
There are “Accelerated Reliability Test Centers” where you can take
some products to try a HALT chamber
The persons at the ARTC will run the chamber, but you have to
run your product using diagnostic software
Take an existing (currently shipping) product for which you know
the failure modes experienced by your customers
This is an excellent way to prove that HALT will find the relevant
failure modes in YOUR product
76
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
80. HALT WORKSHOP
Preparing to HALT a Product
Preparing a Product for HALT
77
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
81. Preparing to HALT a Product
In any test we have to stimulate the product and look for a response
from it. HALT is no different, we need inputs and outputs which
we can control and observe from outside the HALT chamber.
Ideally, we want to check all functions of the product so we can see
any (soft) failures.
We often figure out a “quick test” which we can run at each condition
of voltage, temperature, vibration, etc. This might be the power-on
self-test (POST), so we power cycle the product at each condition.
Then occasionally, we will take the time to do a thorough checkout.
78
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
82. Preparing to HALT a Product
Many products (especially software driven products) detect power
supply voltage and will shut down outside an upper and lower limit.
Some products detect temperature and will shut down outside an
upper and lower limit.
These protections must be disabled, either with special HALT
software (firmware) or by modifying the hardware (supplying a
stable voltage to the temperature and / or voltage comparators).
We want to see the underlying (raw) performance of the circuits.
These voltage and temperature limits will improve design margin.
79
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
83. Preparing to HALT a Product
Some products have rubber feet on them to reduce skidding and
scratching, and take out minor irregularities in the support surface.
These will tend to dampen the vibration we are trying to drive into the
product. We must overcome this dampening by removing the feet
or supporting the product next to the feet on the chassis.
Similarly, inside the product there may be elastomer material to dampen
vibration. These dampeners must be defeated to transmit vibration.
80
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
84. Preparing to HALT a Product
Most products have covers to protect the electronics from foreign
(conductive) material and protect the user from coming in contact
with live voltages.
Some products have fans to circulate air to cool the hot components
(and heat the cool components).
These covers and fans will get in the way of the turbulent airflow in the
HALT chamber, which is trying to impose a temperature on the
components. It makes a convection oven look tame!
Unless these covers are structural, they should be removed. If they are
structural, they must have holes drilled in them to let the airflow in.
81
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.
85. OVERVIEW OF HIGHLY
ACCELERATED LIFE TEST
Chet Haibel
Hobbs Engineering Corporation
www.hobbsengr.com (303) 465-5988
Chet Haibel ©2012 Hobbs Engineering Corp.