SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 22
AAAALLLLWWWWAAAAYYYYSSSS RRRREEEEMMMMEEEEMMMMBBBBEEEERRRR 
SSppeeaakkeerrss aarree 
nnoott bboorrnn,, tthheeyy 
aarree mmaaddee.. 
Speech & Interpersonal 
Communication Enhancement 
Unit, IIUM
BENEFITS OF DEBATING 
• Cultivates qquuiicckk aanndd mmuullttii-- 
ddiimmeennssiioonnaall,, llooggiiccaall tthhiinnkkiinngg.. 
• EEnnhhaanncceess tthhee aabbiilliittyy ttoo ddeevveelloopp 
rreeaassoonneedd ooppiinniioonnss.. 
• GGiivveess aa bbeetttteerr uunnddeerrssttaannddiinngg ooff tthhee 
ccuurrrreenntt eevveennttss aanndd tthhee wwoorrlldd aarroouunndd 
uuss.. 
• IImmpprroovveess sseellff--ccoonnffiiddeennccee,, ssppeeaakkiinngg 
ssttyyllee aanndd ccoommmmaanndd ooff llaanngguuaaggee.. 
• EEnnrriicchheess yyoouurr oovveerraallll lleeaaddeerrsshhiipp 
qquuaalliittiieess.. 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
GOOD DEBATERS POSSESS 
• Good knowledge ooff ccuurrrreenntt iissssuueess.. 
• AAbbiilliittyy ttoo ggeenneerraattee iiddeeaass.. 
• AAbbiilliittyy ttoo tthhiinnkk ccrriittiiccaallllyy aanndd llooggiiccaallllyy.. 
• AAbbiilliittyy ttoo pprreesseenntt tthhee iiddeeaass 
ssyysstteemmaattiiccaallllyy.. 
• AAbbiilliittyy ttoo hhaannddllee ccuullttuurraallllyy ddiivveerrssee 
aanndd cchhaalllleennggiinngg ssiittuuaattiioonnss wwiitthh ggrreeaatt 
eeaassee aanndd ttoo oonnee’’ss tthheeiirr ((oowwnn)) 
eennjjooyymmeenntt.. 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
DIFFERENT FORMATS OF DEBATES 
• PPaarrlliiaammeennttaarryy && NNoonn--ppaarrlliiaammeennttaarryy 
– Parliamentary debates allow Points of Information 
(POI) while Non-Parliamentary debates do not. 
• MMaallaayyssiiaann CCoonnvveennttiioonnaall 
– 3 members to a team 
– Topics given in advance 
– POIs not allowed 
• AAmmeerriiccaann PPaarrlliiaammeennttaarryy 
– 2 members to a team 
– POIs are allowed 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
DIFFERENT FORMATS OF DEBATES 
• RRooyyaall MMaallaayyssiiaann// AAssiiaann 
– 3 members to a team 
– POIS are allowed. 
• BBrriittiisshh PPaarrlliiaammeennttaarryy ((WWoorrlldd DDeebbaatteess)) 
– 2 member to team and 4 teams in a debate 
– POIs are allowed Opening Gov. 
Closing Opp. Opening Opp. 
Speaker/ 
Chairperson 
Audience 
Set up in a 
British 
Parliamentary 
Format of 
Debate 
Closing Gov. 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
A DEBATE IS JUDGED ON THE 
BASIS OF: 
1. Matter: 
What you present (i.e. the 
content) 
2. Manner: 
How you present (i.e. the style) 
3. Method: 
Organisation/ structure of your 
presentation 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
ELEMENTS OF MATTER 
1. Definitions: 
4. Rebuttals: 
- Set up of the debate 
2. Arguments: 
- Must be logical 
- Must be relevant 
3. Evidences: 
- Must be logical 
- Must be relevant 
- Must be prompt 
- Must be relevant 
- Evidential value (strength) 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
DEFINING A TOPIC 
• Explain the kkeeyy--wwoorrddss iinn tthhee 
ttooppiicc.. 
• IIddeennttiiffyy wwhhaatt yyoouu wwaanntt ttoo 
pprroovvee aanndd wwhhaatt iiss yyoouurr ssttaanndd.. 
TThhiiss iiss ccaalllleedd tthhee tthheemmee ooff 
yyoouurr tteeaamm.. 
• IIff tthheerree iiss aa mmeeaassuurreemmeenntt 
iinnvvoollvveedd,, sseett uupp tthhee yyaarrddssttiicckk 
oorr ccrriitteerriiaa ffoorr ssuucchh 
mmeeaassuurreemmeenntt.. 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
RULES OF DEFINITION 
Characteristics of a Proper Definition: 
• It must bear a close relation to the motion. 
• It must not be truistic. 
• It must not employ time or place setting. 
• It must not be based on overly specific knowledge 
Kinds of Definitions: 
• Literal with key-words definition. 
• Metaphorical definition. 
• Issue based &/or specified definition (different 
from time-place setting). 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
CHALLENGE OF DEFINITION 
Grounds for Challenge: 
• You can only challenge a definition if it 
violates any of the criteria stated earlier. 
Frequently used terms in challenging 
definitions are: wholly unreasonable, 
squirrel, time-place set, truistic. 
• You cannot challenge a definition simply 
because you have a more reasonable or 
better definition. 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
CHALLENGE OF DEFINITION 
• Challenge must come from the leader of the opposition, not 
later. 
• Leader of the opposition must provide an alternative 
definition. 
• In most of the cases, the teams must introduce an 'even if’ 
argument. 
• An `Even if' argument is not possible in some cases. (e.g. 
truistic definition & definition running counter to the 
resolution i.e. where govt. has taken the opposition’s case). 
• In a definition debate, all the speakers except the PM argue 
the following: 
• Why challenge? 
• Validity/ invalidity of the two definitions. 
• Even if we are to accept the other side's definition, these are the 
weaknesses of their case. 
• Positive case under their own definition. 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
GETTING THE RIGHT 
ARGUMENTS 
• First, identify what you have to prove under the topic. 
• Then, identify what helps you to prove it. Put them in 
the format of an argument or a set of arguments. 
• Not everything that you know on the subject is relevant. 
• Anticipate the questions that may be raised against 
your arguments and see if you have good answers to 
them. 
• Block the opportunity for those questions to be raised 
by addressing them briefly as you explain the 
argument. 
• Present the arguments in order of their strength. 
• Avoid empty rhetoric and emotionalism - be rational. 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
ESTABLISHING AN ARGUMENT 
Basic statement 
Logical explanations of why and how 
the basic statement stands 
Proofs/ evidences/ examples that factually 
establish your basic statement 
Conclusion/ how it proves 
your team’s theme 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
EFFECTIVE REBUTTALS 
A t t a c k s 
R e b u t t a l s 
( R e b u t t h e A r g u m e n t s ) 
D e f e n c e 
( R e b u t t h e R e b u t t a l s ) 
• Do not rebut the example, attack the very premise of 
the argument of the other side. Only then contrary 
examples can be supplemented. 
• It is advisable to provide multiple rebuttals to each 
argument of the other side. 
• Rebuttals should also be in conformity with your 
case. 
• Rebut the rebuttals of your case by the other side in 
order to defend your case. 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
ELEMENTS OF MANNER/STYLE 
• Respectable attitude towards the judges 
and the other team. 
• Vocal style: volume, clarity, pace, 
intonation etc. 
• Use of notes: not to read a written text. 
• Eye contact. 
• Body language: hand gestures, pacing, 
standing etc. 
• Impression of sincerity. 
• Humour, wit, appropriate and healthy 
sarcasm. 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
ELEMENTS OF METHOD 
- TTeeaamm ssttrruuccttuurree 
- Continuity of team’s theme in all the speeches. 
- Consistency among all the speakers (no 
contradictions) 
- Reinforcement of team members' arguments 
- Clear & logical separation between arguments. 
- IInnddiivviidduuaall SSttrruuccttuurree 
- Attractive opening/ outline of the speech. 
- Proper organisation & priority of the arguments. 
- Organisation of rebuttals. 
- Appropriate timing of the speech 
- Summary of the speech. 
- RReessppoonnsseess ttoo tthhee ddyynnaammiiccss ooff tthhee ddeebbaattee 
- Right thing at the right time. 
- Ability to follow the progression of and changes in the 
Spedeechb a&te I,n taenrpde rtsoo nreal- aCcotm amccuonircdaitniognly E. nhancement Unit, IIUM
MODEL INDIVIDUAL SPEECH 
Definitions/ theme of the 
team 
Rebuttals (attacks and defence) 
Reiteration and defence of your own team’s case 
Presentation of your own arguments 
Conclusion (why your team’s case 
stands and other team’s case does not) 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
TEAMS’ ROLES: ASIAN/ AUSTRALS 
PPRROOPPOOSSIITTIIOONN// 
GGOOVVEERRNNMMEENNTT:: 
TToo ssuuppppoorrtt tthhee mmoottiioonn 
wwhhiicchh iinnvvoollvveess:: 
– Defining the motion, 
– Constructing a 
positive case in 
favour of the motion, 
– Providing substantive 
materials and 
arguments in support 
of the case, 
– Responding to any 
challenges made to 
that case by the 
Opposition. 
OOPPPPOOSSIITTIIOONN:: 
TToo nneeggaattee tthhee mmoottiioonn wwhhiicchh 
iinnvvoollvveess:: 
Responding to the 
Government's definition, 
Constructing a case in 
opposition to the motion, 
Providing substantive 
material and arguments in 
support of the (opposition) 
case, 
Responding to the arguments 
delivered by the 
Government. 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
TEAM ROLES: BRITISH PARLIAMENTARY 
- Defines 
- Builds a positive case to 
support the motion 
- Responds to the Opp.’s case. 
OPENING OPP. 
- Responds to the 
government’s case 
- Builds a case to oppose the 
motion 
- Supports the Opening Gov.’s 
case, 
- Adds new dimensions, 
arguments to further 
substantiate the 
government’s case. 
- Responds to the Opp.’s case 
- Supports the Opening Opp.’s 
case 
- Adds new dimension, 
arguments in Opp.’s case 
- Responds to government’s 
case 
OPENING GOV. 
CLOSING GOV. CLOSING OPP. 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
SPEAKERS' ROLES: ASIAN/ AUSTRALS 
• 1st SSppeeaakkeerr //PPrriimmee MMiinniisstteerr 
PPRROOPPOOSSIITTIIOONN// 
GGOOVVEERRNNMMEENNTT:: 
– Defines the topic. 
– Gives the case structure and theme. 
– Presents own arguments. 
– Provides a summary of his speech. (What I've given u so far..). 
• 22nndd SSppeeaakkeerr 
– Rebuts. 
– Reiterates and defends his first speaker’s arguments. 
– Presents own argument. 
– Provides a summary of his speech. 
• 33rrdd SSppeeaakkeerr 
– Rebuts substantially. 
– Reiterates and defends his own team's case. 
– Provides a summary of his speech. 
• RReeppllyy SSppeeaakkeerr 
– PPrreesseennttss aa ccoommppaarraattiivvee oovveerrvviieeww ooff tthhee ccllaasshh ppooiinnttss iinn tthhee ddeebbaattee 
pprroovviinngg wwhhyy hhiiss tteeaamm’’ss ccaassee ssttaannddss 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
SPEAKERS' ROLES: ASIAN/ AUSTRALS 
OOPPPPOOSSIITTIIOONN:: 
• 1st Speaker //OOppppoossiittiioonn LLeeaaddeerr 
– RReessppoonnddss ttoo tthhee ddeeffiinniittiioonn ((ii..ee.. AAcccceeppttss,, RReejjeeccttss oorr 
CCllaarriiffiieess)).. 
– RReebbuuttss tthhee PPrriimmee MMiinniisstteerr’’ss aarrgguummeennttss.. 
– GGiivveess tthhee ccaassee ssttrruuccttuurree aanndd tthheemmee ooff hhiiss tteeaamm.. 
– PPrreesseennttss oowwnn aarrgguummeennttss.. 
– PPrroovviiddeess aa ssuummmmaarryy ooff hhiiss ssppeeeecchh.. 
• 22nndd SSppeeaakkeerr 
– SSaammee aass tthhee pprrooppoossiittiioonn 22nndd ssppeeaakkeerr 
• 33rrdd SSppeeaakkeerr 
– SSaammee aass tthhee pprrooppoossiittiioonn 33rrdd ssppeeaakkeerr 
• RReeppllyy SSppeeaakkeerr 
– SSaammee aass tthhee pprrooppoossiittiioonn rreeppllyy ssppeeaakkeerr 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
POINTS OF INFORMATION (POIs) 
• A POI can be in a question oorr ssttaatteemmeenntt ffoorrmm aanndd 
sshhoouulldd nnoott ttaakkee mmoorree tthhaann 1155 sseeccoonnddss.. 
• EEaacchh ssppeeaakkeerr sshhoouulldd aacccceepptt aatt lleeaasstt ttwwoo PPOOIIss.. 
• AAllll tthhrreeee mmeemmbbeerrss ooff tthhee tteeaamm sshhoouulldd ttrryy ttoo ggiivvee PPOOIIss,, 
bbuutt tthheeyy mmuusstt nnoott bbee ddiissrruuppttiivvee.. 
• PPOOIIss aarree jjuuddggeedd oonn tthhee bbaassiiss ooff:: 
- tthhee tthhrreeaatt tthheeyy ppoossee ttoo tthhee ssttrreennggtthh ooff tthhee aarrgguummeenntt ooff tthhee 
ddeebbaatteerr.. 
- vvaalluuee ooff iittss wwiitt aanndd hhuummoouurr.. 
• RReessppoonnsseess ttoo tthhee PPOOIIss aarree jjuuddggeedd oonn tthhee bbaassiiss ooff:: 
– pprroommppttnneessss aanndd ccoonnffiiddeennccee iinn aannsswweerriinngg.. 
– ssttrreennggtthh ooff tthhee rreessppoonnssee.. 
– vvaalluuee ooff wwiitt aanndd hhuummoouurr iinn tthhee rreessppoonnssee.. 
Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt? (20)

How to debate
How to debateHow to debate
How to debate
 
Introduction to parliamentary debate
Introduction to parliamentary debateIntroduction to parliamentary debate
Introduction to parliamentary debate
 
Debate 2012 july (1)
Debate 2012 july (1)Debate 2012 july (1)
Debate 2012 july (1)
 
Asian debate competition
Asian debate competitionAsian debate competition
Asian debate competition
 
Rules and Guidelines on Debate Competition
Rules and Guidelines on Debate CompetitionRules and Guidelines on Debate Competition
Rules and Guidelines on Debate Competition
 
Debate seminar
Debate seminarDebate seminar
Debate seminar
 
Basic debating skills
Basic debating skillsBasic debating skills
Basic debating skills
 
Debate
DebateDebate
Debate
 
English Debate
English DebateEnglish Debate
English Debate
 
Debate Basics
Debate BasicsDebate Basics
Debate Basics
 
Oxford – Oregon Debate (How to's and tips)
Oxford – Oregon Debate (How to's and tips) Oxford – Oregon Debate (How to's and tips)
Oxford – Oregon Debate (How to's and tips)
 
Summary of debate
Summary of debateSummary of debate
Summary of debate
 
Debate 101 oktafia
Debate 101   oktafiaDebate 101   oktafia
Debate 101 oktafia
 
Colette - Introduction to BP
Colette - Introduction to BPColette - Introduction to BP
Colette - Introduction to BP
 
Materi debat 1
Materi debat 1Materi debat 1
Materi debat 1
 
Debate
DebateDebate
Debate
 
Philosophy of debating & argumentation
Philosophy of debating & argumentationPhilosophy of debating & argumentation
Philosophy of debating & argumentation
 
Debate
DebateDebate
Debate
 
The Oregon-Oxford Debate
The Oregon-Oxford DebateThe Oregon-Oxford Debate
The Oregon-Oxford Debate
 
Oxford oregon debate
Oxford oregon debateOxford oregon debate
Oxford oregon debate
 

Ähnlich wie Debate guide

Outline on OutliningHeaderKepa M’OrganizedInformative Speech.docx
Outline on OutliningHeaderKepa M’OrganizedInformative Speech.docxOutline on OutliningHeaderKepa M’OrganizedInformative Speech.docx
Outline on OutliningHeaderKepa M’OrganizedInformative Speech.docxvannagoforth
 
Outline on OutliningHeaderKepa M’OrganizedInformative Speech.docx
Outline on OutliningHeaderKepa M’OrganizedInformative Speech.docxOutline on OutliningHeaderKepa M’OrganizedInformative Speech.docx
Outline on OutliningHeaderKepa M’OrganizedInformative Speech.docxaman341480
 
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.pptBasic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.pptzohrearabzadeh
 
Debate formats-Asian Parliamentary procedure
Debate formats-Asian Parliamentary procedureDebate formats-Asian Parliamentary procedure
Debate formats-Asian Parliamentary procedureMarkRenielBalolo
 
Oregon Oxford Debate Format.pptx
Oregon Oxford Debate Format.pptxOregon Oxford Debate Format.pptx
Oregon Oxford Debate Format.pptxJonnaMayMota
 
Debate materials Opinion & thoughts.pptx
Debate materials Opinion & thoughts.pptxDebate materials Opinion & thoughts.pptx
Debate materials Opinion & thoughts.pptxDianOctaviani12
 
Worlds style debate
Worlds style debate Worlds style debate
Worlds style debate Irina K
 
Using Informations from News, Speech, Informative Talks and Pannel Discussion...
Using Informations from News, Speech, Informative Talks and Pannel Discussion...Using Informations from News, Speech, Informative Talks and Pannel Discussion...
Using Informations from News, Speech, Informative Talks and Pannel Discussion...RemieAnneCalvezBohol
 
DEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptx
DEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptxDEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptx
DEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptxssuser6b7a42
 
The proposition of this speech may be one of or.docx
The proposition of this speech may be one of or.docxThe proposition of this speech may be one of or.docx
The proposition of this speech may be one of or.docxwrite5
 
how-to-give-a-persuasive-speech.ppt
how-to-give-a-persuasive-speech.ppthow-to-give-a-persuasive-speech.ppt
how-to-give-a-persuasive-speech.pptKingCajayon1
 
A brief introduction to debate skill for ENG154
A brief introduction to debate skill for ENG154A brief introduction to debate skill for ENG154
A brief introduction to debate skill for ENG154ThanhPhuongNguyenVu
 
1123 speech writing
1123 speech writing1123 speech writing
1123 speech writingSyed Raza
 
Public speaking 2011 british week 2011
Public speaking 2011 british week 2011Public speaking 2011 british week 2011
Public speaking 2011 british week 2011The Mackay School
 
Debating an-introduction-for-beginners
Debating an-introduction-for-beginnersDebating an-introduction-for-beginners
Debating an-introduction-for-beginnersVivine McLeary
 

Ähnlich wie Debate guide (20)

Summary of debate
Summary of debateSummary of debate
Summary of debate
 
Outline on OutliningHeaderKepa M’OrganizedInformative Speech.docx
Outline on OutliningHeaderKepa M’OrganizedInformative Speech.docxOutline on OutliningHeaderKepa M’OrganizedInformative Speech.docx
Outline on OutliningHeaderKepa M’OrganizedInformative Speech.docx
 
Outline on OutliningHeaderKepa M’OrganizedInformative Speech.docx
Outline on OutliningHeaderKepa M’OrganizedInformative Speech.docxOutline on OutliningHeaderKepa M’OrganizedInformative Speech.docx
Outline on OutliningHeaderKepa M’OrganizedInformative Speech.docx
 
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.pptBasic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
 
te natanauan
te natanauante natanauan
te natanauan
 
Debate formats-Asian Parliamentary procedure
Debate formats-Asian Parliamentary procedureDebate formats-Asian Parliamentary procedure
Debate formats-Asian Parliamentary procedure
 
Oregon Oxford Debate Format.pptx
Oregon Oxford Debate Format.pptxOregon Oxford Debate Format.pptx
Oregon Oxford Debate Format.pptx
 
Debate materials Opinion & thoughts.pptx
Debate materials Opinion & thoughts.pptxDebate materials Opinion & thoughts.pptx
Debate materials Opinion & thoughts.pptx
 
Worlds style debate
Worlds style debate Worlds style debate
Worlds style debate
 
EAPP_ LM 6.pptx
EAPP_ LM 6.pptxEAPP_ LM 6.pptx
EAPP_ LM 6.pptx
 
How to debate
How to debateHow to debate
How to debate
 
Using Informations from News, Speech, Informative Talks and Pannel Discussion...
Using Informations from News, Speech, Informative Talks and Pannel Discussion...Using Informations from News, Speech, Informative Talks and Pannel Discussion...
Using Informations from News, Speech, Informative Talks and Pannel Discussion...
 
DEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptx
DEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptxDEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptx
DEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptx
 
The proposition of this speech may be one of or.docx
The proposition of this speech may be one of or.docxThe proposition of this speech may be one of or.docx
The proposition of this speech may be one of or.docx
 
how-to-give-a-persuasive-speech.ppt
how-to-give-a-persuasive-speech.ppthow-to-give-a-persuasive-speech.ppt
how-to-give-a-persuasive-speech.ppt
 
A brief introduction to debate skill for ENG154
A brief introduction to debate skill for ENG154A brief introduction to debate skill for ENG154
A brief introduction to debate skill for ENG154
 
Debate
DebateDebate
Debate
 
1123 speech writing
1123 speech writing1123 speech writing
1123 speech writing
 
Public speaking 2011 british week 2011
Public speaking 2011 british week 2011Public speaking 2011 british week 2011
Public speaking 2011 british week 2011
 
Debating an-introduction-for-beginners
Debating an-introduction-for-beginnersDebating an-introduction-for-beginners
Debating an-introduction-for-beginners
 

Debate guide

  • 1. AAAALLLLWWWWAAAAYYYYSSSS RRRREEEEMMMMEEEEMMMMBBBBEEEERRRR SSppeeaakkeerrss aarree nnoott bboorrnn,, tthheeyy aarree mmaaddee.. Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 2. BENEFITS OF DEBATING • Cultivates qquuiicckk aanndd mmuullttii-- ddiimmeennssiioonnaall,, llooggiiccaall tthhiinnkkiinngg.. • EEnnhhaanncceess tthhee aabbiilliittyy ttoo ddeevveelloopp rreeaassoonneedd ooppiinniioonnss.. • GGiivveess aa bbeetttteerr uunnddeerrssttaannddiinngg ooff tthhee ccuurrrreenntt eevveennttss aanndd tthhee wwoorrlldd aarroouunndd uuss.. • IImmpprroovveess sseellff--ccoonnffiiddeennccee,, ssppeeaakkiinngg ssttyyllee aanndd ccoommmmaanndd ooff llaanngguuaaggee.. • EEnnrriicchheess yyoouurr oovveerraallll lleeaaddeerrsshhiipp qquuaalliittiieess.. Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 3. GOOD DEBATERS POSSESS • Good knowledge ooff ccuurrrreenntt iissssuueess.. • AAbbiilliittyy ttoo ggeenneerraattee iiddeeaass.. • AAbbiilliittyy ttoo tthhiinnkk ccrriittiiccaallllyy aanndd llooggiiccaallllyy.. • AAbbiilliittyy ttoo pprreesseenntt tthhee iiddeeaass ssyysstteemmaattiiccaallllyy.. • AAbbiilliittyy ttoo hhaannddllee ccuullttuurraallllyy ddiivveerrssee aanndd cchhaalllleennggiinngg ssiittuuaattiioonnss wwiitthh ggrreeaatt eeaassee aanndd ttoo oonnee’’ss tthheeiirr ((oowwnn)) eennjjooyymmeenntt.. Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 4. DIFFERENT FORMATS OF DEBATES • PPaarrlliiaammeennttaarryy && NNoonn--ppaarrlliiaammeennttaarryy – Parliamentary debates allow Points of Information (POI) while Non-Parliamentary debates do not. • MMaallaayyssiiaann CCoonnvveennttiioonnaall – 3 members to a team – Topics given in advance – POIs not allowed • AAmmeerriiccaann PPaarrlliiaammeennttaarryy – 2 members to a team – POIs are allowed Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 5. DIFFERENT FORMATS OF DEBATES • RRooyyaall MMaallaayyssiiaann// AAssiiaann – 3 members to a team – POIS are allowed. • BBrriittiisshh PPaarrlliiaammeennttaarryy ((WWoorrlldd DDeebbaatteess)) – 2 member to team and 4 teams in a debate – POIs are allowed Opening Gov. Closing Opp. Opening Opp. Speaker/ Chairperson Audience Set up in a British Parliamentary Format of Debate Closing Gov. Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 6. A DEBATE IS JUDGED ON THE BASIS OF: 1. Matter: What you present (i.e. the content) 2. Manner: How you present (i.e. the style) 3. Method: Organisation/ structure of your presentation Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 7. ELEMENTS OF MATTER 1. Definitions: 4. Rebuttals: - Set up of the debate 2. Arguments: - Must be logical - Must be relevant 3. Evidences: - Must be logical - Must be relevant - Must be prompt - Must be relevant - Evidential value (strength) Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 8. DEFINING A TOPIC • Explain the kkeeyy--wwoorrddss iinn tthhee ttooppiicc.. • IIddeennttiiffyy wwhhaatt yyoouu wwaanntt ttoo pprroovvee aanndd wwhhaatt iiss yyoouurr ssttaanndd.. TThhiiss iiss ccaalllleedd tthhee tthheemmee ooff yyoouurr tteeaamm.. • IIff tthheerree iiss aa mmeeaassuurreemmeenntt iinnvvoollvveedd,, sseett uupp tthhee yyaarrddssttiicckk oorr ccrriitteerriiaa ffoorr ssuucchh mmeeaassuurreemmeenntt.. Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 9. RULES OF DEFINITION Characteristics of a Proper Definition: • It must bear a close relation to the motion. • It must not be truistic. • It must not employ time or place setting. • It must not be based on overly specific knowledge Kinds of Definitions: • Literal with key-words definition. • Metaphorical definition. • Issue based &/or specified definition (different from time-place setting). Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 10. CHALLENGE OF DEFINITION Grounds for Challenge: • You can only challenge a definition if it violates any of the criteria stated earlier. Frequently used terms in challenging definitions are: wholly unreasonable, squirrel, time-place set, truistic. • You cannot challenge a definition simply because you have a more reasonable or better definition. Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 11. CHALLENGE OF DEFINITION • Challenge must come from the leader of the opposition, not later. • Leader of the opposition must provide an alternative definition. • In most of the cases, the teams must introduce an 'even if’ argument. • An `Even if' argument is not possible in some cases. (e.g. truistic definition & definition running counter to the resolution i.e. where govt. has taken the opposition’s case). • In a definition debate, all the speakers except the PM argue the following: • Why challenge? • Validity/ invalidity of the two definitions. • Even if we are to accept the other side's definition, these are the weaknesses of their case. • Positive case under their own definition. Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 12. GETTING THE RIGHT ARGUMENTS • First, identify what you have to prove under the topic. • Then, identify what helps you to prove it. Put them in the format of an argument or a set of arguments. • Not everything that you know on the subject is relevant. • Anticipate the questions that may be raised against your arguments and see if you have good answers to them. • Block the opportunity for those questions to be raised by addressing them briefly as you explain the argument. • Present the arguments in order of their strength. • Avoid empty rhetoric and emotionalism - be rational. Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 13. ESTABLISHING AN ARGUMENT Basic statement Logical explanations of why and how the basic statement stands Proofs/ evidences/ examples that factually establish your basic statement Conclusion/ how it proves your team’s theme Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 14. EFFECTIVE REBUTTALS A t t a c k s R e b u t t a l s ( R e b u t t h e A r g u m e n t s ) D e f e n c e ( R e b u t t h e R e b u t t a l s ) • Do not rebut the example, attack the very premise of the argument of the other side. Only then contrary examples can be supplemented. • It is advisable to provide multiple rebuttals to each argument of the other side. • Rebuttals should also be in conformity with your case. • Rebut the rebuttals of your case by the other side in order to defend your case. Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 15. ELEMENTS OF MANNER/STYLE • Respectable attitude towards the judges and the other team. • Vocal style: volume, clarity, pace, intonation etc. • Use of notes: not to read a written text. • Eye contact. • Body language: hand gestures, pacing, standing etc. • Impression of sincerity. • Humour, wit, appropriate and healthy sarcasm. Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 16. ELEMENTS OF METHOD - TTeeaamm ssttrruuccttuurree - Continuity of team’s theme in all the speeches. - Consistency among all the speakers (no contradictions) - Reinforcement of team members' arguments - Clear & logical separation between arguments. - IInnddiivviidduuaall SSttrruuccttuurree - Attractive opening/ outline of the speech. - Proper organisation & priority of the arguments. - Organisation of rebuttals. - Appropriate timing of the speech - Summary of the speech. - RReessppoonnsseess ttoo tthhee ddyynnaammiiccss ooff tthhee ddeebbaattee - Right thing at the right time. - Ability to follow the progression of and changes in the Spedeechb a&te I,n taenrpde rtsoo nreal- aCcotm amccuonircdaitniognly E. nhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 17. MODEL INDIVIDUAL SPEECH Definitions/ theme of the team Rebuttals (attacks and defence) Reiteration and defence of your own team’s case Presentation of your own arguments Conclusion (why your team’s case stands and other team’s case does not) Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 18. TEAMS’ ROLES: ASIAN/ AUSTRALS PPRROOPPOOSSIITTIIOONN// GGOOVVEERRNNMMEENNTT:: TToo ssuuppppoorrtt tthhee mmoottiioonn wwhhiicchh iinnvvoollvveess:: – Defining the motion, – Constructing a positive case in favour of the motion, – Providing substantive materials and arguments in support of the case, – Responding to any challenges made to that case by the Opposition. OOPPPPOOSSIITTIIOONN:: TToo nneeggaattee tthhee mmoottiioonn wwhhiicchh iinnvvoollvveess:: Responding to the Government's definition, Constructing a case in opposition to the motion, Providing substantive material and arguments in support of the (opposition) case, Responding to the arguments delivered by the Government. Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 19. TEAM ROLES: BRITISH PARLIAMENTARY - Defines - Builds a positive case to support the motion - Responds to the Opp.’s case. OPENING OPP. - Responds to the government’s case - Builds a case to oppose the motion - Supports the Opening Gov.’s case, - Adds new dimensions, arguments to further substantiate the government’s case. - Responds to the Opp.’s case - Supports the Opening Opp.’s case - Adds new dimension, arguments in Opp.’s case - Responds to government’s case OPENING GOV. CLOSING GOV. CLOSING OPP. Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 20. SPEAKERS' ROLES: ASIAN/ AUSTRALS • 1st SSppeeaakkeerr //PPrriimmee MMiinniisstteerr PPRROOPPOOSSIITTIIOONN// GGOOVVEERRNNMMEENNTT:: – Defines the topic. – Gives the case structure and theme. – Presents own arguments. – Provides a summary of his speech. (What I've given u so far..). • 22nndd SSppeeaakkeerr – Rebuts. – Reiterates and defends his first speaker’s arguments. – Presents own argument. – Provides a summary of his speech. • 33rrdd SSppeeaakkeerr – Rebuts substantially. – Reiterates and defends his own team's case. – Provides a summary of his speech. • RReeppllyy SSppeeaakkeerr – PPrreesseennttss aa ccoommppaarraattiivvee oovveerrvviieeww ooff tthhee ccllaasshh ppooiinnttss iinn tthhee ddeebbaattee pprroovviinngg wwhhyy hhiiss tteeaamm’’ss ccaassee ssttaannddss Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 21. SPEAKERS' ROLES: ASIAN/ AUSTRALS OOPPPPOOSSIITTIIOONN:: • 1st Speaker //OOppppoossiittiioonn LLeeaaddeerr – RReessppoonnddss ttoo tthhee ddeeffiinniittiioonn ((ii..ee.. AAcccceeppttss,, RReejjeeccttss oorr CCllaarriiffiieess)).. – RReebbuuttss tthhee PPrriimmee MMiinniisstteerr’’ss aarrgguummeennttss.. – GGiivveess tthhee ccaassee ssttrruuccttuurree aanndd tthheemmee ooff hhiiss tteeaamm.. – PPrreesseennttss oowwnn aarrgguummeennttss.. – PPrroovviiddeess aa ssuummmmaarryy ooff hhiiss ssppeeeecchh.. • 22nndd SSppeeaakkeerr – SSaammee aass tthhee pprrooppoossiittiioonn 22nndd ssppeeaakkeerr • 33rrdd SSppeeaakkeerr – SSaammee aass tthhee pprrooppoossiittiioonn 33rrdd ssppeeaakkeerr • RReeppllyy SSppeeaakkeerr – SSaammee aass tthhee pprrooppoossiittiioonn rreeppllyy ssppeeaakkeerr Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM
  • 22. POINTS OF INFORMATION (POIs) • A POI can be in a question oorr ssttaatteemmeenntt ffoorrmm aanndd sshhoouulldd nnoott ttaakkee mmoorree tthhaann 1155 sseeccoonnddss.. • EEaacchh ssppeeaakkeerr sshhoouulldd aacccceepptt aatt lleeaasstt ttwwoo PPOOIIss.. • AAllll tthhrreeee mmeemmbbeerrss ooff tthhee tteeaamm sshhoouulldd ttrryy ttoo ggiivvee PPOOIIss,, bbuutt tthheeyy mmuusstt nnoott bbee ddiissrruuppttiivvee.. • PPOOIIss aarree jjuuddggeedd oonn tthhee bbaassiiss ooff:: - tthhee tthhrreeaatt tthheeyy ppoossee ttoo tthhee ssttrreennggtthh ooff tthhee aarrgguummeenntt ooff tthhee ddeebbaatteerr.. - vvaalluuee ooff iittss wwiitt aanndd hhuummoouurr.. • RReessppoonnsseess ttoo tthhee PPOOIIss aarree jjuuddggeedd oonn tthhee bbaassiiss ooff:: – pprroommppttnneessss aanndd ccoonnffiiddeennccee iinn aannsswweerriinngg.. – ssttrreennggtthh ooff tthhee rreessppoonnssee.. – vvaalluuee ooff wwiitt aanndd hhuummoouurr iinn tthhee rreessppoonnssee.. Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM