What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
China evaluation
1. IFAD in PR China Country Program Review1997-2010 Thomas Rath, Country Program Manager IFAD-international Fund for Agricultural Development Rome 15 July 2011
4. China’s pathway to growth and wealth – Are all on board ? Population: 1.3 billion (55% rural residents) Extraordinary economic growths since 1975: per capita income grew at 8.3 % (1981 –2005) China became world’s 2nd largest trading nation GNI per capita: USD 3,650 (in 2009) HDI: 0.541 (1980) to 0.772 (2007; rank 92) Poverty fell from 652 mill. to 135 mill. (1981-2004)Poverty fell from 65 % to 10 % of the population Inequality has increased: urban – rural ; east – west
5. China Pic of Beijing Pic of an IFAD village or Farm
6. - IFAD in China – 30 Years of rural development history
11. Effectiveness Physical & financial delivery consistently high Targets have been met or exceeded Strong leadership of prov. PMOs Example: Outreach to women training on adult literacy School drop outs for girls Technical skills training Improved access to water and energy => more time for training & IGA Long-term impact on women’s status Figure: Proportion of Women in Agricultural Training Activities Source: Cumulative Data, Project Monitoring and evaluation systems.
13. Rural Poverty Impact Domains: 1. Household income and assets 2. Food security and Agric. Productivity 3. Human & social capital & empowerment 4. Natural resources & environment 5. Institutions & policies
14. Household Income & assets Poverty reduced from 84% (1995) to 7 % (2001) in Jiangxi Increase in income by 36.8 % in SW Anhui Investments in rural infrastructure (e.g. feeder roads, irrigation,drinking water, biogas) Rural Finance: resources in the hands of the poor farmers & women
15. Food security Grain availability: 256 to 500 kg per capita(Hubei - Qingling Mountains ) Food security: 95% in Guangxi (food sufficiency for > 12 months) Challenges: Some malnutrition among children in marginal areas (20 – 30 %)
16. Agricultural productivity Partnerships with local AgBureaus + New products (niche products, fruits), technologies (extension, terracing, irrigation) = Impact Example: W-Guangxi PAP 95% of HH increased crop production 78 % HH increased livestock production 55 % HH increased fruit tree production Gansu, Inner Mongolia & Ningxia: Cropping index increased by 200-300% to greenhouses Challenges: Variable market demand O&M in less organised villages
17. Human/Social Capital and Empowerment Empowered communities: VIG & VDP (Village Development Plan) Representation of farmers and women Dialogue with township governors Women empowerment: Literacy & health awareness Women sign their credit contracts Women specific training Women taking on their IGAs Ethnic minorities Poverty is frequent in ethnic minority areas Projects adapted measures to the needs of people (e.g. training in ethnic language)
18. Innovations, replications & scaling up GoC (2006) : “Innovation through introduction of useful new international experience is the most valuable role of IFAD in China” Participation of men & women Project Management : modular approach Extension: on-farm demonstration with poor farmers; Technical envoy - TE Agriculture: intercropping Rural energy: Biogas Market access: farmer cooperative Rural Finance: new lending products, Weather index insurance
19. Innovations in Agriculture Continuous work on introduction of new products, technologies and approaches 2 Examples: intercropping of cowpea and potatoes: - Increased land use efficiency - Soil fertility Technical envoy: extension service model based on demand
20.
21.
22. COSOP 1999 Centered on an integrated multi-sector approach for rural development VAM helped targeting the main poverty pockets (12 provinces) Partnership with WFP (5 loans) was effective: FFW & FFT Key decision: Microfinance was introduced through formal rural banks (RCC) to support agriculture & women IGA Working through dedicated VIG – for participation, targeting and gender
23. COSOP 2005 2 thrusts: Access and innovations Strong relevance Innovations: Modular approach, TE and organic farming Strong: reinforcement of gender focus Modest : organics, market access, NRM Modest achievements in institutional building and policy reform Innovation thrust has not gained much traction Systematic approach to KM to capture innovations was missing
24. Reducing poverty in China - summary Strong government commitment & resources & policies Targeting Participation of the poor – VIG Women at the centre Focus on diversified agriculture Combination of sectors (ag-rf-social-infrastructure) Innovation & KM
25. The way forward COSOP 2011 IFAD’s comparative advantage in China (MIC) Targeting approach Identifying and disseminating innovation is key Improve the “E” in M&E KM & South-South cooperation Coherent partnerships (government, NGO and private sector) Increase role of country presence
Why a country program review – what is the difference to a CPE?All consultant and especially the teamleader was new to APR and even IFAD. Only one consultant (Zheng Bo) had worked with APR before, and this was for 2 supervision and the design of a Gef grant
High praise for introducing participation, training and human capital among the poor, esp. women..
Participation was an innovative concept at county levels in the early days of IFAD in ChinaProject Management : modular approachExtension: farm demonstration with the poor farmers; Technical envoy - TEAgricultural technology: intercroppingMarket access: farmer cooperativeRural Finance: new lending products,Weather index insuranceReplication:Rural Finance: no KM platform => replication was limited.Need more analytical to capture and scale up innovationsExchange visits among projects met with high successTechnical innovations were replicated through extension network, Biogas spread to projects in North ChinaConclusions: Lack of a mechanism to scout, promote and scale up of innovations
needs assessment & identification of right expertTri partite agreement – Ag bureau farmer and TEStart up fund to TE to allow the introductionRisk fund to offset any lossesJoint evaluation – determines the incentive to the TE
Chinese sub-site of ENRAP with MOF & FCPMC support
Redefine IFAD’s niche in ChinaWeakness: strong LF with concrete indicators, but no quantifications; which could have helped to set targetsNo identification of partners/institutionsInnovations, yes quite a few, but no mechanism to capture and disseminate them for introducing them elsewhereVerdict: relevant but weak on the innovation mechanism = moderately satisfactory
Environment and risk mitigation (e.g. weather, environmental assessments)