Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.

Information Behavior: Theories, Models & Studies (20091208)

6.488 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

Presentation @ Information Studies Trends classroom seminar - GLIS NTNU, 2009-12-08,

Veröffentlicht in: Bildung
  • Loggen Sie sich ein, um Kommentare anzuzeigen.

Information Behavior: Theories, Models & Studies (20091208)

  1. 1. Information I f i behavior research Studies, Models & Theories 陳啟亮 國立台灣師範大學 圖書資訊學研究所 Charles Chen (XXC) xxc.chen@gmail.com 2009/12/8 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode
  2. 2. Theorizing hierarchy Theori ing hierarch Dervin, 1997 Bates, 2005 Case, 2007 Ontology gy Perspectives Axiology Perspective & & Meta-theory Paradigm Pa methodology Epistemology aradigm Methodology Grand theory Theory Theory Middle theory Theory Grounded theory Model Model Studies Observations • Bates, M. J. (2005). An introduction to metatheories, theories, and models. In Theories of Information Behavior. Medford, NJ: Information Today. • Case, D O (2007) L ki f i f C D. O. (2007). Looking for information: A survey of research on i f ti f h information seeking, needs, and b h i E ti ki d d behavior: Emerald G ld Group P b Ltd Pub Ltd. • Dervin, B. (1997). Given a context by any other name: Methodological tools for taming the unruly beast. Information seeking in context, 13-38.
  3. 3. Ontology O t l the nature of reality 本體論 存在論 Axiology A i l the nature of value 價值論 Meta-theory (fra 後設理論 amewor appr Epistemology E i t l Paradig 研究範 how we know 認識論 rk, gm Methodology how we find out 方法論 範式 roach) Scientific th S i tifi theory 科學理論 Theory Principle 原則 理論 Proposition / hypothesis 命題/假說 Model 模型 Studies / Observations 研究/觀察
  4. 4. "不計科學名, 寧務研究實” "We Don't Have to Be a Science But We Have to Do Research” --賴鼎銘(1991) •Case (2006). Information Behavior. •Case (2007) Looking for information: A survey of research on (2007). information seeking, needs, and behavior •Pettigrew, K. E., Fidel, R., &Bruce, H. (2001). •Pettigrew K E Fidel R &Bruce H (2001) Conceptual frameworks in information behavior 研究 STUDIES
  5. 5. ARIST IB Review 的歷史 Re ie • 1966-1978 – 1966 (Menzel), 1967 (Herner & Herner), 1968 (Paisley), 1969 (Allen), 1970 (Lipetz), 1971 (Crane), 1972 (Lin & Garvey) (Crane) Garvey), – 1974 (Martyn), 1978 (Crawford) • 1986, 1986 1990 – 1986 (Dervin & Nilan), 1990 (Hewins) • 2001, 2002 – 2001 (Pettigrew, Fidel, and Bruce): IB conceptual models – 2001 (King & Tenopir): scholarly literature – 2001 (Wang): methods – 2001 (Cool): situation – 2002 (Solomon): context – 2002 (Case) Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior
  6. 6. Conceptual f C t l framework of studies k f t di Pettigrew, et al. (2001) Case (2002, 2006, 2007) • 認知取向 • by Occupation: occupations are the most common entry point Cognitive approaches – Scientists, Engineers, and Scholars • 社會取向 – Managers – Journalists, L J li t Lawyers, Oth Others * Social approaches • by Role • 多元取向 – – Citizen Consumer Multifaceted approaches – Patient – Student – Others: Hobbyists • By Demographic or Social Group – Age – Racial – Socioeconomic – Gender – Others • Case, D O (2006) Information Behavior. in Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 40 C D. O. (2006). I f ti B h i i A lR i fI f ti S i dT h l (ARIST) • Case, D. O. (2007). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior: Emerald Group Pub Ltd. • Pettigrew, K. E., Fidel, R., &Bruce, H. (2001). Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. in Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 35, 43-78.
  7. 7. Cognitive Cogniti e approaches • History – 1968: Taylor (1968) 的模型是關於「使用者不完整的世界圖像」, 即對資訊的需求、意義與價值乃立基於個人的認知觀點。 即對資訊的需求 意義與價值乃立基於個人的認知觀點。 – 1986: Dervin & Nilan (1986) 鼓吹並揚棄系統取向 • 何謂認知 – Belkin: 人類(或資訊處理機制)在接受/感知或生產時,如何運作(或 互動)知識、信念、等等 • Scope (Pettigrew, et.al., 2001) (Pettigrew et al – 關於個人如何應用他自我世界的觀點或模型,處理資訊的需求、 搜尋、給出、與使用的研究 – Include: 此觀點關注於認知與情感的資訊行為動機, – Exclude: • 與情境無關的。即,此觀點不討論資訊行為的情境 與情境無關的 即 此觀點不討論資訊行為的情境 • 與社會認知(social cognitive)研究不同
  8. 8. Ellis’s (1989) information seeking model
  9. 9. Social approaches • History –從從1990年代初期慢慢興起,並變得越來越重要 年代初期慢慢興起 並變得越來越重要 – Chatman (80s ) 開始研究貧窮勞工階級的資訊 (80s-) 行為 • 何謂社會取向 – 資訊的意義與價值,與其社會脈絡相關 資訊的意義與價值 與其社會脈絡相關 – 偏向以自然探究, 人類學或社會學的方法進行 研究
  10. 10. Chatman's 資訊貧困 Chatman s Information poverty • 資訊尋求程序中的自我保護行為 Key concepts: self-protective behaviors invoked during the information seeking p y p p g g process – 守密(隱蔽自我) secrecy – 欺瞞(自我扮演) deception – 風險評估 risk taking risk-taking – 情境相關性 situational relevance
  11. 11. 6 項命題 propositions propositions: – 缺乏資訊覺察使他們遠離能幫助他們的資訊 The information poor perceive themselves to be devoid of the sources that might help them – 資訊貧困與社會階級有關 Information poverty is partially associated with class distinction – 對社會規範的自我保護行為導致資訊貧困 Information poverty is determined by self-protective behaviors, which are used in response to social norms. – 守密與欺瞞是因對他人的不信任感,而有的自我保護機制 Both secrecy and deception are self protecting mechanisms due to a sense of mistrust regarding the interest or ability self-protecting of others to provide useful information. – 因為權衡利害,通常不會冒險揭露自我感覺 A decision to risk exposure about our true feeling is often not taken due to a perception that negative consequences outweigh benefits – 貧困者選擇性地接受新知識,此選擇取決於新資訊與日常生 活的相關性 New knowledge will be selectively introduced into the information world of poor people. A condition that influences this process is the relevance of that information in response to everyday problems and concerns.
  12. 12. Multifaceted M ltifaceted approaches • 由於了解到人類資訊行為的複雜性,越來 越多研究者認為需要以多元觀點進行研究, 而非只考慮認知的與社會的一種觀點 – Rosenbaum ** – Johnson * – Bystrom & Jarvelm * –SSonnenwald ** ld – Leckie et al. * – Cognitive Work Analysis, CWA **
  13. 13. "這類模型很少能發展到與特定理論命題建立關聯:只能說是處在一個前 理論的階段,而所描繪的關係或者能有助於往後的探索或檢驗” "rarely do such models advance to the stage of specifying relationships among theoretical propositions: rather they are at a pre-theoretical stage, but may suggest relationships that might be fruitful to explore or test. -- Wilson (1999: 250) ( ) Case, D. (2007). Looking for information. 模型 MODELS
  14. 14. 3 Criterions 1. 該模型能就相關變數描繪並闡明行為序列, 而非僅僅指出事件的順序 The model attempts to depict and explain a sequence of behavior by referring to relevant variables, rather than merely indicates a sequence of events. 2. 該模型需涵蓋資訊需求與來源 The model indicates something about information needs and sources. (Ellis & Kuhlthau) 3. 為通用的行為模型,而非特定職業或身份 General models
  15. 15. 7 models • Wilson, 1981 • Krikelas, 1983 K ik l • Leckie et al., 1996 , • Bystrom & Jarvelin, 1995 • Savolainen, 1995 • Johnson, 1997 • Wilson 1996 Wilson,
  16. 16. Wilson, 1981
  17. 17. Krikelas, 1983
  18. 18. Leckie et al., 1996
  19. 19. Bystrom & Jarvelin, 1995
  20. 20. Savolainen, 1995
  21. 21. Johnson, 1997
  22. 22. Wilson, 1996
  23. 23. 理論 THEORY
  24. 24. Theory Theor • Theories are explanations (Case, 2007) • Theories are statements that try to explain relationships among various phenomena (Baker, 1999; Mullins & Mullins 1973) • A well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world (WordNet) • A theory, in the general sense of the word, is an analytic structure designed to explain a set of observations (wikipedia)
  25. 25. • 最小努力原則(語言學) Zipf s Zipf's Principle of lease effort • 使用與滿足(大眾傳播) Uses & gratification • 意義建構 Sense-making • 建構主義 (語言、心理、社會) Constructionism • 遊戲與娛樂理論(大眾傳播, 心理學) ( , ) Stephenson's Play theory & Entertainment theory
  26. 26. Other theories
  27. 27. Cont’d
  28. 28. Taylor's Ta lor's IUE (1991) • 以使用者為中心,處理其社會脈絡中的資訊 It focuses on the study of information in its social contexts and explicitly places th user at th center of f th t d f i f ti i it i l t t d li itl l the t the t f its conceptual framework • IUE 的四元素 People 人口統計,已決定的社會特性:經濟上的社會定位、 人 產業社會學的政治與文化結構 Problems 由結構對使用者的認知 資訊需求所起的決定性作用 P bl 由結構對使用者的認知、資訊需求所起的決定性作用 問題 Resolution 對問題類型列出可行性解決方案的前提 方案前提 Settings 環境的物質與場所的社會脈絡 場所特徵
  29. 29. Rosenbaum Rosenba m (1996) • 系統導向的資訊行為研究過於受限於既有系統框架 • 但使用者導向的資訊行為研究又過於流於個人主義,缺乏對社 但使用者導向的資訊行為研究又過於流於個人主義 缺乏對社 會結構面向的解釋力 • 以Taylor的IUE為基礎,並參考Giddens的結構化理論,以建立 以Taylor的IUE為基礎 並參考Giddens的結構化理論 以建立 一整合的資訊行為研究的理論性框架 Taylor IUE Rosembaum IUE Giddens people l role l actor t problem problematic situation (structure of problem) setting resource structure resolution resolution (tool, 便利工具)
  30. 30. Sonnen ald 資訊視域 (1999) Sonnenwald: • 要素:人類的資訊行為由個人(individuals)、社會網路(social network)、情境 (situation)與脈絡(context)所形成,但也影響這些因素。 • 資訊行為:處於一特定情境與脈絡的個體或系統,能感知(perceive)、反映( 資訊行為 處於 特定情境與脈絡的個體或系統 能感知 映 reflect)、或評估(evaluate)週遭的變化。資訊行為是在反映與評估間建 構而起的;特別是關於反映或評估知識的缺乏。並由 對知識缺乏的感 ; 知作為起點,開始一資訊(搜尋)行為的序列。 • 資訊視域:當個人決定要進行搜尋行為時,他會在他的資訊視域(information horizon)中尋找資訊。 • 協同合作:人類資訊搜尋行為,理論上,可以視為一種個體與其資訊資源間 的協同合作。 • 解決方案效益:因為資訊視域是由各種資訊資源所組成,各自擁有部分的知 識,因此可以將資訊視域概念化為密集空間(densely populated spaces) 在密集解決方案空間中 假定有許多解決方案 而資訊搜尋 spaces)。在密集解決方案空間中,假定有許多解決方案,而資訊搜尋 問題由決定其中最有效率的路徑展開。
  31. 31. Cognitive Work Analysis (1990) C iti W k A l i

×