1. Standards Emanating From TJC Discussion
Standards Emanating From TJC DiscussionStandards Emanating From TJC DiscussionIn the
article “Managing to Improve Quality: The Relationship Between Accreditation Standards,
Safety Practices, and Patient Outcomes,” the authors discuss the growing trend by medical
insurance companies to eliminate reimbursement for Never Events. As these types of
mistakes should be easily preventable, hospitals have developed protocols to lessen or
extinguish the occurrence of these events. In addition, The Joint Commission (TJC) and the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) have developed core measures to guide
health care providers’ efforts in improving patient safety and the quality of care
delivered.Health care organizations have developed strategic agendas to help meet these
standards and reduce the incidence of Never Events. Nurses significantly influence the
overall quality of health care provided and play a pivotal role in improving patient
outcomes.For this Discussion, you will consider the standards that are in place for nurses
and how they can be used to improve quality of care.To prepare for this Discussion:Review
the information at the Joint Commission and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
websites on the core measures and standards presented in this week’s Resources.Consider
the nurse’s role in ing the organization’s strategic agenda as it relates to improving clinical
outcomes.Conduct an Internet search for either a Never Event or a core measure, and select
one to address in your post.By Day 3Respond to the following:How has the emphasis on
quality of care, patient safety, and clinical care outcomes been impacted by specific
standards emanating from TJC and/or CMS? Cite your selected core measure or Never Event
in your response.What is the impact of the nurse’s role in clinical outcomes for the
organization?Discuss nurse-specific challenges in influencing change in quality
improvement.How does this influence the ability of the organization to achieve its strategic
agenda? your response with references from the professional nursing literature.Note
Initial Post: A 3-paragraph (at least 350 words) response. Be sure to use evidence from the
readings and include in-text citations. Utilize essay-level writing practice and skills,
including the use of transitional material and organizational frames. Avoid quotes;
paraphrase to incorporate evidence into your own writing. A reference list is required. Use
the most current evidence (usually ? 5 years old).By Day 7Read two or more of your
colleagues’ postings from the Discussion question ( with evidence if indicated).ORDER
NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERSYou must proofread your paper. But
do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so
indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly.
2. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read
over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as
necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious
errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.Use a standard 10
to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers
with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over
the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.Likewise,
large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space
between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at
“padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not
fool your professor.The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch
margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to
use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be
hard to follow your argument.