Patrick Costello Green Guide Presentation Final 032112
1. Data Centers and
Sustainable Energy
An Introduction to
Developing a Balanced
Portfolio of Solutions
March 22, 2012
Patrick Costello
2. What Does It Mean To Be Green?
Today’s focus: reducing the footprint of energy consumption
– Establish an emissions baseline
– Set a reduction target
– Invest in energy efficiency, clean energy + carbon offsets
Potential benefits of sustainable energy investments:
– Environmental Impact Reduction + PR Perks
– Electricity cost hedge
Key considerations:
– Cost
– Practicality
– Strategic value
2
4. Grid Power – Where Are Emissions The
Highest?
eGrid Subregion Annual CO2 Output Emission Rates (lb/MWh)
4
5. Tools Available to Reduce Energy Consumption
Related Emissions
Options: more efficient onsite
generation, RECs, offsets
RECs ≠ Offsets
Renewable energy certificates (RECs)
– Green attributes of 1 MWh of
generation
– Scope 2 reduction
Carbon offsets
– 1 MtCO2e reduction
– Scope 1,2,3 reduction
5
6. Onsite Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Systems
Flexible, increasingly
affordable
– Attractive savings in
some areas
– Several ownership
options
100%
REC swapping reduces 80%
Average Hourly Capacity Factor
Capacity Factor
Average Monthly Capacity Factor
costs 60%
Net metering useful but 40%
20%
not always needed 0%
High PR value Hour of Day
6
7. Onsite Fuel Cell Systems
High
efficiency, scalable
Potential electricity
cost savings; varies by
location
Illustrative Comparison of Power Generation and Electric
Operational Cost Risks CO2 Emissions Rate Grid CO2 Emission Rates
– Fuel price volatility 2,500
(lb CO2/MWh)
2,000
– GHG programs 1,500
1,000
Consistent output 500
pairs well with flat -
load Fuel Cell Cogeneration Generation
Fuel Cell Natural Gas-fired Generation Average Grid Emission Factor
Coal-fired Generation
U.S.
7
8. Offsite, Utility-Scale Renewable Energy Projects
Power Purchase Agreement (PPA); long-term contract
Large supply of bundled or unbundled RECs
Electricity not delivered
Potential hedge against rate increases; could require Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) approval
8
9. Voluntary RECs
NERC Regions
Inexpensive
Scalable
Count against Scope 2 emissions
Limited transparency, impact of
investment unknown
Potential PR challenges
“Any RECs you buy absolutely help get more generation built. How much? It’s very hard
to determine.”
– Marty Sedler, Intel’s Director of Global Utilities and Infrastructure
“There is a lot of scrutiny about RECs and whether they’re helping to launch
projects…It might not be something we’d want to be associated with.”
– Sarah Severn, Nike’s Director of Corporate Sustainability
9
10. Carbon Offsets
Inexpensive Carbon Offset Transaction Volume by Project Type
Scalable
Count against Scope
1,2, or 3 emissions
Often more transparency
than RECs
– More stringent
certification
requirements
Potential PR challenges
Source: Ecosystem Marketplace and Bloomberg New Energy Finance 2010
10
12. Data Center Energy Efficiency, Renewable Energy, and Carbon
Offset Investment Best Practices:
A Guide to Greening Your Organization’s Energy Consumption
by Patrick Costello and Roshni Rathi, 2012
www.realenergywriters.com
pcostello.energy@gmail.com | twitter: @pj_costello
12
Hinweis der Redaktion
Hi everyone,The internet and advanced computing has transformed nearly every aspect of our lives. Our demand for greater connectivity and data processing is growing by the second, requiring unprecedented data center expansion.At the same time as our data center needs have grown, environmental sustainability has come to the forefront of public concern. However, fossil fuel electricity generation is the largest source of emissions in the U.S., and it disproportionately powers the data centers that feed the many manifestations of our insatiable information appetite such as the tens of billions of email communications we send every day to the 60 hours of new video content bombarding YouTube every minute. Electricity used at U.S. data centers accounts for roughly 2% of total U.S. electricity consumption and total consumption is expected to more than double by 2020. CO2, nitrogen, sulfur, mercury and other emissions of generators powering our data centers have an enormous environmental impact. Organizations are facing growing pressure to reduce the impact of their energy consumption while they’re also expected to minimize energy costs. These goals might seem to contradict one another, but they can be jointly addressed through a balanced blend of green investments which I’ll cover today.RR: I think you should focus less on the huge environmental impact of data centers, which I suspect will be covered in other presentations as well. I’d focus a little more on:Environmental sustainability and corporate stewardship have come to forefront of public concern.Energy efficiency is key to reducing costs while reducing impact, but it won’t take you all the way in terms of mitigating impact and it may be viewed as something all companies should do anyway (as Facebook saw).There are other options to greening energy consumption, such as renewable energy and carbon offsets, and a balanced blend of green investments is crucial to mitigating impact while addressing cost.It’s a confusing landscape, figuring out how to green energy consumption at data centers. I’m going to help you make sense of it. Where are you going to tell people that your focus is renewables, you co-author is the offsets person. So you’re going to take them through offsets but detailed questions that they may have will have to be “forwarded to the co-author”?