This document discusses key areas to consider in identifying and reducing fraud, waste, and control losses at foreign locations: professionalism, audit, process, and policy. It provides a 10-point assessment scale for each area and an embedded calculator to estimate potential loss rates ranging from 5-30% based on the scores. Several examples are given showing how different combinations and focuses on the areas can affect loss percentages. The conclusions emphasize that the biggest levers for reducing risk are professionalism through developing staff and implementing standard company processes across locations.
2. 4 Key Areas For Consideration
• Professionalism
• Audit
• Process
• Policy
Combined performance on these can result is range of loss from
a practical range of loss fro 5% to 30%.
Excludes absolute extremes which if really existed would not be sustainable
3. Modeland DiscussionDO NOT Consider
CompliancewithSarbanes Oxley or FCPA
• This model does NOT consider Legal Compliance requirements
or risk
• This only looks at loss as a % of the Foreign Locations
Spending
• For some companies the benefits of operating in a low cost
country may so far outweigh concern higher absolute costs
that they may chose not to be concerned about “tolerable
level of loss”
• Calculator based on proprietary data/experience. Not meant
to be exact rather general guidance on potetial loss.
4. Assessment
Category 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Professionalism Family Members
No Training or
background
Some OJT
Mix Experienced and
others
Local Professional
Accredidation Training
Some with Broader
training
Some Integration with
Corporate Functional
Group
Frequnet Professional
integration of
Professional Functions
Rotation of positions
between Divisions
Degreed Experienced
Professionals Global
Experience
Audit No Audit
review by Site
Management GM, HR
Some review By
LocalFinance
Annual Local Audit
Annual Local with
Outside review
Occassional Corp
Audit
Regularlar corp review
of many functional
areas
Site Integrated into
Corporate
Always one site
Fnctional Leader from
other site
Integrated into
Process
Process No
Irregularily Set and
reviewed Locally no
documentation
Informal
Undocumented
Minimal
Documentation
Manual Local Complex
Documented
Manual more
streamlined Including
step with corp
Some automation with
local transparency
Reporting on process
itself
Local connected with
corpoarte
Single Corporate with
ww transparency
Policy No Policy Unwritten
written but no control
and set by Local
GMlocal
Local writen control
and review by 2 Local
Execs
Local witten control
and audit repoting to
Corp
Complex Local control
different from Corp
ocasional Corpo site
review
Site and Corp Link wit
regular reviews by
corporate
Corporate and Local
Linked and
strightforward Site
Person with Corporate
reporting
Equal Level GM and
Policy with separate
reporting
Single Corporate
Platform and policy
with transparency of
policy and update
5. Calculator
Calculator will be imbedded in e-copy of presentation
Category Score
Process
5
Audit
5
Policy
5
Professional Staff
5
Potential Loss 12.1%
6. Examples–ExcludingExtremes
Category Score
Process
5
Audit
5
Policy
5
Professional Staff
5
Potential Loss 12.1%
Category Score
Process
3
Audit
8
Policy
3
Professional Staff
3
Potential Loss 18.3%
Audit Driven Balanced
Category Score
Process
8
Audit
5
Policy
5
Professional Staff
8
Potential Loss 8.5%
Staff & Process
Category Score
Process
4
Audit
8
Policy
8
Professional Staff
4
Potential Loss 11.6%
Audit & Policy Focus
Category Score
Process
4
Audit
6
Policy
5
Professional Staff
4
Potential Loss 13.9%
Generally well run Corporations
in first 10 years
Category Score
Process
8
Audit
8
Policy
8
Professional Staff
8
Potential Loss 7.6%
Realistic Optimum
7. Conclusions
• Biggest Levers to Reduce Risk of Loss are Professionalism and
Process
• Both areas develop and tend to improve overtime and are
hard to put in place on Day 1
• Investing in and developing people helps
• Regular interaction with variety of Corporate functions helps
• Bringing in Standard Company Processes will reduces loss
• Expense
• Accounting
• Hiring
• Purchasing
8. Conclusions
• Traditional Audit and Policy Driven Approaches provide some
containment but still result in ongoing loss level
• Further investment in Audit and Policy has less return than
other areas