Warren Hatter's slides from a workshop at the SOLACE Conference 2010. The main message is that UK local government needs to build its capacity to use known behavioural effects and behaviour change techniques. The context is carbon reduction, but the implications are broader. Slides revised to include speaker notes as callouts, for maximum effect!
1. Can Councils lead Behaviour Change?
Warren Hatter
Local Improvement Advisor
Climate & Behaviour Change Advisor
to West Sussex County Council
warren@rippleprd.co.uk
07971 413164
2. Can Councils lead Behaviour Change?
Well, can they? And
should they?!
Warren Hatter
Local Improvement Advisor
Climate & Behaviour Change Advisor
to West Sussex County Council
warren@rippleprd.co.uk
07971 413164
4. Signs that behaviour change is
being taken seriously
… from a broadsheet reader’s
perspective at least
5. Why does this work?
• We are nowhere near as rational
in our decision-making as we
like to think we are
• Though we are predictably
irrational (which is helpful)
• Our behaviour is highly context-
dependent
• (though there’s lots we don’t
understand) we know it’s linked
to our evolutionary success as a
‘Super Social Ape’
6. Why does this work?
• We are nowhere near as rational
in our decision-making as we
It’s deep, and we
like to thinkshouldn’t deny it!
we are
• Though we are predictably
irrational (which is helpful)
• Our behaviour is highly context-
dependent
• (though there’s lots we don’t
understand) we know it’s linked
to our evolutionary success as a
‘Super Social Ape’
7. One example among many
Two groups given information about their neighbourhood
energy use
Group A example (almost) citedGroup B
The by
David Cameron in his TED talk.
Straight info about energy use Straight info and smiley/sad face
Source: Hunting Dynasty
8. One example among many
Two groups given information about their neighbourhood
energy use
Group A Group B
High users reduced consumption High users reduced consumption
Low users increased consumption Low users consistent consumption
40% more energy saved
Source: Hunting Dynasty
9. One example among many
Two groups given information about their neighbourhood
energy use
Group A Group B
Key point: something as simple
as a smiley has a major impact,
which shows that using
behaviour effects can be low/no
cost, but can need lots of
High users reduced consumption High users reduced consumption
expertise.
Low users increased consumption Low users consistent consumption
40% more energy saved
Source: Hunting Dynasty
11. Overview of effects
This is one of many ways of
categorising behavioural
effects. The different models
have much in common and
hardly contradict each other –
it’s just that there is no definitive
understanding.
Source: Young Foundation
12. Behavioural Economics Cheat
Sheet
• Framing
• Loss aversion
• Social norms
If you want to give a non-expert a VERY
quick way of thinking about whether they
could use behavioural techniques/effects,
here is the ultra-shortlist of the effects most
likely to work!
14. Emissions in a Locality
From
To
…
In the context of reducing emisssions: the
major reductions needed are in the
emissions of citizens and businesses, not
the state. Limited control over this means
that if local authorities are to act as place
shapers and reduce emissions, they
need to be expert in prompting
behaviour change.
15. Typical UK Person: 15 tonnes
Defence,
education and
health and social Other
services 10%
Household fuel
11% Household
13%
Vehicle fuel
10%
Water and you let people and places take
Once
Sewage
responsibility for their emissions by
2%
including embedded emissions, Household
Construction this is how
electricity
6%
Electronic emissions of a typical place or person in
the //
computers
9%
Textiles
and
the UK break down. What does this air
appliances
Personal
mean in
clothes 4%
behavioural terms? travel
2% Food and 8%
Paper and drink (from
printing shops) Cars
Hotels, pubs 5%
1% 12% Other Personal
and catering
4% transport
3%
Source: Mike Berners-Lee
16. Typical UK Person: 15 tonnes
Defence,
education and
health and social Other
services 10%
Household fuel
11% Household
13%
Vehicle fuel
10%
Water and
Sewage
2%
Construction Household
6% electricity
Electronic /
9%
Textiles computers /
appliances
and Personal air
clothes 4%
travel
2% Food and 8%
Paper and drink (from
printing shops) Cars
Hotels, pubs 5%
1% 12% Other Personal
and catering
4% transport
3%
Source: Mike Berners-Lee
17. Asparagus (250g pack): 2kg
Low Average High
125 g 2 kg 3.5 kg
Local In- Air
season freighted
from Peru
There’s lots of knowledge we are
just getting to feel our way
around. One example of many is
the massive difference in
emissions between air-freighted
and seasonal, local food.
Source: Mike Berners-Lee
18. Understanding footprints helps
us understand behaviour
Understanding the real breakdown of
the emissions for which we are
responsible could lead us to a
behavioural checklist – a menu of
things that doing more or less of will
reduce our emissions. This is a very
early draft from WSCC developing
this idea in relation to food …
Source: West Sussex County Council
20. … continued
Issue Changes in behaviour to
address issue
… and in
relation to
transport
Speed plays a dominant role in a
number of transport indicators •People drive at 60 mph on motorways
including fuel consumption and •People drive within speed limits
CO2 emissions
•People keep the windows up when driving
fast
A congested drive can cause
three times the emissions of the •More people work at home
same drive on a clear road •People avoid driving during rush hour
•Parents walk their children to school
•People to holiday in the UK
Flying is 10 times worse than
•Businesses to use video-conferencing for
taking the train
meetings
Source: West Sussex County Council
21. Not just about CO2
sustainability
• Current climate:
o how to withdraw from service delivery?
• Building Big Society:
o how to get people involved who aren’t yet?
• Health, crime, etc
Behaviour change debates rage in
these and other areas – more
developed in some than others, as
is the expertise.
22. Map
of
behaviour
change
interven:ons
“Carrots”
“S:cks”
Showers
Events
WPAs,
Love
Food
Hate
Waste,
‘Clearing
up’
Physical
changes
Removing
abandoned
cars
Legisla:on
etc
Community
champions
graffi:
Co-‐produc:on
School
Safety
Zones
Tree
wardens,
Greening
Campaign
Safer
Routes
To
School
Enforcement
Travel
plans
for
site
developments
Energy
Management
Project,
Energy
M’ment
Plan
ac:ons
bike
purchase
scheme
Fees
and
charges
One-‐to-‐ones
Car
parking
charges
Fines
WPAs,
SBP,
STAs
Financial
incen:ves
Health
checks
Engauge,
3-‐in-‐1
Card
Mileage
budgets
Pool
bikes
Making
it
easier
Consultancy
Service
redesigns
Prosecu:on
U:lity
management
seminars,
Engauge
Greening
Campaign
Business
WPAs
cold-‐calling
Peer
pressure
Naming
(and
shaming)
Safer
Routes
to
School
10%
Challenge
Rangers’
woodland
projects
Social
adver:sing
Informa:on
Educa:on
Energy
Management
Project
monitoring
Love
Food,
Hate
Waste
Tree
wardens’
awareness
raising,
Perform
driving/cycling
courses,
Taste
magazine,
Staff
champions
Staff
sustainability
groups
Health
Walks,
Small
Change
Big
Difference
booklet
Corporate
tools
Corporate
sustainability
group
Move
For
Health
seminars
Sustainability
appraisal
Bigger
Picture
training,
etc
We can map interventions
Carbon
model
in different ways, for
Key:
different audiences …
Targe:ng
public
businesses
Targe:ng
staff
services
24. We use some of this knowledge
If we look at a local
authority’s behaviour
change interventions,
we can see examples
of behaviour change
techniques being used,
though often
unconsciously.
25. Operational approach
What is needed is
more systematic
approaches. The
MINDSPACE
adaptation of the 4Es
model was a good
start.
Source: Mindspace (Institute for Government/Cabinet Office, 2010)
27. Do we take behaviour change
seriously?
• JDs?
• Capacity?
• Manage performance?
• Networking?
A rhetorical question to be
honest! Local authorities
have little deliberate
capacity in behaviour
change theory or practice.
This is what I’m working to
change – @warrenhatter
Hinweis der Redaktion
The famous ‘Piano Stairs’. But why does this work? It’s not just ‘fun’, is it?
From a broadsheet reader’s perspective …
It’s deep, and we shouldn’t deny it.
It’s deep, and we shouldn’t deny it.
The example (almost) cited by David Cameron in his TED talk.
Key point: something as simple as a smiley has a major impact, which shows that using behaviour effects can be low/no cost, but can need lots of expertise.
Key point: something as simple as a smiley has a major impact, which shows that using behaviour effects can be low/no cost, but can need lots of expertise.
This is one of many ways of categorising behavioural effects. The different models have much in common and hardly contradict each other – it’s just that there is no definitive understanding.
This is one of many ways of categorising behavioural effects. The different models have much in common and hardly contradict each other – it’s just that there is no definitive understanding.
If you want to give a non-expert a VERY quick way of thinking about whether they could use behavioural techniques/effects, here is the ultra-shortlist of the effects most likely to work!
In the context of reducing emisssions: the major reductions needed are in the emissions of citizens and businesses, not the state. Limited control over this means that if local authorities are to act as place shapers and reduce emissions, they need to be expert in prompting behaviour change.
In the context of reducing emisssions: the major reductions needed are in the emissions of citizens and businesses, not the state. Limited control over this means that if local authorities are to act as place shapers and reduce emissions, they need to be expert in prompting behaviour change.
Once you let people and places take responsibility for their emissions by including embedded emissions, this is how the emissions of a typical place or person in the UK break down. What does this mean in behavioural terms?
Once you let people and places take responsibility for their emissions by including embedded emissions, this is how the emissions of a typical place or person in the UK break down. What does this mean in behavioural terms?
There’s lots of knowledge we are just getting to feel our way around. One example of many is the massive difference in emissions between air-freighted and seasonal, local food.
Understanding the real breakdown of the emissions for which we are responsible could lead us to a behavioural checklist – a menu of things that doing more or less of will reduce our emissions. This is a very early draft from WSCC developing this idea in relation to food …
Understanding the real breakdown of the emissions for which we are responsible could lead us to a behavioural checklist – a menu of things that doing more or less of will reduce our emissions. This is a very early draft from WSCC developing this idea in relation to food …
… and in relation to transport.
Behaviour change debates rage in these and other areas – more developed in some than others, as is the expertise.
We can map our interventions, though the inclination until now has been to use idiomatic terms like ‘carrot and stick’ to help non-experts access the ideas.
If we look at a local authority’s behaviour change interventions, we can see examples of behaviour change techniques being used, though often unconsciously.
If we look at a local authority’s behaviour change interventions, we can see examples of behaviour change techniques being used, though often unconsciously.
What is needed is more systematic approaches. The MINDSPACE adaptation of the 4Es model was a good start.
What is needed is more systematic approaches. The MINDSPACE adaptation of the 4Es model was a good start.
This is a rhetorical question – local authorities have little deliberate capacity in behaviour change theory or practice.