SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 25
Budget Comparison of In-pond
  Raceways vs. Open-Pond



           Jay Warecki, Ph.D.




         © 2013 Superior Aquaculture,
                    LLC
What do you see ?
Do You See…?
•Increasing feed costs
•Increasing energy costs
•A depressed economy
•Unfair competition from imports
•Increasing environmental mandates
•Lower prices to growers
Is This You ?
     (As we fish for complementary sciences.)




◊   LEFT: Depressed, shrunk, reduced phospholipids.
◊   RIGHT: Normal after 30-90 days of omega-3’s.
◊   CRITICAL for brain development and maintenance.
◊   Controlling every cell, enzyme, and sense, e.g. vision
◊   A game-changer for growers, fish, & consumers.
What I See
A massive, solar-powered, food machine
 where harvesting yields new life.

Micro Algae: 80% of all settleable solids
 ---8 liters/min/raceway flowing in.
 ---Valuable lipids for feed, biodiesel, etc
 ---Excellent amino acid profiles
 ---The freshwater source of all omega-3
What Else I See
Zooplankton:
1.2 Billion live zooplankton, weighing
 about 100 Lbs./hr./raceway.
 Bio-accumulated omega-3’s critical for
 fingerlings, immune systems & marketing
 An on-farm, renewable source of high-
 value nutrients.
 A perfect example of sustainable,
 Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture.
I see all this and more because in-pond
 raceways enhance observation & control.
Farm Animal Production Trends




Turkeys
Chickens
Hogs
FISH
Movement toward highly controlled growing
 conditions & thus higher intensities.
Recent In-Pond Raceway
             History
Two basic types: Floating & Non-Floating
Work “Spearheaded” by Dr. Michael Masser
 with floating raceways in the mid 1990’s +

Major contributions by Dr. Dave Brune of
 Clemson with the (non-floating) PAS

Numerous other contributors, including those
 working with “split ponds”.
(More) Recent History




 An aluminum, floating raceway developed
  by Dr. Hansen and colleagues at Auburn,
  about 2008.
 Construction costs “above our pay-grade”.
Current History




 Dr. Jessie Chappel, colleagues, & growers
  from Auburn , about 2009, concrete.
 Their most recent work: a 2-cell, poly
  (40-60 mil) lining over steel framed wall
  sections, 2011.
More Current History




 The practical and affordable solution?
  Floating or Sit-0n-Bottom; 1/8 in. thick HDPE. ANY Size.
 Early 2000’s; Patented to Jay & Bonnie Warecki in 2006.
 Years of successful use studied by Dr. Hartleb and colleagues,
  University of Wis. (2004-2007).
 World Aquaculture Conf., Aquaculture Magazine, Amer. Fish Soc.
 Listed in “Best Management Practices for Aquaculture…” 2006
Significant Variable Cost
           Factors
               (Approx. 95%)
(Production Levels)      Fingerling Costs
Feed Costs               Electricity
Feed Conversion Ratios Harvesting
Survivorship             Meds. & Chem.
Production Level Assumptions
 3 raceways/6 acre pond.


 IPRS:  30,000 Lbs/acre      180,000 Lb/pond
 O-Pond: 8,000 ”     ”        48,000 ”   ”

 8,000Lbs/acre is Alabama average—catfish.
 5,200Lbs/acre is North Carolina ave.-catfish.
 8,000Lbs/acre (approx.) Texas ave.-catfish.
Harvest Densities, Catfish
 1.8Lbs/gal achieved, Auburn, IPRS, 2010 +
 Harvest densities > 1.8 achieved for many
  species.
 Assuming 1.55Lbs/gal for “Tables 1&2”.
 A 40,000 gal (usable water) IPR can yield
  62,500 Lbs.
 Thus, 3 IPR’s can yield 30,000Lbs/acre, or
  180,000Lbs/6 acres/cycle, while only
  carrying 15,000Lbs/acre at a time, which is
  only ½ of the pond’s estimated
  30,000Lb/acre carrying capacity.
Feed Conversion Ratios (FCR’s)
 Most Alabama catfish farmers: 2.8-3.0:1
 Texas channel catfish farmers: 2.4-2.9:1
 Texas HSB farmers, estimated: 2.6:1
 Raceway users elsewhere routinely
  achieve 1.1-1:1.
 Auburn researchers/growers achieved:
        1.2-1.5 in 2010
        1.1-1.2 in 2012
        We have assumed a 1.2 FCR for
        “Tables 1 and 2”.
High-Tech Feeding Systems




Feed the fish, not the pond.
Critical for achieving optimal FCR’s.
Feeding many times daily and at night.
Feeding only when fish eagerly feed, using an
 automated feed verification system.
Automated, computer assisted, labor-saving
 systems with safe-guards work.
Feed Costs
 Assume feed costs will increase.
 At $500/ton (Aug. 2012), and a 2.8 FCR,
  feed cost=$0.70/Lb. harvested.
 At $500/ton and a 2.8 FCR, every $100/ton
  feed increase=$0.14/Lb. product increase.

                  HOWEVER

 At $500/ton and a 1.2 FCR, every $100/ton
  feed increase=$0.06/Lb. product increase.
 This also holds for $600/ton and higher.
 Clearly, more expensive feed MANDATES
  better feed management.
Survivorship

 Fingerling costs are about 20% of all
  variable costs.
 Survivorship in open-ponds: about 55%.
 Survivorship in IPRS: about 90%.
Fingerling Stocking Costs
 45% fewer fingerlings needed in IPRS.
 45% reduced feed costs from Day 1.
 Reduced fingerling costs (alone) can
  equal savings of $0.05/Lb harvested,
  assuming a $0.13/fingerling cost.
 Growth assessment and survivorship
  easily observed in raceways.
Electrical Costs
 Oxygenate the fish, not the whole pond.
 Modern, diffuser grid airlifts much more
  efficient than paddle wheels.
 At first glance, 24/7 raceway aeration
  costs similar to short-term, intermittent
  whole pond aeration.
 Long-term objective and savings:
  Significant reduction in acuity of D.O.
  swings.
Harvesting Costs

 Fish pumps and/or raceway seining are
  much easier, thorough, and fish-friendly
  than pond seining.
 Net savings in harvesting costs estimated
  @ about $0.02/Lb.
Medicine and Chemical Costs
  Water treatment and chemical costs can
  approximate 2.5% of variable costs.

  Early observable problems in raceways can
  often be effectively mitigated and
  controlled at a fraction of the cost of open-
  pond treatments.

  The above can include the reduction of off-
  flavor issues.
Table 1
Most Significant Variable Expenses
                          Pounds/ Pounds/ Pounds/             Cost/      Cost/     Cost/    $/Harvest Lb   $/Harvest Lb
                             Acre      Pond      Lb. Fish     Lb.       Acre       Pond     @ $500/t Feed___@$400/t
Feed
(Note: Bold, straight print below is for in-pond raceway method. Italics print is for open-pond method.)
Number of Raceways           0.5          3          ---         ---       ---         ---         ---       ---
Number of Raceways           -0-           ---       ---         ---       ---         ---         ---       ---
Production level (Lbs) 30,000         180,000        ---         ---        ---        ---         ---       ---
Production level (Lbs)     8,000       48,000         ---        ---       ---         ---         ---       ---
Feed (@$500/ton)          36,000      216,000 1.2 (FCR) $0.25           $9,000 $54,000         $0.30         ---
Feed (@$500/ton)          22,400      134,400 2.8 (FCR) $0.25           $5,600 $33,600         $0.70         ---
Feed ($400/ton)           36,000      216,000 1.2 (FCR) $0.20           $7,200     $43,200        ---      $0.24
Feed ($400/ton)           22,400      134,400 2.8 (FCR) $0.20           $4,480     $26,880        ---      $0.56
Fingerlings (pieces)       4,900        29,400         ---        ---    $3,822 $22,932         $0.08      $0.08
Fingerlings (pieces)       8,000        48,000         ---        ---    $1,040      $6,240     $0.13      $0.13
Harvesting and hauling 36,000         216,000        ---          ---    $1,080      $6,480     $0.03      $0.03
Harvesting and hauling 8,000            48,000        ---         ---      $400     $2,400      $0.05      $0.05
Electricity (Kwh)             ---          ---         ---     $0.09       $295     $3,540      $0.019     $0.019
Electricity (Kwh)             ---          ---         ---     $0.09       $161        $960      $0.020    $0.020
                                                           In-Pond Raceways TOTAL:               $0.43      $0.37
                                                                    Open Pond TOTAL:             $0.90      $0.76
$/Harvested Pound Difference:
@ $500/ton, $0.47/Lb which represents a 52% variable cost savings.
@ $400/ton, $0.39/Lb which represents a 51% variable cost savings.
Table 2
Return on Investment & Viability
                                                      Total
          Feed Cost Selling         Est. Fixed*    $/Harvest Lb       Viability** ROI**
           $/ton       Price____Cost @ $0.17/Lb_(Bottom Table 1)__________________
(Note: Bold print below is for in-pond raceway method. Italics print is for open-pond
method.)
Raceways      500      0.80            0.17           0.43               Yes       <1 yr.
Open-pond 500          0.80            0.17           0.90               No      ------
Raceways      500      0.90            0.17           0.43               Yes      <1 yr.
Open-pond 500          0.90            0.17           0.90               No       ------
Raceways      400      0.80            0.17           0.37               Yes       <1 yr.
Open-pond 400          0.80            0.17           0.76               No      ------
Raceways      400      0.90            0.17           0.37               Yes     <1 yr.
Open-pond 400          0.90            0.17           0.76            Marginal ------
**Does NOT reflect approx. $6,300/acre income from pond fish (e.g. tilapia, paddlefish, etc.) in IPRS.
*Examination of Dr. Carole Engle’s “Breakeven Costs of Catfish Production”, Univ. of Arkansas, P.B. supports this.
IPRS Projected Capital Expenses
           (Assumptions Used for ROI Estimates)

A set of (3) 48,000 gal floating or sit-on-
 bottom, HDPE, approx 1/8”                        $25,500
    (Volume pricing available.)
Lumber for walkways, est.          $2,700
(3) 3-Grid Airlifts w/frames, est. $3,000
(3) 1.5 hp. Blowers est.@ $800 = $2,400

(Estimated)         TOTAL For 3: $33,600
(Est.) “Bonus Fish” Income/Pond $37,800

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Recirculating Aquaculture System
Recirculating Aquaculture SystemRecirculating Aquaculture System
Recirculating Aquaculture System
vishal solanki
 
FISH-SEED-CERTIFICATION-AND-QUARANTINE-PROCEDURES (1).ppt
FISH-SEED-CERTIFICATION-AND-QUARANTINE-PROCEDURES (1).pptFISH-SEED-CERTIFICATION-AND-QUARANTINE-PROCEDURES (1).ppt
FISH-SEED-CERTIFICATION-AND-QUARANTINE-PROCEDURES (1).ppt
AmitSharma3227
 
COMMON VIRAL DISEASES OF FISHES AND SHRIMP IN BANGLADESH
COMMON VIRAL DISEASES OF FISHES AND SHRIMP IN BANGLADESH COMMON VIRAL DISEASES OF FISHES AND SHRIMP IN BANGLADESH
COMMON VIRAL DISEASES OF FISHES AND SHRIMP IN BANGLADESH
As Siyam
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Bioenrichment in rotifers4
Bioenrichment in rotifers4Bioenrichment in rotifers4
Bioenrichment in rotifers4
 
Brood stock management and larval rearing of mud crab scylla serrata-Gayatri ...
Brood stock management and larval rearing of mud crab scylla serrata-Gayatri ...Brood stock management and larval rearing of mud crab scylla serrata-Gayatri ...
Brood stock management and larval rearing of mud crab scylla serrata-Gayatri ...
 
Recirculating Aquaculture System
Recirculating Aquaculture SystemRecirculating Aquaculture System
Recirculating Aquaculture System
 
FISH-SEED-CERTIFICATION-AND-QUARANTINE-PROCEDURES (1).ppt
FISH-SEED-CERTIFICATION-AND-QUARANTINE-PROCEDURES (1).pptFISH-SEED-CERTIFICATION-AND-QUARANTINE-PROCEDURES (1).ppt
FISH-SEED-CERTIFICATION-AND-QUARANTINE-PROCEDURES (1).ppt
 
ASIAN SEABASS CULTURE
ASIAN SEABASS CULTUREASIAN SEABASS CULTURE
ASIAN SEABASS CULTURE
 
Pen-Culture.pptx
Pen-Culture.pptxPen-Culture.pptx
Pen-Culture.pptx
 
Nursery Management of Fin Fish
Nursery Management of Fin FishNursery Management of Fin Fish
Nursery Management of Fin Fish
 
Deep sea fisheries
Deep sea fisheriesDeep sea fisheries
Deep sea fisheries
 
Potential Yield from Indian EEZ
Potential Yield from Indian EEZ Potential Yield from Indian EEZ
Potential Yield from Indian EEZ
 
Culture of pearl oyster,clams and scallops
Culture of pearl oyster,clams and scallopsCulture of pearl oyster,clams and scallops
Culture of pearl oyster,clams and scallops
 
COMMON VIRAL DISEASES OF FISHES AND SHRIMP IN BANGLADESH
COMMON VIRAL DISEASES OF FISHES AND SHRIMP IN BANGLADESH COMMON VIRAL DISEASES OF FISHES AND SHRIMP IN BANGLADESH
COMMON VIRAL DISEASES OF FISHES AND SHRIMP IN BANGLADESH
 
input andoutput control measuresUnit vii
 input andoutput control measuresUnit vii input andoutput control measuresUnit vii
input andoutput control measuresUnit vii
 
deficiency & imbalances due to dietary components in fish
deficiency & imbalances due to dietary components in fish deficiency & imbalances due to dietary components in fish
deficiency & imbalances due to dietary components in fish
 
CAGE CULTURE
CAGE CULTURECAGE CULTURE
CAGE CULTURE
 
Hatcheries advances in design and construction
Hatcheries advances in design and constructionHatcheries advances in design and construction
Hatcheries advances in design and construction
 
Asian sea bass culture
Asian sea bass cultureAsian sea bass culture
Asian sea bass culture
 
Mud crab
Mud crabMud crab
Mud crab
 
Pen-Culture.pptx
Pen-Culture.pptxPen-Culture.pptx
Pen-Culture.pptx
 
Use of Artemia in Aquaculture in Bangladesh
Use of Artemia in Aquaculture in BangladeshUse of Artemia in Aquaculture in Bangladesh
Use of Artemia in Aquaculture in Bangladesh
 
Role of microrganisms in aquaculture. c
Role of microrganisms in aquaculture. cRole of microrganisms in aquaculture. c
Role of microrganisms in aquaculture. c
 

Andere mochten auch

Cage Culture 3
Cage Culture 3Cage Culture 3
Cage Culture 3
Ridzaludin
 
Exogenous application with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) or pro...
Exogenous application with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) or pro...Exogenous application with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) or pro...
Exogenous application with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) or pro...
Agriculture Journal IJOEAR
 
Fish breeding by dr chris andrews
Fish breeding by dr chris andrewsFish breeding by dr chris andrews
Fish breeding by dr chris andrews
zooamigo
 
Biological process that effect fish stock
Biological process that effect fish stockBiological process that effect fish stock
Biological process that effect fish stock
ecam2462
 
الطحالب الذهبية, الطحالب الدوارة
الطحالب الذهبية, الطحالب الدوارةالطحالب الذهبية, الطحالب الدوارة
الطحالب الذهبية, الطحالب الدوارة
biologyblog
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

Raceway aquaculture
Raceway aquacultureRaceway aquaculture
Raceway aquaculture
 
Aquaculture systems
Aquaculture systemsAquaculture systems
Aquaculture systems
 
Lecture 3. farming methods
Lecture 3. farming methodsLecture 3. farming methods
Lecture 3. farming methods
 
Lecture 1. history aquaculture
Lecture 1. history  aquacultureLecture 1. history  aquaculture
Lecture 1. history aquaculture
 
Lecture 2. aquaculture systems methods_and_types - copy
Lecture 2. aquaculture systems methods_and_types - copyLecture 2. aquaculture systems methods_and_types - copy
Lecture 2. aquaculture systems methods_and_types - copy
 
Diatom - Overview
Diatom - OverviewDiatom - Overview
Diatom - Overview
 
Cage Culture 3
Cage Culture 3Cage Culture 3
Cage Culture 3
 
Aquaculture
AquacultureAquaculture
Aquaculture
 
Dr. Jeff Silverstein - Current Status of U.S. Aquaculture Research
Dr. Jeff Silverstein - Current Status of U.S. Aquaculture ResearchDr. Jeff Silverstein - Current Status of U.S. Aquaculture Research
Dr. Jeff Silverstein - Current Status of U.S. Aquaculture Research
 
Exogenous application with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) or pro...
Exogenous application with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) or pro...Exogenous application with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) or pro...
Exogenous application with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) or pro...
 
swimmer crab culture in the pond
swimmer crab culture in the pondswimmer crab culture in the pond
swimmer crab culture in the pond
 
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
 
Diatoms - Diaonoflagellets
Diatoms - Diaonoflagellets Diatoms - Diaonoflagellets
Diatoms - Diaonoflagellets
 
Towards a Natural Classification of Diatoms (Bacillariophyceae)
Towards a Natural Classification of Diatoms (Bacillariophyceae)Towards a Natural Classification of Diatoms (Bacillariophyceae)
Towards a Natural Classification of Diatoms (Bacillariophyceae)
 
Ecology bacillariophyceae
Ecology bacillariophyceaeEcology bacillariophyceae
Ecology bacillariophyceae
 
Fish breeding by dr chris andrews
Fish breeding by dr chris andrewsFish breeding by dr chris andrews
Fish breeding by dr chris andrews
 
Internetblog presentation
Internetblog presentationInternetblog presentation
Internetblog presentation
 
Biological process that effect fish stock
Biological process that effect fish stockBiological process that effect fish stock
Biological process that effect fish stock
 
الطحالب الذهبية, الطحالب الدوارة
الطحالب الذهبية, الطحالب الدوارةالطحالب الذهبية, الطحالب الدوارة
الطحالب الذهبية, الطحالب الدوارة
 
درس الطحالب
درس الطحالبدرس الطحالب
درس الطحالب
 

Ähnlich wie Comparison of In-Pond Raceways vs. Open Pond, 2013, 07, 2007 pp

Fertilizer value of swine manure: a comparison of a lagoon and a deep pit slu...
Fertilizer value of swine manure: a comparison of a lagoon and a deep pit slu...Fertilizer value of swine manure: a comparison of a lagoon and a deep pit slu...
Fertilizer value of swine manure: a comparison of a lagoon and a deep pit slu...
LPE Learning Center
 
Presentación Algas
Presentación AlgasPresentación Algas
Presentación Algas
H2RAmbiental
 
Ace 10 high efficiency plumbing fixtures are flush with savings
Ace 10 high efficiency plumbing fixtures are flush with savingsAce 10 high efficiency plumbing fixtures are flush with savings
Ace 10 high efficiency plumbing fixtures are flush with savings
Troy Aichele
 
Olmito project aquaculture with investors numbers & graphics fish & prawns
Olmito project aquaculture with investors numbers & graphics   fish & prawnsOlmito project aquaculture with investors numbers & graphics   fish & prawns
Olmito project aquaculture with investors numbers & graphics fish & prawns
PaulSkillicorn
 
Banks Island Gold Ltd. Reports NPV(8%) of $155M and IRR of 43% from Red Mount...
Banks Island Gold Ltd. Reports NPV(8%) of $155M and IRR of 43% from Red Mount...Banks Island Gold Ltd. Reports NPV(8%) of $155M and IRR of 43% from Red Mount...
Banks Island Gold Ltd. Reports NPV(8%) of $155M and IRR of 43% from Red Mount...
Viral Network Inc
 
Ppt gramsat.ppt 26.08.11
Ppt gramsat.ppt 26.08.11Ppt gramsat.ppt 26.08.11
Ppt gramsat.ppt 26.08.11
Odishafisheries
 

Ähnlich wie Comparison of In-Pond Raceways vs. Open Pond, 2013, 07, 2007 pp (20)

High Tunnel Economics, 2015
High Tunnel Economics, 2015High Tunnel Economics, 2015
High Tunnel Economics, 2015
 
Fertilizer value of swine manure: a comparison of a lagoon and a deep pit slu...
Fertilizer value of swine manure: a comparison of a lagoon and a deep pit slu...Fertilizer value of swine manure: a comparison of a lagoon and a deep pit slu...
Fertilizer value of swine manure: a comparison of a lagoon and a deep pit slu...
 
Manage your water systems for cost control & reliability
Manage your water systems for cost control & reliabilityManage your water systems for cost control & reliability
Manage your water systems for cost control & reliability
 
Hossler coastal impoundments decision making
Hossler coastal impoundments decision makingHossler coastal impoundments decision making
Hossler coastal impoundments decision making
 
Presentación Algas
Presentación AlgasPresentación Algas
Presentación Algas
 
Research into technologies for Commercial Aquaponics
Research into technologies for Commercial AquaponicsResearch into technologies for Commercial Aquaponics
Research into technologies for Commercial Aquaponics
 
Ace 10 high efficiency plumbing fixtures are flush with savings
Ace 10 high efficiency plumbing fixtures are flush with savingsAce 10 high efficiency plumbing fixtures are flush with savings
Ace 10 high efficiency plumbing fixtures are flush with savings
 
20 ways to reduce your building's water footprint
20 ways to reduce your building's water footprint20 ways to reduce your building's water footprint
20 ways to reduce your building's water footprint
 
Olmito project aquaculture with investors numbers & graphics fish & prawns
Olmito project aquaculture with investors numbers & graphics   fish & prawnsOlmito project aquaculture with investors numbers & graphics   fish & prawns
Olmito project aquaculture with investors numbers & graphics fish & prawns
 
Brian vinci-presentation-of-an-economic-model-comparing-open-net-and-land-bas...
Brian vinci-presentation-of-an-economic-model-comparing-open-net-and-land-bas...Brian vinci-presentation-of-an-economic-model-comparing-open-net-and-land-bas...
Brian vinci-presentation-of-an-economic-model-comparing-open-net-and-land-bas...
 
SEAWEED PADDLE POND SYSTEMS
SEAWEED PADDLE POND SYSTEMSSEAWEED PADDLE POND SYSTEMS
SEAWEED PADDLE POND SYSTEMS
 
Aquaculture Technologies Consultants
Aquaculture Technologies ConsultantsAquaculture Technologies Consultants
Aquaculture Technologies Consultants
 
8115630 hydro-power
8115630 hydro-power8115630 hydro-power
8115630 hydro-power
 
Craft Brewery Supply Chain Optimization Project
Craft Brewery Supply Chain Optimization ProjectCraft Brewery Supply Chain Optimization Project
Craft Brewery Supply Chain Optimization Project
 
Economics of Commercially important fishes Aquaculture.pptx
Economics of Commercially important fishes Aquaculture.pptxEconomics of Commercially important fishes Aquaculture.pptx
Economics of Commercially important fishes Aquaculture.pptx
 
Banks Island Gold Ltd. Reports NPV(8%) of $155M and IRR of 43% from Red Mount...
Banks Island Gold Ltd. Reports NPV(8%) of $155M and IRR of 43% from Red Mount...Banks Island Gold Ltd. Reports NPV(8%) of $155M and IRR of 43% from Red Mount...
Banks Island Gold Ltd. Reports NPV(8%) of $155M and IRR of 43% from Red Mount...
 
Dr. Mike Brumm - Impact of heavy swine market weights on facility and equipme...
Dr. Mike Brumm - Impact of heavy swine market weights on facility and equipme...Dr. Mike Brumm - Impact of heavy swine market weights on facility and equipme...
Dr. Mike Brumm - Impact of heavy swine market weights on facility and equipme...
 
Ppt gramsat.ppt 26.08.11
Ppt gramsat.ppt 26.08.11Ppt gramsat.ppt 26.08.11
Ppt gramsat.ppt 26.08.11
 
Sanctuary Belize BioMass Energy Proof of Concept
Sanctuary Belize BioMass Energy Proof of ConceptSanctuary Belize BioMass Energy Proof of Concept
Sanctuary Belize BioMass Energy Proof of Concept
 
Dr. Daniel Andersen - Getting the Most from Your Manure
Dr. Daniel Andersen - Getting the Most from Your ManureDr. Daniel Andersen - Getting the Most from Your Manure
Dr. Daniel Andersen - Getting the Most from Your Manure
 

Comparison of In-Pond Raceways vs. Open Pond, 2013, 07, 2007 pp

  • 1. Budget Comparison of In-pond Raceways vs. Open-Pond Jay Warecki, Ph.D. © 2013 Superior Aquaculture, LLC
  • 2. What do you see ?
  • 3. Do You See…? •Increasing feed costs •Increasing energy costs •A depressed economy •Unfair competition from imports •Increasing environmental mandates •Lower prices to growers
  • 4. Is This You ? (As we fish for complementary sciences.) ◊ LEFT: Depressed, shrunk, reduced phospholipids. ◊ RIGHT: Normal after 30-90 days of omega-3’s. ◊ CRITICAL for brain development and maintenance. ◊ Controlling every cell, enzyme, and sense, e.g. vision ◊ A game-changer for growers, fish, & consumers.
  • 5. What I See A massive, solar-powered, food machine where harvesting yields new life. Micro Algae: 80% of all settleable solids  ---8 liters/min/raceway flowing in.  ---Valuable lipids for feed, biodiesel, etc  ---Excellent amino acid profiles  ---The freshwater source of all omega-3
  • 6. What Else I See Zooplankton: 1.2 Billion live zooplankton, weighing about 100 Lbs./hr./raceway.  Bio-accumulated omega-3’s critical for fingerlings, immune systems & marketing  An on-farm, renewable source of high- value nutrients.  A perfect example of sustainable, Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture. I see all this and more because in-pond raceways enhance observation & control.
  • 7. Farm Animal Production Trends Turkeys Chickens Hogs FISH Movement toward highly controlled growing conditions & thus higher intensities.
  • 8. Recent In-Pond Raceway History Two basic types: Floating & Non-Floating Work “Spearheaded” by Dr. Michael Masser with floating raceways in the mid 1990’s + Major contributions by Dr. Dave Brune of Clemson with the (non-floating) PAS Numerous other contributors, including those working with “split ponds”.
  • 9. (More) Recent History  An aluminum, floating raceway developed by Dr. Hansen and colleagues at Auburn, about 2008.  Construction costs “above our pay-grade”.
  • 10. Current History  Dr. Jessie Chappel, colleagues, & growers from Auburn , about 2009, concrete.  Their most recent work: a 2-cell, poly (40-60 mil) lining over steel framed wall sections, 2011.
  • 11. More Current History  The practical and affordable solution?  Floating or Sit-0n-Bottom; 1/8 in. thick HDPE. ANY Size.  Early 2000’s; Patented to Jay & Bonnie Warecki in 2006.  Years of successful use studied by Dr. Hartleb and colleagues, University of Wis. (2004-2007).  World Aquaculture Conf., Aquaculture Magazine, Amer. Fish Soc.  Listed in “Best Management Practices for Aquaculture…” 2006
  • 12. Significant Variable Cost Factors (Approx. 95%) (Production Levels) Fingerling Costs Feed Costs Electricity Feed Conversion Ratios Harvesting Survivorship Meds. & Chem.
  • 13. Production Level Assumptions  3 raceways/6 acre pond.  IPRS: 30,000 Lbs/acre 180,000 Lb/pond  O-Pond: 8,000 ” ” 48,000 ” ”  8,000Lbs/acre is Alabama average—catfish.  5,200Lbs/acre is North Carolina ave.-catfish.  8,000Lbs/acre (approx.) Texas ave.-catfish.
  • 14. Harvest Densities, Catfish  1.8Lbs/gal achieved, Auburn, IPRS, 2010 +  Harvest densities > 1.8 achieved for many species.  Assuming 1.55Lbs/gal for “Tables 1&2”.  A 40,000 gal (usable water) IPR can yield 62,500 Lbs.  Thus, 3 IPR’s can yield 30,000Lbs/acre, or 180,000Lbs/6 acres/cycle, while only carrying 15,000Lbs/acre at a time, which is only ½ of the pond’s estimated 30,000Lb/acre carrying capacity.
  • 15. Feed Conversion Ratios (FCR’s)  Most Alabama catfish farmers: 2.8-3.0:1  Texas channel catfish farmers: 2.4-2.9:1  Texas HSB farmers, estimated: 2.6:1  Raceway users elsewhere routinely achieve 1.1-1:1.  Auburn researchers/growers achieved: 1.2-1.5 in 2010 1.1-1.2 in 2012 We have assumed a 1.2 FCR for “Tables 1 and 2”.
  • 16. High-Tech Feeding Systems Feed the fish, not the pond. Critical for achieving optimal FCR’s. Feeding many times daily and at night. Feeding only when fish eagerly feed, using an automated feed verification system. Automated, computer assisted, labor-saving systems with safe-guards work.
  • 17. Feed Costs  Assume feed costs will increase.  At $500/ton (Aug. 2012), and a 2.8 FCR, feed cost=$0.70/Lb. harvested.  At $500/ton and a 2.8 FCR, every $100/ton feed increase=$0.14/Lb. product increase. HOWEVER  At $500/ton and a 1.2 FCR, every $100/ton feed increase=$0.06/Lb. product increase.  This also holds for $600/ton and higher.  Clearly, more expensive feed MANDATES better feed management.
  • 18. Survivorship  Fingerling costs are about 20% of all variable costs.  Survivorship in open-ponds: about 55%.  Survivorship in IPRS: about 90%.
  • 19. Fingerling Stocking Costs  45% fewer fingerlings needed in IPRS.  45% reduced feed costs from Day 1.  Reduced fingerling costs (alone) can equal savings of $0.05/Lb harvested, assuming a $0.13/fingerling cost.  Growth assessment and survivorship easily observed in raceways.
  • 20. Electrical Costs  Oxygenate the fish, not the whole pond.  Modern, diffuser grid airlifts much more efficient than paddle wheels.  At first glance, 24/7 raceway aeration costs similar to short-term, intermittent whole pond aeration.  Long-term objective and savings: Significant reduction in acuity of D.O. swings.
  • 21. Harvesting Costs  Fish pumps and/or raceway seining are much easier, thorough, and fish-friendly than pond seining.  Net savings in harvesting costs estimated @ about $0.02/Lb.
  • 22. Medicine and Chemical Costs  Water treatment and chemical costs can approximate 2.5% of variable costs.  Early observable problems in raceways can often be effectively mitigated and controlled at a fraction of the cost of open- pond treatments.  The above can include the reduction of off- flavor issues.
  • 23. Table 1 Most Significant Variable Expenses Pounds/ Pounds/ Pounds/ Cost/ Cost/ Cost/ $/Harvest Lb $/Harvest Lb Acre Pond Lb. Fish Lb. Acre Pond @ $500/t Feed___@$400/t Feed (Note: Bold, straight print below is for in-pond raceway method. Italics print is for open-pond method.) Number of Raceways 0.5 3 --- --- --- --- --- --- Number of Raceways -0- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Production level (Lbs) 30,000 180,000 --- --- --- --- --- --- Production level (Lbs) 8,000 48,000 --- --- --- --- --- --- Feed (@$500/ton) 36,000 216,000 1.2 (FCR) $0.25 $9,000 $54,000 $0.30 --- Feed (@$500/ton) 22,400 134,400 2.8 (FCR) $0.25 $5,600 $33,600 $0.70 --- Feed ($400/ton) 36,000 216,000 1.2 (FCR) $0.20 $7,200 $43,200 --- $0.24 Feed ($400/ton) 22,400 134,400 2.8 (FCR) $0.20 $4,480 $26,880 --- $0.56 Fingerlings (pieces) 4,900 29,400 --- --- $3,822 $22,932 $0.08 $0.08 Fingerlings (pieces) 8,000 48,000 --- --- $1,040 $6,240 $0.13 $0.13 Harvesting and hauling 36,000 216,000 --- --- $1,080 $6,480 $0.03 $0.03 Harvesting and hauling 8,000 48,000 --- --- $400 $2,400 $0.05 $0.05 Electricity (Kwh) --- --- --- $0.09 $295 $3,540 $0.019 $0.019 Electricity (Kwh) --- --- --- $0.09 $161 $960 $0.020 $0.020 In-Pond Raceways TOTAL: $0.43 $0.37 Open Pond TOTAL: $0.90 $0.76 $/Harvested Pound Difference: @ $500/ton, $0.47/Lb which represents a 52% variable cost savings. @ $400/ton, $0.39/Lb which represents a 51% variable cost savings.
  • 24. Table 2 Return on Investment & Viability Total Feed Cost Selling Est. Fixed* $/Harvest Lb Viability** ROI** $/ton Price____Cost @ $0.17/Lb_(Bottom Table 1)__________________ (Note: Bold print below is for in-pond raceway method. Italics print is for open-pond method.) Raceways 500 0.80 0.17 0.43 Yes <1 yr. Open-pond 500 0.80 0.17 0.90 No ------ Raceways 500 0.90 0.17 0.43 Yes <1 yr. Open-pond 500 0.90 0.17 0.90 No ------ Raceways 400 0.80 0.17 0.37 Yes <1 yr. Open-pond 400 0.80 0.17 0.76 No ------ Raceways 400 0.90 0.17 0.37 Yes <1 yr. Open-pond 400 0.90 0.17 0.76 Marginal ------ **Does NOT reflect approx. $6,300/acre income from pond fish (e.g. tilapia, paddlefish, etc.) in IPRS. *Examination of Dr. Carole Engle’s “Breakeven Costs of Catfish Production”, Univ. of Arkansas, P.B. supports this.
  • 25. IPRS Projected Capital Expenses (Assumptions Used for ROI Estimates) A set of (3) 48,000 gal floating or sit-on- bottom, HDPE, approx 1/8” $25,500 (Volume pricing available.) Lumber for walkways, est. $2,700 (3) 3-Grid Airlifts w/frames, est. $3,000 (3) 1.5 hp. Blowers est.@ $800 = $2,400 (Estimated) TOTAL For 3: $33,600 (Est.) “Bonus Fish” Income/Pond $37,800