1. Action Research How Do ‘I’ Improve My Practice? Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
2. What is my reality? Experience a tension between my values and the values of my organization Lack of democratic principles in decision-making Teachers voices are not heard Support for teachers by Curriculum Officers vary Teachers’ voices are not heard Few forums for teachers to experience learning from their colleagues Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
3. Why do I choose Action Research as my Methodology? What is Action research? My Action Research Project Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar Action Research
4. Choosing a Methodology Phenomenology case study Evaluation research Applied/ Empirical research Participatory Action research Action research ethnography Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
5. Two Definitions of Action Research A term which refers to a practical way of looking at your own work to check that it is as you would like it to be. Because action research is done by you, the practitioner, it is often referred to as practitioner based research; and because it involves you thinking about and reflecting on your work, it can also be called a form of self-reflective practice. (McNiff (2002) in jeanmcniff.com) A form of self-reflective enquiry undertaken by participants in social (educational) situations in order to improve the rationality and justice of Their own social or educational practices Their understanding of these practices The situations in which the practices are carried out (Kemmis (1988) Action Research p168 in Hammersley (ed.) 2007 SAGE) Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
6. Generations of Action Research Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
7. What is Action Research ? Action research covers a broad array of research strategies that are dedicated to the integrated production of knowledge and the implementation of change Action research … is Praxis- committed action is Systematic system of inquiry knowledge-generating enacts change is participatory relies on a cyclical self reflective process can only be enacted by the actor himself O’Leary 2004 The Essential Guide to Doing Research London. SAGE. Chapter 10. Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
8. Approaches to Action Research Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar Participatory Action Research (PAR) Action Research for Professional Development Kemmis 1983
9. Epistemological and Ontological Considerations of ParticipatoryAction Research Kemmis and McTaggart 2005 Critical Theory perspectives: Multiple Methods Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
10. Participatory Action Research Kemmis and McTaggart 2005 Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
11. Issues in Participatory Action Research Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
12. Action Research as a Methodology of Care “While action research might begin with the commitment of the individual ‘I’, this is an ‘I’ who recognises her or himself in relation to others; and this is a reciprocal commitment enacted collectively. It is not a case of one individual over against the rest; it is a case of all individuals acting in the best interest of each other.” “This is why I call action research a methodology of care. Jean McNiff (1999) Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
13. Action Research and Learning Doing action research helps you to grow professionally, to show how you are extending your own professional knowledge. Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
14. Living Educational Theories Teachers are generating their own living educational theories by examining their own practice by answering questions like ‘How can I improve my practice? (Whitehead 1989) Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
15. My Educative Influence While I recognise I may not be able to change a system with a legacy of colonial structure I can change the way I practice and relate with those in my sphere of influence These include my colleagues at the MOE and teachers whom I am supposed to support as they work to inplement curriculum at schools Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
16. Action Research is a Decolonizing Methodology Action Research places the practioner as the main actor in his/her research (McNiff 2003) Action Research is tailored to a specific historical-social context Action Research allows freedom of choice of methods to use (Kemmis and McTaggart 2005) Action Research is empowering and liberating Action Research is about me interrogating my practice in the here and now (Kemmis 1988) Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
17. Issues in Practioner-based Research Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
18. How do I validate my Action Research project? Through developing criteria and standards Through gathering evidence to show that a change that is democratic can take place Through my writings and insights Through the ‘voices’ of teachers via computer-mediated text Through remaining critical throughout the process Through adopting ethical procedures Through making decisions to change my practice based on the evaluations of my project Through my communication of my findings using Habermas(1971) validity claims. Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
19. Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar My Action Research Project
20. My Action Research Questions As a I reflect on my practice, crafting some good questions will enable me to examine the problem more closely and then to collect evidence that will help me to find solutions. Recognise a problem Identify a possible solution Anticipate outcomes… Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
21. Crafting my question(s) My concerns I care about the level of support that I give to teachers as they try to integrate technology into the curriculum My problem statement I am not satisfied with the quality and level of support that teachers have when they attempt to integrate technology into the curriculum My action question What action can I take to improve the level of support that teachers currently have as they try to integrate technology into the curriculum My anticipated outcomes If I use an online forum such as a professional social network, and observe if and how teachers participate, will this provide clues as to how I, and colleagues at the CPDD, can enhance the level of support that teachers need to effectively integrate technology into the curriculum? Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
22. Still Crafting my question(s) My methodology Action Research to investigate the impact of using an online social network site to engage teachers professionally My critical friends My colleagues at MOE in eight core curricular areas plus others involved with technology from ICT , media and Educational Technology. My evidence Talk, conversations, actions of site participants collected through computer-mediated tools My expected contribution to new knowledge This research could encourage officers at CPDD to adopt action research as a way to interrogate their practice, to be self-critical and to discover new ways of improving practice. Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
23. Characteristics of an Action Researcher Acquiescence is not a characteristic of an action researcher. He is resourceful, committed, tenacious, and above all, curious. He will not be satisfied with a given system if he sees elements of the system as unsatisfactory. He will seek to change it. In doing so, he refuses to be a servant, but becomes an acting agent. He rises above the role of a skilled technician and becomes an educator. Jean McNiff, Action Research, Principles and Practice, McNiff,1988, 50 Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
24. References Elliott,J. (1991)Action Research for Educational Change. Open University Press. Hammersley,M. (2004) Action Research- A contradiction in terms? Oxford Review of Education 30:2 p 165 Kember,D. (2000) Action Learning and Action Research-Improving the Quality of Teaching and learning. KoganPage. Kemmis , S.(1988)Action Research in Hammersley,M. (ed.) Educational Research and Evidence-Based Practice SAGE. P167-180 Kemmis.S. and McTaggart,R. (2005)’Participatory Action Research: Communicative Action and the Public Sphere’ in Denzin,N. and Lincoln,Y. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research 3rd ed. p 599 McNiff, J. (2001)Action Research and the professional learning of Teachers available at http://www.jeanmcniff.com/items.asp?id=42 O’Leary,Z. (2004) The Essential Guide to Doing Research. SAGE. London. Whitehead,J. (1989) Creating a Living Educational theory From Questions of the Kind, How Do I improve My practice? Available at http://www.actionresearch.net/writings/livtheory.html Prepared by Vimala Kamalodeen 14/7/11 EdD University of Sheffield Pro-D Seminar
Hinweis der Redaktion
Where other research paradigms carefully avoid perturbing the subject of the research, action research sets out with the expressed intention of changing and improving practice (kember 2000, p 25)
Kurt Lewin (1946) is credited with coining the term action research. Lewin’s formulation of the idea was based on the belief that it is in trying to change social situations that we best come to understand them. Lewin's approach consists of four steps: plan, act, observe and reflect. A number of researchers have extended and shaped the model since then. Kemmis and McTaggart (1982) developed a simple model of the cyclical nature of the typical action-research process that emphasizes the iterative nature of action research. McNiff (1988, 27) gives an example using Kemmis and McTaggart's model.Elliott (2004) builds on the action-research model, the prevalent idea of theory as referring exclusively to generalizable representations of events. For Elliott, small-scale studies can not only improve practical situations but can also lead to the generation of theory. In effect, Elliott’s work encourages the notion that teachers can be enabled to create their theory of practice through critical reflection on their practice.Similarly, Stringer (1999) applied action research to community-based work. Stringer's model of action research suggests a process that works through an explicit set of social values; that process of inquiry has the following characteristics:it is democratic, enabling the participation of all people;it is equitable, acknowledging people’s equality of worth;it is liberating, providing freedom from oppressive, debilitating conditions; andit is life enhancing, enabling the expression of people’s full human potential. (Stringer 1999, 9-10)Convinced that research inquiry in the human sciences can and should take account of the potentiality for creative action of all relevant participants and relate to broader social environments, an active and lively body of researchers are applying action research in a range of fields, including education.Action Research in EducationStephen Corey (1953) was one of the first to use action research in the field ofeducation. He was "convinced that the disposition to study . . . the consequences of our own teaching is more likely to change and improve our practices than is reading about what someone else has discovered of his teaching” (70). Lawrence Stenhouse (1975) extended Corey's work, promoting the idea of teachers as researchers in the United Kingdom.For the past 30 years, Jack Whitehead has been committed to an action-research approach that he calls "living educational theory." For Whitehead (1989, 2005), asking questions like "how do I improve what I am doing?" helps practitioners to create their own theories, embodying their educational values in their practice. Whitehead sees the purpose of educational research as the creation and testing of educational theories:Because I see educational theory as an account of the educational influence of individuals and social formations that include learning to live values more fully, I attach great importance to those values that appear to carry hope for the future of humanity. (Whitehead 2004, 872)Similarly, Whitehead and McNiff (2006) believe that an educational theory must explain our educational influence in our own learning, in the learning of others, or in the education of social formations. By education of social formations, I refer to Whitehead's (2005) notion of living values that carry hope for the future of humanity more fully in the rules and processes that govern the social organization. All I am meaning by a living educational theory (Whitehead, 1989) is an explanation of an educational influence in one's own learning, in the learning of others or in the education of a social formation. Because of our uniqueness as human beings I think each of our quests will reflect the unique constellation of the values that help us to constitute who we are. As we learn from our quests, in seeking to live as fully as we can values of humanity, I think we have significant insights to share and to learn from each other.ReferencesCarr, W., and S. Kemmis. 1986. Becoming critical: Education, knowledge, and action research. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.Corey, S. M. 1953. Action research to improve school practices. New York: Teachers College Press.Elliott, J. 1991. Action research for educational change. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.Elliott, J. 2004. The struggle to redefine the relationship between "knowledge" and "action" in the academy: Some reflections on action research. Educar 34, 11-26.http://ddd.uab.es/pub/educar/0211819Xn34p11.pdf (accessed April 4, 2008). Archived at http://www.webcitation.org/5Z4GKEX4O.Farren, M. 2005. How can I create a pedagogy of the unique through a web of betweenness? Ph.D. dissertation, University of Bath. http://people.bath.ac.uk/edsajw/farren.shtml(accessed May 21, 2008). Archived at http://www.webcitation.org/5YfRIXjQR.Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 1982. The action research planner. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.Lewin, K. 1946. Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues 2 (4): 34-46. http://www.vschool.net.cn/huangrh/hcscl/papers/Lewin2.files/lewin_action_research.gif(accessed June 10, 2008). Archived at http://www.webcitation.org/5YeDw1nL9.McKernan, J. 1991. Curriculum action research: A handbook of methods and resources for the reflective practitioner. London: Kogan Page.McNiff, J. 1988. Action research: Principles and practice. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan.McNiff, J., P. Lomax, and J. Whitehead. 1996. You and your action research project. London: Routledge.McNiff, J., and J. Whitehead. 2006. All you need to know about action research. London: SAGE.Mills, G. E. 2006. Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Reason, P. 2006. Handbook of action research. London: SAGE.Somekh, B. 2006. Action research: A methodology for change and development. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.Stenhouse, L. 1975. An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.Stringer, E. 1999. Action research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Van Manen, M. 1991. The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. Albany: State University of New York Press.Whitehead, J. 1989. Creating a living educational theory from questions of the kind, How do I improve my practice? British Educational Research Journal 15:3-17.Whitehead, J. 2004. What counts as evidence in self-studies of teacher-education practices. In The international handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices, eds. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, and T. L. Russell, 871-904.Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. http://people.bath.ac.uk/edsajw/writings/evid.htm (accessed May 4, 2008). Archived at http://www.webcitation.org/5Z4GUgvIF.Whitehead, J. 2005. How can we improve the educational influences of our teacher-researcher quests? Keynote Presentation to the 12th International Conference of Teacher Research, McGill University, Toronto, Canada, April 16. http://www.jackwhitehead.com/ictr05/jwictr05key.htm (accessed June 1, 2008). Archived athttp://www.webcitation.org/5YfDZ80tE.Whitehead, J., and J. McNiff. 2006. Action research: Living theory. London: SAGE.Winter, R. 1987. Action research and the nature of social inquiry. Aldershot, England: Gower.
It does this in many ways, including the following:Doing your research helps you to examine your own practice and see whether it lives up to your own expectations of yourself in your work. If you say you hold certain values, how can you show that you are living in their direction?By showing other people what you are doing, you can establish a systematic evaluation procedure. You can identify the criteria, or standards, that you and others are using to judge the quality of what you are doing. You identify how you understand your professionalism, in negotiation with others, and you show how you are trying to live in this way.
“Educational theory itself needs to be reconceptualised as a caring and responsible practice, a form of praxis, whose validity may be judged in terms of the values practitioners bring to their work. This view is quite different from a traditional view of theory as an abstract body of knowledge which may be applied to practice. Instead, it regards theory as a living, developmental process of making sense of what we do with the intent of improving personal and social living through education” (McNiff 2001) .