5. Language as CREATION
• Hindu myth:
• God wanted to speak
• God said bhur and the Earth was created
• God said bhuvar and Space was created
• God said suvar and Sky was created
6. Language as CREATION
• The Bible
• In the beginning was the Word
• And the Word was with God
• And the Word was God
7. Language as CREATION
• Let there be light!
• Let there be animals!
• Let there be sea!
• Etc
70. Language as CREATION
• Hindu myth:
• God wanted to speak
• God said bhur and the Earth was created
• God said bhuvar and Space was created
• God said suvar and Sky was created
71. Language as CREATION
• The Bible
• In the beginning was the Word
• And the Word was with God
• And the Word was God
72. Language as CREATION
• Let there be light!
• Let there be animals!
• Let there be sea!
• Etc
74. PHON /hɪm/
SYN
CAT [ noun CASE [ acc ]]
VAL < >
SEM
INDEX X
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity X
>
The Word
creates an
individual
Or
object
Or
individual
In the
listener’s
mind
75. PHON /hɪm/
SYN
CAT [ noun CASE [ acc ]]
VAL < >
SEM
INDEX X
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity X
>
The Word
IS LIKE
an
individual
Or
object
Or
individual
76. PHON /hɪm/
SYN
CAT [ noun CASE [ acc ]]
VAL < >
SEM
INDEX X
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity X
>
The Word
IS
an
individual
Or
object
Or
individual
77. The word as CREATION
PHON /siːz/
SYN
CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X= PER:3 NUM: 1 ,
NP[CASE acc ] Y= PER: NUM: >
SEM
INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
78. The word creates a situation
PHON /siːz/
SYN
CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X= PER:3 NUM: 1 ,
NP[CASE acc ] Y= PER: NUM: >
SEM
INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
79. The word IS LIKE a situation
PHON /siːz/
SYN
CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X= PER:3 NUM: 1 ,
NP[CASE acc ] Y= PER: NUM: >
SEM
INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
80. The word ISa situation
PHON /siːz/
SYN
CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X= PER:3 NUM: 1 ,
NP[CASE acc ] Y= PER: NUM: >
SEM
INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
81. The word as CREATION
• A word IS a thing?
• A word IS an individual?
• A word IS an action?
• A phrase IS a thing?
• A phrase IS a situation?
• A sentence IS a situation?
• Maybe I’m crazy?
82. Language as CREATION
• Hindu myth:
• God wanted to speak
• God said bhur and the Earth was created
• God said bhuvar and Space was created
• God said suvar and Sky was created
83. Language as CREATION
• The Bible
• In the beginning was the Word
• And the Word was with God
• And the Word was God
84. Language as CREATION
• Unicorn
• The unicorn
• Friend
• Your friend
• Playing
• Playing tennis
• The unicorn was playing tennis with your
friend in the hotel room
85. • Don’t we EXPERIENCE language as a REAL
THING?
• Or am I crazy??
• Anyway…
• …how does it work?
128. MERGE SEM
INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
SEMANTICS OF “sees”
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y >
SEMANTICS OF
“him”
129. MERGE SEM
INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
SEMANTICS OF “sees”
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y >
SEMANTICS OF “him”
NOTICE the Ys are merging already.
WHY?
130. PHON /siːz/
SYN
CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X= PER:3 NUM: 1 ,
NP[CASE acc ] Y= PER: NUM: >
SEM
INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
VALENCY and
SEM SPECS
131. MERGE SEM
INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
SEMANTICS OF “sees”
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y >
SEMANTICS OF “him”
133. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE MERGE SEMANTIC INFO?
134. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX ?
FRAMES < >????????
135. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX ?
FRAMES < >????????
WHAT
KIND OF
INDEX FOR
“sees
him”?
136. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX ?
FRAMES < >????????
INDEX
identifies
as a
situation
or
individual
137. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX ?
FRAMES < >????????
Is “sees
him” more
like an
individual
or a
situation?
138. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >????????
Probably a
situation
139. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >????????
How
about
Frames?
140. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >????????
Well
FRAMES is
a list
141. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >????????
FRAMES is
a list of
general
meanings
142. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >????????
So we can
keep both
143. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >
Seeing –Frame
X
Y
SEER
SEEN
144. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >
Seeing –Frame
X
Y
SEER
SEEN
145. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >
Seeing –Frame
X
Y
SEER
SEEN
Male –Frame
Entity Y
146. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >
Seeing –Frame
X
Y
SEER
SEEN
Male –Frame
Entity Y
,
147. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >
Seeing –Frame
X
Y
SEER
SEEN
Male –Frame
Entity Y
,
“sees him”
Identity as a
situation from
the DOMINANT
(Stronger)
PARENT
148. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >
Seeing –Frame
X
Y
SEER
SEEN
Male –Frame
Entity Y
,
“sees him”
General meaning
(FRAMES) from
BOTH PARENTS
149. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >
Seeing –Frame
X
Y
SEER
SEEN
Male –Frame
Entity Y
,
“sees” “him”
“sees him”
150. Isn’t this fun?!
• In MERGE …
• Sound (PHONOLOGICAL) info comes from
both parents equally
• General meaning (FRAMES) info comes from
both parents equally
• But the identity (INDEX) comes from the
dominant parent
151. INDEX S
FRAMES <
Seeing –Frame
>SEER
SEEN
X
Y
INDEX Y
FRAMES <
Male –Frame
Entity Y
>
INDEX S
FRAMES < >
Seeing –Frame
X
Y
SEER
SEEN
Male –Frame
Entity Y
,
“sees” “him”
“sees him”
157. SYNTAX for “him”
CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X,
NP[CASE acc ] Y>
CAT [noun [CASE acc]]
VAL < >
158. SYNTAX for “ sees him”?
CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X,
NP[CASE acc ] Y>
CAT [noun [CASE acc]]
VAL < >
159. What do you think?
CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X,
NP[CASE acc ] Y>
CAT [noun [CASE acc]]
VAL < >
160. CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X,
NP[CASE acc ] Y>
CAT [noun [CASE acc]]
VAL < >
SYNTAX of “sees him”
161. CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X,
NP[CASE acc ] Y>
CAT [noun [CASE acc]]
VAL < >
CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X,
NP[CASE acc ] Y>
Exactly
the same
as the
SYNTAX of
the verb …
162. CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X,
NP[CASE acc ] Y>
CAT [noun [CASE acc]]
VAL < >
CAT [ verb ]
VAL <NP[CASE nom ] X>
… minus
the object
in the
VALENCY
list