The document summarizes plans to develop a socio-technical infrastructure in the UK to support open access repositories. It discusses conducting stakeholder analysis to understand requirements and select components. Key components were identified for functions like search, deposit tools, and metrics. A process will integrate selected components into a production environment in waves, with the goal of building sustainable shared services for repositories.

1. A socio-technical infrastructure to support repositories Andrew Dorward EDINA UKCoRR Member’s Meeting, January 2012

6. High-Level Plan Preparation: Stakeholder analysis Functional requirements Select components Implementation: Wave One Integrate components into a production environment Sustainability business models Other JISC Programmes (Open Access Implementation Group, Research Information Management, etc.) Implementation: WaveTwo Service enhancement Integrate new components JISC Service Portfolio Review Jan 2011 2012 Oct Mar Apr Jul 2013 Jan Oct Aug

9. The problem landscape….

10. Eval Academic reader researcher Research Outcomes UKPMC HEI Institution [OA mandate] Library CRIS Institutional Repository Publisher author(s) editor referee teacher student P.I . journal monograph Licensed/ tollgate access to Publisher’s Final Copy (PFC) Rich Picture: Actors, Agency & Relationships for Report, Deposit & Access ARMA Research Award reporting Deposit of metadata/text of Authors’ Final Copy (AFC) Digital Library curation micro - services Research Excellence Framework metrics Subject Repository stewardship budgets NORA UK Research Funder [OA mandate] HEFCE, SFC … EU RCUK Wellcome Trust SWORD CERIF UKCoRR EU

11. Supported Activites Publishers Academics Institutions Funders Reader Author P.I. Teacher Faculty Research Awards Institutional Repository Subject Repository Funders Repository Monograph Journal Article CRIS Library Open Access Research Information Management Research Grant Office

13. Components by SIPG and functional Category ROAR University of Southampton OAR-J Broker EDINA OPEN DOAR University of Nottingham RoMEO Juliet Open Depot ORI IRS MIMAS IRUS-UK NAMES2 REPUK Innovation UKOLN CORE Linked data/mobile Open University Search, Aggregation and Text Mining Statistics, Reporting and Benchmarking Relevant Registries Deposit Tools Metadata Quality, eg Naming Authority

14. Components Summary ROAR OAR-J OPEN DOAR RoMEO Juliet Open Depot ORI IRS IRUS-UK NAMES2 REPUK CORE Search, Aggregation and Text Mining Statistics, Reporting and Benchmarking Relevant Registries Deposit Tools Metadata Quality, eg Naming Authority Authoritative, manually curated registry of OA repositories, combined with harvested metadata Registry of OA repositories compiled by automatically harvesting metadata Organisation and Repository Identification – registry of all IRs Centralised service for collection of OA usage statistics Centralised Naming Authority for the UK assigning identifiers to organisations and individuals engaged in research Aggregated set of metadata for development Search, aggregation, full-text mining for OA repositories Search, aggregation, data-mining for all Institutional Repositories Database containing publisher policies on Open Access Database containing research funders’ policies on Open Access Virtual OA repository for researchers. Also redirects to relevant OA IR or SR using OAR-J Broker and ORI Identifies and directs researchers of multi-authored works to relevant OA repository(ies)

17. O A Publishing – PLoS ONE Number of publications each quarter since 2006, when PLoS ONE launched. Capture article metrics: ■ Article usage statistics - HTML pageviews, PDF downloads and XML downloads ■ Citations from the scholarly literature – currently from Web of Science, PubMed Central, Scopus and CrossRef ■ Comments – left by readers of each article ■ Notes – left by readers of each article ■ Blog posts – aggregated from Nature Blogs, Bloglines and ResearchBlogging. ■ Ratings – left by readers of each article

18. PLoSOne: article usage metrics

19. OA going mainstream….