Dokumen tersebut membahas tentang teori pendulum yang menjelaskan bahwa setelah mengalami pengalaman sosial yang traumatis, seseorang akan berpendapat secara berlebihan ke arah yang berlawanan. Pendapatnya akan berayun seperti pendulum dari satu sisi ke sisi lainnya, sebelum akhirnya menetap pada sikap yang lebih moderat. Dokumen selanjutnya membahas perspektif global dan nasional terhadap ke
Inovasi Sebagai Strategi Mewujudkan Pelayanan Publik Berdampak
Sistem Manajemen Nasional
1. Tri Widodo W. Utomo
Kepala Pusat Kajian Hukum Administrasi Negara
LAN-RI
DisampaikanDisampaikan padapada DiklatDiklat IntelstratIntelstrat Tingkat II BINTingkat II BIN
Jakarta, 14Jakarta, 14 JuniJuni 20132013
2. DataDataDataDataDataDataDataData PribadiPribadiPribadiPribadiPribadiPribadiPribadiPribadi
Nama : Tri Widodo W. Utomo, SH.,MA
TTL : Yogyakarta, 15-07-1968
NIP : 19680715 199401 1 001
Jabatan : Kepala Pusat Kajian Hukum Adm. Negara/
Ahli Peneliti Utama Bidang Administrasi Publik
Gol/Pangkat : IV-d / Pembina Utama Madya
Alamat Ktr : Jl. Veteran No. 10 Jakarta
Alamt Rmh : Villa Melati Mas Blok M6/12A, Serpong
Tangerang Selatan, HP. 0813-1786-9936
Email : triwidodowu@yahoo.com
Blog : http://triwidodowutomo.blogspot.com/
http://www.slideshare.net/tiwidodowutomo/
3. Pendulum Theory
Whenever a person goes through a traumatic social experience, that person will make judgments
that overcompensate in the opposite direction. The person’s judgments will swing like a
pendulum, from one side to the other, before finally settling on a more moderate stance. This is a
natural defense mechanism, innate in us all. It is inevitable and even necessary for our recovery
from traumatic social experiences, provided we swing back eventually.
http://www.mikelee.org/the-pendulum-theory.html
5. 5
Global PerspectiveGlobal Perspective
EHM
Tugas:
• Menyebarkan cerita bohong tentang pertumbuhan
ekonomi, GNP, dll. negara target;
• Membuat laporan fiktif untuk IMF & WB agar
mengucurkan hutang;
• “Memancing” KKN di negara target;
• Membangkrutkan negara penerima hutang dan
menciptakan ketergantungan (debt trap, debt web);
• Menekan negara pengutang mendukung AS
(pangkalan militer, voting, dll);
• Memaksa negara pengutang menjual kekayaan alam;
• Mempromosikan kepentingan Korporatokrasi (koalisi
pemerintah, bank, korporat AS).
Metode:
• Penipuan, pemerasan & penyuapan;
• Pembunuhan;
• Penggermoan;
• Merusak ekosistem;
• Mengingkari Deklarasi Kemerdekaan.
Hasil Kerja:
• Kejatuhan Shah Iran;
• Pembunuhan Presiden Panama;
• Invasi ke Irak;
• Kejatuhan Bung Karno;
• Ketergantungan ekonomi
negara berkembang (inc. RI).
Negara Target:
Indonesia, Panama, Ekuador,
Kolombia, Arab Saudi, Iran, dll.
Dampak:
• Kesenjangan & ketidakadilan global;
• Kebencian thd AS;
• Peristiwa 9-11.
Membangun
Imperium
Membiayai
kampanye
politik
S
S
6. 6
INDONESIA
PANPANAMAAMA
EKUADOR
IRAN
• Hutang LN membuat ketergantungan tinggi
(30% APBN untuk bayar hutang);
• Tambang strategis dikuasai AS;
• Pergantian rezim Orla – Orba – Reformasi.
• Invasi militer;
• Terbunuhnya Presiden Omar
Torrijos (1981)
• 50% APBN untuk bayar
hutang;
• Terbunuhnya Presiden Jaime
Roldos (1981)
Penggulingan rezim Shah (1953) Pintu masuk untuk
menguasai seluruh Afrika
PresidenPresiden Richard NixonRichard Nixon
menginginkanmenginginkan kekayaankekayaan IndonesiaIndonesia
diperasdiperas sampaisampai keringkering. Di. Di matamata
Nixon, IndonesiaNixon, Indonesia ibaratibarat real estatereal estate
terbesarterbesar didi duniadunia ygyg taktak bolehboleh jatuhjatuh
keke tangantangan SovietSoviet atauatau China.China.
MESIRIRAN
7. Indonesia mulai retak & rapuh?
PotensiPotensi DisintegrasiDisintegrasi RakyatRakyat vsvs NegaraNegara KemarahanKemarahan MassaMassa
HedonismeHedonisme KawulaKawula MudaMudaKonflikKonflik ElitElit PolitikPolitik KonflikKonflik AntarAntar PemelukPemeluk AgamaAgama
National PerspectiveNational Perspective
8. Indonesia mulai retak & rapuh?
PerangPerang AntarAntar SukuSuku di Papua & NTT/Bdi Papua & NTT/B DayakDayak vsvs MaduraMadura
KekerasanKekerasan thdthd WargaWarga KeturunanKeturunanAlamAlam--punpun TurutTurut MurkaMurka
National PerspectiveNational Perspective
9. Indonesia Gagal?
PelantikanPelantikan GubernurGubernur && WagubWagub JawaJawa BaratBarat
Bandung, 13Bandung, 13 JuniJuni 20132013
Seminar “MauSeminar “Mau DibawaDibawa KemanaKemana Indonesia?Indonesia?
Jakarta, 11Jakarta, 11 JuniJuni 20132013
National PerspectiveNational Perspective
11. 2 Category of State Failures
CasesCases which do not alter the underlying willingness of thewhich do not alter the underlying willingness of the
population topopulation to accept rules, decisions and measures adopted byaccept rules, decisions and measures adopted by
aa common governmentcommon government (k(kasus ygasus yg tidak mengubahtidak mengubah hasrathasrat
pendudukpenduduk untuk menerima aturan, keputusanuntuk menerima aturan, keputusan && tindakantindakan
pemerintahpemerintah));;
CasesCases which do alter thiswhich do alter this dispositiondisposition ((kasuskasus ygyg mengubahmengubah sikapsikap
masyarakatmasyarakat thdthd pemerintahpemerintah).).
This can be calledThis can be called nation failure !!nation failure !!
• a process in which the requirements of normal politics, the social
substratum essential for the acceptance of majority and redistribution
decisions, disappear;
• the cultural projection of a nation is no longer convincing to many; there
is no consensus on the cultural traditions, customs, symbols, rituals, and
the historical experience – there is no “usable past”;
• when individual and mutually exclusive nationalisms replace the former
common identity.
Armin von Bogdandy, et.al., State-Building, Nation-Building, and Constitutional Politics in Post-Conflict
Situations: Conceptual Clarifications and an Appraisal of Different Approaches, Max Planck Yearbook of
United Nations Law, Volume 9, 2005, p. 579-613, Netherlands.
12. Benarkah Indonesia Negara Gagal?
PresidenPresiden JermanJerman, Christian, Christian WulffWulff,, KuliahKuliah UmumUmum didi UIUI DepokDepok, 1, 1 DesemberDesember 20112011
13.
14. Benarkah Indonesia Negara Gagal?
20 besar negara terkuat dari segi militer menurut
Globalfirepower:
1. Amerika
2. Rusia
3. China
4. India
5. Inggris
6. Turki
7. Korea Selatan
8. Prancis
9. Jepang
10. Israel
Philipina (23)
Australia (24)
11. Brasil
12. Iran
13. Jerman
14. Taiwan
15. Pakistan
16. Mesir
17. Italia
18.18. INDONESIAINDONESIA
19. Thailand
20. Ukraina
Malaysia (27)
Singapura (41)
16. Fused Prismatic Diffracted
ascription attainment achievement
particularism selectivism universalism
functional diffusion poly-functionalism functional specificity
Mengapa muncul gejala Negara
Gagal atau Negara Terfragmentasi?
17. If a society is highly differentiated (function) and well integratedIf a society is highly differentiated (function) and well integrated
(structure),(structure), then it is diffractedthen it is diffracted..
If a society is differentiated and poorly integrated (malIf a society is differentiated and poorly integrated (mal--
integrated), then it is prismatic.integrated), then it is prismatic.
If a society is not at all differentiated, there are no specialists,If a society is not at all differentiated, there are no specialists,
and everyone can do everything, it is a fused system.and everyone can do everything, it is a fused system.
DalamDalam fused societyfused society,, strukturstruktur tunggaltunggal akanakan mempengaruhimempengaruhi
seluruhseluruh//banyakbanyak fungsifungsi dalamdalam masyarakatmasyarakat..
DalamDalam diffracted societydiffracted society,, terciptatercipta banyakbanyak strukturstruktur untukuntuk
menjalankanmenjalankan fungsifungsi--fungsifungsi spesifikspesifik..
DalamDalam prismatic societyprismatic society,, terdapatterdapat ciriciri keduakedua bentukbentuk tersebuttersebut
““All societies are generally prismatic in nature“.All societies are generally prismatic in nature“.
((R.K. Sapru, Administrative Theories And Management Thought, pp. 246)pp. 246)
Fused-Prismatic-Diffracted Model Fred W. Riggs
18. HETEROGENEITYHETEROGENEITY:: dalamdalam masyarakatmasyarakat prismatikprismatik terdapatterdapat strukturstruktur
sosialsosial ygyg sangatsangat beragamberagam,, ygyg memungkinkanmemungkinkan terjadinyaterjadinya
disparitasdisparitas sosialsosial,, ekonomiekonomi,, kepercayaankepercayaan,, dandan kulturalkultural.. AdaAda
kelompokkelompok ygyg sangatsangat modern,modern, namunnamun adaada jugajuga ygyg masihmasih sangatsangat
tradisionaltradisional,, dandan cenderungcenderung adaada ketimpanganketimpangan pembangunanpembangunan
dalamdalam masyarakatmasyarakat..
IMPLIKASI THD BIROKRASIIMPLIKASI THD BIROKRASI:: bureaucratsbureaucrats eenjoynjoy enormousenormous
influence, power & prestige, and make moneyinfluence, power & prestige, and make money. The people who. The people who
are in power would make all efforts in furtherance of theirare in power would make all efforts in furtherance of their
interests andinterests and stick to powerstick to power. The problem becomes much more. The problem becomes much more
complicated where different communities strive tocomplicated where different communities strive to pull thepull the
society in different directionssociety in different directions in promoting their own sectionalin promoting their own sectional
interests. Such disparities lead tointerests. Such disparities lead to creation of administrativecreation of administrative
problemproblem. The. The rullingrulling elite would try toelite would try to protect the interests ofprotect the interests of
“haves” and ignore the interests “have“haves” and ignore the interests “have--notsnots””..
CiriCiri--ciriciri Prismatic SocietyPrismatic Society
19. CiriCiri--ciriciri Prismatic SocietyPrismatic Society
FORMALISMFORMALISM:: merujumerujukk adanyaadanya diskrepansidiskrepansi antaraantara
normanorma dengandengan perilakuperilaku,, antaraantara formal powerformal power dandan
effective powereffective power,, antaraantara ygyg diinginkandiinginkan pemerintahpemerintah
dengandengan ygyg dilakukandilakukan masyarakatmasyarakat..
IMPLIKASI THD BIROKRASIIMPLIKASI THD BIROKRASI:: the constitution vests lawthe constitution vests law--
making responsibilities in legislators, but in realitymaking responsibilities in legislators, but in reality theythey
spend only a little time in lawspend only a little time in law--making activitiesmaking activities. This. This
facilitates thefacilitates the bureaucracy to play a decisivebureaucracy to play a decisive role inrole in
lawlaw--making processmaking process..
20. CiriCiri--ciriciri Prismatic SocietyPrismatic Society
OVERLAPPINGOVERLAPPING:: sejauhmanasejauhmana strukturstruktur yangyang terdiferensiasiterdiferensiasi padapada
diffracted societydiffracted society berdampinganberdampingan dengandengan strukturstruktur ygyg tidaktidak
terdiferensiasiterdiferensiasi padapada fused societyfused society.. PadaPada prismatic societyprismatic society,,
strukturstruktur tradisionaltradisional dandan modernmodern dapatdapat fungsifungsi--fungsifungsi ygyg samasama..
IMPLIKASI THD BIROKRASIIMPLIKASI THD BIROKRASI:: in prismatic society,in prismatic society, the legislature,the legislature,
executive, and bureaucracy perform various administrative,executive, and bureaucracy perform various administrative,
political, economic, and social functionpolitical, economic, and social function.. In practice, theirIn practice, their
behavior is largely governed andbehavior is largely governed and controlled by certain traditionalcontrolled by certain traditional
organization like family, religion, and casteorganization like family, religion, and caste..
OverlappingOverlapping in a prismatic society manifests in severalin a prismatic society manifests in several
dimensions such asdimensions such as nepotism, polynepotism, poly--communalism, the existencecommunalism, the existence
ofof clectsclects, poly, poly--normativismnormativism, and lack of consensus and, and lack of consensus and
separation of authority from controlseparation of authority from control..
24. SISMENAS
BangunBangun kesatuankesatuan visivisi
VISI IDEAL (Cita-cita & Tujuan Bangsa Indonesia):
“... Negara Indonesia yg merdeka, bersatu, berdaulat, adil & makmur”
“... melindungi segenap bangsa Indonesia & seluruh tumpah darah Indonesia &
untuk memajukan kesejahteraan umum, mencerdaskan kehidupan bangsa & ikut
melaksanakan ketertiban dunia yg berdasarkan kemerdekaan, perdamaian abadi
& keadilan sosial …”
Visi Indonesia 2020 (Visi Antara):
“Terwujudnya masy. Indonesia yg religius, manusiawi,
bersatu, demokratis, adil, sejahtera, maju, mandiri,
serta baik & bersih dalam penyelenggaraan negara.”
(Tap MPR No. VII/2001 ttg Visi Indonesia Masa
Depan)
Visi Jangka Panjang :
“Indonesia yang
mandiri, maju, adil, dan
makmur .”
(UU No. 17/2007
tentang RPJP Nasional)