This presentation was for 2015 Summer Workshop at Cedar Crest College and explored the following: Metaliterate learners, who apply integrated competencies related to evaluating, consuming, and producing information in participatory environments, will be better prepared for college level learning and lifelong civic engagement. This workshop defined metaliteracy, discussed the four domains of metaliteracy and related learning goals and objectives, and examined how this approach has been applied in the curricular design of several innovative projects such as competency based digital badging and three MOOCs. Participants discussed ways to envisage opportunities to enhance students’ metaliteracy abilities, and to share these ideas with other attendees.
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
Expanding Metaliteracy Across the Curriculum to Advance Lifelong Civic Engagement
1. Expanding Metaliteracy Across the Curriculum
to Advance Lifelong Civic Engagement
1
Tom Mackey and Trudi Jacobson
#metaliteracy
Summer Workshop
Wednesday, August 19, 2015
Cedar Crest College
Allentown, Pennsylvania
2. Today’s Workshop
10:00 Overview of Metaliteracy
10:45 Break!
10:55 Activity: ML Learning Objective
11:15 Metaliteracy Learning Collaborative Projects
11:35 The ACRL Framework and Metaliteracy
12:00 Activity: Putting It Together
12:15 Q & A
2
4. • “promotes critical thinking and collaboration in
a digital age” (p. 62).
• “comprehensive framework to effectively
participate in social media and online
communities” (p. 62).
• “unified construct that supports the acquisition,
production, and sharing of knowledge in
collaborative online communities” (p. 62).
4
Thomas P. Mackey and Trudi E. Jacobson “Reframing Information Literacy as a Metaliteracy”
College & Research Libraries. January 2011 72:62-78. http://crl.acrl.org/content/72/1/62.full.pdf
5. 5
Understand Format Type and Delivery Mode
Evaluate User Feedback as Active Researcher
Create a Context for User-generated Information
Thomas P. Mackey and Trudi E. Jacobson “Reframing Information Literacy as a Metaliteracy”
College & Research Libraries. January 2011 72:62-78. http://crl.acrl.org/content/72/1/62.full.pdf
Initial ML Learning Objectives
Evaluate Dynamic Content Critically
6. 6
Produce Original Content in Multiple Media
Formats
Understand Personal Privacy, Information Ethics
and Intellectual Property Issues
Share Information in Participatory Environments
Thomas P. Mackey and Trudi E. Jacobson “Reframing Information Literacy as a Metaliteracy”
College & Research Libraries. January 2011 72:62-78. http://crl.acrl.org/content/72/1/62.full.pdf
Initial ML Learning Objectives
7. 7
Mackey and Jacobson (2014)
Metaliteracy: Reinventing
Information Literacy to
Empower Learners
8. Metaliteracy: Reinventing Information
Literacy to Empower Learners
(Mackey and Jacobson, 2014).
“Metaliteracy expands the scope
of traditional information skills
(determine, access, locate,
understand, produce, and use
information) to include the
collaborative production and
sharing of information in
participatory digital environments
(collaborate, participate, produce,
and share)” (p. 1).
9. “Metaliteracy is envisioned
as a comprehensive model
for information literacy to
advance critical thinking
and reflection in social
media, open learning
settings, and online
communities.”
(Jacobson and Mackey, Proposing a
Metaliteracy Model to Redefine
Information Literacy, 2013)
10. “Metaliteracy empowers
learners to participate in
interactive information
environments, equipped
with the ability to
continuously reflect,
change, and contribute as
critical thinkers”
(p. 86).
(Jacobson and Mackey, Proposing a
Metaliteracy Model to Redefine
Information Literacy, 2013)
11. Metaliteracy: Reinventing Information
Literacy to Empower Learners
(Mackey and Jacobson, 2014).
“Metaliteracy is not about
introducing yet another literacy
format, but rather reinventing an
existing one, information literacy,
the critical foundation literacy that
informs many others while being
flexible and adaptive enough to
evolve and change over time” (p.
1-2).
12. Metaliteracy: Reinventing Information
Literacy to Empower Learners
(Mackey and Jacobson, 2014).
“While literacy is focused on
reading and writing, and
information literacy has strongly
emphasized search and retrieval,
metaliteracy is about what
happens beyond these abilities to
promote the collaborative
production and sharing of
information” (p. 6).
13. Collaboratively Developed ML Goals
and Objectives
1. Evaluate content critically, including dynamic, online
content that changes and evolves, such as article
preprints, blogs, and wikis
2. Understand personal privacy, information ethics, and
intellectual property issues in changing technology
environments
3. Share information and collaborate in a variety of
participatory environments
4. Demonstrate ability to connect learning and research
strategies with lifelong learning processes and
personal, academic, and professional goals
13
http://metaliteracy.org/learning-objectives/
14. 14
Mackey and Jacobson (2014)
Metaliteracy: Reinventing
Information Literacy to
Empower Learners
16. Metaliteracy in Practice
(Jacobson and Mackey, Forthcoming).
“Metaliteracy applies to all stages
and facets of an individual’s life. It
is not limited to the academic
realm, nor is it something learned
once and for all. Indeed,
metaliteracy focuses on
adaptability as information
environments change, and the
critical reflection necessary to
recognize new and evolving needs
in order to remain adept.”
(Preface)
17. 17
Can’t seem to
stop those ads
following you
around? Why
not become
‘metaliterate’?
Jacobson and Mackey, August 7, 2015
18. 18
“Metaliteracy prepares us
to ask critical questions
about our searches and the
technologies we use to
seek answers and to
communicate with others.”
Jacobson and Mackey, August 7, 2015
19. 19
“We do not just accept the
authority of information
because it comes from an
established news
organization, a celebrity, a
friend, or a friend of a
friend. Metaliteracy
encourages reflection on
the circumstances of the
information produced.”
Jacobson and Mackey, August 7, 2015
20. 20
“The truth is that we can all
be metaliterate learners –
meditative and empowered,
asking perceptive
questions, thinking about
what and how we learn,
while sharing our content
and insights as we make
contributions to society.”
Jacobson and Mackey, August 7, 2015
23. Think / Pair / Share (later)
• What metaliteracy learning objectives are missing
in your courses or other teaching that you feel
would be beneficial to your students?
• Identify one learning objective that you’d
particularly like to tackle (maybe connected to
the role you chose). How might you start? Discuss
with someone near you. Share your ideas on
Padlet:
http://padlet.com/tjacobson/CCCWorkshop
23
26. Grant #1: Establish metaliteracy learning
collaborative and explore badging;
For Fun: Connectivist MOOC and badging
system
Grant #2: Integrate badging into Coursera
MOOC
Extra credit: Canvas MOOC
For Fun: Reach a wider audience
Projects
32. What is a digital badge?
o Record of an
accomplishment
o Corresponds to
knowledge shown or
abilities proven
o A component in the
competency-based
education movement
o Methods of gauging
accomplishment varies
o For metaliteracy
badges, reading by
humans important,
given nature of the
learning
Image Source: Girl Guides of Canada, CC-BY
36. Preliminary Observations
Students
• Student engagement
dependent upon faculty
buy-in
• Students put a great deal of
themselves into their work
• Interest in earning badge
– “something unusual to
discuss with interviewers”
• Potential to earn badge
appeared to increase
student motivation
Faculty
• Level of interest varied
dependent on context
• Willingness to take the time to
review
• Frequently select quests that
cover traditional content
• Willingness to embed open
content
• Sometimes led to additional
collaboration with librarians
36
46. Goals for the Framework
• A flexible system of learning information
literacy concepts that can be tailored to
individual settings
• Recognizes the participatory, collaborative
information environment: learners as
content/knowledge creators, not just
consumers
(Mackey and Jacobson, “Reframing Information Literacy as a Metaliteracy,” C & RL, 72 (1) 2011,
pp. 62-78)
47. Goals for the Framework
• Importance of metacognition (thinking
about one’s own thinking)
(Mackey and Jacobson, “Reframing Information Literacy as a Metaliteracy,”
C & RL, 72 (1) 2011, pp. 62-78)
• Recognition of affective factors
(dispositions/habits of mind) (Carol Kuhlthau’s
work, amongst others)
48. From Standards to Framework
Determine extent of
information need
Access/Search
Evaluate
Use/apply
Consider
ethical/legal/social
issues
Scholarship
Authority
Information
Creation
Value
Searching
Inquiry
49. The Framework vs. The Standards
• 4 domains addressed:
cognitive, affective,
behavioral, metacognitive
• Learners as information
consumers and producers
• 6 Frames
• Learning outcomes and
assessment locally-based
• Faculty involvement critical
• Emphasis on behavioral
and cognitive domains
• Learners as information
consumers
• 5 Standards, 22
Performance Indicators
• Learning outcomes
specified
• Meshes with one-shots
Framework Standards
52. Threshold Concepts
Hofer, Townsend, and Brunetti describe threshold
concepts and their criteria, as based on the work of Jan
Meyer and Ray Land:
…Threshold concepts are the core ideas and processes in any
discipline that define the discipline, but that are so
ingrained that they often go unspoken or unrecognized by
practitioner. They are the central concepts that we want
our students to understand and put into practice, that
encourage them to think and act like practitioners
themselves. (Hofer, Townsend, and Brunetti, 2012, 387-
88)
52
53. 53
“Threshold concepts reflect the
perspective of experts in our profession
on the most important concepts in our
field, and also provide a developmental
trajectory for assisting our students in
moving from novice to experts in using
and understanding information in a wide
variety of contexts.”
Why Threshold Concepts?
54. Threshold Concepts
• A passage through a portal or gateway: gaining
a new view of a subject landscape
• Involve a “rite of passage” to a new level of
understanding: a crucial transition
• Require movement through a “liminal” space
which is challenging, unsettling, disturbing—
where the student may become “stuck”
56. Threshold Concepts in Disciplines
• Geology: the scale of geologic time
• Economics: opportunity cost
• Accounting: depreciation
• History: no unitary account of the past
• Writing/rhetoric studies: audience, purpose, situated
practice, genre
• Biology: photosynthesis
57. Threshold Concepts for IL
• Authority is Constructed and Contextual
• Information Creation as a Process
• Information Has Value
• Research as Inquiry
• Scholarship as Conversation
• Searching as Strategic Exploration
The concepts were identified through an ongoing Delphi study being conducted by L.
Townsend, A. R. Hofer, S. Lu, and K. Brunetti, though the Task Force took some of them
in new directions
58. Curriculum Design Considerations
• Want students to stay in liminal state long
enough to learn (B. Fister)
• Design with colleagues
• Faculty and librarians identify existing
connections
• Faculty and librarians co-develop assignments
• Position frames strategically across the
curriculum
• Align threshold concepts with learning outcomes
(or create new learning outcomes)
59. Curriculum Design Considerations
• Design learning activities or lessons
around threshold concepts
• Allow for confusion and uncertainty
• Revisit the concept more than once
• Revise learning outcomes if
necessary
Adapted from: “Threshold Concepts: Strategies and Approaches.”
Office of Learning and Teaching, Southern Cross University.
Available at: http://scu.edu.au/teachinglearning.index.php/92)
60. Initial Ideas About Assessment
Need to avoid assessments that allow mimicry
Rather, declarative approach
where students represent their
knowledge, such as concept
maps, portfolios, logs, blogs,
diaries
(Meyer and Land, 2010)
61. Metaliteracy in Practice
(Jacobson and Mackey, Forthcoming).
“The similarities to metaliteracy are
striking: metacognition, information
creation, and participation in learning
communities all reflect elements
espoused by metaliteracy when it was
originally developed to significantly
broaden the conception of
information literacy that was
commonly accepted, at least in the
United States, due to the definition in
the ACRL Information Literacy
Standards.” (Preface)
63. Pair work continued
• Review the ML learning objective you
identified earlier
• Is there a frame you would like to
connect it with? Any ideas on how?
• Add to your Padlet post
63
66. 66
Tom Mackey, Ph.D.
Vice Provost for Academic Programs
Office of Academic Affairs
SUNY Empire State College
Tom.Mackey@esc.edu
@TomMackey
Trudi Jacobson, M.L.S., M.A.
Distinguished Librarian
Head, Information Literacy Department
University Libraries
University at Albany, SUNY
Tjacobson@albany.edu
@PBKTrudi
Hinweis der Redaktion
Tom and Trudi
Thrilled to be doing a collaborative keynote, embodies our work, thank you for inviting us
Hope you will be as excited
Remind you about Twitter
I played around with the timing a bit, to give a bit more time for the report on the projects
Tom
Tom… mention the original article from 2011…
FT: The value of information does not correspond to its packaging or “wrapper”: for example, some blogs may provide the highest quality information, while others do not
Also mixes signals students may be receiving
User Feedback:just as information production and publication has been democratized, so too has critiquing information. No longer does one have to be an expert to be able to share one’s opinion widely. Plus constantly changing
Context:information appears as discrete units, no longer tethered to once-recognizable cohesive entities, this issue has become increasingly obvious. Need to understand & contextualize the info,
Eval Dynamic: fluidity info environment requires critical assessment abilities on a variety of fronts, from recognizing the value of less formal methods of communication, to understanding how to synthesize and reconcile conflicting information or viewpoints that may shift before one’s eyes, to determining how to separate opinion from fact. Not new, but more nuanced. And new layer: now possible for individuals to actively engage in conversations
Original: can now create and share—important to be able to do so effectively, using appropriate venues and formats
Privacy, etc: importance has become magnified in today’s de-centered information environment. Thoughtful reflection is needed, but this only happens when people are aware of these issues and have gained the knowledge and critical thinking perspective to tackle such complex concerns
Share: abillity to reach global audience brings responsibility differs greatly from the traditional situation of producing information for small, very localized group of readers. must understand: most appropriate ways share content,particularized nature of various venues, the rights issues, and the continuing responsibilities authorship on this scale entails.
Tom
This was the original visual model to explain the development of Metaliteracy (pause)
We see this as a flexible, circular model that builds on information literacy with new technologies and competencies (pause)
Metaliteracy expands information literacy to include the ability to produce, participate, share, and collaborate in open learning and social media environments (pause)
Metaliteracy also includes a central focus on metacognition, or the ability to think about one’s thinking.
Today’s learner moves through these spheres from any direction rather than a traditional linear manner
Tom– its all about the book!
Tom
Tom
Tom
Tom: “Metaliteracy also includes a metacognitive component and openness to format and mode that is less pronounced
in information literacy” (p. 6).
Ask the audience to review handout with detailed goals and objectives
Tom: behavioral (what students should be able to do upon successful completion of learning activities—skills, competencies), cognitive (what students should know upon successful completion of learning activities—comprehension, organization, application, evaluation), affective (changes in learners’ emotions or attitudes through engagement with learning activities), and metacognitive (what learners think about their own thinking—a reflective understanding of how and why they learn, what they do and do not know, their preconceptions, and how to continue to learn).
Understands the process of creating and sharing information
Recognizes gaps in knowledge
Seeks new knowledge to adjust to challenging situations
Adapts to changing technologies
Continuously self-reflects
Demonstrates empowerment through interaction, communication, and presentation
Reflects on production and participation
Quick quiet reflection on part of participants
Tom: “Metaliteracy also includes a metacognitive component and openness to format and mode that is less pronounced
in information literacy” (p. 6).
Tom
Tom
Tom
Tom
Need to get to this point by 10:45
Trudi
Trudi
Tom
Tom: What we are going to talk about. Badges and connectivist MOOC developed simultaneously
Tom
Tom
Stephen Downes and gRSShopper aggretator
Tom
Tom
Trudi
Trudi: digital badging
Skepticism about badges
When many people hear the word “badge” they think of this, but it’s really become something so much more.
Competency based education – libraries and info lit
Badging fit with metaliteracy
Trudi Use of badge content – adapted for Coursera
Trudi
Trudi
Trudi
Trudi
Tom
Tom
Trudi:
I think we can talk here about the different video approached we used and how Coursera recommends NOT using YouTube etc…because of issues in some countries with access.
We needn’t show all three videos – just the different approaches, and why … interviews, pecha kucha, animation, etc.
Tom
Don’t show this – just leave for visual …
Tom
Tom--- finish by 11:35am
Trudi start at 11:35 (goes to noon)
5 Standards, 6 Frames
Long have heard that we don’t need to turn students into novice librarians, but actually, the key concepts we understand will only help them
Transformative—cause the learner to experience a shift in perspective;
Integrative—bring together separate concepts (often identified as learning objectives) into a unified whole;
Irreversible—once grasped, cannot be un-grasped;
Bounded—may help define the boundaries of a particular discipline, are perhaps unique to the discipline;
Troublesome—usually difficult or counterintuitive ideas that can cause students to hit a roadblock in their learning.
Can enter into the conversation, language
Trudi
Trudi
Trudi: “Metaliteracy also includes a metacognitive component and openness to format and mode that is less pronounced
in information literacy” (p. 6).