Action plan 5352 week 4

T
Action Plan for Technology<br />By Thomas Eaves<br />Part 1:  District Organizational Chart for Technology<br />JobResponsibilitySuperintendentKeeps abreast of the latest trends regarding technology and education, and disseminates this information to stakeholders.  Evaluates the effectiveness of technology and its integration into classroom instructional initiatives. Asst. SuperintendentAssists the superintendent with evaluating programs.  Gathers feedback from relevant parties, especially at the campus level.District TechnologyCoordinatorInforms superintendents of latest ideas in technology.  Oversees implementation of technology on the campuses, and provides troubleshooting services for the network.  Evaluates the district’s progress towards the Texas Long Range Plan.District ProfessionalDevelopment CoordinatorCoordinates the implementation of staff development in the area of technology, such as the recent Smart Board in-service.  Evaluates the effectiveness of the training and reports the results to the superintendents.Curriculum SupervisorsProvides information to classroom teachers and principals regarding technology innovations in their particular subject area.   Provides feedback to teachers and principals regarding effectiveness of technology use.PrincipalsMonitors and encourages the use of technology on his/her campus.   Identifies teacher leaders that are proficient with technology use.Asst. PrincipalsAssists the principal in meeting the campus’ technology goals, such as all teachers having Internet access and multiple computers in each room.Campus Technology CoordinatorHelps set up the network on his/her campus.  Troubleshoots and corrects network problems as they occur.  Takes the lead role in getting teachers to complete the STaR Charts.  Head technology instructor for the campus.TeachersOn the front lines when it comes to merging technology and instruction.  Creates lesson plans and facilitates the use of technology to enhance the effectiveness of instruction.Parents and TeachersSupports the school and its technology use by following the guidelines set forth by the school regarding appropriate technology use.<br />Role of principal in making sure the organizational chart is implemented<br />As campus instructional leader, the principal is at the forefront when it comes to implementing and evaluating campus technology initiatives.  He/she will interact with the various parties on the organizational chart, and will provide valuable feedback regarding campus programs.  For example, if our computers are encountering a virus, he/she will coordinate with the district and campus technology coordinator to begin solving the problem.  The principal will meet with the superintendents and staff development coordinator to give updates on the training’s dissemination.  The principal then is a key component to ensuring successful technology use at the individual schools.<br />Part 2:  Professional Development Training<br />One of the main needs for my campus and district is to spread the many great ideas in technology instruction throughout the district.  As I discussed in my week three reports, my campus has many teachers doing great things with technology.  Smart Boards, Elmos, Claymation videos, and the Rapid Response System are some of the ways teachers at Vincent Middle School are using technology.  To move us forward in this area, those teachers who are using technology to enhance instruction must be identified and put to good use.  <br />To start, we need to know what works, and then develop a way to identify teachers who are using technology successfully. Next, these teachers need to be provided training in the area of in-service leadership and delivery.  For example, Smart Board technology has been implemented on my campus.  Just recently the staff underwent training in this area led by teachers proficient with the technology.  The staff members presenting the training received specialized instruction about how to organize the in-service.  As principals, we must harvest the skills demonstrated by those teachers who are strong in technology implementation. <br />In this age of accountability, teachers and administrators must be competent in gathering, analyzing, and reading the data. In-service training focusing on interpretting AEIS data is a necessary skill for my district.  It is not enough for the principal to tell us our state rankings.  Rather, as instructional leader of the campus, the principal should provide each staff member with the school’s data and explain the data at an in-service training.  Another aspect of improving the schools ability to gather and use data would be in-service using a technology search engine.  At my school, we all have computers in every classroom.  But it should not be assumed that every teacher is an expert in its use.  An in-service covering the use of search engines, such as Google or Yahoo Search, could strengthen our school’s data gathering techniques.  It would also strengthen the technology skills of our many digital immigrants.<br />Looking back at my school’s STaR Chart score, we gave ourselves an Advanced rating.  Having served as assistant principal many times during the past year, I have had the opportunity to visit most of the classrooms.  While I have seen teachers putting technology to excellent use, I have also seen just the opposite.  I feel my campus and district could benefit from in-service that focuses on basic technology use.  Some examples include:<br />1.  How to create a blog and the benefits it provides for the teachers and students.<br />2.  How to make use of basic tools, such as PowerPoint, Charts, Graphs, Spreadsheets, Cutting/Pasting, and Word Processing.   It should not be assumed that everyone is familiar with these items.<br />3.  How to create a Web Conference, allowing students to reach outside of the classroom walls.  <br />4.  Development of On-line lesson planning with evidence of technology usage.<br />5.  Grade level mastery of specific software programs.<br />6.  Teachers will become proficient in posting items to the district website.<br />7.  Teacher leaders will be identified by the SBDM committee, and utilized as technology coaches.  Stipends will be provided.<br />Lastly, the staff needs to be heard from when it comes to addressing technology needs.  I would use a variety of methods, formal and informal, to survey the teachers and find out what technology training they would like to receive. After receiving that information, I would enlist the help of technology savvy teachers, as mentioned above, to help present the training to our staff.<br />Part 3:  Evaluation<br />Getting an accurate picture of the effective of in-service or various programs has been problematic for my district.  Over the years, I have attended many in-service workshops where the evaluation tool was a written document asking the teacher to rank the session.   These surveys were given out at the end of the in-service when everyone was ready to go.  Consequently, I have seen many of them completed in a haphazard fashion.    Some new ideas are needed in gathering useful feedback, and technology can play a role.<br />When it comes to evaluating professional development, I would initiate an “after- action” approach to the evaluation process.  Following the session, I would instruct the participants to reflect on what they have learned from the training.  I would then ask that they email a brief reflection about their feeling the next day.  By allowing the information to soak in, a more accurate evaluation may be obtained.  <br />Another idea aimed at getting better data on the effectiveness of in-service is to solicit opinions while the training is on-going.  An example of this occurred on my campus during the recent Smart Board training.  Participants were actively engaged with the technology, and the presenters were gathering their responses as the training was ongoing.  There was a written evaluation provided at the session’s conclusion, but the real information was obtained during the actual training.  <br />As far as our campus plans go, we are all about getting to Exemplary status.  Our school uses technology to help us get to that goal, and provides updates along the way.  We begin with the AEIS data, and also the TAKS report for each individual child.  Teachers work to improve a student’s weak areas, and testing occurs every 6 weeks.  Test results are put into reports and shared with department heads, principals, and curriculum supervisors.  Technology is leading the way when it comes to handling this mass of information.  These reports are generated electronically and emailed to the interested parties.  When it comes to evaluating the effectiveness of our efforts, the principal will take the lead.   Are the reports generated in a timely fashion?  Are the appropriate personnel given the necessary data?  The administrative team will analyze the data to make sure we are working towards our campus goals.<br />When it comes to our technology goals and the Texas Long Range Plan, the administrative team needs to put in place ways to evaluate our progress.  Currently at my school, there are two formal methods of evaluating teacher technology use in the classroom: the PDAS evaluation, or Professional Development and Appraisal System, and the STaR Charts.  Both of these tools only give us a cursory look at campus technology usage.    For it to thrive, technology use needs to be made a priority.  Administrators need to look for it as they conduct their walk-throughs.     Teachers strong in technology use need to be encouraged to spread their ideas with colleagues.  To move towards the goals of the Texas Long Range Technology Plan, my campus has to improve our commitment to its use, going beyond a one- sentence statement in the campus improvement plan. <br />Finally, some obvious sources must be utilized when evaluating our technology usage.  They are:<br />1.  Students- feedback will consist of how they’ve experienced technology in the classroom.<br />2.  Teachers- periodically throughout the year teachers will email to administrators how technology is being used in the classroom.<br />3.  Assistant Principals- lesson plans will be analyzed for evidence of tech use, in addition to the classroom walk throughs.<br />4.  District Administrators- will visit the building looking for evidence of technology enhancing instruction, and will report the findings to the building administrative team.<br />
Action plan 5352 week 4
Action plan 5352 week 4
Action plan 5352 week 4
Action plan 5352 week 4
Action plan 5352 week 4

Recomendados

Action plan von
Action planAction plan
Action plantrecebird
132 views4 Folien
Week 4 5352 von
Week 4 5352Week 4 5352
Week 4 5352abby20
348 views9 Folien
The Action Plan von
The Action PlanThe Action Plan
The Action Planabby20
722 views11 Folien
The Action Plan von
The Action PlanThe Action Plan
The Action Planabby20
614 views11 Folien
5352 action plan von
5352 action plan5352 action plan
5352 action planLBrister
127 views7 Folien
Action and Evaluation Report von
Action and Evaluation ReportAction and Evaluation Report
Action and Evaluation Reportacalax
284 views5 Folien

Más contenido relacionado

Was ist angesagt?

Masters Pro Dev. Chart von
Masters Pro Dev. ChartMasters Pro Dev. Chart
Masters Pro Dev. Chartjmoore1228
285 views8 Folien
Action plan[1] von
Action plan[1]Action plan[1]
Action plan[1]amberivy2550
583 views11 Folien
Research paper middle east college von
Research paper middle east collegeResearch paper middle east college
Research paper middle east collegemazin
296 views9 Folien
Edld 5352 Week 4 Blog Upload von
Edld 5352 Week 4   Blog UploadEdld 5352 Week 4   Blog Upload
Edld 5352 Week 4 Blog Uploadjim brewster
307 views10 Folien
Week 4 Action Plan von
Week 4 Action PlanWeek 4 Action Plan
Week 4 Action Plansteenhard
81 views2 Folien
Action Plan von
Action PlanAction Plan
Action PlanJennLynn2004
213 views5 Folien

Was ist angesagt?(20)

Masters Pro Dev. Chart von jmoore1228
Masters Pro Dev. ChartMasters Pro Dev. Chart
Masters Pro Dev. Chart
jmoore1228285 views
Research paper middle east college von mazin
Research paper middle east collegeResearch paper middle east college
Research paper middle east college
mazin296 views
Edld 5352 Week 4 Blog Upload von jim brewster
Edld 5352 Week 4   Blog UploadEdld 5352 Week 4   Blog Upload
Edld 5352 Week 4 Blog Upload
jim brewster307 views
Week 4 Action Plan von steenhard
Week 4 Action PlanWeek 4 Action Plan
Week 4 Action Plan
steenhard81 views
Fish Net High School von lerowe
Fish Net High SchoolFish Net High School
Fish Net High School
lerowe1K views
Ict in-schools-inspectorate-evaluation-studies von AVINASH JURIANI
Ict in-schools-inspectorate-evaluation-studiesIct in-schools-inspectorate-evaluation-studies
Ict in-schools-inspectorate-evaluation-studies
AVINASH JURIANI641 views
Tech Needs Assessment von guest1e6b8b5
Tech Needs AssessmentTech Needs Assessment
Tech Needs Assessment
guest1e6b8b51.7K views
Technology Action Plan von Tom Robbins
Technology Action PlanTechnology Action Plan
Technology Action Plan
Tom Robbins45 views
Final draft tech plan-group work (1) von walshdavisjm
Final draft tech plan-group work (1)Final draft tech plan-group work (1)
Final draft tech plan-group work (1)
walshdavisjm359 views
Final draft tech plan-group work (1) von walshdavisjm
Final draft tech plan-group work (1)Final draft tech plan-group work (1)
Final draft tech plan-group work (1)
walshdavisjm185 views
Mjh action report complete von coachpayne
Mjh action report completeMjh action report complete
Mjh action report complete
coachpayne177 views
Week 4 Blog von tlmeadows
Week 4 BlogWeek 4 Blog
Week 4 Blog
tlmeadows193 views

Destacado

野菜2009 von
野菜2009野菜2009
野菜2009Masami Yabusaki
206 views8 Folien
Facebook marketing cust88 von
Facebook marketing cust88Facebook marketing cust88
Facebook marketing cust88seanfnjqpe
276 views9 Folien
Hitless handover von
Hitless handoverHitless handover
Hitless handoverMasami Yabusaki
146 views10 Folien
Edld 5352 wk 2 ppt von
Edld 5352 wk 2 pptEdld 5352 wk 2 ppt
Edld 5352 wk 2 pptaemunoz624
117 views10 Folien
Philippi battle sequence von
Philippi battle sequencePhilippi battle sequence
Philippi battle sequencefoster2
237 views10 Folien
Facebook profit-guide-cust99 von
Facebook profit-guide-cust99Facebook profit-guide-cust99
Facebook profit-guide-cust99seanfnjqpe
1.4K views108 Folien

Destacado(15)

Facebook marketing cust88 von seanfnjqpe
Facebook marketing cust88Facebook marketing cust88
Facebook marketing cust88
seanfnjqpe276 views
Edld 5352 wk 2 ppt von aemunoz624
Edld 5352 wk 2 pptEdld 5352 wk 2 ppt
Edld 5352 wk 2 ppt
aemunoz624117 views
Philippi battle sequence von foster2
Philippi battle sequencePhilippi battle sequence
Philippi battle sequence
foster2237 views
Facebook profit-guide-cust99 von seanfnjqpe
Facebook profit-guide-cust99Facebook profit-guide-cust99
Facebook profit-guide-cust99
seanfnjqpe1.4K views
Week 4 assignment von sdgunter
Week 4 assignmentWeek 4 assignment
Week 4 assignment
sdgunter123 views
Texas star chart wildcats von sdgunter
Texas star chart   wildcatsTexas star chart   wildcats
Texas star chart wildcats
sdgunter140 views
Edld 5352 texas s ta r chart von heathbrown
Edld 5352 texas s ta r chartEdld 5352 texas s ta r chart
Edld 5352 texas s ta r chart
heathbrown164 views
Alzheimer's Disease von stefanie23r
Alzheimer's DiseaseAlzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
stefanie23r225 views
Update on therapeutic temperature management von Emilian Necula
Update on therapeutic temperature managementUpdate on therapeutic temperature management
Update on therapeutic temperature management
Emilian Necula1.3K views
Aerobic lecture, von pheyay
Aerobic lecture,Aerobic lecture,
Aerobic lecture,
pheyay30.2K views

Similar a Action plan 5352 week 4

Action plan 2 von
Action plan 2Action plan 2
Action plan 2alancaster40
96 views3 Folien
Technology Summary von
Technology SummaryTechnology Summary
Technology Summarydavewilson1122
153 views6 Folien
Hms STaR chart summary 2009-2010 von
Hms STaR chart summary 2009-2010Hms STaR chart summary 2009-2010
Hms STaR chart summary 2009-2010corey shepard
216 views14 Folien
Polly snipes section 1237 von
Polly snipes section 1237Polly snipes section 1237
Polly snipes section 1237psnipes
74 views2 Folien
Polly snipes section 1237 von
Polly snipes section 1237Polly snipes section 1237
Polly snipes section 1237psnipes
138 views2 Folien
Technology action plan von
Technology action planTechnology action plan
Technology action planAnnMoody
191 views6 Folien

Similar a Action plan 5352 week 4(19)

Hms STaR chart summary 2009-2010 von corey shepard
Hms STaR chart summary 2009-2010Hms STaR chart summary 2009-2010
Hms STaR chart summary 2009-2010
corey shepard216 views
Polly snipes section 1237 von psnipes
Polly snipes section 1237Polly snipes section 1237
Polly snipes section 1237
psnipes74 views
Polly snipes section 1237 von psnipes
Polly snipes section 1237Polly snipes section 1237
Polly snipes section 1237
psnipes138 views
Technology action plan von AnnMoody
Technology action planTechnology action plan
Technology action plan
AnnMoody191 views
Polly snipes section 1237 (2) von psnipes
Polly snipes section 1237 (2)Polly snipes section 1237 (2)
Polly snipes section 1237 (2)
psnipes236 views
Week 4 Assignment von lbailiff
Week 4 AssignmentWeek 4 Assignment
Week 4 Assignment
lbailiff153 views
Technology action plan von sneadm
Technology action planTechnology action plan
Technology action plan
sneadm225 views
Action Plan in Action! von JennLynn2004
Action Plan in Action!Action Plan in Action!
Action Plan in Action!
JennLynn2004307 views
Week 4 Action Plan von KimHolbrook
Week 4 Action PlanWeek 4 Action Plan
Week 4 Action Plan
KimHolbrook330 views
Action Plan von mlpope34
Action PlanAction Plan
Action Plan
mlpope34247 views
Action Plan von lkieler
Action PlanAction Plan
Action Plan
lkieler751 views
As I Pondered The Most Appropriate Way To Address The Technology Issue von chet deaver
As I Pondered The Most Appropriate Way To Address The Technology IssueAs I Pondered The Most Appropriate Way To Address The Technology Issue
As I Pondered The Most Appropriate Way To Address The Technology Issue
chet deaver165 views
Action Plan Week 4 von andrearyan
Action Plan Week 4Action Plan Week 4
Action Plan Week 4
andrearyan161 views

Action plan 5352 week 4

  • 1. Action Plan for Technology<br />By Thomas Eaves<br />Part 1: District Organizational Chart for Technology<br />JobResponsibilitySuperintendentKeeps abreast of the latest trends regarding technology and education, and disseminates this information to stakeholders. Evaluates the effectiveness of technology and its integration into classroom instructional initiatives. Asst. SuperintendentAssists the superintendent with evaluating programs. Gathers feedback from relevant parties, especially at the campus level.District TechnologyCoordinatorInforms superintendents of latest ideas in technology. Oversees implementation of technology on the campuses, and provides troubleshooting services for the network. Evaluates the district’s progress towards the Texas Long Range Plan.District ProfessionalDevelopment CoordinatorCoordinates the implementation of staff development in the area of technology, such as the recent Smart Board in-service. Evaluates the effectiveness of the training and reports the results to the superintendents.Curriculum SupervisorsProvides information to classroom teachers and principals regarding technology innovations in their particular subject area. Provides feedback to teachers and principals regarding effectiveness of technology use.PrincipalsMonitors and encourages the use of technology on his/her campus. Identifies teacher leaders that are proficient with technology use.Asst. PrincipalsAssists the principal in meeting the campus’ technology goals, such as all teachers having Internet access and multiple computers in each room.Campus Technology CoordinatorHelps set up the network on his/her campus. Troubleshoots and corrects network problems as they occur. Takes the lead role in getting teachers to complete the STaR Charts. Head technology instructor for the campus.TeachersOn the front lines when it comes to merging technology and instruction. Creates lesson plans and facilitates the use of technology to enhance the effectiveness of instruction.Parents and TeachersSupports the school and its technology use by following the guidelines set forth by the school regarding appropriate technology use.<br />Role of principal in making sure the organizational chart is implemented<br />As campus instructional leader, the principal is at the forefront when it comes to implementing and evaluating campus technology initiatives. He/she will interact with the various parties on the organizational chart, and will provide valuable feedback regarding campus programs. For example, if our computers are encountering a virus, he/she will coordinate with the district and campus technology coordinator to begin solving the problem. The principal will meet with the superintendents and staff development coordinator to give updates on the training’s dissemination. The principal then is a key component to ensuring successful technology use at the individual schools.<br />Part 2: Professional Development Training<br />One of the main needs for my campus and district is to spread the many great ideas in technology instruction throughout the district. As I discussed in my week three reports, my campus has many teachers doing great things with technology. Smart Boards, Elmos, Claymation videos, and the Rapid Response System are some of the ways teachers at Vincent Middle School are using technology. To move us forward in this area, those teachers who are using technology to enhance instruction must be identified and put to good use. <br />To start, we need to know what works, and then develop a way to identify teachers who are using technology successfully. Next, these teachers need to be provided training in the area of in-service leadership and delivery. For example, Smart Board technology has been implemented on my campus. Just recently the staff underwent training in this area led by teachers proficient with the technology. The staff members presenting the training received specialized instruction about how to organize the in-service. As principals, we must harvest the skills demonstrated by those teachers who are strong in technology implementation. <br />In this age of accountability, teachers and administrators must be competent in gathering, analyzing, and reading the data. In-service training focusing on interpretting AEIS data is a necessary skill for my district. It is not enough for the principal to tell us our state rankings. Rather, as instructional leader of the campus, the principal should provide each staff member with the school’s data and explain the data at an in-service training. Another aspect of improving the schools ability to gather and use data would be in-service using a technology search engine. At my school, we all have computers in every classroom. But it should not be assumed that every teacher is an expert in its use. An in-service covering the use of search engines, such as Google or Yahoo Search, could strengthen our school’s data gathering techniques. It would also strengthen the technology skills of our many digital immigrants.<br />Looking back at my school’s STaR Chart score, we gave ourselves an Advanced rating. Having served as assistant principal many times during the past year, I have had the opportunity to visit most of the classrooms. While I have seen teachers putting technology to excellent use, I have also seen just the opposite. I feel my campus and district could benefit from in-service that focuses on basic technology use. Some examples include:<br />1. How to create a blog and the benefits it provides for the teachers and students.<br />2. How to make use of basic tools, such as PowerPoint, Charts, Graphs, Spreadsheets, Cutting/Pasting, and Word Processing. It should not be assumed that everyone is familiar with these items.<br />3. How to create a Web Conference, allowing students to reach outside of the classroom walls. <br />4. Development of On-line lesson planning with evidence of technology usage.<br />5. Grade level mastery of specific software programs.<br />6. Teachers will become proficient in posting items to the district website.<br />7. Teacher leaders will be identified by the SBDM committee, and utilized as technology coaches. Stipends will be provided.<br />Lastly, the staff needs to be heard from when it comes to addressing technology needs. I would use a variety of methods, formal and informal, to survey the teachers and find out what technology training they would like to receive. After receiving that information, I would enlist the help of technology savvy teachers, as mentioned above, to help present the training to our staff.<br />Part 3: Evaluation<br />Getting an accurate picture of the effective of in-service or various programs has been problematic for my district. Over the years, I have attended many in-service workshops where the evaluation tool was a written document asking the teacher to rank the session. These surveys were given out at the end of the in-service when everyone was ready to go. Consequently, I have seen many of them completed in a haphazard fashion. Some new ideas are needed in gathering useful feedback, and technology can play a role.<br />When it comes to evaluating professional development, I would initiate an “after- action” approach to the evaluation process. Following the session, I would instruct the participants to reflect on what they have learned from the training. I would then ask that they email a brief reflection about their feeling the next day. By allowing the information to soak in, a more accurate evaluation may be obtained. <br />Another idea aimed at getting better data on the effectiveness of in-service is to solicit opinions while the training is on-going. An example of this occurred on my campus during the recent Smart Board training. Participants were actively engaged with the technology, and the presenters were gathering their responses as the training was ongoing. There was a written evaluation provided at the session’s conclusion, but the real information was obtained during the actual training. <br />As far as our campus plans go, we are all about getting to Exemplary status. Our school uses technology to help us get to that goal, and provides updates along the way. We begin with the AEIS data, and also the TAKS report for each individual child. Teachers work to improve a student’s weak areas, and testing occurs every 6 weeks. Test results are put into reports and shared with department heads, principals, and curriculum supervisors. Technology is leading the way when it comes to handling this mass of information. These reports are generated electronically and emailed to the interested parties. When it comes to evaluating the effectiveness of our efforts, the principal will take the lead. Are the reports generated in a timely fashion? Are the appropriate personnel given the necessary data? The administrative team will analyze the data to make sure we are working towards our campus goals.<br />When it comes to our technology goals and the Texas Long Range Plan, the administrative team needs to put in place ways to evaluate our progress. Currently at my school, there are two formal methods of evaluating teacher technology use in the classroom: the PDAS evaluation, or Professional Development and Appraisal System, and the STaR Charts. Both of these tools only give us a cursory look at campus technology usage. For it to thrive, technology use needs to be made a priority. Administrators need to look for it as they conduct their walk-throughs. Teachers strong in technology use need to be encouraged to spread their ideas with colleagues. To move towards the goals of the Texas Long Range Technology Plan, my campus has to improve our commitment to its use, going beyond a one- sentence statement in the campus improvement plan. <br />Finally, some obvious sources must be utilized when evaluating our technology usage. They are:<br />1. Students- feedback will consist of how they’ve experienced technology in the classroom.<br />2. Teachers- periodically throughout the year teachers will email to administrators how technology is being used in the classroom.<br />3. Assistant Principals- lesson plans will be analyzed for evidence of tech use, in addition to the classroom walk throughs.<br />4. District Administrators- will visit the building looking for evidence of technology enhancing instruction, and will report the findings to the building administrative team.<br />