This document discusses osteoporosis management and the efficacy and safety of bisphosphonates. It begins with an overview of the burden of osteoporosis, noting that over 2.5 million people in Indonesia have osteoporosis and over 88 million have osteopenia. It then reviews screening and treatment guidelines before focusing on bisphosphonates. The document discusses the efficacy of various bisphosphonates at reducing fractures based on clinical trials. It also reviews controversial issues associated with long-term bisphosphonate use such as osteonecrosis of the jaw, atypical fractures, atrial fibrillation, and esophageal cancer. It concludes by noting that annual zoledronic acid injections can significantly reduce hip,
4. Burden of DiseaseBurden of Disease
2.52.5 million people in Indonesiamillion people in Indonesia
have Osteoporosishave Osteoporosis
88 million people in Indonesiamillion people in Indonesia
have Osteopenia.have Osteopenia.
5. Burden of DiseaseBurden of Disease
> 0,5 million> 0,5 million
fractures/year due to either.fractures/year due to either.
75,00075,000 HIP fractures.HIP fractures.
150,000150,000 vertebral fractures.vertebral fractures.
35,00035,000 pelvic factures.pelvic factures.
Bone health and osteoporosis: Department ofBone health and osteoporosis: Department of
6. Burden of Disease :Burden of Disease :
Hip fracturesHip fractures ::
50 %50 % Permanent impairedPermanent impaired
mobility.mobility.
25 %25 % Loose skills to liveLoose skills to live
independently.independently.
Increased all cause mortality : firstIncreased all cause mortality : first 33
monthsmonths after hip fracture.after hip fracture.
1.2010 position statement of the North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2010.1.2010 position statement of the North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2010.
8. Etiology of Bone loss in OsteoporosisEtiology of Bone loss in Osteoporosis
OSTEOCLAST - RESORPTIONOSTEOBLAST - FORMATION
Primary cause is estrogen deficiency
+
11. Vertebral Fractures
Semi-quantitative reading / visual scoring
Genant et al., J Bone Miner Res 1993, 8:137
Normal
(Grade 0)
Wedge fracture Biconcave fracture Crush fracture
Mild fracture
(Grade 1, ~20-25%)
Moderate fracture
(Grade 2, ~25-40%)
Severe fracture
(Grade 3, ~40%)
12. Who to screenWho to screen
Women > 65 years.Women > 65 years.
Men > 70 years.Men > 70 years.
Postmenopausal women /men >50 yearsPostmenopausal women /men >50 years
with clinical risk factors.with clinical risk factors.
H/o fracture at age > 50 years.H/o fracture at age > 50 years.
Chronic steroid use.Chronic steroid use.
17. Who to treat ?Who to treat ?
Prior h/o hip/vertebral #Prior h/o hip/vertebral #
oror
T Score < -2.5T Score < -2.5
oror
T Score -1 to -2.5 &
10 yr risk (FRAX) :
HIP # > 3 % or
major osteoporotic # > 20 %
T Score -1 to -2.5 &
10 yr risk (FRAX) :
HIP # > 3 % or
major osteoporotic # > 20 %
Postmenopausal women /men > 50 yrs
with
18. Recommendation for women and men > 50 yoRecommendation for women and men > 50 yo
•• Counsel on the risk of osteoporosis and related fractures.Counsel on the risk of osteoporosis and related fractures.
•• Advise on a diet rich inAdvise on a diet rich in fruits and vegetablesfruits and vegetables and that includesand that includes
adequate amounts of totaladequate amounts of total calcium intakecalcium intake (1,000 mg per day(1,000 mg per day
for men 50-70; 1,200 mg per day for women 51 and olderfor men 50-70; 1,200 mg per day for women 51 and older
and men 71 and older).and men 71 and older).
•• Advise onAdvise on vitamin Dvitamin D intake (800-1,000 IU per day), includingintake (800-1,000 IU per day), including
supplements if necessary for individuals age 50 and older.supplements if necessary for individuals age 50 and older.
•• Recommend regularRecommend regular weight-bearing and muscle-strengtheningweight-bearing and muscle-strengthening
exercise to improve agility, strength, posture and balance andexercise to improve agility, strength, posture and balance and
reduce the risk of falls and fractures.reduce the risk of falls and fractures.
19. ••AssessAssess risk factorsrisk factors for falls and offerfor falls and offer
appropriate modifications :appropriate modifications :
home safety assessment,home safety assessment,
balance training exercises,balance training exercises,
correction of vitamin D insufficiency,correction of vitamin D insufficiency,
avoidance of certain medications andavoidance of certain medications and
bifocals use when appropriatebifocals use when appropriate
22. Bone marrow precursorsBone marrow precursors
OsteoblastsOsteoblasts
OsteoclastOsteoclast
Lining cellsLining cells
Stimulators ofStimulators of
Bone FormationBone Formation
FluorideFluoride
PTH analogsPTH analogs
Sr Ranelate (?)Sr Ranelate (?)
Inhibitors ofInhibitors of
Bone ResorptionBone Resorption
Estrogen, SERMsEstrogen, SERMs
BisphosphonatesBisphosphonates
CalcitoninCalcitonin
Inhibitors of
RANKL
Cathepsin K
Therapeutic strategiesTherapeutic strategies
23. Treatments & Efficacy
Vertebral Fx Non-vertebral Fx
Other Fx Hip Fx
Oral
HRT Yes Yes Yes
Etidronate* Yes
Alendronate* Yes Yes Yes
Risedronate* Yes Yes Yes
Ibandronate* Yes [Yes]
Raloxifene* Yes
Calcitriol* Yes
Strontium Ranelate* Yes Yes [Yes]
24. Vertebral Fx Non-vertebral Fx
Other Fx Hip Fx
Subcutaneous
Teriparatide* Yes Yes
1-84 PTH* Yes
Denosumab* Yes Yes Yes
Intravenous
Pamidronate
Ibandronate*
Zoledronate* Yes Yes Yes
Intranasal or Subcutaneous
Calcitonin* Yes
25. Vertebral Fx Nonvertebral Fx
Other Fx Hip Fx
Alendronate* Yes Yes Yes
Risedronate* Yes Yes Yes
Zoledronic acid* Yes Yes Yes
PTH* Yes Yes ???
Strontium ranelate* Yes Yes ???
Denosumab* Yes Yes Yes
Appropriate use of appropriate treatmentsAppropriate use of appropriate treatments
can halve the incidence of fracturescan halve the incidence of fractures
* plus calcium + vitaminD
26. Mainstay ofMainstay of treatmenttreatment ::
BisphosphonatesBisphosphonates
Approval in US for osteoporosisApproval in US for osteoporosis
Alendronate : 1995Alendronate : 1995
Risedronate : 2000Risedronate : 2000
Ibandronate : 2005Ibandronate : 2005
Zoledronate : 2007.Zoledronate : 2007.
37. Atypical fracturesAtypical fractures
? Long term over suppression of bone? Long term over suppression of bone
turnover.turnover.
Incidence : 1 in 10,000.Incidence : 1 in 10,000.
Associated median treatment duration : 7Associated median treatment duration : 7
years.years.
Causality : long term bp/ atypical #Causality : long term bp/ atypical #
unproven.unproven.
Further large scale studies needed.Further large scale studies needed.
38. RecommendationsRecommendations
Educate physician/patient aboutEducate physician/patient about
Prodromal pain.Prodromal pain.
Evaluate with urgent X-Ray.Evaluate with urgent X-Ray.
If negative, may consider MRI.If negative, may consider MRI.
Stop BP’s if atypical fracture confirmed.Stop BP’s if atypical fracture confirmed.
39. Atrial fibrillationAtrial fibrillation
FDA recommends physiciansFDA recommends physicians to not alterto not alter
their prescribing patterntheir prescribing patterns while it continuess while it continues
to monitor post marketing reports of AF into monitor post marketing reports of AF in
such patients.such patients.
In v/o above and absence of definitiveIn v/o above and absence of definitive
data : Benefits of treatment outweigh risks.data : Benefits of treatment outweigh risks.
40. Esophageal cancerEsophageal cancer
23 cases reported in last 223 cases reported in last 2
decades. (Wysowski et al)decades. (Wysowski et al)
31 cases from31 cases from
Europe/Japan.Europe/Japan.
Median time from use toMedian time from use to
diagnosis : 1-2 yr.diagnosis : 1-2 yr.
Time from exposureTime from exposure
inconsistent w/ causalinconsistent w/ causal
relation.relation.
Further studies neededFurther studies needed..
41. Renal safetyRenal safety
Safe for creatinine clearance > 30 -35 mlSafe for creatinine clearance > 30 -35 ml/min./min.
Lack of experience < 30 ml/min.Lack of experience < 30 ml/min.
No data for use in ESRD.No data for use in ESRD.
Exact bone disease unknown unless biopsy.Exact bone disease unknown unless biopsy.
Expert opinion: half the dose could be usedExpert opinion: half the dose could be used
for 3 years in ESRD once bone biopsyfor 3 years in ESRD once bone biopsy
confirms osteoporosis.confirms osteoporosis.
43. HIP FRACTURE – Female Age 75 and over
Give single oral dose 100,000 IU vitaminD @ as soon as feasible post hip fracture & start 1000mg
CaCO3+800IU vitaminD asap, (if on this already – continue)
Already on a BP(bisphosphonate)?
No
Yes
Good prognosis & eGFR 30 or over
Duration of treatment?Yes No
1. Patient or resident carer understand
concepts of osteoporosis, fracture risk
reduction & protocol for ingesting oral BP
AND
2. No contraindications to oral BPs
[dysphagia / oesophageal stricture /
achalasia /hypocalcaemia].
Yes
Oral ALN 70mg / wk
No
Patient suitable for IV BP
& eGFR 35 or over
Yes No
Arrange IV zoledronic acid 5mg
infusion (over at least 15min),
4-6/52 after hip fracture
Consider oral BP or, if at risk
equivalent to that of fracture
plus T-score -2.4 or less,
consider strontium ranelate.
Continue b.d. calcium + vitaminD
Continue b.d.
oral calcium + vitaminD
More than 2yr 2yr or less
Optimal compliance with / adherence
to BP & BP well tolerated
YesNo
Continue oral BP
IF eGFR is 30 or more
Otherwise continue
b.d. calcium + vitaminD
GREATER GLASGOW & CLYDE PROTOCOL FOR FRACTURE SECONDARY PREVENTION AFTER HIP FRACTURE IN WOMEN AGE 75+
46. Once Yearly Zoledronic AcidOnce Yearly Zoledronic Acid
Reduces FracturesReduces Fractures
HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial
Multi-national, multi-center, RCT
7,736 women age 65-89 with T-score <
-2.5 or fracture plus T-score < -1.5
Calcium 1000-1500 mg/day vit D (400-
1200 IU/day)
Zoledronic acid IV infusion 5 mg
lack et al. NEJM 356:1809-1822, 2007
47. ZOLZOL reducesreduces hiphip fracturefracture
*Relative risk reduction (95% confidence interval) vs placebo
Black et al. NEJM 356:1809-1822, 2007
P = .0024
1
2
3
0
Placebo (n = 3861)
ZOL 5 mg (n = 3875)
CumulativeIncidence(%)
Time to First Hip Fracture (months)
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
41%*
(17%, 58%)
48. P < .0001
CumulativeIncidence(%)
Time to First Clinical Vertebral Fracture (months)
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
77%
(63%, 86%)
Placebo (n = 3861)
ZOL 5 mg (n = 3875)
1
2
3
0
ZOLZOL reducesreduces vertebralvertebral
fxfx
*Relative risk reduction (95% confidence interval) vs placebo
Black et al. NEJM 356:1809-1822, 2007
49. P = .0002
Time to First Clinical Non-vertebral Fracture (months)
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
25%
(13%, 36%)
Placebo (n = 3861)
ZOL 5 mg (n = 3875)
0
CumulativeIncidence(%)
ZOLZOL reducesreduces non-vertebralnon-vertebral
fxfx
*Relative risk reduction (95% confidence interval) vs placebo
Black et al. NEJM 356:1809-1822, 2007
50. Zoledronic Acid will ImproveZoledronic Acid will Improve PatientPatient
Compliance asCompliance as Once-Yearly IV Therapy isOnce-Yearly IV Therapy is
PreferredPreferred
Data from Lindsay R, et al. Poster presented at ECCEO6; March 15-18, 2006; Vienna, Austria.
16.4
18.9
Both Are Equal
Once-Yearly IV
Once-Weekly Pill
More convenient
More willing to
take long term
Overall
preference
N = 122
66.4
59.8
0 20 40 60 80 100
68.0
66.4
15.6
18.0
20.5
15.6
19.7
13.9
% of Patients
More
satisfying
51. Take home pointsTake home points
Osteoporosis :Osteoporosis : significant burden of diseasesignificant burden of disease..
Main stay treatment :Main stay treatment : bisphosphonatesbisphosphonates..
? Duration of treatment : individualized.? Duration of treatment : individualized.
Patient compliancePatient compliance
Patient educationPatient education
once yearly IV BPonce yearly IV BP
More research needed to confirm associationMore research needed to confirm association
with ONJ, Sub trochanteric fracture.with ONJ, Sub trochanteric fracture.
Benefits of treatmentBenefits of treatment outweigh risks inoutweigh risks in
osteoporosis.
Osteoporosis is a disease that simply can’t be ignored. The statistics are mind boggling ! In USA alone there are 10 million ppl….. Out of which 80 % are women. Also about 10 % of US population ( 33 million) have weak bones i.e. osteopenia.
Here we can see the immense fracture risk ass. with the disease. More than 2 million fractures occur per year in patients with either osteo…or osteo… Out of which majority are vertebral # f/b hip # f/b pelvic #.
Out of these 3, maximum morbidity and mortality is assoc. with hip #. As you can see after sustaining hip #, half of the people loose their mobility and a quarter loose skills to live independently. A recent metaanalysis showed increase in rate of death by 5- 8 times after a hip #.
This graph shows the relevance of recognizing osteoporosis as a major disease. As you can clearly see it far out numbers the other 3 major illnesses.
Coming to the definition , This disease has three components: loss of mass and architecture and fragility . Who DEFINES OSTEOPOROSIS AS t SCORE OF -2.5 AS DIAGNOSTIC. Definition of t score and z score……?
Following are the risk factors which predispose to osteoporosis: elderly caucasian female, low BMI, h/o personal or parental fracture , rheumatoid arthritis, chronic alcoholic, smoking.
As per the NOF guidelines, the recommendations for screening are women ……
This is the WHO’s fracture risk assessment tool called FRAX which takes into account the prior mentioned risk factors and calculates their 10 year risk of fracture. This is used to guide management of patient's with osteopenia.
So, Who to treat ? As per the NOF guidelines …. For T score b/w -1 to – 2.5, we go by the FRAX risk score.
As we all know calcium and vitamin d are useful for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. These are the sources rich in calcium and vitamin D. Weight bearing exercise plays an important part in management as well.
This slide gives an overview of different therapeutic strategies for osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates act by inhibiting bone resorption. Many other modalities including estrogen, serms, calcitonin, denosumab act by inhibiting bone resorption.Few of the treatment are aimed at stimulation of bone formation . PTH analog Teriparatide is the only FDA approoved agent which is an anabolic agent.
The mainstay of treatment is bisphosphonates. Alendronate was the first bisphosphonates approved in US f/b rise.., f/b iband…and the most recent one is zoledronate.
The CI include….
There has been considerable discussion about how long to treat with bisphosphonates. This does not come up with other diseases such as HTN, hyperlipidemia. For these diseases, benefits of treatment disappear on stopping drugs. However, Bispho. Accumulate in the bone for years. There is no standard of care on this but numerous opinions exist.. As per one expert opinion, duration should be individualized and should be based on risk factors. Patient with high risk should be treated for 10 years , then a holi……….., Patients who deserve treatment should have min. duration of 5 years , then holiday and resumption of drug depends on risk factors.
ONJ is defined as Exposed necrotic bone in maxillofacial region, not healing > 6-8 weeks with no prior h/o cranio- facial radiation.60 % of the cases have been found to follow dental surgical procedure. Pain/swelling/suppuration/paresthesia/soft tissue ulceration/sinus tracts/loose teeth..The First report came in 2003. These are all post marketing trial . They looked retrospectively in patients in the HORIZON trial, they found one case each in placebo and ZA group.
This slide shows the difference in incidence of ONJ in patient with skeletal mets vs osteoporosis. The reporting rate has been 1 ……….. As compared to patients with malignancy and mets ,in whom incidence is much higher.The main reason behind the difference is that patients with sk mets require higher and more frequent doses/
The risk factors for ONJ are high dose frequent dosing of Iv bisphosphonates as in cancer patients ,patients on chemo/ chronic steroids, dental extraction/ dental surgical procedure , prior periodontal disease ,alcohol/smoking. LONG duration of treatment. poorly fitting dental appliances and intraoral trauma.
Patients should be informed about the risk of developing ONJ, good dental hygiene is recommended. Endodontic treatment is preferred to dental extraction or surgery.
ThThe usual osteoporotic hip # occurs at femoral neck or intertrochanteric site. This atypical fracture has been found to occur below the lesser trochanter and above the supracondylar flare. It may be assoc. with Prodromal groin or thigh pain for weeks to months. This # has characteristic radiological findings…transverse or short oblique, medial cortical spike and cortical hypertrophy
Prolonged tx with BPs decreased structural integrity at the femoral shaft. This corresponds with the occurrence of this type of transverse subtrochanteric fracture clinically. The published and unpublished data reviewed show these atypical fractures occur in less than 1 in 10000 pts and many more fractures are prevented by these medications. The risk-benefit ratio clearly favors treatment with bisphosphonates. ASBMR position statement : The published and unpublished data reviewed show these atypical fractures occur in less than 1 in 10000 pts and many more fractures are prevented by these medications. The risk-benefit ratio clearly favors treatment with bisphosphonates. Patients should be aware of this and report thigh pain and continue current medications as directed. Physicians should also be aware and follow prescribing instructions and report side effects to the FDA.
The HORIZON pivotal trial showed a significant increased incidence of serious a fib. 1.3 % vs 0.5 %. But no statistically sig. Increase in incidence was found in the HORIZON recurrent # trial (small/short study), or FIT or VERT trial. A recent meta analysis did show ass. With risk of serious A fib but no risk of stroke or CV mortality.
Esophageal cancer has been a concern in patients on oral bisphosphonates. Over the past 2 decades, FDA has received 23 case reports from USA. 31 cases from Japan/Europe. Current data do not support a causal ass. b/w oral bisphosphonates $ eso. Ca.
Adverse effects on kidneys after iv infusion depends on peak conc, dose and rate of infusion. Risk is lowered by decreasing rate of infusion and hydrating prior to infusion.
Reduction in bone mass has long dominated the thinking about and approach to the problem of osteoporosis. A now large body of evidence indicates that bone mass is not adequate to explain satisfactorily either the skeletal fragility of osteoporosis or the effects of bone active agents. By contrast, bone remodeling activity seems to provide a better explanation of both. Current theory in the field is shifting to this conclusion. This figure represents a revision of the commonly held hierarchical relationship of factors contributing to osteoporotic fracture risk. It shows an enhanced role for bone remodeling in skeletal fragility and also indicates secondary effects of factors such as nutrition and hormones on bone mass.
14/06/13 04:05 Slide 30: Zoledronic Acid 5 mg Clinical Program The robust clinical development program for zoledronic acid 5 mg includes studies for the treatment of Paget’s disease (core study completed, 1 extension study results forthcoming), postmenopausal osteoporosis, osteogenesis imperfecta, corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, prevention of recurrent hip fractures, and male osteoporosis. Other additional trials under way are not shown here. Zoledronic acid 5 mg is not approved for postmenopausal osteoporosis, male osteoporosis, corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, prevention of recurrent hip fracture, or osteogenesis imperfecta, as of 1 March 2006. Reference 1. Reid I, Miller P, Fraser W, et al. Comparison of a single infusion of zoledronic acid with risedronate in Paget’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:898-908.
Cumulative Risk of Hip Fracture (Strata I & II) ZOL 5 mg reduced the relative risk of incurring a hip fracture over time by 41% compared with placebo (hazard ratio=0.59; P = .0024). Reference Black DM, Boonen S, Cauley J, et al. Effect of once-yearly infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg on spine and hip fracture reduction in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: the HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial. Presented at: 28th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research; September 15-19, 2006; Philadelphia, Pa. Abstract 1054.
Cumulative Risk of Clinical Vertebral Fracture (Strata I & II) Assessment of number of clinical fractures (painful fractures that led to an office evaluation) occurring over 3 years revealed that a single annual infusion of ZOL 5 mg reduced the risk of clinical vertebral fractures by 77% compared with placebo over 3 years ( P < .0001). Reference Black DM, Boonen S, Cauley J, et al. Effect of once-yearly infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg on spine and hip fracture reduction in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: the HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial. Presented at: 28th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research; September 15-19, 2006; Philadelphia, Pa. Abstract 1054.
Cumulative Risk of Clinical Non-vertebral Fracture (Strata I & II) Incidence of clinical non-vertebral fractures was significantly reduced (approximately 25%) over 3 years with ZOL 5 mg treatment compared with placebo ( P = .0002; estimated hazard ratio of 0.75). The most frequent fracture locations were wrist, hip, arm, and rib. Reference Black DM, Boonen S, Cauley J, et al. Effect of once-yearly infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg on spine and hip fracture reduction in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: the HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial. Presented at: 28th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research; September 15-19, 2006; Philadelphia, Pa. Abstract 1054.
14/06/13 04:05 看完臨床的資料後,再來看看從骨鬆患者的角度對於這種一年一次靜脈注射的骨鬆治療的看法,這是 2006 於歐洲 ECCEO 所發表的資料 : 以下資料就是 Lindsay 等人分別針對骨鬆患者對一週一次口服 alendronate 70 mg (n = 59) 與一年一針的 Zoledronic acid 5 mg (n = 69) 之喜好度進行為期二十四週的研究,每一位患者會在研究結束後,針對下列方便性、滿意度、長期接受意願及喜好程度等四個問題做回答 1 根據這個多中心、隨機、雙盲的研究結果顯示,整體而言將近有 66.4% 的人 (N = 122) 表示比較喜愛一年一針的治療,另有 19.7% 則是比較喜愛一週一次口服治療,至於其他的 13.9% 則無特別的喜好。 因此,不論是從患者的角度,還是從臨床的角度,都支持 Zoledronic acid 5 mg 這種一年一針的 IV 劑型應用於骨鬆治療的潛力,也請各位醫師們可向患者推薦這種創新、又方便的治療,以有效改善患者醫囑性不佳的老問題,因為惟有持續的治療,才能有效控制骨鬆、達到避免骨鬆惡化、預防骨折的目的 ! Reference 1. Lindsay R, Saag K, Kriegman A, Davis J, Beamer E, Zhou W. A single zoledronic acid 5-mg infusion is preferred over weekly 70 mg oral alendronate in a clinical trial of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis/osteopenia. Poster presented at: 6th European Congress on Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis; March 15-18, 2006; Vienna, Austria.