This document provides an overview of opportunities for academic reading in EAP courses. It discusses connecting language skills through an academic process focus, distinguishing EAP approaches that focus on language vs. academic work, exploiting texts for classroom activities, connecting multiple texts, teacher roles in developing reading skills, and ways teachers can further develop their skills in working with academic reading. The key points are that EAP reading instruction should scaffold students' participation in academic practices, engage teachers and students equally in content, and provide feedback to support students' writing and knowledge development from texts.
14. EAP as Language Work EAP as Academic Work
Sentence-level Accuracy
Vocabulary Choice
Spoken Fluency
Pronunciation & Intelligibility
(etc)
15. EAP as Language Work EAP as Academic Work
Sentence-level Accuracy Understanding the Practices of the
Academy
Vocabulary Choice Disciplinary Differences
Spoken Fluency Content Learning (through R.W.S.L)
Pronunciation & Intelligibility Integration and Synthesis of Reading
(etc) (etc)
20. textploitation
How might each text be exploited for reading-
oriented classwork & development?
applied linguistics journal paper
Guardian article
(MA TESOL student essay)
21. textploitation
How might each text be exploited for reading-
oriented classwork & development?
applied linguistics journal paper
Guardian article
(MA TESOL student essay)
22. textploitation
Questions you might ask of a text:
who is writing?
in what context?
for what purpose? for whom?
how does this impact:
content?
structure?
language choices?
24. textploitation
Questions (S/T) readers might ask of
themselves:
why am I reading this?
knowledge building?
territory defining?
drilling down for detail?
as preparation for writing?
what (therefore) do I need from this text?
28. textploitation
work that can emerge from an isolated text:
knowledge building (content
learning)
academy-oriented values
structural awareness (macro &
meso)
language in context
29. textploitation
work that can emerge from an isolated text:
knowledge building (content
learning)
academy-oriented values
structural awareness (macro &
meso)
language in context
30. textploitation
work that can emerge from an isolated text:
knowledge building (content
learning)
academy-oriented values
structural awareness (macro &
meso)
language in context
33. the âmanaged essayâ:
The process:
Reading pack: 4-6 x journal articles / bk chapters
Essay question (no choice)
(Content-based) lecture
Sessions on dealing with long readings
Sessions on notetaking / summarising
(Content-based) seminar
Sessions on planning writing
Integrated language work
34. the literature review:
The process:
Reading pack: 6-8 x journal articles on theme of plagiarism
(Content-based) lecture
Session on concept of literature review (model based)
Students use readings to develop a âresearch nicheâ
Collaborate to summarise the readings
(Content-based) seminar
Integrated language work
Individually-written literature review
35. work that can emerge from connecting texts:
knowledge building (content learning)
synthesis & comparison of content
stance/argument building & weakening
criticality
= essential foundation for writing
+ speaking
connecting
texts
36. work that can emerge from connecting texts:
comparative structural awareness
language patterns
threads
choice
connecting
texts
37. Stables, A. (2003)
'Reading the Teacher; Writing the Lesson',
Language and Education, 17: 6, 450 â 460
connecting
texts (e.g.)
38. The paper considers the consequences for research in
classrooms of regarding âlessonsâ of all sorts as elaborate
sequences of discourse, or âtextâ, as part of a move towards a
greater emphasis in research, teacher education and policy
on education as cultural (vis Ă vis social or linguistic) practice.
A quadruple perspective is offered, considering, in turn,
teachers as writers, teachers as readers, students as readers
and students as writers, attempting to clarify both similarities
and distinctions between teacher/student and reader/writer
roles. The discussion ends with a critical reflection on
undifferentiated concepts of educational practice, arguing that
teachers and students contribute to discourse, and that no
one agency can therefore be held responsible for the
educational experience. Exemplification is drawn from
archived videoed lessons that have previously been used for
teacher education and research purposes.
39. The paper considers the consequences for research in
classrooms of regarding âlessonsâ of all sorts as elaborate
sequences of discourse, or âtextâ, as part of a move towards a
greater emphasis in research, teacher education and policy
on education as cultural (vis Ă vis social or linguistic) practice.
A quadruple perspective is offered, considering, in turn,
teachers as writers, teachers as readers, students as readers
and students as writers, attempting to clarify both similarities
and distinctions between teacher/student and reader/writer
roles. The discussion ends with a critical reflection on
undifferentiated concepts of educational practice, arguing that
teachers and students contribute to discourse, and that no
one agency can therefore be held responsible for the
educational experience. Exemplification is drawn from
archived videoed lessons that have previously been used for
teacher education and research purposes.
40. The paper considers the consequences for research in
classrooms of regarding âlessonsâ of all sorts as elaborate
sequences of discourse, or âtextâ, as part of a move towards a
greater emphasis in research, teacher education and policy
on education as cultural (vis Ă vis social or linguistic) practice.
A quadruple perspective is offered, considering, in turn,
teachers as writers, teachers as readers, students as readers
and students as writers, attempting to clarify both similarities
and distinctions between teacher/student and reader/writer
roles. The discussion ends with a critical reflection on
undifferentiated concepts of educational practice, arguing that
teachers and students contribute to discourse, and that no
one agency can therefore be held responsible for the
educational experience. Exemplification is drawn from
archived videoed lessons that have previously been used for
teacher education and research purposes.
41. The paper considers the consequences for research in
classrooms of regarding âlessonsâ of all sorts as elaborate
sequences of discourse, or âtextâ, as part of a move towards a
greater emphasis in research, teacher education and policy
on education as cultural (vis Ă vis social or linguistic) practice.
A quadruple perspective is offered, considering, in turn,
teachers as writers, teachers as readers, students as readers
and students as writers, attempting to clarify both similarities
and distinctions between teacher/student and reader/writer
roles. The discussion ends with a critical reflection on
undifferentiated concepts of educational practice, arguing that
teachers and students contribute to discourse, and that no
one agency can therefore be held responsible for the
educational experience. Exemplification is drawn from
archived videoed lessons that have previously been used for
teacher education and research purposes.
47. What is the place of reading on a pre-sessional course?
What is the role of the EAP teacher in helping a
student develop necessary skills?
e.g. 1
48. What is the place of reading on a pre-sessional course?
What is the role of the EAP teacher in helping a
student develop necessary skills?
e.g. 1
49. On our programme you may be required to work on
the Irish financial crisis with students. You and they
would get 5-6 readings on the topic and an essay
question to work towards
(over about a fortnight).
What do you think would be the key challenges of this
kind of task â both for the students and for you?
e.g. 2
50. academic reading development requires
teachers to:
have basic disciplinary awareness
read (some of) what students are reading
engage with content â as a co-participant
teacher roles
51. âIn other words, the [E(S)AP] teacher
should not become a teacher of the
subject matter, but rather an
interested student of the subject
matter.â
(Hutchinson & Waters, 1987: 163)
52. âIn other words, the [E(S)AP] teacher
should not become a teacher of the
subject matter, but rather an
interested student of the subject
matter.â
(Hutchinson & Waters, 1987: 163)
53. academic reading development requires
teachers to:
scaffold the extension of group learning
(e.g. in a seminar)
recognise & exploit students-as-experts
provide content-based feedback on writing
teacher roles
54. Why?
learners need to participate in scholarly practices
to avoid âdeliveryâ of a lessonâŠin favour of:
engagement with learning at point of need
teachers need to be plausible partners in
learning
teacher roles
56. what do you do / could you do to work with
academic reading (more) in these ways?
teacher
development
57. in-sessional tutorials:
getting a sense of what students read.
engaging with content â to get at
structure.
interaction with academic staff, if needed
text analysis: spend time in the libraryâŠ
work across texts.
teacher
development
60. References
Hutchinson, T. and A. Waters (1987) English for Specific Purposes; A
learning- centred approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Stables, A. (2003) 'Reading the Teacher; Writing the Lessonâ. Language
and Education, 17: 6, 450 â 460
1 & 2: preamble, so as to outline the underlying view of EAP3 & 4: dealing with texts and reading5 & 6: implications for teachers and development
Skills connecting task. A4 sheets.Connecting lines/arrows. Skip feedback. Present my view for the session.
Could also see speaking as an end â in summative presentations, etc.
From EAP-as-language-work to EAP-as-academic-work.
Seminar class as it wasâŠTask: given the syllabus organising principles we talked about, what do you think we realised was wrong with this task
Seminar class as it is
Seminar class as it is
Since weâre interesting in teaching, weâll put teacher decision making at the heart of this (since it isâŠ)
Since weâre interesting in teaching, weâll put teacher decision making at the heart of this (since it isâŠ)
Mention text work as spanning the two, though arguably mistaken as âstructureâ (EAP:LP) rather than as emerging from rhetorical needsâŠand thus emerging from the practice of the disciple and the Academy.
Working with a single text: use one of TESOL managed essay texts. Use three circles here (helps think about both EAP:LP and EAP:AP)Seeing context (before co-text). Making Academy-appropriate links (reliability of information. Creation and extension of knowledge. Etc)
Use three circles here (helps think about both EAP:LP and EAP:AP).TESOL essay: probably not time (or patience) for 3 texts. Mention in passing, as it reminds us of what âreadingâ might mean in different EAP classes, and the purposes this may serve.
Use three circles here (helps think about both EAP:LP and EAP:AP).TESOL essay: probably not time (or patience) for 3 texts. Mention in passing, as it reminds us of what âreadingâ might mean in different EAP classes, and the purposes this may serve.
For whom: thinking about audience and writer status enables the whyness of e.g. first person use to emerge. See House 2003 abstract (example article) for instance.
Ways of reading. Whether or not to take notes. Dynamic defining of purpose. Etc
NB â separating out functions of reading means (e.g.) a journalistic text can be appropriate â for conversations about reliability of information, evidence, etc; for content learning (perhaps) ⊠but not as appropriately academic reading on its own. These discussions can be had explicitly with students (and teachersâŠ)
It is only really when you connect texts that you can get to the heart of the academic process â and to notions of criticality etcContent learning | Criticaility as slow-burn | language work as thread, not as patch (including returning to âoldâ textsâŠ) | as underpinning the essence of academic writing (for many disciplines, at least)Task: Look at student essay (MA TESOL?). What are the reading oriented skills/knowledge needed to complete this assignment?Managed Essay. Literature Review. Extended Essay.
Lesson â dealing with long complex readings
Lesson â dealing with long complex readings
Not best model necessarily for students but here: illustrative of a pointâŠItâs real (itâs random)âŠbut itâs potentially useful, taken on its own termsâŠ
Typical âenlightenedâ CLT approach might be (at least) to start with passive structures in context and draw out their usage.âŠso as then to highlight form (or to have Ss work this out for themselves first)âInductiveâ approach. Perhaps reminiscent of Lewisâs OHE (?)
This seems far more interesting to look at.We need more teaching and materials based on this view of form: as embedded (in text and in culture) and serving the purpose of the user (in text and for apprentice participation in a discourse community)Separate recognition in reading (as here) and use in writing: journal paper writing is perhaps unfair and realistic model for writing. Comptent NNS essay model may be more appropriate for the latterâŠ
Examining usage on its own termsâŠâŠand in combination with other devices that serve a similar purpose
âŠso the passive (or any other form) is not sth done once, but a thread that resurfacesthroughout examinations of writingAlso: impersonal NP subjects, metaphor, etc.
âŠso the passive (or any other form) is not sth done once, but in passing â and then as a thread that resurfaces, throughoutexaminations of writingFundamental point: this is not recycling the idea of âteaching language in contextâ; itâs starting with context and looking at how language services the creation of writer meaning.
Hence the title â ârevisiting the âAâ in EAPââŠ