SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 10
Nicholas Carr
“Is Google Making Us Stupid?”
Four main claims
1) Media shape our thoughts.
2) The new media of the internet and smart
phones aim at efficiency and in this ways they
are different qualitatively different from the old
media of books.
3) Human intelligence is more than a mechanical
process.
4) The internet could make human thought and
culture more mechanical/superficial and less
reflective/deep.
Analyzing his argument #1:
Is it true or false
• Where does he provide evidence?
• How does his evidence compare with our
experiences?
• How does his evidence compare with our
research?
Analyzing his argument #2:
Is it persuasive or unpersuasive?
• Are his logical appeals sound?
• Does his establish his authority on this topic?
• Are his emotional appeals fair?
Analyzing Carr’s Argument
In what ways is Carr’s argument true, false,
persuasive, unpersuasive?
Please take notes as we discuss each point in
detail.
Claim #1: Media shape our thoughts.
• Evidence: His experience. The experiences of
others. Academic studies. Expert opinion.
• Comparison to your experience:
• Comparison to your research:
• Methods of persuasion: Your evaluation.
Claim #2: The new media aim at efficiency
and are different from books.
• Evidence: 1) Nietzsche’s writing “from arguments
to aphorisms” b/c of typewriter. 2) The effects of
the clock on our appetites. 3) Taylor and scientific
management of Midvale Steel.
• Comparison to your experience:
• Comparison to your research:
• Methods of persuasion: Your evaluation.
Claim #3 Human intelligence is more
than a mechanical process.
• Evidence: ?
• Comparison to your experience:
• Comparison to your research:
• Methods of persuasion: Your evaluation.
The internet makes human thought/culture
mechanical/superficial not reflective/deep.
• Evidence: Playwright Richard Foreman.
• Comparison to your experience:
• Comparison to your research:
• Methods of persuasion: Your evaluation.
Overall analysis:
Question for discussion:
In what ways is Carr’s argument true, false,
persuasive, unpersuasive?

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches
Tw 3.2 theoretical approachesTw 3.2 theoretical approaches
Tw 3.2 theoretical approachesstephaniewade
 
Signature assignment 1
Signature assignment 1 Signature assignment 1
Signature assignment 1 stephaniewade
 
Summary Project Slideshow
Summary Project SlideshowSummary Project Slideshow
Summary Project SlideshowAndy Black
 

Andere mochten auch (6)

Tw week #11. 2pptx
Tw week #11. 2pptxTw week #11. 2pptx
Tw week #11. 2pptx
 
Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches
Tw 3.2 theoretical approachesTw 3.2 theoretical approaches
Tw 3.2 theoretical approaches
 
Microsoft® office
Microsoft® officeMicrosoft® office
Microsoft® office
 
إدارة
إدارةإدارة
إدارة
 
Signature assignment 1
Signature assignment 1 Signature assignment 1
Signature assignment 1
 
Summary Project Slideshow
Summary Project SlideshowSummary Project Slideshow
Summary Project Slideshow
 

Ähnlich wie Carr

490 Presentation: Disgust, Shame, and Networks
490 Presentation: Disgust, Shame, and Networks490 Presentation: Disgust, Shame, and Networks
490 Presentation: Disgust, Shame, and NetworksJodie Nicotra
 
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideaspart 1.pptx
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideaspart 1.pptxJudging the Relevance and worth of ideaspart 1.pptx
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideaspart 1.pptxSherlyMaeNeri
 
475 media effects methods 2012 up
475 media effects methods 2012 up475 media effects methods 2012 up
475 media effects methods 2012 upmpeffl
 
Postgrad slides mk5
Postgrad slides mk5Postgrad slides mk5
Postgrad slides mk5DMFAULKNER
 
Frances Ryan DARTS5 presentation
Frances Ryan DARTS5 presentationFrances Ryan DARTS5 presentation
Frances Ryan DARTS5 presentationARLGSW
 
Personal online reputations: Managing what you can’t control
Personal online reputations: Managing what you can’t controlPersonal online reputations: Managing what you can’t control
Personal online reputations: Managing what you can’t controlFrances Ryan
 
Research: primary, secondary, quant, qual
Research: primary, secondary, quant, qualResearch: primary, secondary, quant, qual
Research: primary, secondary, quant, qualiain bruce
 
Waal 2018: All Hands on Deck: Social Justice, Empathy in the Age of Informati...
Waal 2018: All Hands on Deck: Social Justice, Empathy in the Age of Informati...Waal 2018: All Hands on Deck: Social Justice, Empathy in the Age of Informati...
Waal 2018: All Hands on Deck: Social Justice, Empathy in the Age of Informati...Ilana Stonebraker
 
Multimedia Academic Literacy
Multimedia Academic LiteracyMultimedia Academic Literacy
Multimedia Academic LiteracySpelman College
 
Fake News, Real Concerns: Developing Information Literate Students (December ...
Fake News, Real Concerns: Developing Information Literate Students (December ...Fake News, Real Concerns: Developing Information Literate Students (December ...
Fake News, Real Concerns: Developing Information Literate Students (December ...ALAeLearningSolutions
 
Big data luiss Facebook and epistemology
Big data luiss Facebook and epistemologyBig data luiss Facebook and epistemology
Big data luiss Facebook and epistemologyTeresa Numerico
 
Big data luiss
Big data luissBig data luiss
Big data luissterindis
 
Survey (Primer on Questions, Sampling + Case Study)
Survey (Primer on Questions, Sampling + Case Study)Survey (Primer on Questions, Sampling + Case Study)
Survey (Primer on Questions, Sampling + Case Study)Dada Veloso-Beltran
 
Belief: learning about new problems from old things
Belief: learning about new problems from old thingsBelief: learning about new problems from old things
Belief: learning about new problems from old thingsSara-Jayne Terp
 
Critical Thinking as a Skill for Democracy: A Case of Citizen Engagement with...
Critical Thinking as a Skill for Democracy: A Case of Citizen Engagement with...Critical Thinking as a Skill for Democracy: A Case of Citizen Engagement with...
Critical Thinking as a Skill for Democracy: A Case of Citizen Engagement with...DIPRC2019
 
Lecture, Curation Journalism
Lecture, Curation JournalismLecture, Curation Journalism
Lecture, Curation JournalismSung Woo Yoo
 
Research primary secondary quant qual
Research primary secondary quant qualResearch primary secondary quant qual
Research primary secondary quant qualiain bruce
 
Week 1 Discussion 1Corrections An Overview  Please respond .docx
Week 1 Discussion 1Corrections An Overview  Please respond .docxWeek 1 Discussion 1Corrections An Overview  Please respond .docx
Week 1 Discussion 1Corrections An Overview  Please respond .docxcelenarouzie
 
Today's Main Street, Shoestring Tips For Qual Researchers In Advertising
Today's Main Street, Shoestring Tips For Qual Researchers In AdvertisingToday's Main Street, Shoestring Tips For Qual Researchers In Advertising
Today's Main Street, Shoestring Tips For Qual Researchers In AdvertisingGreenGold34
 

Ähnlich wie Carr (20)

490 Presentation: Disgust, Shame, and Networks
490 Presentation: Disgust, Shame, and Networks490 Presentation: Disgust, Shame, and Networks
490 Presentation: Disgust, Shame, and Networks
 
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideaspart 1.pptx
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideaspart 1.pptxJudging the Relevance and worth of ideaspart 1.pptx
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideaspart 1.pptx
 
475 media effects methods 2012 up
475 media effects methods 2012 up475 media effects methods 2012 up
475 media effects methods 2012 up
 
Postgrad slides mk5
Postgrad slides mk5Postgrad slides mk5
Postgrad slides mk5
 
Using evidence
Using evidenceUsing evidence
Using evidence
 
Frances Ryan DARTS5 presentation
Frances Ryan DARTS5 presentationFrances Ryan DARTS5 presentation
Frances Ryan DARTS5 presentation
 
Personal online reputations: Managing what you can’t control
Personal online reputations: Managing what you can’t controlPersonal online reputations: Managing what you can’t control
Personal online reputations: Managing what you can’t control
 
Research: primary, secondary, quant, qual
Research: primary, secondary, quant, qualResearch: primary, secondary, quant, qual
Research: primary, secondary, quant, qual
 
Waal 2018: All Hands on Deck: Social Justice, Empathy in the Age of Informati...
Waal 2018: All Hands on Deck: Social Justice, Empathy in the Age of Informati...Waal 2018: All Hands on Deck: Social Justice, Empathy in the Age of Informati...
Waal 2018: All Hands on Deck: Social Justice, Empathy in the Age of Informati...
 
Multimedia Academic Literacy
Multimedia Academic LiteracyMultimedia Academic Literacy
Multimedia Academic Literacy
 
Fake News, Real Concerns: Developing Information Literate Students (December ...
Fake News, Real Concerns: Developing Information Literate Students (December ...Fake News, Real Concerns: Developing Information Literate Students (December ...
Fake News, Real Concerns: Developing Information Literate Students (December ...
 
Big data luiss Facebook and epistemology
Big data luiss Facebook and epistemologyBig data luiss Facebook and epistemology
Big data luiss Facebook and epistemology
 
Big data luiss
Big data luissBig data luiss
Big data luiss
 
Survey (Primer on Questions, Sampling + Case Study)
Survey (Primer on Questions, Sampling + Case Study)Survey (Primer on Questions, Sampling + Case Study)
Survey (Primer on Questions, Sampling + Case Study)
 
Belief: learning about new problems from old things
Belief: learning about new problems from old thingsBelief: learning about new problems from old things
Belief: learning about new problems from old things
 
Critical Thinking as a Skill for Democracy: A Case of Citizen Engagement with...
Critical Thinking as a Skill for Democracy: A Case of Citizen Engagement with...Critical Thinking as a Skill for Democracy: A Case of Citizen Engagement with...
Critical Thinking as a Skill for Democracy: A Case of Citizen Engagement with...
 
Lecture, Curation Journalism
Lecture, Curation JournalismLecture, Curation Journalism
Lecture, Curation Journalism
 
Research primary secondary quant qual
Research primary secondary quant qualResearch primary secondary quant qual
Research primary secondary quant qual
 
Week 1 Discussion 1Corrections An Overview  Please respond .docx
Week 1 Discussion 1Corrections An Overview  Please respond .docxWeek 1 Discussion 1Corrections An Overview  Please respond .docx
Week 1 Discussion 1Corrections An Overview  Please respond .docx
 
Today's Main Street, Shoestring Tips For Qual Researchers In Advertising
Today's Main Street, Shoestring Tips For Qual Researchers In AdvertisingToday's Main Street, Shoestring Tips For Qual Researchers In Advertising
Today's Main Street, Shoestring Tips For Qual Researchers In Advertising
 

Mehr von stephaniewade

Mehr von stephaniewade (14)

Sentence style
Sentence styleSentence style
Sentence style
 
Conclusions
ConclusionsConclusions
Conclusions
 
Tw 5.2 minimalist directive
Tw 5.2 minimalist directiveTw 5.2 minimalist directive
Tw 5.2 minimalist directive
 
Analytical map 2
Analytical map 2Analytical map 2
Analytical map 2
 
Analytical map 2
Analytical map 2Analytical map 2
Analytical map 2
 
Analytical maps
Analytical mapsAnalytical maps
Analytical maps
 
Tw 3.2 north
Tw 3.2 northTw 3.2 north
Tw 3.2 north
 
3.2
3.23.2
3.2
 
Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments
Cc2 sp 11 3.1 argumentsCc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments
Cc2 sp 11 3.1 arguments
 
Tw week #11
Tw week #11Tw week #11
Tw week #11
 
Language variety #1
Language variety #1Language variety #1
Language variety #1
 
Watson revision 1
Watson revision 1Watson revision 1
Watson revision 1
 
Icc1 code phrases sentences
Icc1 code phrases sentencesIcc1 code phrases sentences
Icc1 code phrases sentences
 
Tw week 3
Tw week 3Tw week 3
Tw week 3
 

Carr

  • 1. Nicholas Carr “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”
  • 2. Four main claims 1) Media shape our thoughts. 2) The new media of the internet and smart phones aim at efficiency and in this ways they are different qualitatively different from the old media of books. 3) Human intelligence is more than a mechanical process. 4) The internet could make human thought and culture more mechanical/superficial and less reflective/deep.
  • 3. Analyzing his argument #1: Is it true or false • Where does he provide evidence? • How does his evidence compare with our experiences? • How does his evidence compare with our research?
  • 4. Analyzing his argument #2: Is it persuasive or unpersuasive? • Are his logical appeals sound? • Does his establish his authority on this topic? • Are his emotional appeals fair?
  • 5. Analyzing Carr’s Argument In what ways is Carr’s argument true, false, persuasive, unpersuasive? Please take notes as we discuss each point in detail.
  • 6. Claim #1: Media shape our thoughts. • Evidence: His experience. The experiences of others. Academic studies. Expert opinion. • Comparison to your experience: • Comparison to your research: • Methods of persuasion: Your evaluation.
  • 7. Claim #2: The new media aim at efficiency and are different from books. • Evidence: 1) Nietzsche’s writing “from arguments to aphorisms” b/c of typewriter. 2) The effects of the clock on our appetites. 3) Taylor and scientific management of Midvale Steel. • Comparison to your experience: • Comparison to your research: • Methods of persuasion: Your evaluation.
  • 8. Claim #3 Human intelligence is more than a mechanical process. • Evidence: ? • Comparison to your experience: • Comparison to your research: • Methods of persuasion: Your evaluation.
  • 9. The internet makes human thought/culture mechanical/superficial not reflective/deep. • Evidence: Playwright Richard Foreman. • Comparison to your experience: • Comparison to your research: • Methods of persuasion: Your evaluation.
  • 10. Overall analysis: Question for discussion: In what ways is Carr’s argument true, false, persuasive, unpersuasive?