SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 12
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
ANXIETY!!
Anxiety
There is evidence to suggest that anxiety can
 affect the accuracy of eyewitness
 testimony...
On one hand lab studies have shown impaired
 (weak) recall in people who have witnessed
 anxiety-inducing situations
On the other hand research into real-life
 incidents involving high stress levels show
 that EWT can be detailed and long-lasting
Deffenbacher 1983
Very Good
            EWT




Very Poor
                  Low       Anxiety    High
Anxiety is sometimes good for EWT.

    •Too much anxiety means the
   individual can’t focus on detail

•Too little anxiety and the individual
isn’t concentrating enough to absorb
              any detail
Weapons-Focus Effect
Loftus 1979 – aimed to investigate the effect
  of anxiety on the accuracy of EWT.
Procedure:
In a laboratory experiment, Loftus asked
  participants to wait outside a room before the
  study began.
In condition 1 participants heard an amicable
  discussion and a man emerged with greasy
  hands holding a pen
In condition 2 participants heard a heated
  discussion and a man emerged holding a knife
  covered in blood
Participants were then asked to identify the man
  from 50 photographs
Weapons-Focus Effect
Results:
Participants who has witnessed the peaceful
  scene (C1) were more accurate in recognising
  the man than the participants who had
  witnessed the more violent scene (C2)
Conclusion:
The weapon caused anxiety which narrowed the
  focus of attention – taking attention away from
  the face of the man (making him harder to
  identify)
              Knife = central detail
             Face = peripheral detail
Weapons-Focus Effect
Evaluation:
Can you think of any?

Laboratory experiment, so.......
High control over variables
Replication
High demand characteristics
Low ecological validity
Weapons-Focus Effect
Weapons-focus effect research has been
  supported by other research
1. Loftus (again!)
2. Deffenbacher

However, there is research to contradict
   the findings of Loftus
1. Christianson & Hubinette
WFE evaluation
    High
   control            For example, the lighting &
                         noise levels could be
                              controlled



This means that all
     potential             Strength because
    extraneous                it gives the
                             research high
variables could be          internal validity
    controlled
WFE evaluation
Deffenbacher
 et al (1983)     Conducted meta-analysis and
                   found that higher levels of
                     anxiety decrease EWT
                            accuracy

This shows that
   eyewitness            Supporting the
  testimony is         findings of Loftus
impaired if the          1979 research
                       into the weapons-
person becomes
                          focus effect
  too anxious
WFE evaluation
 Christianson           Found that of 58 witnesses
 & Hubinette            to bank robberies who had
                       been threatened in some way
                         had more accurate recall
                              than onlookers
This shows that in
real life situations
                              Criticising Loftus’
of EWT high levels            WFE research as it
  of anxiety can              demonstrates that
 actually improve              anxiety does not
 the accuracy of               always decrease
                                recall accuracy
        recall

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von sssfcpsychology

Ethics the only way is ethics
Ethics   the only way is ethicsEthics   the only way is ethics
Ethics the only way is ethicssssfcpsychology
 
Social influence intro asch & sherif
Social influence intro   asch & sherifSocial influence intro   asch & sherif
Social influence intro asch & sherifsssfcpsychology
 
Explanations of why people conform nsi & isi
Explanations of why people conform   nsi & isiExplanations of why people conform   nsi & isi
Explanations of why people conform nsi & isisssfcpsychology
 
Explanations of why people conform nsi & isi
Explanations of why people conform   nsi & isiExplanations of why people conform   nsi & isi
Explanations of why people conform nsi & isisssfcpsychology
 
Abnormality booklet 1 2013 students
Abnormality booklet 1 2013   studentsAbnormality booklet 1 2013   students
Abnormality booklet 1 2013 studentssssfcpsychology
 
Effects of institutionalisation
Effects of institutionalisationEffects of institutionalisation
Effects of institutionalisationsssfcpsychology
 
Individual differences in attachment
Individual differences in attachmentIndividual differences in attachment
Individual differences in attachmentsssfcpsychology
 
Cross cultural variations in attachment type
Cross cultural variations in attachment typeCross cultural variations in attachment type
Cross cultural variations in attachment typesssfcpsychology
 
Content analysis material
Content analysis materialContent analysis material
Content analysis materialsssfcpsychology
 
Psychology report template
Psychology report templatePsychology report template
Psychology report templatesssfcpsychology
 

Mehr von sssfcpsychology (20)

Ethics the only way is ethics
Ethics   the only way is ethicsEthics   the only way is ethics
Ethics the only way is ethics
 
Ethics (towie)
Ethics (towie)Ethics (towie)
Ethics (towie)
 
Social influence intro asch & sherif
Social influence intro   asch & sherifSocial influence intro   asch & sherif
Social influence intro asch & sherif
 
Explanations of why people conform nsi & isi
Explanations of why people conform   nsi & isiExplanations of why people conform   nsi & isi
Explanations of why people conform nsi & isi
 
Explanations of why people conform nsi & isi
Explanations of why people conform   nsi & isiExplanations of why people conform   nsi & isi
Explanations of why people conform nsi & isi
 
Abnormality booklet 1 2013 students
Abnormality booklet 1 2013   studentsAbnormality booklet 1 2013   students
Abnormality booklet 1 2013 students
 
Effects of institutionalisation
Effects of institutionalisationEffects of institutionalisation
Effects of institutionalisation
 
Privation
PrivationPrivation
Privation
 
Learning theory
Learning theoryLearning theory
Learning theory
 
Learning theory
Learning theoryLearning theory
Learning theory
 
Individual differences in attachment
Individual differences in attachmentIndividual differences in attachment
Individual differences in attachment
 
Cross cultural variations in attachment type
Cross cultural variations in attachment typeCross cultural variations in attachment type
Cross cultural variations in attachment type
 
Bowlby's theory
Bowlby's theoryBowlby's theory
Bowlby's theory
 
Content analysis table
Content analysis tableContent analysis table
Content analysis table
 
Content analysis material
Content analysis materialContent analysis material
Content analysis material
 
Content analysis
Content analysisContent analysis
Content analysis
 
Variables
VariablesVariables
Variables
 
Eating questionnaire
Eating questionnaireEating questionnaire
Eating questionnaire
 
Psychology report template
Psychology report templatePsychology report template
Psychology report template
 
Doc
DocDoc
Doc
 

How Anxiety Affects Eyewitness Testimony Accuracy

  • 2.
  • 3. Anxiety There is evidence to suggest that anxiety can affect the accuracy of eyewitness testimony... On one hand lab studies have shown impaired (weak) recall in people who have witnessed anxiety-inducing situations On the other hand research into real-life incidents involving high stress levels show that EWT can be detailed and long-lasting
  • 4. Deffenbacher 1983 Very Good EWT Very Poor Low Anxiety High
  • 5. Anxiety is sometimes good for EWT. •Too much anxiety means the individual can’t focus on detail •Too little anxiety and the individual isn’t concentrating enough to absorb any detail
  • 6. Weapons-Focus Effect Loftus 1979 – aimed to investigate the effect of anxiety on the accuracy of EWT. Procedure: In a laboratory experiment, Loftus asked participants to wait outside a room before the study began. In condition 1 participants heard an amicable discussion and a man emerged with greasy hands holding a pen In condition 2 participants heard a heated discussion and a man emerged holding a knife covered in blood Participants were then asked to identify the man from 50 photographs
  • 7. Weapons-Focus Effect Results: Participants who has witnessed the peaceful scene (C1) were more accurate in recognising the man than the participants who had witnessed the more violent scene (C2) Conclusion: The weapon caused anxiety which narrowed the focus of attention – taking attention away from the face of the man (making him harder to identify) Knife = central detail Face = peripheral detail
  • 8. Weapons-Focus Effect Evaluation: Can you think of any? Laboratory experiment, so....... High control over variables Replication High demand characteristics Low ecological validity
  • 9. Weapons-Focus Effect Weapons-focus effect research has been supported by other research 1. Loftus (again!) 2. Deffenbacher However, there is research to contradict the findings of Loftus 1. Christianson & Hubinette
  • 10. WFE evaluation High control For example, the lighting & noise levels could be controlled This means that all potential Strength because extraneous it gives the research high variables could be internal validity controlled
  • 11. WFE evaluation Deffenbacher et al (1983) Conducted meta-analysis and found that higher levels of anxiety decrease EWT accuracy This shows that eyewitness Supporting the testimony is findings of Loftus impaired if the 1979 research into the weapons- person becomes focus effect too anxious
  • 12. WFE evaluation Christianson Found that of 58 witnesses & Hubinette to bank robberies who had been threatened in some way had more accurate recall than onlookers This shows that in real life situations Criticising Loftus’ of EWT high levels WFE research as it of anxiety can demonstrates that actually improve anxiety does not the accuracy of always decrease recall accuracy recall