SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 27
Organizational
Strategy & Structure

Presented by

Group 4 _ Section C

Anand Kumar             12P127
Bhoomi Ashwin           12P131
Chirayu Gandhi          12P135
Rakshit Sharma          12P160
Saurabh Saxena          12P167
Soumyajit Sengupta      12P171

Under the able guidance of
Prof. Amit Gupta &
Prof. Anil Anand Pathak
Organization Structure


   Organization Structure is typically the hierarchical
    arrangement of lines of authority, communications, rights and
    duties of an organization

   It determines how the roles, power and responsibilities are
    assigned, controlled, and coordinated, and how information
    flows between the different levels of management

   Organization Structure defines 3 key components
     It designates formal reporting relationships
     It identifies the grouping together of individuals
     It includes the design of systems to ensure effective
      communication, coordination and integration across
      departments
Organization Structure



   Organization Structure is reflected in an Organization Chart

   Organization Chart is the visual representation of a whole set
    of underlying activities and processes in an organization

   After the Industrial Revolution, Organization Structure came
    into existence, largely to increase efficiency

   In the modern day, a hierarchical structure is not always viable
    and different companies adopt different structures
Information Sharing



   Organization Design requires both vertical and horizontal flow
    of information

   Vertical flow of information emphasizes on efficiency and
    control, thus calling for centralized decision making

   On the other hand, Horizontal flow of information emphasizes
    on learning and adaption, resulting in decentralized decision
    making

   Each of these flows makes use of structural devices
Information Sharing




 Vertical   Information Sharing
     Hierarchical Referral
     Rules and Plans
     Vertical Information Systems

 Horizontal    Information Sharing
     Information Systems
     Direct Contact
     Task Forces
     Full-Time Integrator
     Teams
Grouping Options


   Functional Grouping: Places together employees who perform
    similar functions or work processes

   Divisional Grouping: People are organized according to what
    the organization produces

   Multifocused Grouping: Organization embraces two or more
    structural grouping alternatives simultaneously

   Horizontal Grouping: Employees are organized around core
    work processes

   Virtual Network Grouping: Organization is a loosely connected
    cluster of separate components
Functional Structure


   In this activities are grouped together by common
    function from the bottom to the top of the
    organization

   Most effective when in-depth expertise is critical to
    meet organizational goals and efficiency is
    important

   It is centralized, as decisions are forced all the way
    to the top

   In the modern world, companies find it hard to be
    successful with this structure

   Organizations compensate by installing horizontal
    linkages
Functional Structure


         STRENGTHS                         WEAKNESSES

Allows Economics of scale within   Slow response time to
functional departments             environmental changes

Enables in-depth knowledge and     May cause decisions to pile on
skill development                  top;
                                   Hierarchy overload
Enables organization to            Leads to poor horizontal
accomplish functional goals        coordination among departments

Is best with only one or a few     Results in less innovation
products

                                   Involves restricted view of
                                   organizational goals
Divisional Structure



   It is also sometimes known as Product Structure or Strategic
    Business Units

   Divisions can be organized based on products, services,
    divisions, etc.

   Its distinctive feature is that grouping is based on
    organizational outputs

   Unless effective horizontal mechanisms are in place, a
    divisional structure can hurt overall performance
Divisional Structure


         STRENGTHS                           WEAKNESSES
Suited to fast changes in unstable    Eliminates Economies of scale in
environment                           functional departments

Leads to customer satisfaction        Leads to poor coordination across
because product responsibility        product lines
and contact points are clear
Involves high coordination across     Eliminates in-depth competence
functions                             and technical specialization

Allow units to adapt to differences   Makes integration and
in products, regions, customers       standardization across product
                                      lines difficult
Best in large organizations with
several products

Decentralizes decision making
Matrix Structure


   This can be used when both technical expertise
    and product innovation and change are
    important to organizational goals

   Unique characteristic is that both product divisions
    and functional structures (horizontal and vertical)
    are implemented simultaneously

   Conditions for Matrix Structure
     Condition 1: Pressure exists to share scarce
      resources across product lines
     Condition 2: Environmental pressure exists for
      two or more critical outputs
     Condition 3: Environmental domain of the
      organization is both complex and uncertain
Matrix Structure



   Companies have found balancing of horizontal and vertical
    structures

   Two matrix structures have evolved: Functional Matrix &
    Product Matrix

   Works best when there is high environmental change and
    goals reflect dual requirement

   Works best when there are few product lines as too many
    product lines cause difficulty in coordination of both directions
Matrix Structure


         STRENGTHS                           WEAKNESSES
Achieve coordination necessary to Causes participants to experience
meet dual demands from            dual authority which can be
customers                         frustrating and confusing
Flexible sharing of human            Means participants need good
resources across products            interpersonal skills and extensive
                                     training
Suited to complex decisions and      Is time consuming; involves
frequent changes in unstable         frequent meetings and conflict
environment                          resolution sessions
Provides opportunity for both        Will not work unless participants
functional and product skill         understand it and adopt collegial
development                          rather than vertical type
                                     relationship
Best in medium-sized organizations   Requires great effort to maintain
with multiple product                power balance
Horizontal Structure



   It organizes employees around core processes

   Organizations shift towards this structure by
    Reengineering, which means redesigning a
    vertical organization along its horizontal workflows
    and processes

   Process is an organized group of related tasks and
    activities that work together to transform inputs
    and outputs that create value for customers

   Many companies are now moving towards the
    Horizontal Structure
Horizontal Structure



         STRENGTHS                          WEAKNESSES
Promotes flexibility and rapid       Determining core processes is
response to changes in customer      difficult and time consuming
needs

Directs the attention of everyone    Requires changes in culture, job
towards the production and           design, management philosophy,
delivery of value to the customers   and information and reward
                                     systems

Each employee has a broader          Traditional managers may balk
view of organizational goals         when they have to give up power
                                     and authority

Promotes a focus on teamwork         Requires significant training of
and collaboration                    employees to work effectively in a
                                     horizontal team environment
Strategy & Structure




   Strategy is a company’s plan to achieve a set of goals

   Strategy & Structure of an organization are intricately
    bound and should be closely linked to achieve chosen
    results

   Once the organizational strategy is in place, the company
    can choose the optimum structure to go about
    implementing it
About




   Tata Consultancy Services is the most leading IT services, business
    solutions and outsourcing organization in India

   It organizes its global operations into integrated, customer-centric
    units to enhance customer focus, drive operational agility and
    address new growth opportunities in the market

   TCS has over 263,000 of the world's best trained IT consultants in more
    than 50 countries and year-end revenues of more than $10 billion

   With such a large employee base, it needs a structure that allows us
    to build a nimble organization to capture new growth opportunities
The Changing Structure

   The IT firm tweaked its management
    structure to bring in greater vertical
    focus within the firm

   The company has a vertical
    structure under which the company
    has 23 separate business units, and
    each unit’s head reports directly to
    the CEO

   The heads will own the profit and
    loss aggregated from those of the
    individual ISUs within their stack;
    country heads don't own P&Ls

   It is not a major change, similar to
    Infosys executive council model
    focusing more on vertical structure
Organizational Structure




   TCS has tried to find the middle ground between the 'Vertical vs.
    Horizontal' structure, with clients clustered vertically within the business
    so that they can benefit from shared expertise in each ISU, supported
    by horizontal groups focusing on strategic and tactical company-wide
    initiatives

   It makes the company 'stove-piped', resulting in reduced economies
    of scale, flexibility and agility but its process/technology excellence,
    resource management, and strategic initiatives as horizontal units is
    clearly trying to counter this risk

   Major verticals have their own ISUs but clients could just as well be
    clustered, not by industry vertical, but by the problem they are trying
    to solve, or the technology utilized, or geographic region.
Growth and empowerment


   The model provides customers with a single view of TCS
    encompassing project delivery and relationship
    management and enable a sharper focus on the
    customer

   It will provide more opportunities for leadership growth
    at all levels to run business units with growth and profit
    responsibilities

   The modular structure will simplify the customer interface
    to adapt to specific customer and market requirements
    while ensuring a uniform global service delivery

   The structure will also support greater focus for strategic
    initiatives that will help drive non-linear revenue growth
    and leverage TCS sales, delivery and customer
    relationships as required
Starbucks - Matrix Structure

    Form in which there are multiple
     lines of authority and some
     individuals report to at least two
     managers.

    Made up of cross functional work
     teams that have the ability to
     report to heads of the organization
     other than the primary supervisor.

    Successful communication
     upward, downward, and laterally
     with its employees.

    All channel communication
     allowing employees to
     communicate actively with each
     other, making all members free to
     contribute
Love Coffee Love People !




   District managers oversee regional groupings of stores.
   These district managers report directly to the Starbucks Corporation.
    At each store, a store manager acts as the chief.
   Under this store manager are a collection of shift supervisors who act
    as managers on duty when the store manager is out.
   Below the shift supervisors are the rest of the employees, referred to
    as baristas.
Love Coffee Love People !


Organizational Distribution
Three-region organizational structure:
  China and Asia Pacific: All Asia Pacific markets and China
  Americas: United States, Canada, Mexico and Latin America
  EMEA: Europe, U.K., Middle East, Russia and Africa


   A president for each region will oversee the company-
    operated retail business, working closely with both the licensed
    and joint-venture business

   They will also work closely with Starbucks Global Consumer
    Products and Foodservice team.

   All three new regional presidents – Burrows, Culver and Gass -
    along with Hansberry and Young-Scrivner will report to Schultz,
    CEO.
Love Coffee Love People !




            Employees as “Partners”




    While Starbucks workers also have more specific titles, including
    barista and shift supervisor, the Starbucks corporation has long
    referred to their workers as "partners."

   This term is intended to make clear how integral Starbucks
    employees, no matter how low on the chain, are to the
    company's success.
Love Coffee Love People !



                        Effects of Matrix Structure

   Productivity - implementing the concepts of lean manufacturing to raise
    the efficiency and productivity of its stores.

   Empowerment - delivering great customer experience, supporting in
    doing the right thing and conducting business with integrity.

   Responsibility - playing a critical role in ensuring that Starbucks is a great
    work environment and in protecting culture, reputation and brand.

   Mutual Help – Making resources available in times when needed,
    including the Standards of Business Conduct and the Business Conduct
    Helpline.

   Voicing Opinions – Sharing concerns and believing in opinions, knowing
    that Starbucks wants to hear them and value them all.
Brief Interaction with Starbucks
Employees at CP(on a scale of 1-10)
 Freedom   of Employees?
     8
 Standardization?
     9
 Coordination?
     8
 Recognition?
     7
Org design & change strategy & structure

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Patanjali's BCG Matrix, Ansoff's Matrix, Marketing Mix Details Business Project
Patanjali's BCG Matrix, Ansoff's Matrix, Marketing Mix Details Business ProjectPatanjali's BCG Matrix, Ansoff's Matrix, Marketing Mix Details Business Project
Patanjali's BCG Matrix, Ansoff's Matrix, Marketing Mix Details Business ProjectJayeshKishore
 
Strategic Business Management Project Report on HUL
Strategic Business Management Project Report on HULStrategic Business Management Project Report on HUL
Strategic Business Management Project Report on HULSubhashish Mondal
 
FMCG: SWOT Analysis
FMCG: SWOT AnalysisFMCG: SWOT Analysis
FMCG: SWOT AnalysisSagar Sharma
 
Success Story Of Dhirubhai Ambani Ji
Success Story Of Dhirubhai Ambani JiSuccess Story Of Dhirubhai Ambani Ji
Success Story Of Dhirubhai Ambani JiSiddhesh Shah
 
ultratech cement marketing strategy, 4 P's, swot analysis, competitor analysis
ultratech cement marketing strategy, 4 P's, swot analysis, competitor analysis ultratech cement marketing strategy, 4 P's, swot analysis, competitor analysis
ultratech cement marketing strategy, 4 P's, swot analysis, competitor analysis kunal mittal
 
Organizational Design - HCL Technologies
Organizational Design - HCL TechnologiesOrganizational Design - HCL Technologies
Organizational Design - HCL TechnologiesGautam Mahesh
 
SG Cowen New Recruits
SG Cowen New RecruitsSG Cowen New Recruits
SG Cowen New RecruitsInes Ha
 
Airtel Branding Strategies
Airtel Branding StrategiesAirtel Branding Strategies
Airtel Branding StrategiesAkhil Jain
 
TCS vision, mission strategies.
TCS vision, mission strategies.TCS vision, mission strategies.
TCS vision, mission strategies.Hitaishi Gupta
 
It industry & tcs strategic analysis
It industry & tcs strategic analysisIt industry & tcs strategic analysis
It industry & tcs strategic analysisAbhigyan Singh
 
Case Study of Lifebuoy
Case Study of LifebuoyCase Study of Lifebuoy
Case Study of LifebuoySagar Anand
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

FMCD Industry
 FMCD Industry FMCD Industry
FMCD Industry
 
Hul
HulHul
Hul
 
Hul final ppt
Hul final pptHul final ppt
Hul final ppt
 
Colgate vs P&G
Colgate vs P&GColgate vs P&G
Colgate vs P&G
 
Patanjali's BCG Matrix, Ansoff's Matrix, Marketing Mix Details Business Project
Patanjali's BCG Matrix, Ansoff's Matrix, Marketing Mix Details Business ProjectPatanjali's BCG Matrix, Ansoff's Matrix, Marketing Mix Details Business Project
Patanjali's BCG Matrix, Ansoff's Matrix, Marketing Mix Details Business Project
 
HUL Marketing Strategy
HUL Marketing StrategyHUL Marketing Strategy
HUL Marketing Strategy
 
Final Infosys
Final InfosysFinal Infosys
Final Infosys
 
Strategic Business Management Project Report on HUL
Strategic Business Management Project Report on HULStrategic Business Management Project Report on HUL
Strategic Business Management Project Report on HUL
 
FMCG: SWOT Analysis
FMCG: SWOT AnalysisFMCG: SWOT Analysis
FMCG: SWOT Analysis
 
Success Story Of Dhirubhai Ambani Ji
Success Story Of Dhirubhai Ambani JiSuccess Story Of Dhirubhai Ambani Ji
Success Story Of Dhirubhai Ambani Ji
 
ultratech cement marketing strategy, 4 P's, swot analysis, competitor analysis
ultratech cement marketing strategy, 4 P's, swot analysis, competitor analysis ultratech cement marketing strategy, 4 P's, swot analysis, competitor analysis
ultratech cement marketing strategy, 4 P's, swot analysis, competitor analysis
 
Cipla Global Ltd.
Cipla Global Ltd.Cipla Global Ltd.
Cipla Global Ltd.
 
Organizational Design - HCL Technologies
Organizational Design - HCL TechnologiesOrganizational Design - HCL Technologies
Organizational Design - HCL Technologies
 
SG Cowen New Recruits
SG Cowen New RecruitsSG Cowen New Recruits
SG Cowen New Recruits
 
Airtel Branding Strategies
Airtel Branding StrategiesAirtel Branding Strategies
Airtel Branding Strategies
 
BCG Matrix of Tata Group
BCG Matrix of Tata GroupBCG Matrix of Tata Group
BCG Matrix of Tata Group
 
TCS vision, mission strategies.
TCS vision, mission strategies.TCS vision, mission strategies.
TCS vision, mission strategies.
 
It industry & tcs strategic analysis
It industry & tcs strategic analysisIt industry & tcs strategic analysis
It industry & tcs strategic analysis
 
Case Study of Lifebuoy
Case Study of LifebuoyCase Study of Lifebuoy
Case Study of Lifebuoy
 
HUL BCG MATRIX
HUL BCG MATRIXHUL BCG MATRIX
HUL BCG MATRIX
 

Andere mochten auch

Tata consultancy services final
Tata consultancy services finalTata consultancy services final
Tata consultancy services finalWasim Akram
 
Accenture organisational design and structure of formalisation
Accenture organisational design and structure of formalisationAccenture organisational design and structure of formalisation
Accenture organisational design and structure of formalisationVikalp Mehta
 
The od journey of TCS - Case study - Organizational Change and Development - ...
The od journey of TCS - Case study - Organizational Change and Development - ...The od journey of TCS - Case study - Organizational Change and Development - ...
The od journey of TCS - Case study - Organizational Change and Development - ...manumelwin
 
Company Analysis - TCS (Tata Consultancy Services)
Company Analysis - TCS (Tata Consultancy Services)Company Analysis - TCS (Tata Consultancy Services)
Company Analysis - TCS (Tata Consultancy Services)Kaustubh Barve
 
Accenture company details
Accenture company details Accenture company details
Accenture company details Arabinda Das
 
Tata Consultancy Services - The Assembly Line of People
Tata Consultancy Services - The Assembly Line of PeopleTata Consultancy Services - The Assembly Line of People
Tata Consultancy Services - The Assembly Line of PeopleArgha Ray
 
TATA CONAULTENCY SERVICES (TCS)
TATA CONAULTENCY SERVICES (TCS)TATA CONAULTENCY SERVICES (TCS)
TATA CONAULTENCY SERVICES (TCS)kiran kumar
 
Tds online return filing
Tds online return filingTds online return filing
Tds online return filingNimesh Dedhia
 
Chandler strategy and structure summ1
Chandler   strategy and structure summ1Chandler   strategy and structure summ1
Chandler strategy and structure summ1KamranAli143
 
Accenture Organisation Profile
Accenture Organisation ProfileAccenture Organisation Profile
Accenture Organisation ProfileCH EdgeMakers
 
recruitment process
recruitment processrecruitment process
recruitment processArabinda Das
 
Organization Design - A Case Study
Organization Design - A Case StudyOrganization Design - A Case Study
Organization Design - A Case StudyPeopleWiz Consulting
 
Starbucks - Strateic Knowledge Management
Starbucks - Strateic Knowledge Management Starbucks - Strateic Knowledge Management
Starbucks - Strateic Knowledge Management Marwan H. Noman
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

Tata consultancy services final
Tata consultancy services finalTata consultancy services final
Tata consultancy services final
 
Accenture organisational design and structure of formalisation
Accenture organisational design and structure of formalisationAccenture organisational design and structure of formalisation
Accenture organisational design and structure of formalisation
 
Tcs ppt
Tcs pptTcs ppt
Tcs ppt
 
Tcs
TcsTcs
Tcs
 
The od journey of TCS - Case study - Organizational Change and Development - ...
The od journey of TCS - Case study - Organizational Change and Development - ...The od journey of TCS - Case study - Organizational Change and Development - ...
The od journey of TCS - Case study - Organizational Change and Development - ...
 
Company Analysis - TCS (Tata Consultancy Services)
Company Analysis - TCS (Tata Consultancy Services)Company Analysis - TCS (Tata Consultancy Services)
Company Analysis - TCS (Tata Consultancy Services)
 
Accenture company details
Accenture company details Accenture company details
Accenture company details
 
companies structure
companies structurecompanies structure
companies structure
 
Tata Consultancy Services - The Assembly Line of People
Tata Consultancy Services - The Assembly Line of PeopleTata Consultancy Services - The Assembly Line of People
Tata Consultancy Services - The Assembly Line of People
 
TATA CONAULTENCY SERVICES (TCS)
TATA CONAULTENCY SERVICES (TCS)TATA CONAULTENCY SERVICES (TCS)
TATA CONAULTENCY SERVICES (TCS)
 
Tds online return filing
Tds online return filingTds online return filing
Tds online return filing
 
Pom ppt
Pom pptPom ppt
Pom ppt
 
Chandler strategy and structure summ1
Chandler   strategy and structure summ1Chandler   strategy and structure summ1
Chandler strategy and structure summ1
 
MG371 ch7
MG371 ch7MG371 ch7
MG371 ch7
 
TCS case study
TCS case studyTCS case study
TCS case study
 
Accenture Organisation Profile
Accenture Organisation ProfileAccenture Organisation Profile
Accenture Organisation Profile
 
Organisation structure
Organisation structureOrganisation structure
Organisation structure
 
recruitment process
recruitment processrecruitment process
recruitment process
 
Organization Design - A Case Study
Organization Design - A Case StudyOrganization Design - A Case Study
Organization Design - A Case Study
 
Starbucks - Strateic Knowledge Management
Starbucks - Strateic Knowledge Management Starbucks - Strateic Knowledge Management
Starbucks - Strateic Knowledge Management
 

Ähnlich wie Org design & change strategy & structure

Organizational Design - Soumyaa Srikrishna
Organizational Design - Soumyaa SrikrishnaOrganizational Design - Soumyaa Srikrishna
Organizational Design - Soumyaa SrikrishnaSrikrishna Narasimhan
 
Ch06 - Organisation theory design and change gareth jones
Ch06 - Organisation theory design and change gareth jonesCh06 - Organisation theory design and change gareth jones
Ch06 - Organisation theory design and change gareth jonesAnkit Kesri
 
Management Chapter10
Management Chapter10Management Chapter10
Management Chapter10WanBK Leo
 
organization structure
organization structureorganization structure
organization structureMukesh Gupta
 
Organitional sturcture
Organitional sturctureOrganitional sturcture
Organitional sturctureumeedshah
 
Org. structure by Neeraj Bhandari ( Surkhet.Nepal )
Org. structure by Neeraj Bhandari ( Surkhet.Nepal )Org. structure by Neeraj Bhandari ( Surkhet.Nepal )
Org. structure by Neeraj Bhandari ( Surkhet.Nepal )Neeraj Bhandari
 
Organizational Behavior & Organization Designs
Organizational Behavior & Organization Designs  Organizational Behavior & Organization Designs
Organizational Behavior & Organization Designs Abdullah Razaq
 
Lecture 5 6 7_organizational structure
Lecture 5 6 7_organizational structureLecture 5 6 7_organizational structure
Lecture 5 6 7_organizational structureChandan Sah
 
Basic organizational design assignment
Basic organizational design assignmentBasic organizational design assignment
Basic organizational design assignmentmalikbilalran
 
Chapter 7 strategic management
Chapter 7 strategic management Chapter 7 strategic management
Chapter 7 strategic management Kalsoom Fatima
 

Ähnlich wie Org design & change strategy & structure (20)

Work Design and Technology
Work Design and TechnologyWork Design and Technology
Work Design and Technology
 
Organizational Design - Soumyaa Srikrishna
Organizational Design - Soumyaa SrikrishnaOrganizational Design - Soumyaa Srikrishna
Organizational Design - Soumyaa Srikrishna
 
Organizing
OrganizingOrganizing
Organizing
 
Organizing
OrganizingOrganizing
Organizing
 
Ch06 - Organisation theory design and change gareth jones
Ch06 - Organisation theory design and change gareth jonesCh06 - Organisation theory design and change gareth jones
Ch06 - Organisation theory design and change gareth jones
 
Management Chapter10
Management Chapter10Management Chapter10
Management Chapter10
 
Organizing
OrganizingOrganizing
Organizing
 
Organizing
OrganizingOrganizing
Organizing
 
organization structure
organization structureorganization structure
organization structure
 
Mo 2b
Mo 2bMo 2b
Mo 2b
 
Organitional sturcture
Organitional sturctureOrganitional sturcture
Organitional sturcture
 
Org. structure by Neeraj Bhandari ( Surkhet.Nepal )
Org. structure by Neeraj Bhandari ( Surkhet.Nepal )Org. structure by Neeraj Bhandari ( Surkhet.Nepal )
Org. structure by Neeraj Bhandari ( Surkhet.Nepal )
 
Organizational Behavior & Organization Designs
Organizational Behavior & Organization Designs  Organizational Behavior & Organization Designs
Organizational Behavior & Organization Designs
 
Lecture 5 6 7_organizational structure
Lecture 5 6 7_organizational structureLecture 5 6 7_organizational structure
Lecture 5 6 7_organizational structure
 
Basic organizational design assignment
Basic organizational design assignmentBasic organizational design assignment
Basic organizational design assignment
 
Unit iv
Unit ivUnit iv
Unit iv
 
Chapter 7 strategic management
Chapter 7 strategic management Chapter 7 strategic management
Chapter 7 strategic management
 
Chap006 BUS137
Chap006 BUS137Chap006 BUS137
Chap006 BUS137
 
Chap08
Chap08Chap08
Chap08
 
Organisation Structure
Organisation StructureOrganisation Structure
Organisation Structure
 

Mehr von Soumyajit Sengupta

Joint Venture, Nestle-General Mills
Joint Venture, Nestle-General MillsJoint Venture, Nestle-General Mills
Joint Venture, Nestle-General MillsSoumyajit Sengupta
 
FMCG v/s Pharmaceuticals: Strategic Alliances & Joint Ventures
FMCG v/s Pharmaceuticals: Strategic Alliances & Joint VenturesFMCG v/s Pharmaceuticals: Strategic Alliances & Joint Ventures
FMCG v/s Pharmaceuticals: Strategic Alliances & Joint VenturesSoumyajit Sengupta
 
Marks & Spencer_Strategic Management
Marks & Spencer_Strategic ManagementMarks & Spencer_Strategic Management
Marks & Spencer_Strategic ManagementSoumyajit Sengupta
 
General Motors_Strategic Management
General Motors_Strategic ManagementGeneral Motors_Strategic Management
General Motors_Strategic ManagementSoumyajit Sengupta
 
Corporate finance_Impact of Shareholding Pattern on Corporate Governance & Fi...
Corporate finance_Impact of Shareholding Pattern on Corporate Governance & Fi...Corporate finance_Impact of Shareholding Pattern on Corporate Governance & Fi...
Corporate finance_Impact of Shareholding Pattern on Corporate Governance & Fi...Soumyajit Sengupta
 
B.tech(Vibrational Analysis)-2012
B.tech(Vibrational Analysis)-2012B.tech(Vibrational Analysis)-2012
B.tech(Vibrational Analysis)-2012Soumyajit Sengupta
 
Mobile loyalty landscape & need gap analysis
Mobile loyalty landscape & need gap analysisMobile loyalty landscape & need gap analysis
Mobile loyalty landscape & need gap analysisSoumyajit Sengupta
 
Great depression & financial crisis
Great depression & financial crisisGreat depression & financial crisis
Great depression & financial crisisSoumyajit Sengupta
 

Mehr von Soumyajit Sengupta (16)

Joint Venture, Nestle-General Mills
Joint Venture, Nestle-General MillsJoint Venture, Nestle-General Mills
Joint Venture, Nestle-General Mills
 
FMCG v/s Pharmaceuticals: Strategic Alliances & Joint Ventures
FMCG v/s Pharmaceuticals: Strategic Alliances & Joint VenturesFMCG v/s Pharmaceuticals: Strategic Alliances & Joint Ventures
FMCG v/s Pharmaceuticals: Strategic Alliances & Joint Ventures
 
Delhi Gurgaon Expressway PPP
Delhi Gurgaon Expressway PPPDelhi Gurgaon Expressway PPP
Delhi Gurgaon Expressway PPP
 
Microsoft-Skype
Microsoft-SkypeMicrosoft-Skype
Microsoft-Skype
 
Apple: Turnaround
Apple: TurnaroundApple: Turnaround
Apple: Turnaround
 
General Electric_Leadership
General Electric_LeadershipGeneral Electric_Leadership
General Electric_Leadership
 
Marks & Spencer_Strategic Management
Marks & Spencer_Strategic ManagementMarks & Spencer_Strategic Management
Marks & Spencer_Strategic Management
 
General Motors_Strategic Management
General Motors_Strategic ManagementGeneral Motors_Strategic Management
General Motors_Strategic Management
 
Apple_Strategic Management
Apple_Strategic Management Apple_Strategic Management
Apple_Strategic Management
 
M&A_HP outbids DELL
M&A_HP outbids DELLM&A_HP outbids DELL
M&A_HP outbids DELL
 
Corporate finance_Impact of Shareholding Pattern on Corporate Governance & Fi...
Corporate finance_Impact of Shareholding Pattern on Corporate Governance & Fi...Corporate finance_Impact of Shareholding Pattern on Corporate Governance & Fi...
Corporate finance_Impact of Shareholding Pattern on Corporate Governance & Fi...
 
B.tech(Vibrational Analysis)-2012
B.tech(Vibrational Analysis)-2012B.tech(Vibrational Analysis)-2012
B.tech(Vibrational Analysis)-2012
 
Mobile loyalty landscape & need gap analysis
Mobile loyalty landscape & need gap analysisMobile loyalty landscape & need gap analysis
Mobile loyalty landscape & need gap analysis
 
RedBUS
RedBUSRedBUS
RedBUS
 
Csr theories & stakeholders
Csr theories & stakeholdersCsr theories & stakeholders
Csr theories & stakeholders
 
Great depression & financial crisis
Great depression & financial crisisGreat depression & financial crisis
Great depression & financial crisis
 

Org design & change strategy & structure

  • 1. Organizational Strategy & Structure Presented by Group 4 _ Section C Anand Kumar 12P127 Bhoomi Ashwin 12P131 Chirayu Gandhi 12P135 Rakshit Sharma 12P160 Saurabh Saxena 12P167 Soumyajit Sengupta 12P171 Under the able guidance of Prof. Amit Gupta & Prof. Anil Anand Pathak
  • 2. Organization Structure  Organization Structure is typically the hierarchical arrangement of lines of authority, communications, rights and duties of an organization  It determines how the roles, power and responsibilities are assigned, controlled, and coordinated, and how information flows between the different levels of management  Organization Structure defines 3 key components  It designates formal reporting relationships  It identifies the grouping together of individuals  It includes the design of systems to ensure effective communication, coordination and integration across departments
  • 3. Organization Structure  Organization Structure is reflected in an Organization Chart  Organization Chart is the visual representation of a whole set of underlying activities and processes in an organization  After the Industrial Revolution, Organization Structure came into existence, largely to increase efficiency  In the modern day, a hierarchical structure is not always viable and different companies adopt different structures
  • 4. Information Sharing  Organization Design requires both vertical and horizontal flow of information  Vertical flow of information emphasizes on efficiency and control, thus calling for centralized decision making  On the other hand, Horizontal flow of information emphasizes on learning and adaption, resulting in decentralized decision making  Each of these flows makes use of structural devices
  • 5. Information Sharing  Vertical Information Sharing  Hierarchical Referral  Rules and Plans  Vertical Information Systems  Horizontal Information Sharing  Information Systems  Direct Contact  Task Forces  Full-Time Integrator  Teams
  • 6. Grouping Options  Functional Grouping: Places together employees who perform similar functions or work processes  Divisional Grouping: People are organized according to what the organization produces  Multifocused Grouping: Organization embraces two or more structural grouping alternatives simultaneously  Horizontal Grouping: Employees are organized around core work processes  Virtual Network Grouping: Organization is a loosely connected cluster of separate components
  • 7. Functional Structure  In this activities are grouped together by common function from the bottom to the top of the organization  Most effective when in-depth expertise is critical to meet organizational goals and efficiency is important  It is centralized, as decisions are forced all the way to the top  In the modern world, companies find it hard to be successful with this structure  Organizations compensate by installing horizontal linkages
  • 8. Functional Structure STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES Allows Economics of scale within Slow response time to functional departments environmental changes Enables in-depth knowledge and May cause decisions to pile on skill development top; Hierarchy overload Enables organization to Leads to poor horizontal accomplish functional goals coordination among departments Is best with only one or a few Results in less innovation products Involves restricted view of organizational goals
  • 9. Divisional Structure  It is also sometimes known as Product Structure or Strategic Business Units  Divisions can be organized based on products, services, divisions, etc.  Its distinctive feature is that grouping is based on organizational outputs  Unless effective horizontal mechanisms are in place, a divisional structure can hurt overall performance
  • 10. Divisional Structure STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES Suited to fast changes in unstable Eliminates Economies of scale in environment functional departments Leads to customer satisfaction Leads to poor coordination across because product responsibility product lines and contact points are clear Involves high coordination across Eliminates in-depth competence functions and technical specialization Allow units to adapt to differences Makes integration and in products, regions, customers standardization across product lines difficult Best in large organizations with several products Decentralizes decision making
  • 11. Matrix Structure  This can be used when both technical expertise and product innovation and change are important to organizational goals  Unique characteristic is that both product divisions and functional structures (horizontal and vertical) are implemented simultaneously  Conditions for Matrix Structure  Condition 1: Pressure exists to share scarce resources across product lines  Condition 2: Environmental pressure exists for two or more critical outputs  Condition 3: Environmental domain of the organization is both complex and uncertain
  • 12. Matrix Structure  Companies have found balancing of horizontal and vertical structures  Two matrix structures have evolved: Functional Matrix & Product Matrix  Works best when there is high environmental change and goals reflect dual requirement  Works best when there are few product lines as too many product lines cause difficulty in coordination of both directions
  • 13. Matrix Structure STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES Achieve coordination necessary to Causes participants to experience meet dual demands from dual authority which can be customers frustrating and confusing Flexible sharing of human Means participants need good resources across products interpersonal skills and extensive training Suited to complex decisions and Is time consuming; involves frequent changes in unstable frequent meetings and conflict environment resolution sessions Provides opportunity for both Will not work unless participants functional and product skill understand it and adopt collegial development rather than vertical type relationship Best in medium-sized organizations Requires great effort to maintain with multiple product power balance
  • 14. Horizontal Structure  It organizes employees around core processes  Organizations shift towards this structure by Reengineering, which means redesigning a vertical organization along its horizontal workflows and processes  Process is an organized group of related tasks and activities that work together to transform inputs and outputs that create value for customers  Many companies are now moving towards the Horizontal Structure
  • 15. Horizontal Structure STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES Promotes flexibility and rapid Determining core processes is response to changes in customer difficult and time consuming needs Directs the attention of everyone Requires changes in culture, job towards the production and design, management philosophy, delivery of value to the customers and information and reward systems Each employee has a broader Traditional managers may balk view of organizational goals when they have to give up power and authority Promotes a focus on teamwork Requires significant training of and collaboration employees to work effectively in a horizontal team environment
  • 16. Strategy & Structure  Strategy is a company’s plan to achieve a set of goals  Strategy & Structure of an organization are intricately bound and should be closely linked to achieve chosen results  Once the organizational strategy is in place, the company can choose the optimum structure to go about implementing it
  • 17. About  Tata Consultancy Services is the most leading IT services, business solutions and outsourcing organization in India  It organizes its global operations into integrated, customer-centric units to enhance customer focus, drive operational agility and address new growth opportunities in the market  TCS has over 263,000 of the world's best trained IT consultants in more than 50 countries and year-end revenues of more than $10 billion  With such a large employee base, it needs a structure that allows us to build a nimble organization to capture new growth opportunities
  • 18. The Changing Structure  The IT firm tweaked its management structure to bring in greater vertical focus within the firm  The company has a vertical structure under which the company has 23 separate business units, and each unit’s head reports directly to the CEO  The heads will own the profit and loss aggregated from those of the individual ISUs within their stack; country heads don't own P&Ls  It is not a major change, similar to Infosys executive council model focusing more on vertical structure
  • 19. Organizational Structure  TCS has tried to find the middle ground between the 'Vertical vs. Horizontal' structure, with clients clustered vertically within the business so that they can benefit from shared expertise in each ISU, supported by horizontal groups focusing on strategic and tactical company-wide initiatives  It makes the company 'stove-piped', resulting in reduced economies of scale, flexibility and agility but its process/technology excellence, resource management, and strategic initiatives as horizontal units is clearly trying to counter this risk  Major verticals have their own ISUs but clients could just as well be clustered, not by industry vertical, but by the problem they are trying to solve, or the technology utilized, or geographic region.
  • 20. Growth and empowerment  The model provides customers with a single view of TCS encompassing project delivery and relationship management and enable a sharper focus on the customer  It will provide more opportunities for leadership growth at all levels to run business units with growth and profit responsibilities  The modular structure will simplify the customer interface to adapt to specific customer and market requirements while ensuring a uniform global service delivery  The structure will also support greater focus for strategic initiatives that will help drive non-linear revenue growth and leverage TCS sales, delivery and customer relationships as required
  • 21. Starbucks - Matrix Structure  Form in which there are multiple lines of authority and some individuals report to at least two managers.  Made up of cross functional work teams that have the ability to report to heads of the organization other than the primary supervisor.  Successful communication upward, downward, and laterally with its employees.  All channel communication allowing employees to communicate actively with each other, making all members free to contribute
  • 22. Love Coffee Love People !  District managers oversee regional groupings of stores.  These district managers report directly to the Starbucks Corporation.  At each store, a store manager acts as the chief.  Under this store manager are a collection of shift supervisors who act as managers on duty when the store manager is out.  Below the shift supervisors are the rest of the employees, referred to as baristas.
  • 23. Love Coffee Love People ! Organizational Distribution Three-region organizational structure:  China and Asia Pacific: All Asia Pacific markets and China  Americas: United States, Canada, Mexico and Latin America  EMEA: Europe, U.K., Middle East, Russia and Africa  A president for each region will oversee the company- operated retail business, working closely with both the licensed and joint-venture business  They will also work closely with Starbucks Global Consumer Products and Foodservice team.  All three new regional presidents – Burrows, Culver and Gass - along with Hansberry and Young-Scrivner will report to Schultz, CEO.
  • 24. Love Coffee Love People ! Employees as “Partners”  While Starbucks workers also have more specific titles, including barista and shift supervisor, the Starbucks corporation has long referred to their workers as "partners."  This term is intended to make clear how integral Starbucks employees, no matter how low on the chain, are to the company's success.
  • 25. Love Coffee Love People ! Effects of Matrix Structure  Productivity - implementing the concepts of lean manufacturing to raise the efficiency and productivity of its stores.  Empowerment - delivering great customer experience, supporting in doing the right thing and conducting business with integrity.  Responsibility - playing a critical role in ensuring that Starbucks is a great work environment and in protecting culture, reputation and brand.  Mutual Help – Making resources available in times when needed, including the Standards of Business Conduct and the Business Conduct Helpline.  Voicing Opinions – Sharing concerns and believing in opinions, knowing that Starbucks wants to hear them and value them all.
  • 26. Brief Interaction with Starbucks Employees at CP(on a scale of 1-10)  Freedom of Employees?  8  Standardization?  9  Coordination?  8  Recognition?  7

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. Key Components of Organization Structure – Refer Pg. 44
  2. centralized decision making – problems and decisions are funneled to top level of hierarchy for resolutiondecentralized decision making – decision-making authority is pushed down to lower organizational levels
  3. Refer Pg 47-52
  4. Talk about differences between functional and divisional structures (Pg 59)
  5. Define Functional & Product Matrices (Pg 63)