Week 8 Assignment 3 Submission Click the link above to submit your assignment. Students, please view the "Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment" in the Student Center.  Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.  Assignment 3: International Crime Witness, Part 2 Due Week 8 and worth 250 points After providing your report to the professor in Assignment 2, the country’s governing body asks you to return to the country and testify in the court proceedings. While you are abroad, your professor asks you to report on the court proceedings and correctional system. Use the Internet or Strayer databases to research court proceedings and the correctional system in the same country you selected in Assignment 2. Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you: Analyze both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Provide support for the analysis. Assuming the accused is ultimately sentenced to a term of imprisonment, depict the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Provide justification for your view of the country’s prison system. Expose two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems. Provide one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Provide justification for the recommendations. Use at least four (4) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Evaluate and explain ethical issues inherent in criminal justice systems. Differentiate the role of courts in various societies and in international context. Compare international perspectives on corrections and criminal punishment, including comparative sentencing typologies. Use technology and information resources to research comparative perspectives in criminal justice. Write clearly and concisely about criminal justice topics using proper writing mechanics and APA style conventions. Click here to view the grading rubric for this assignment. Points: 250 Assignment 3: International Crime Witness, Part 2 Criteria Unacceptable Below 60% F Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A 1. Analyze both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as w.

1. Week 8 Assignment 3 Submission
Click the link above to submit your assignment.
Students, please view the "Submit a Clickable Rubric
Assignment" in the Student Center.
Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor
Center.
Assignment 3: International Crime Witness, Part 2
Due Week 8 and worth 250 points
After providing your report to the professor in Assignment 2,
the country’s governing body asks you to return to the country
and testify in the court proceedings. While you are abroad, your
professor asks you to report on the court proceedings and
correctional system.
Use the Internet or Strayer databases to research court
proceedings and the correctional system in the same country
you selected in Assignment 2.
Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:
Analyze both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s
rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the
defendant during trial proceedings. Provide support for the
analysis.
Assuming the accused is ultimately sentenced to a term of
imprisonment, depict the most likely experience the defendant
will have within the country’s prison system. Provide
justification for your view of the country’s prison system.
Expose two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the
country’s court and correctional systems.
Provide one (1) recommendation for change within each of the
systems (court and correctional). Provide justification for the
recommendations.
Use at least four (4) quality references.
Note:

2. Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic
resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size
12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references
must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your
professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the
student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the
date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in
the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this
assignment are:
Evaluate and explain ethical issues inherent in criminal justice
systems.
Differentiate the role of courts in various societies and in
international context.
Compare international perspectives on corrections and criminal
punishment, including comparative sentencing typologies.
Use technology and information resources to research
comparative perspectives in criminal justice.
Write clearly and concisely about criminal justice topics using
proper writing mechanics and APA style conventions.
Click
here
to view the grading rubric for this assignment.
Points: 250
Assignment 3: International Crime Witness, Part 2
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 60% F

3. Meets Minimum Expectations
60-69% D
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Analyze both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s
rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the
defendant during trial proceedings. Provide support for the
analysis.
Weight: 23%
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed both the court
system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the
court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial
proceedings. Did not submit or incompletely provided support
for the analysis.
Insufficiently analyzed both the court system’s likely view on
the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely
treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings.
Insufficiently provided support for the analysis.
Partially analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the
accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment
of the defendant during trial proceedings. Partially provided
support for the analysis.
Satisfactorily analyzed both the court system’s likely view on
the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely
treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings.
Satisfactorily provided support for the analysis.
Thoroughly analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the
accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment
of the defendant during trial proceedings. Thoroughly provided

4. support for the analysis.
2. Assuming the accused is ultimately sentenced to a term of
imprisonment, depict the most likely experience the defendant
will have within the country’s prison system. Provide
justification for your view of the country’s prison system.
Weight: 22%
Did not submit or incompletely depicted the most likely
experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison
system. Did not submit or incompletely provided justification
for your view of the country’s prison system.
Insufficiently depicted the most likely experience the defendant
will have within the country’s prison system. Insufficiently
provided justification for your view of the country’s prison
system.
Partially depicted the most likely experience the defendant will
have within the country’s prison system. Partially provided
justification for your view of the country’s prison system.
Satisfactorily depicted the most likely experience the defendant
will have within the country’s prison system. Satisfactorily
provided justification for your view of the country’s prison
system.
Thoroughly depicted the most likely experience the defendant
will have within the country’s prison system. Thoroughly
provided justification for your view of the country’s prison
system.
3. Expose two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the
country’s court and correctional systems.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely exposed two (2) ethical
concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and
correctional systems.
Insufficiently exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed
regarding the country’s court and correctional systems.
Partially exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed
regarding the country’s court and correctional systems.
Satisfactorily exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed

5. regarding the country’s court and correctional systems.
Thoroughly exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed
regarding the country’s court and correctional systems.
4. Provide one (1) recommendation for change within each of
the systems (court and correctional). Provide justification for
the recommendations.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely provided one (1)
recommendation for change within each of the systems (court
and correctional). Did not submit or incompletely provided
justification for the recommendations.
Insufficiently provided one (1) recommendation for change
within each of the systems (court and correctional).
Insufficiently provided justification for the recommendations.
Partially provided one (1) recommendation for change within
each of the systems (court and correctional). Partially provided
justification for the recommendations.
Satisfactorily provided one (1) recommendation for change
within each of the systems (court and correctional).
Satisfactorily provided justification for the recommendations.
Thoroughly provided one (1) recommendation for change within
each of the systems (court and correctional). Thoroughly
provided justification for the recommendations.
5. 4 references
Weight: 5%
No references provided
Does not meet the required number of references; all references
poor quality choices.
Does not meet the required number of references; some
references poor quality choices.
Meets number of required references; all references high quality
choices.
Exceeds number of required references; all references high
quality choices.
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%

6. More than 8 errors present
7-8 errors present
5-6 errors present
3-4 errors present
0-2 errors present