Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Die SlideShare-Präsentation wird heruntergeladen. ×

soccerteamtactics.com Match Analysis: Borussia Dortmund - Bayern Munich

Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Wird geladen in …3
×

Hier ansehen

1 von 12 Anzeige

Weitere Verwandte Inhalte

Diashows für Sie (16)

Andere mochten auch (20)

Anzeige

Aktuellste (20)

soccerteamtactics.com Match Analysis: Borussia Dortmund - Bayern Munich

  1. 1. © Copyright by Athanasios Terzis 2015 Match analysis: Borussia Dortmund - Bayern Effectiveness in front of goal proved to be decisive By Athanasios Terzis Bundesliga’s clasico ended with Bayern as the winners. Each team tried to dominate with its own way. Bayern was more effective in front of goal and managed to score by taking advantage one of the few scoring chances for both teams during the match. Dortmund didn’t achieve to score the equalizer despite the fact that during the second half had most of the possession, as Bayern defended effectively after Lewandowski’s goal.
  2. 2. © Copyright by Athanasios Terzis 2015 1st half: Dortmund began in high tempo and pressed high, but Bayern managed to deal with it Dortmund: The black and yellows started with a 4-2-3-1 formation. However as they had to deal with a three man defence, their formation during the defensive phase was more like a lopsided 4-4-2. Klopp knew that Bayern’s strength is their domination in possession during the matches, so pressing intensively high up the field seemed the perfect antidote. In order to achieve this, Klopp placed Kampl in a balanced position between the wing back Rafinha and the side defender Benatia. By this way he could create (together with Aub/yang and Reus) a 3 v 3 situation in front, against the 3 Bayern defenders. On the other hand Blas/wski had a more conservative role, to stay close to the left wing back Bernat. At the back Schmelzer had instructions to move in more advanced positions than Sokratis did on the right. So when Kampl moved to put pressure on Benatia, Schmelzer moved forward to mark Rafinha.
  3. 3. © Copyright by Athanasios Terzis 2015 This tactical beheviour demanded the good synchronizasion of both players (Kampl and Schmelzer) as well as the effective dealing with the problems related to the space that was created behind Schmelzer. Klopp instructed Sokratis to stay close to the c. defenders (Subotic and Hummels) in order to create a 3 v 2 situation at the back against the very dangerous forwards Muller and Lew/wski. Furthermore Borussia tried to force the play towards the side where Sokratis was positioned as he was the most defensive minded of the two fullbacks, as well as there was a numerical superiority for the home side on the right. The problem for Borussia was the positioning of Alonso in front of the three. He was the free player for Bayern and moved constantly towards the available passing options in order to receive and move the ball forward. This aim couldn’t be achieved during the first15 minutes as the intensive pressing didn’t let time and space for Bayern players to analyse the tactical situations and make the right decisions. After the first quarter Guardiola’s team managed overcome the pressure. Dortmund tried to close Alonso by narrowing the passing lanes towards him, mainly with Aub/yang and Reus, but Bayern managed to move the ball towards the weak side and to find time on the ball.
  4. 4. © Copyright by Athanasios Terzis 2015 Klopp didn’t want to move one of the defensive midfielders Gundogan and Bender out of position and forward to mark Alonso, in order to avoid creating space in front of his defence, as Lew/wski is very skillful in playing with his back turned to goal. So by keeping both central midfielders close to the defenders he tried to limited the space for the Polish international and block him. Bayern: Guardiola started with a 3-5-2 formation which enabled him to outnumber Borussia at the back and build up from the GK. His intention was to put pressure on Borussia defenders, force them to use long balls which the three defenders of Bayern could easily neutralize. For maintaining safety at the back he kept four defenders back according to the tactical situation. So when the wing back of the strong side moved forward to put pressure on the opposing fullback, the weak side’s wing back dropped back close to the three defenders.
  5. 5. © Copyright by Athanasios Terzis 2015 When the attacking midfielder moved to put pressure on the fullback and the wing back of the strong side was in deep position, the weak side’s one didn’t have to drop very deep. Finally the positioning of Alonso in front of the defending trio, enabled both wing backs to move forward at the same time occasionally.
  6. 6. © Copyright by Athanasios Terzis 2015 However Alonso’s contribution was far more important. In occasions that both wing backs were high and either Benatia or Dante were forced to shift towards the side, he dropped between the defenders to ensure numerical superiority inside the box and thus provided safety.
  7. 7. © Copyright by Athanasios Terzis 2015 As regards the attacking phase, Bayern players after a hard first quarter where they found great difficulties in moving the ball forward, they started reading the tactical context and evaluating the weaknesses of the opposition. First of all they managed to overcome the intensive pressing by moving the ball quickly from the left towards the right side.
  8. 8. © Copyright by Athanasios Terzis 2015 Additionally they found ways to pass the ball either to Alonso or to Lahm and Schw/ger who dropped occasionally deeper either to receive and turn or to play as link players and move the ball to the free defender. Next aim was the exploitation of the space behind Schmelzer. This was done either by Muller who tried to win the duels against the solid but not so quick Hummels or Lahm who moved towards this space when the forward wasn’t close enough to take advantage of it.
  9. 9. © Copyright by Athanasios Terzis 2015 In cases that Hummels moved at the right time to fill the gap behind Schmelzer, the defence was stretched and there were gaps between the defenders. Bayern forwards tried to exploit these gaps and receive a potential pass behind the defence. The first goal scoring chance was created by this kind of a pass towards Muller. However Muller failed to find the target after shooting over Weid/ller.
  10. 10. © Copyright by Athanasios Terzis 2015 Finally Guardiola tried to take advantage of the 2 v 2 situation in the centre of Borussia defence. This was the part of the field that Klopp tried to secure by creating a 3 v 2 after putting Sokratis next to Subotic and Hummels and giving him orders to avoid moving in advanced positions. However Bayern managed to take advantage of the situation once but Lew/wski after a combination play with Muller was caught offside. The second time was crucial for the outcome of the game as in an indirect positive transition for Bayern, Sokratis was a few yards forward. Despite this fact Hummels decided to follow Lew/wski’s dropping back and left Subotic in a 1 v 1 situation against Muller. Lew/wski managed to receive and turn despite Hummel’s attempt to stop him. Then the former Borussia man found the time to pass to Muller who moved towards the gap between Sokratis and Subotic. Muller took the shot and Lew/wski with a header after Weid/ller’s save scored against his former club.
  11. 11. © Copyright by Athanasios Terzis 2015 Being one goal down Borussia had to react. However despite putting heavy pressure, they couldn’t create scoring chances until the end of the first half.
  12. 12. © Copyright by Athanasios Terzis 2015 2nd half: Pressing and possession for Borussia, good defensive organization for Bayern The second half started the way the first half had. Borussia put a lot of effort in pressing and gave no time on the ball to Bayern players. On the other hand Gualdiola’s team defended passively and maintained compactness between the lines. The team restricted the spaces especially in the centre and prevent Borussia from using combination play within the spaces between the lines. Additionally in cases that Borussia managed to move the ball to the flanks, the crosses weren’t made in the first phase and behind the defence, but after the tall defenders of Bayern took up positions inside the box. The only way for Borussia to create scoring chances was to find Bayern’s defence unbalanced. This could be achieved either by winning the ball high after pressing application or by regaining possession during immediate negative transition (counter pressing). Finally one another option was to take advantage of the set pieces. Borussia had two chances to score the equalizer. One after a quick negative transition where Reus failed to beat Neuer in a duel and one after a free kick taken by the same player. The substitutes made during the 2nd half didn’t change things tactically. Conclusion: Bayern managed to beat Borussia mainly due to the effectiveness in front of goal. Bayern couldn’t create much during the attacking phase despite the fact that mainly in the first half they dominated possession. On the other hand Borussia found many difficulties once again in breaking through the opposition’s compact defence and struggled to create as the available spaces were limited. The team spent too much energy in pressing and counter pressing but this wasn’t enough to score the equalizer. Dortmund misses Lew/wski or a player like Lew/wski, who is capable in playing both inside and outside the box and create both in tight spaces as well as in open play.

×