What is the fan perception of watching live sports in virtual reality? Is there a demand for a more immersive, interactive environment in live sports consumption? This presentation highlights a research study conducted by two Media Psychologists to determine the efficacy and suggestions of using VR as a platform to consume live sports.
2. What is the fan perception of watching live sports
with virtual reality?
Is there a demand for a more immersive, interactive
environment in sports media?
QUANTITATIVE
RESEARCH
STUDY
4. 1. ASK
• Quantitative survey under 4 categories:
a) Level of Fandom
b) Viewing experience
c) Tech competency with social dynamics
d) Cost-benefit analysis
5. 2. CODE
• Analyze results with SPSS 22 variable coding.
• Responses for each question were assigned equal
weight.
• Statistical analysis was performed across N=52
6. 3. REPORT
• Respondents are generalized from a population of
self-identified fans.
• Results reveal preliminary opinions, value, and
expectations of consumers.
9. KEY TRANSLATION:
• Percentage of Self-
Identified Super and
Moderate fans = 71%
• Percentage of 0-2
Games Watched per
Week = 48%
Affiliation is NOT contingent upon
games consumed.
Sport fandom = emotional connection
and intrinsic commitment.
11. b) cont’d.
VIEWING EXPERIENCE
Do fans prefer live
attendance or VR for
sports consumption?
Avg of 3.61 shows a
preference for live
attendance!!
12. b) cont’d.
VIEWING EXPERIENCE
Do fans prefer live
attendance or watching
the game on TV?
Avg of 3.81 shows
preference for live
attendance!
13. KEY
TRANSLATION:
However...
A desire for deeper immersion is
suggested with an interest in VR over
standard TV viewing!
Live attendance
provides the best
overall sport
experience.
18. d) cont’d. COST SPENDING
Avg spent on live
events Willing to spend on VR ticket
19. d) cont’d.
COST BENEFIT
• Avg seating: $949
• Premiere seating (courtside):
$30,000
• Luxury seating (box suite):
$57,000
Ex: 2013 NBA
finals San
Antonio Spurs
vs. Miami Heat
20. KEY TRANSLATION:
• The promise of VR is a
comparable viewing
experience to premiere,
high-end seating – at a
fraction of the cost.
• 98.1%, are willing to
spend between $0-
$100 per “seat” for a
virtual version of the
same experience.
21. FINALDISCUSSION • With the goal of integrating VR
as a sustainable viewing option,
it is integral for developers to
consider:
• individual tickets and seasonal
packages.
• “discounted ticket prices for
multiple purchases” (P48)
22. FINALDISCUSSION • Incorporate an option for social
viewing and group interaction.
• “...Ability to interact with others
during it, chat maybe. (P9)
• “would also expect limited or no
distractions from other viewers.” (P47)
23. FINALDISCUSSION • Augment the experience with
immersive-based features
beyond premium seating or
traditional home viewing.
• “Extra technological features you
won't get in-person: ability to
pause/rewind/fast-forward, zoom,
change views, overlay commentary,
take and upload screenshots HQ
sights/sounds” (P38)
24. ONEBIGTHING VR represents a turning point in
media consumption.
The sport experience is no longer
storytelling; it’s STORY LIVING.