Presented by Sven Wunder (European Forest Institute (EFI) - CIFOR Senior Associate) at "GFOI 2023 Plenary: Myths, realities, and solutions towards high-integrity forest carbon credits" on 9-11 May 2023
Effectiveness of REDD+: Meta-study resultsCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Sven Wunder (European Forest Institute (EFI) and CIFOR-ICRAF Senior Associate) at "Bonn Climate Change Conference (SB58) side event: High-integrity forest carbon markets: from global stock-taking to advancing science" on 8 Jun 2023
This document discusses REDD+, a global program aimed at reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. It provides background on REDD+, noting it was established at the UN climate conference in 2007. The document then summarizes research on REDD+, including findings that REDD+ initiatives have had some success in reducing deforestation but have shown mostly neutral impacts on livelihoods. It also notes that REDD+ funding has remained relatively small compared to emissions from deforestation. In conclusion, the document argues REDD+ still holds promise if given more funding and with improved program design.
Walking the REDD+ line: Insights from CIFOR's REDD+ Global Comparative StudyCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Arild Angelsen, from the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), during CIFOR's side event 'REDD+: Where does it stand and what is needed now?' at UNFCCC's COP23 in Bonn, Germany, on November 9, 2017.
Transforming REDD+ lessons learned and way forwardCIFOR-ICRAF
1. The document discusses lessons learned from REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) programs and ways to improve their effectiveness.
2. It summarizes findings from the Global Comparative Study on REDD+ which assessed REDD+ policies and projects in 6 countries and found modest impacts on reducing deforestation and mixed effects on community well-being.
3. It argues that for REDD+ to be more effective, programs need to support large-scale reforms that incentivize conservation, economic efficiency, and government budgets, rather than remain as small projects. Impact assessments also need to better evaluate REDD+ outcomes.
This presentation by Terry Sunderland from CIFOR focuses on the evolution of REDD+ over time, how REDD+ can present a new hope for conservation, what risks and challenges surface, where CIFOR's current REDD+ projects are located and what the key issues are.
Forests, Climate Change and REDD+: A brief introductionCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Maria Brockhaus at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable REDD+ carbon and non-carbon results', held from 21-23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
This study was presented during the conference “Production and Carbon Dynamics in Sustainable Agricultural and Forest Systems in Africa” held in September, 2010.
Effectiveness of REDD+: Meta-study resultsCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Sven Wunder (European Forest Institute (EFI) and CIFOR-ICRAF Senior Associate) at "Bonn Climate Change Conference (SB58) side event: High-integrity forest carbon markets: from global stock-taking to advancing science" on 8 Jun 2023
This document discusses REDD+, a global program aimed at reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. It provides background on REDD+, noting it was established at the UN climate conference in 2007. The document then summarizes research on REDD+, including findings that REDD+ initiatives have had some success in reducing deforestation but have shown mostly neutral impacts on livelihoods. It also notes that REDD+ funding has remained relatively small compared to emissions from deforestation. In conclusion, the document argues REDD+ still holds promise if given more funding and with improved program design.
Walking the REDD+ line: Insights from CIFOR's REDD+ Global Comparative StudyCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Arild Angelsen, from the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), during CIFOR's side event 'REDD+: Where does it stand and what is needed now?' at UNFCCC's COP23 in Bonn, Germany, on November 9, 2017.
Transforming REDD+ lessons learned and way forwardCIFOR-ICRAF
1. The document discusses lessons learned from REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) programs and ways to improve their effectiveness.
2. It summarizes findings from the Global Comparative Study on REDD+ which assessed REDD+ policies and projects in 6 countries and found modest impacts on reducing deforestation and mixed effects on community well-being.
3. It argues that for REDD+ to be more effective, programs need to support large-scale reforms that incentivize conservation, economic efficiency, and government budgets, rather than remain as small projects. Impact assessments also need to better evaluate REDD+ outcomes.
This presentation by Terry Sunderland from CIFOR focuses on the evolution of REDD+ over time, how REDD+ can present a new hope for conservation, what risks and challenges surface, where CIFOR's current REDD+ projects are located and what the key issues are.
Forests, Climate Change and REDD+: A brief introductionCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Maria Brockhaus at a workshop on 'Sharing insights across REDD+ countries: Opportunities and obstacles for effective, efficient, and equitable REDD+ carbon and non-carbon results', held from 21-23 February 2017 in Naypyidaw, Myanmar.
This study was presented during the conference “Production and Carbon Dynamics in Sustainable Agricultural and Forest Systems in Africa” held in September, 2010.
Measuring the opportunity costs of forest conservation in Uganda: Implication...CIFOR-ICRAF
Glenn Bush, Woods Hole Research Center, USA
Nick Hanley, University of Stirling, UK
Daniel Rondeau, University of Victoria, Canada
Presentation for the conference on
Taking stock of smallholders and community forestry
Montpellier France
March 24-26, 2010
The document discusses reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) as a cost-effective way to mitigate climate change. REDD aims to provide payments to developing countries for reducing emissions from deforestation and could also help conserve biodiversity and support rural livelihoods. However, there are still many outstanding issues to address regarding REDD, such as avoiding leakage, establishing appropriate baselines, and integrating REDD into carbon markets or developing a separate mechanism.
The document discusses reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) as a cost-effective way to mitigate climate change. REDD aims to provide payments to developing countries for reducing emissions from deforestation and could also help conserve biodiversity and support rural livelihoods. However, there are still many outstanding issues to address regarding REDD, such as avoiding leakage, establishing appropriate baselines, and integrating REDD into carbon markets or creating a separate mechanism.
Facilitated by SNV, this event was held on April 24 to coincide with the Asia Pacific Forestry Week (APFW), which occured over April 21-26. The event featured a special Guest speaker - David Huberman - who was visiting Hanoi for the APFW - and focussed on REDD, the forestry mechanism proposed for the post-2012 UNFCCC protocol. Click on the link below to read his presentation.
Presentation by David Huberman
CIFOR and Global Comparative Study on REDD+CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Pham Thu Thuy, from the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), at the Knowledge Sharing Event "Sharing Insights Across REDD+ Countries" in Georgetown, Guyana, on June 6, 2017.
The document discusses the costs of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+). It identifies four main types of costs: opportunity costs, implementation costs, transaction costs, and other hidden costs. Opportunity costs represent the value of alternative land uses forgone, such as agriculture. Implementation and transaction costs include the expenses of carrying out and monitoring REDD+ programs. Considering all costs is important for accurately assessing the financial requirements of REDD+ policies and programs.
REDD+ is a mechanism to incentivize developing countries to protect and better manage their forests. It aims to make standing forests more valuable than cleared forests by creating a financial value for the carbon stored in trees. Developed countries would pay developing countries carbon offsets for maintaining their forest carbon stocks. REDD+ was established in 2005 within the UNFCCC to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. It pursues plans and programs to identify drivers of forest loss, encourage sustainable forest management, and enhance carbon stocks. REDD+ investment can help transition economies toward green development by valuing ecosystem services provided by forests. Implementation of REDD+ involves designing national plans, economic and political factors, and assessing impacts on forests and
This document provides an introduction to REDD+, which stands for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. REDD+ emerged from UNFCCC negotiations in 2005 as a way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by paying tropical countries to conserve their forests. The mechanism calculates emissions reductions based on a national baseline and provides compensation based on tons of CO2 not emitted. REDD+ now includes conservation, sustainable forest management, and increasing forest carbon stocks. Key challenges include governance reforms, monitoring emissions accurately, and implementing social and environmental safeguards.
What are the barriers and opportunities to conditional incentives in REDD+ pr...CIFOR-ICRAF
Dr William Sunderlin gave this presentation in Bonn, Germany on 5 June 2013 at an event organized by CIFOR titled ‘REDD+ performance and verification: Insights from CIFOR’s Global Comparative Study (GCS) on REDD+’. This was an official side event to the 2013 Bonn Climate Change Conference.
REDD+ aims to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and foster conservation and sustainable forest management. It has opportunities to mainstream climate change actions and improve forest governance. However, it faces many challenges including strengthening institutions, ensuring participation and benefits for local communities, addressing issues around land and carbon tenure rights, financing, setting reference levels and implementing monitoring. Full implementation costs and addressing multiple stakeholder interests are also challenges. Capacity development and coordination are needed to realize REDD+ goals.
The future of forests in the low-emissions development agendaCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented at the COP21 side event 'Forests, landscapes, climate & sustainable development – The evidence we need for the future we want' by Markku Kanninen on 3 December 2015.
Avoiding deforestation and forest degradation under a new climate agreement: ...CIFOR-ICRAF
This document provides an overview and summary of REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) and its evolution. It discusses key aspects of the Paris Agreement in relation to forests and REDD+. It outlines the history and architecture of REDD+ and examines factors that can hinder or enable transformational change towards reducing deforestation. Finally, it discusses findings from CIFOR's Global Comparative Study on national REDD+ policies and processes in 14 countries.
REDD in Asia - Challenges and OpportunitiesCIFOR-ICRAF
Can REDD+ achieve poverty alleviation and deliver conservation benefits for Great Apes? Laura D'Arcy from ZSL explores this question in a presentation she gave at the ‘Linking Great Ape Conservation with Poverty Alleviation’ workshop hosted by CIFOR in January 2012.
Presented by Arild Angelsen (Professor, School of Economics and Business, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway & Senior Associate, CIFOR , Bogor, Indonesia) at SBSTA 50, 25 Jun 2019, World Conference Center, Bonn, Germany.
Mejorando la estimación de emisiones GEI conversión bosque degradado a planta...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Kristell Hergoualc'h (Scientist, CIFOR-ICRAF) at Workshop “Lecciones para el monitoreo transparente: Experiencias de la Amazonia peruana” on 7 Mei 2024 in Lima, Peru.
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Ähnlich wie Effectiveness of REDD+: Meta-study results
Measuring the opportunity costs of forest conservation in Uganda: Implication...CIFOR-ICRAF
Glenn Bush, Woods Hole Research Center, USA
Nick Hanley, University of Stirling, UK
Daniel Rondeau, University of Victoria, Canada
Presentation for the conference on
Taking stock of smallholders and community forestry
Montpellier France
March 24-26, 2010
The document discusses reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) as a cost-effective way to mitigate climate change. REDD aims to provide payments to developing countries for reducing emissions from deforestation and could also help conserve biodiversity and support rural livelihoods. However, there are still many outstanding issues to address regarding REDD, such as avoiding leakage, establishing appropriate baselines, and integrating REDD into carbon markets or developing a separate mechanism.
The document discusses reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) as a cost-effective way to mitigate climate change. REDD aims to provide payments to developing countries for reducing emissions from deforestation and could also help conserve biodiversity and support rural livelihoods. However, there are still many outstanding issues to address regarding REDD, such as avoiding leakage, establishing appropriate baselines, and integrating REDD into carbon markets or creating a separate mechanism.
Facilitated by SNV, this event was held on April 24 to coincide with the Asia Pacific Forestry Week (APFW), which occured over April 21-26. The event featured a special Guest speaker - David Huberman - who was visiting Hanoi for the APFW - and focussed on REDD, the forestry mechanism proposed for the post-2012 UNFCCC protocol. Click on the link below to read his presentation.
Presentation by David Huberman
CIFOR and Global Comparative Study on REDD+CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Pham Thu Thuy, from the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), at the Knowledge Sharing Event "Sharing Insights Across REDD+ Countries" in Georgetown, Guyana, on June 6, 2017.
The document discusses the costs of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+). It identifies four main types of costs: opportunity costs, implementation costs, transaction costs, and other hidden costs. Opportunity costs represent the value of alternative land uses forgone, such as agriculture. Implementation and transaction costs include the expenses of carrying out and monitoring REDD+ programs. Considering all costs is important for accurately assessing the financial requirements of REDD+ policies and programs.
REDD+ is a mechanism to incentivize developing countries to protect and better manage their forests. It aims to make standing forests more valuable than cleared forests by creating a financial value for the carbon stored in trees. Developed countries would pay developing countries carbon offsets for maintaining their forest carbon stocks. REDD+ was established in 2005 within the UNFCCC to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. It pursues plans and programs to identify drivers of forest loss, encourage sustainable forest management, and enhance carbon stocks. REDD+ investment can help transition economies toward green development by valuing ecosystem services provided by forests. Implementation of REDD+ involves designing national plans, economic and political factors, and assessing impacts on forests and
This document provides an introduction to REDD+, which stands for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. REDD+ emerged from UNFCCC negotiations in 2005 as a way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by paying tropical countries to conserve their forests. The mechanism calculates emissions reductions based on a national baseline and provides compensation based on tons of CO2 not emitted. REDD+ now includes conservation, sustainable forest management, and increasing forest carbon stocks. Key challenges include governance reforms, monitoring emissions accurately, and implementing social and environmental safeguards.
What are the barriers and opportunities to conditional incentives in REDD+ pr...CIFOR-ICRAF
Dr William Sunderlin gave this presentation in Bonn, Germany on 5 June 2013 at an event organized by CIFOR titled ‘REDD+ performance and verification: Insights from CIFOR’s Global Comparative Study (GCS) on REDD+’. This was an official side event to the 2013 Bonn Climate Change Conference.
REDD+ aims to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and foster conservation and sustainable forest management. It has opportunities to mainstream climate change actions and improve forest governance. However, it faces many challenges including strengthening institutions, ensuring participation and benefits for local communities, addressing issues around land and carbon tenure rights, financing, setting reference levels and implementing monitoring. Full implementation costs and addressing multiple stakeholder interests are also challenges. Capacity development and coordination are needed to realize REDD+ goals.
The future of forests in the low-emissions development agendaCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented at the COP21 side event 'Forests, landscapes, climate & sustainable development – The evidence we need for the future we want' by Markku Kanninen on 3 December 2015.
Avoiding deforestation and forest degradation under a new climate agreement: ...CIFOR-ICRAF
This document provides an overview and summary of REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) and its evolution. It discusses key aspects of the Paris Agreement in relation to forests and REDD+. It outlines the history and architecture of REDD+ and examines factors that can hinder or enable transformational change towards reducing deforestation. Finally, it discusses findings from CIFOR's Global Comparative Study on national REDD+ policies and processes in 14 countries.
REDD in Asia - Challenges and OpportunitiesCIFOR-ICRAF
Can REDD+ achieve poverty alleviation and deliver conservation benefits for Great Apes? Laura D'Arcy from ZSL explores this question in a presentation she gave at the ‘Linking Great Ape Conservation with Poverty Alleviation’ workshop hosted by CIFOR in January 2012.
Presented by Arild Angelsen (Professor, School of Economics and Business, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway & Senior Associate, CIFOR , Bogor, Indonesia) at SBSTA 50, 25 Jun 2019, World Conference Center, Bonn, Germany.
Ähnlich wie Effectiveness of REDD+: Meta-study results (20)
Mejorando la estimación de emisiones GEI conversión bosque degradado a planta...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Kristell Hergoualc'h (Scientist, CIFOR-ICRAF) at Workshop “Lecciones para el monitoreo transparente: Experiencias de la Amazonia peruana” on 7 Mei 2024 in Lima, Peru.
Inclusión y transparencia como clave del éxito para el mecanismo de transfere...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Lauren Cooper and Rowenn Kalman (Michigan State University) at Workshop “Lecciones para el monitoreo transparente: Experiencias de la Amazonia peruana” on 7 Mei 2024 in Lima, Peru.
Avances de Perú con relación al marco de transparencia del Acuerdo de ParísCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Berioska Quispe Estrada (Directora General de Cambio Climático y Desertificación) at Workshop “Lecciones para el monitoreo transparente: Experiencias de la Amazonia peruana” on 7 Mei 2024 in Lima, Peru.
Land tenure and forest landscape restoration in Cameroon and MadagascarCIFOR-ICRAF
FLR is an adaptive process that brings people (including women, men, youth, local and indigenous communities) together to identify, negotiate and implement practices that restore and enhance ecological and social functionality of forest landscapes that have been deforested or degraded.
ReSI-NoC - Strategie de mise en oeuvre.pdfCIFOR-ICRAF
Re nforcer les S ystèmes d’ I nnovations
agrosylvopastorales économiquement
rentables, écologiquement durables et
socialement équitables dans la région du
No rd C ameroun
ReSI-NoC: Introduction au contexte du projetCIFOR-ICRAF
Renforcer les systèmes d’innovation agricole en vue de
promouvoir des systèmes de production agricole et
d’élevage économiquement rentables, écologiquement
durables et socialement équitables dans la région du
Nord au Cameroun (ReSI-NoC)
Renforcer les Systèmes d’Innovations agrosylvopastorales économiquement renta...CIFOR-ICRAF
Renforcer les Systèmes d’Innovations agrosylvopastorales économiquement rentables, écologiquement durables et socialement équitables dans la région du
Nord Cameroun
Introducing Blue Carbon Deck seeking for actionable partnershipsCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Daniel Murdiyarso (Principal Scientist, CIFOR-ICRAF) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
A Wide Range of Eco System Services with MangrovesCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Mihyun Seol and Himlal Baral (CIFOR-ICRAF) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Presented by Citra Gilang (Research Consultant, CIFOR-ICRAF) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Peat land Restoration Project in HLG LonderangCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Hyoung Gyun Kim (Korea–Indonesia Forest Cooperation Center) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Sungsang Mangrove Restoration and Ecotourism (SMART): A participatory action ...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Beni Okarda (Senior Research Officer, CIFOR-ICRAF) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Coastal and mangrove vulnerability assessment In the Northern Coast of Java, ...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Phidju Marrin Sagala (Research Consultant, CIFOR-ICRAF) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Carbon Stock Assessment in Banten Province and Demak, Central Java, IndonesiaCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Milkah Royna (Student Intern, CIFOR-ICRAF) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Cooperative Mangrove Project: Introduction, Scope, and PerspectivesCIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Bora Lee (Warm-Temperate and Subtropical Forest Research Center, NIFoS Jeju, Republic of Korea) at the "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation with Mangrove Ecosystems: Introducing Mangrove Ecosystems Strategies to the Climate Change Agenda" event in Bogor, 29 April 2024.
Evolving Lifecycles with High Resolution Site Characterization (HRSC) and 3-D...Joshua Orris
The incorporation of a 3DCSM and completion of HRSC provided a tool for enhanced, data-driven, decisions to support a change in remediation closure strategies. Currently, an approved pilot study has been obtained to shut-down the remediation systems (ISCO, P&T) and conduct a hydraulic study under non-pumping conditions. A separate micro-biological bench scale treatability study was competed that yielded positive results for an emerging innovative technology. As a result, a field pilot study has commenced with results expected in nine-twelve months. With the results of the hydraulic study, field pilot studies and an updated risk assessment leading site monitoring optimization cost lifecycle savings upwards of $15MM towards an alternatively evolved best available technology remediation closure strategy.
Optimizing Post Remediation Groundwater Performance with Enhanced Microbiolog...Joshua Orris
Results of geophysics and pneumatic injection pilot tests during 2003 – 2007 yielded significant positive results for injection delivery design and contaminant mass treatment, resulting in permanent shut-down of an existing groundwater Pump & Treat system.
Accessible source areas were subsequently removed (2011) by soil excavation and treated with the placement of Emulsified Vegetable Oil EVO and zero-valent iron ZVI to accelerate treatment of impacted groundwater in overburden and weathered fractured bedrock. Post pilot test and post remediation groundwater monitoring has included analyses of CVOCs, organic fatty acids, dissolved gases and QuantArray® -Chlor to quantify key microorganisms (e.g., Dehalococcoides, Dehalobacter, etc.) and functional genes (e.g., vinyl chloride reductase, methane monooxygenase, etc.) to assess potential for reductive dechlorination and aerobic cometabolism of CVOCs.
In 2022, the first commercial application of MetaArray™ was performed at the site. MetaArray™ utilizes statistical analysis, such as principal component analysis and multivariate analysis to provide evidence that reductive dechlorination is active or even that it is slowing. This creates actionable data allowing users to save money by making important site management decisions earlier.
The results of the MetaArray™ analysis’ support vector machine (SVM) identified groundwater monitoring wells with a 80% confidence that were characterized as either Limited for Reductive Decholorination or had a High Reductive Reduction Dechlorination potential. The results of MetaArray™ will be used to further optimize the site’s post remediation monitoring program for monitored natural attenuation.
Improving the viability of probiotics by encapsulation methods for developmen...Open Access Research Paper
The popularity of functional foods among scientists and common people has been increasing day by day. Awareness and modernization make the consumer think better regarding food and nutrition. Now a day’s individual knows very well about the relation between food consumption and disease prevalence. Humans have a diversity of microbes in the gut that together form the gut microflora. Probiotics are the health-promoting live microbial cells improve host health through gut and brain connection and fighting against harmful bacteria. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are the two bacterial genera which are considered to be probiotic. These good bacteria are facing challenges of viability. There are so many factors such as sensitivity to heat, pH, acidity, osmotic effect, mechanical shear, chemical components, freezing and storage time as well which affects the viability of probiotics in the dairy food matrix as well as in the gut. Multiple efforts have been done in the past and ongoing in present for these beneficial microbial population stability until their destination in the gut. One of a useful technique known as microencapsulation makes the probiotic effective in the diversified conditions and maintain these microbe’s community to the optimum level for achieving targeted benefits. Dairy products are found to be an ideal vehicle for probiotic incorporation. It has been seen that the encapsulated microbial cells show higher viability than the free cells in different processing and storage conditions as well as against bile salts in the gut. They make the food functional when incorporated, without affecting the product sensory characteristics.
RoHS stands for Restriction of Hazardous Substances, which is also known as t...vijaykumar292010
RoHS stands for Restriction of Hazardous Substances, which is also known as the Directive 2002/95/EC. It includes the restrictions for the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. RoHS is a WEEE (Waste of Electrical and Electronic Equipment).
Kinetic studies on malachite green dye adsorption from aqueous solutions by A...Open Access Research Paper
Water polluted by dyestuffs compounds is a global threat to health and the environment; accordingly, we prepared a green novel sorbent chemical and Physical system from an algae, chitosan and chitosan nanoparticle and impregnated with algae with chitosan nanocomposite for the sorption of Malachite green dye from water. The algae with chitosan nanocomposite by a simple method and used as a recyclable and effective adsorbent for the removal of malachite green dye from aqueous solutions. Algae, chitosan, chitosan nanoparticle and algae with chitosan nanocomposite were characterized using different physicochemical methods. The functional groups and chemical compounds found in algae, chitosan, chitosan algae, chitosan nanoparticle, and chitosan nanoparticle with algae were identified using FTIR, SEM, and TGADTA/DTG techniques. The optimal adsorption conditions, different dosages, pH and Temperature the amount of algae with chitosan nanocomposite were determined. At optimized conditions and the batch equilibrium studies more than 99% of the dye was removed. The adsorption process data matched well kinetics showed that the reaction order for dye varied with pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order. Furthermore, the maximum adsorption capacity of the algae with chitosan nanocomposite toward malachite green dye reached as high as 15.5mg/g, respectively. Finally, multiple times reusing of algae with chitosan nanocomposite and removing dye from a real wastewater has made it a promising and attractive option for further practical applications.
2. Figure 1: Stylized theory of change: the impact of REDD+ interventions on the ground
REDD+ finance
from donors and
carbon markets
Enabling measures:
(FPIC, land tenure
clarified)
Incentives:
(conditional and
non-conditional)
Disincentives:
(enforcing laws
& rules)
Input Treatment
Ownership of
forestland clear
and uncontested
Outputs
REDD+
interventions
understood by
beneficiaries
Incentives
delivered to
households in an
equitable manner
Violations of forest
and land use rules
identified and
sanctioned
Outcomes
Goal: Contribute to
mitigating global
greenhouse gas
emissions
Improved income,
consumption, assets,
security, equality etc.
in intervention area
Funding flows
Cost-effective
design (e.g. spatial
targeting, differential
payments)
REDD beneficiaries
key for LUC decisions
Leakage
Rebound and
magnet effects
on local incomes
Impacts
REDD+ beneficiaries
reduce deforestation
& forest degradation
in intervention area
Side objectives:
- Biodiversity saved
- Wellbeing improved
- Secure land tenure
- Equity strengthened
- Indigenous rights
Permanence
Baseline scenarios
for carbon stocks,
land use, trends
Threat
Theory of change for REDD+
3. # Dimension Filtering factor Observation/ justification
1 REDD+ label Self-labelled and ‘REDD+ like’ Incl. multipurpose C-focused national
PES (separate category)
2 Actions Forest carbon conservation element Excl. pure A/R projects
3 Scale National and subnational REDD+ No filter: projects and programmes alike
4 Starting time Implementation start not before 2007 COP13 initiated REDD process in 2007
A Literature Peer-reviewed + Grey Filtering instead on evaluation quality
B Impacts Forest carbon + human wellbeing Incl., as main bottom lines for REDD+
C Outcomes Forest cover/loss + socio-economic Incl., as shorter-term bottom lines.
D Outputs Excluded Excl. all middle-part ToC (intermediary)
E Objectivity Subjective wellbeing, self-reporting Included
F Evaluation (Quasi-)experimental methods Counterfactual approach always needed
Our REDD+ impact meta- study: delimitations
4. Mapping REDD+: projects, programmes, and location of study sample
=> Overlapping subnational, regional and national REDD+
=> variable implementation & research densities across tropics
9. Conservation impacts: REDD+ compared
REDD+ performs as
least as ‘well’ (or as
poorly…) as other
conservation tools
…but little analysis of
cost effectiveness
10. REDD+ credit
additionality:
Project impacts
vs. its baselines
Tan ania 9 Tan ania 9
eru eru 9 eru 95 Tan ania 5
59 eru eru eru
olombia 95 olombia 9 olombia olombia 5
ambodia 5 ambodia 9 olombia 9 olombia 9
9 9
9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9
9 9 9 9
5
5
5
5
e
5e
e 5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
e
5e
e 5
ear
umulative
deforestation
(ha)
……… De facto observed deforestation
_____ Ex-ante deforestation baselines
_____ Deforestation synthetic control sites
West et al. (2023), Science (resubmitted)
=> Much of REDD+
credit non-performance
(West et al.: 90+%) is
due to project non-
conservative ex-ante
baselines (Verra)
11. Five take-away messages
1. REDD+ has remained under-financed, especially national
REDD+ (the original target) – projects a drop in the sea…
2. REDD+ is to carbon, what ICDP has been to biodiversity: a
heterogenous mix of on-the-ground interventions
3. Forest impacts are: stat. significant, modestly sized, in part
permanent: about same record as other conservation tools
4. REDD+ could have more impact if more spatially targeted
to high-threat, forest carbon-dense areas
5. For carbon credit integrity, REDD+ impact performance
also needs to be paired with realistic ex ante baselines