Mike Barker. Proyecto EMPOWER “Empowering customers to save energy by informative billing”

Introduction
Cerdanyola
Demo Site
Features

Proyecto EMPOWER
“Empowering customers to save energy by
informative billing”
Mike Barker
mbarker@cimne.upc.edu
JORNADA INFORMATIVA, ENERGÍA INTELIGENTE PARA EUROPA (EIE)
CONVOCATORIA 2013, Madrid, 31 de enero 2013

GUIÓN

• Presentación CIMNE

• Resumen del proyecto EMPOWER

• Análisis del proceso de preparación de la
propuesta

• Conclusiones

http://www.cimne.com/cdl1/vpage/2/0/Menu-web-cimne/eng/About/Cimne-in-numbers

CIMNE BEEGROUP

The Building Energy and Environment Group (BEE) is an autonomous research unit
of CIMNE. It was founded in 2001.

 EU supported projects:

 AIDA - Affirmative Integrated Energy Design Action,
http://www.aidaproject.eu/
 BECA – Balanced European Conservation Approach – ICT services for
resource saving in social housing, http://www.beca-project.eu
 Build up - the European web portal for energy efficiency in buildings,
http://www.buildup.eu/
 eSESH- Saving Energy in Social Housing with ICT., http://www.esesh.eu
 SEMANCO - Semantic Technologies For Carbon Reduction In Urban
Planning, http://semanco-project.eu/index.htm
 SmartSpaces - Saving Energy in Europe's Public Buildings Using ICT,
http://www.smartspaces.eu

 Start up company: INERGY (http://inergybcn.com/)



Empower

• Objetivo:
– “to empower consumers by involving and informing them, helping
them take measures to save energy on the basis of the information
they read on their meters or on their bills.”

• Presupuesto (en negociación):
– Coste total: 2M€
– Suporte UE: 1,5M€ (75%)

• Consorcio:
– 12 participants from 5 EU members states (Be, Dk, Es, Fr, It).
• four utility companies (Dk, Es, Fr, It)
• in a well balanced team with R&D specialists and social agents
representing the target group.

• Duración: 30 meses

• to implement more informative billing
services as the basis for energy
performance improvement programmes
and the development of energy services.

EMPOWER Coverage of services

GISCE (ES) Reggio Emilia Sinergie (IT)
ALEC (FR)
Metering and (IT) End user Socio-economic
Social support
billing perspective study

Power-link (BE)
GEG EnergiMidit EL-GAS IREN
Communication
France Denmark Spain Italy

Polito (IT)
HESPUL (FR) CIMNE (ES)
Evaluation and
Technical support Analysis engine
analysis

Control Group,
27.210 200 Denmark
200 France
17.000 Denmark 200 Italy
9.000 France 200 Spain
Test
310 Italy
group
900 Spain
800

Experimental
group, 244890
153.000 Denmark
81.000 France
2.790 Italy
8.100 Spain

• over 270 000 consumers will be involved.
• to save up to 25% of the approximately 20% baseload
household electricity consumption not addressed by
other energy efficiency measures.

El PROCESO EN EL TIEMPO

• Idea / concepto /necesidad
• Propuesta de proyecto
• Convocatoria adecuada
• Esbozo de propuesta
• Investigación de interés
• Construcción y consolidación del consorcio
• Desarrollo de la propuesta
• Revisión y control de calidad
• Entrega

LOS FACTORES CRÍTICOS

• La convocatoria
• La sección / área / acción
• El estado del arte
• Las prioridades a nivel EU/nacional/local
• Los 5 criterios de evaluación
• La puntuación y los umbrales

CRITERIOS Y PUNCTUACIÖN
5 Criterios:
1 Relevancia 2 Calidad 3 Impacto 4 Valor EU 5 Recursos

10: Excelente…completamente en línea con el criterio
8-9: Muy bien…aunque podría haber sido aún mejor
7: Bien…pero mejoras necesarias
6: Suficiente pero necesita mejoras importantes
4-5: Insuficiente : debilidades insalvables
2-3: Lamentable: muy débil / errores de fondo.
1: Terrible: mal enfocada y/o superficial

En resumen….

El reto

La respuesta / solución
que proponemos…

…en el contexto de la
convocatoria

Concretamos en que
consiste la acción

Especificamos los resultados
concretos y medibles

Detallamos el porque del consorcio

Los criterios de evaluación

• 1. Relevance of the proposed action
a) extent to which the proposed action is
consistent with the IEE II Call priorities;
b) extent to which the proposed action responds
to important user needs and market barriers;
c) extent to which the proposed action
complements other related activities.


• 2. Quality of implementation
methodology (score 0-10), including:
a) suitability of the proposed approach and
extent to which the proposed action engages
the target groups and stakeholders;
b) clarity of the work packages, project planning
and suitability of performance monitoring;
c) quality of communication plan for the uptake
of solution(s).

Engagement of target group….

(a) Target Group(s) How will the target group(s) benefit from this action? Key task(s) nº from your work programme Name of organisation(s) providing a Letter of Support (Country)

Direct Consumer representatives Provision of models for empowerment services that can be applied to other T2.3 User expectation ATC Torino – Housing company Italy
utility services. CNL Isère (Tenants Union) France
Housing / tenants agents WP3-4 – Response to initial and definitive service provisions
Gaining of good practice examples to help in other programmes for UFC (Consumers’ association) France
awareness raising and in collaboration with energy service companies WP4, WP6, WP7 ECC - European Customer Centre Belgium

Indirect Consumer representatives Provision of models and examples (see above). T2.5 Legal and reg. issues City of Grenoble France
Province of Turin / Torino Italy
Public authorities Insight into the possibilities for public participation and empowerment in WP3-4 – Response to initial and definitive service provisions
smart cities and communities through smart metering City of Turin Italy
WP4, WP6, WP7 Government of Catalonia Spain

Energy efficiency agencies / organisations New tools to enable more precise targeting of awareness raising and capacity WP3-4 – Response to initial and definitive service provisions WP4, IREA Regional organisation for energy efficiency and renewable France
building campaigns WP6, WP7 energy (EE & RES)

CLER Umbrella organisation for EE & RES France

FNCCR Umbrella organisation for EE & RES France

How will the key actor(s) contribute to this action? Key task(s) nº from your work programme Name of organisation(s) providing a Letter of Support (Country)
(b) Key Actor(s)
Utility companies Feedback: contrasting the services developed with their own business T2.4 Use cases for service operation Wase Wind Belgium
models and metering systems. Ecopower (utility) Belgium
WP3-4 – Response to initial and definitive service provisions
Validation: responding to surveys about business opportunities in their SOMENERGIA (utility) Spain
markets WP6, WP7 Dragefossen Norway

Energy sector associations Validation: responding to surveys about business opportunities in their T2.5 Legal and reg. issues Danish Energy Association Denmark
markets
WP7
ELE – Union of local energy agencies France
Communication: informing members and facilitating contacts
ASEME (Electricity Companies association) Spain

Energy sector industrial companies Feedback: contrasting the services developed with their own business WP6, WP7 AG EOS Belgium
models and metering systems


• 3. Ambition and credibility of the
impacts of the proposed action
a) services / outcomes produced by the action
(deliverables, hours of training, etc.);
b) impact within and beyond the project lifetime
assessed with specific, measurable,
accepted, realistic and time-dependent
(SMART) indicators;
c) sustainability of the solutions offered by the
proposed action beyond the project lifetime.


• 4. EU added value
a) a evidence that collaboration / team working
across national borders will lead to greater
benefits than separate actions at national /
local level in the same countries
b) appropriate geographical focus of the
proposed action including learning and
exchanges among stakeholders;
c) transferability of the solutions offered by the
proposed action.

¿Porqué un proyecto internacional?

Appropriate geographical focus and
transferability…


• 5. Resources allocated to the proposed
action
a) management and composition of the team,
balance of skills, experience, and
responsibilities;
b) appropriate levels of hours per partner and
per work package;
c) justification of costs (sub-contracts, travel
costs, and other specific costs) and co-
financing.

Conclusiones 1/2

• Asegurarse que la convocatoria coincide
con su experiencia/estrategia.
• Empezar con tiempo (4 meses o más.
• Utilizar todos los medios disponibles para
contrastar ideas y formar el mejor consorcio
posible.
• Haz caso a la documentación de la
convocatoria.

Conclusiones 2/2

• Implica todos los socios en el desarrollo de
la propuesta.
• Explicar en la propuesta cómo se
involucrarán otros agentes.
• Saber explicar porqué el proyecto se tiene
que ejecutar a nivel Europeo.
• Definir objetivos, cuantificar indicadores e
impactos.
• Contrastar la propuesta con los criterios de
evaluación (si es posible por un tercero).

Gracias

¡Ánimos!

Mike Barker
Responsible de proyectos internacionales
CIMNE BEEGROUP
mbarker@cimne.upc.edu

Mike Barker. Proyecto EMPOWER “Empowering customers to save energy by informative billing”

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Mike Barker. Proyecto EMPOWER “Empowering customers to save energy by informative billing”

Ähnlich wie Mike Barker. Proyecto EMPOWER “Empowering customers to save energy by informative billing” (20)

Mehr von EOI Escuela de Organización Industrial

Mehr von EOI Escuela de Organización Industrial (20)

Mike Barker. Proyecto EMPOWER “Empowering customers to save energy by informative billing”